iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Criminal Background Checks Upend Job Search For Some Unemployed

Background Checks

First Posted: 03/24/11 04:16 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

First, the college sent a letter.

It welcomed Curtis Andrews, Ed.D, Ph.D, to its adjunct faculty. A few days later, the emails about faculty orientation sessions and department meetings started arriving in Andrews' email inbox. But when a college human resources officer called him three times to ask for details about his 2006 wire fraud conviction, Andrews started to suspect that the job was no longer his.

“He just said, 'We’ll be in touch,'” said Andrews. “By that point, I had filled out, I guess, 70, 80 applications. So, I knew all about the box I have to check saying I have been convicted of a crime and that the applications all say that having been convicted may not prevent you from being hired. But you do get the sense that they get one look at a conviction and they put you in the technological trash … This time, they apparently thought I was qualified, then changed their mind.”

About 65 million Americans -- that’s one in four adults -- have an arrest or conviction that can show up on a routine criminal background check. What’s found can effectively upend their search for work or put them out of a job amid one of the most difficult job markets in recent history, according to a new report released by the National Employment Law Project.

In fact, in the years since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, criminal background checks calibrated to detect everything from arrests on dismissed or expunged charges to misdemeanor and felony convictions have become an increasingly common part of the job application process. A 2010 survey of the Society for Human Resources Management's member firms found that more than 90 percent routinely probe job applicants' backgrounds. The trade group’s members are mostly large employers.

A booming private criminal background industry has made clients of all kinds of companies doing everything from cleaning offices and delivering pizzas to sorting and delivering retail merchandise, said Maurice Emsellem, a policy co-director for the National Employment Law Project and one of the researchers behind the NELP report.

The National Association of Professional Background Screeners, a North Carolina-based industry trade group, could not be reached for comment.

“The industry of private screening firms, they make a big buck off of these practices,” Emsellem said. “They’ve got better and better at identifying and isolating employers who don’t use criminal background checks. The marketing pitch goes something like this: 'All your competitors are doing criminal background checks. Do you want to take the alleged risk?'”

What’s never mentioned is the growing body of evidence suggesting that after as few as three years –- depending on the person’s age and original crime -- people released from prison are no more likely than the general population to commit more crime, Emsellem said. But failing to find legitimate work is a major predictor of a return to jail, according to the NELP report.

That’s part of the reason why nonprofit agencies and even some corrections departments throughout the country are working to help ex-offenders find jobs.

"I think we’ve finally reached the point where people are starting to realize that if we have 3 percent of the world’s population but 20 percent of its prisoners, disqualifying that many people from work once they get out just isn’t sustainable," said Todd Berger, the managing attorney with the Rutgers School of Law-Camden’s Federal Prisoner Reentry Project. Berger oversees a law school clinic in which students seek to resolve some of the issues preventing federal parolees in the area from obtaining work.

In Maryland, Catholic Charities of Baltimore established the Our Daily Bread Employment Center four years ago. The center helps people with criminal backgrounds and limited job skills find work. The program reports serving more than 3,000 people in fiscal 2010. Since July, Our Daily Bread has helped place in jobs 296 of the 540 people who committed to the most intensive part of its program, according to Karen Heyward-West, a program manager for employment services.

Our Daily Bread informs employers about tax credits available to companies that hire ex-offenders, but Heyward-West said one of the program’s most effective tools is the mock interview. About 80 percent of the companies that send volunteer representatives to conduct mock interviews wind up offering to hire the center's clients, putting in a good word at their company for the program or referring clients to job opportunities elsewhere, she said.

“I am just going to be really honest -- there is a fear,” Heyward-West said. “There are people, employers who think we don’t want to hire those people, people with (criminal) backgrounds, people who were previously homeless. That’s a big part of what we have to overcome.”

In 1987, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the nation’s workplace discrimination watchdog agency, issued a statement that declared employer policies that disqualify any job candidates with a criminal record likely illegal. Employers are supposed to consider the age and nature of a conviction and its relevance to the job. Because a disproportionate share of African American and Latino adults have criminal records, blanket policies can effectively discriminate against groups protected by U.S. civil rights law, the commission said.

Still, the National Employment Law Project report found ample evidence of job ads that overtly exclude anyone with a criminal conviction. In a review of ads posted on Craigslist during a four-month period in five major cities, researchers found more than 300 ads in which employers stated that applicants with criminal records would not be considered. One ad for a sewer cleaning technician read, “***Do not apply with any misdemeanors/felonies.***”

“This is a major civil rights issue and a violation of the law,” NELP's Emsellem said.

There are entire industries where people with any type of criminal history –- no matter how minor or old –- will have difficulty finding work. After 9/11, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security began requiring truck drivers to undergo background checks in order to pick up or drop off loads at certain locations, such as ports. Truck drivers with a criminal record can request a waiver, but if the waiver is declined, a driver’s ability to work just about anywhere on the east or west coast is virtually destroyed, Berger of the Rutgers-Camden law clinic said. At least three or four times per semester, Berger said, his clinic hears from a truck driver who is having problems getting the necessary clearance to work at a port.

The situation defies reason, Berger said.

“You can understand how someone with an embezzlement conviction should not work in a bank or why someone with a child pornography charge should not work with kids," he said. "But you cannot understand how a drug conviction should disqualify someone from driving a truck or working as a janitor for the rest of their lives.”

A series of lawsuits filed last year against staffing companies and corporations has highlighted just how common blanket bans on hiring applicants with criminal records have become. A 2010 suit filed against First Transit, Inc. alleges that the busing company won’t hire anyone who has been convicted of a felony or served a single day in jail.

The practice isn’t limited to private employers. A class action lawsuit filed last year claims that the U.S. Census Bureau has refused to even consider applicants with criminal records for temporary Census jobs.

“Another part of the problem is the total lack of regulation on background check providers and the extremely high number of errors that pop up in their reports,” said Elizabeth Farid, deputy director of the National HIRE Network. HIRE is a New York-based nonprofit founded by the Legal Action Center, an advocacy group that opposes hiring discrimination against those with criminal records, HIV/AIDS or a history of addiction.

HIRE distributes information and advocates for policies that may expand job opportunities for people with criminal records. It also runs The Rap Sheet Workshop, in which job seekers with a criminal record are taught how to discuss their past in a frank but productive way. Participants are also shown how to identify duplications and errors and find help getting their records corrected.

Some cities, including Chicago, and states such as Michigan have implemented policies that require public agencies or private employers to stop automatically screening anyone with a criminal record out of the applicant pool.

But, there are also places like New Jersey.

Andrews called the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General after the community college backed away from his job offer. Andrews said office staff told him that they were no longer taking on criminal background check-related civil rights cases.

In an email, the New Jersey attorney general's office declined to comment on Andrew's case or its plans to pursue cases involving employers and criminal background checks.

“If I had a hard time, I don’t know what the hell some of the people who are being released form jail are supposed to do,” said Andrews, who has found an adjunct slot teaching liberal arts courses at another New Jersey community college. “People have to be able to work.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
First, the college sent a letter. It welcomed Curtis Andrews, Ed.D, Ph.D, to its adjunct faculty. A few days later, the emails about faculty orientation sessions and department meetings started ar...
First, the college sent a letter. It welcomed Curtis Andrews, Ed.D, Ph.D, to its adjunct faculty. A few days later, the emails about faculty orientation sessions and department meetings started ar...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,805
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
02:27 PM on 03/29/2011
That's a pretty sobering statistic -- 1 in 4? Like, 25% of the population? Mind-boggling.

http://www.jobvirtue.com
09:37 PM on 03/27/2011
What I truly find most ironic is that businesses that use criminal background checks are more likely, I believe it was 8% to hire a minority than businesses that do not. This was in the chicago journal of management in 08. Also ironic is the fact that one of the great civil rights leaders who is commonly cited for his I have a dream speech also included "by the content of their character." You know, the part you are supposed to judge a person for.

I admit, I do laugh when someone refers to a past conviction as a "mistake." Take the wire fraud example above....Can you imagine this guy being in charge of your grades and having access to your personal information. This is someone who committed a crime that took planning, thought, and had many chances to back out. A felony is not something that is taken lightly in the court, and in all criminal cases, there is a complete burden of proof on the prosecution.

Lastly, to those who say everyone else "doesn't get caught." Stop saying that, people will take you more seriously, I promise. I also agree with some other people here....GET NEW FRIENDS!!! I promise you, not everyone "doesn't get caught." Most people value and respect others enough not to commit crimes.
10:07 PM on 04/15/2011
WOW. You are truly ignorant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Audrey Ferragamo
If u stand 4 everything,u stand 4 nothing
08:17 PM on 03/27/2011
As I've said to friends,you leave the house to go shopping for the day,then come home in the afternoon.And your bound to have broken at least a few laws.When you see the police ,now a days,people don't think ,proctect and serve,they think ticket.FEAR.Revenue,is what it's all about.And it come down to Money,once again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
04:42 AM on 03/27/2011
Life just isn't fair!
 
There ought to be a law!
11:47 PM on 03/26/2011
If they use a Job Search Website they have a better chance of finding a job. Also the government is giving some businesses a tax break for hiring people with a criminal record.
11:24 PM on 03/26/2011
The problem goes deeper than just those that were rightly convicted not finding jobs. Think of the millions of low income young adults unjustly accused, no money for a lawyer, who has a court appointed attorney. The court appointed defenders push paper. The don't defend squat. Their only goal is to get rid of the case so they plea bargain, tell the kid to accept it, get probation and not do time.

Little does a 19 year old know he has just destroyed his life. Innocence does not matter in this country. The only thing that matters is what kind of show your expensive attorney puts on.

If you don't think plea bargaining keeps things humming along and stops protests, think of the last speeding tkt you got. Police habitually write the speed lower than you were going. You shut your mouth and pay the fine.

However it is a thought that should be expanded on. I would like the Congressmen and Senators booted out if they can't pass the same test that Walmart gives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kwhitney333
Common sense is not common
08:37 PM on 03/26/2011
I think that there are certain professions that should have a background check, drug check, homeland security check. Professions where you are responsible for other lives such as driving a bus, flying a plain, working with children or the elderly. However most of these tests now a days for every job you can think of are nothing more than money in the pockets of the insurance company's. You know the in case sh--- happens company's. The ones that make money off of the fear that something could happen. You can test from now until dooms day and if someone wants to steal, fight, kill or cause any kind of mayhem they are still going to do it. Insurance company's are the winners here and we the public are the losers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnfkennedyjr
Look to my left & to my right, I'm in the Center!
01:44 PM on 03/27/2011
I am sorry that ex-cons and drug users have trouble finding work. For most this will be a long and painful process as they work hard to gain back the trust they lost from society. You just can't legislate employers to hire such people or skip background checks.

If I were a business owner, I would want the very best people for the job no matter the position. The success and failure of a business is mostly due to the employees it hires, and getting the wrong people can destroy a business.
bcunnin679
Political Correctness, the enemy of free speech
06:49 PM on 03/26/2011
I thought that almost everyone that was at Homeland Security was a criminal or do have them mixed up with the TSA?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnfkennedyjr
Look to my left & to my right, I'm in the Center!
02:05 PM on 03/27/2011
Pre-TSA with private screeners.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:33 PM on 03/26/2011
You have to check that box on the job application. Don't and it's fraud and you're out no questions asked. But check that box and write 'drugs' on that line and just forget about getting that job. Two or three mistakes when you're in your 20's or 30's shouldn't follow you around for the rest of your life. People shouldn't be penilized for things that happened in the past as this is no indication of the decisions they will make in the future. I would like to see this type of discrimination be made illegal, as a persons criminal record is covered under privacy rights.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnfkennedyjr
Look to my left & to my right, I'm in the Center!
01:45 PM on 03/27/2011
Criminal records are covered under privacy laws? I thought they were of public record.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleo Creech
Atlanta writer, poet, activist.
04:09 PM on 03/26/2011
This is another example of how the current economy and unemployment leads often to rampant discrimination.

It's one thing if HR and managers are looking at one candidate and having to decide if one factor or another should really keep him from being hired for a particular job they're qualified for - that just doesn't happen in todays environment much anymore.

Today HR and managers probably have 5-10 final candidates for a position, all of whom could probably do it, so then they start looking for reasons to not to hire someone.

So in that sort of "all things equal" situation, suddenly that record triggers a "well why take a risk."

It's much easier to discriminate against someone for a whole range of reasons by not hiring, than to terminate an existing employee for the same sort of things.

Getting a job today isn't so much about being the best qualified (lots of people are), it's about having the least negatives.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:34 PM on 03/26/2011
Exactly. Just the mention of Meth just once on the application is the only reason they need to discriminate against a candidate. This just isn't fair.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnfkennedyjr
Look to my left & to my right, I'm in the Center!
01:55 PM on 03/27/2011
If you were an employer or in HR, you would see a LOT of resumes and applications for every job available. Your estimate of 10 is way off as employers typically see 50 + applicants for a single job! You would also see a lot of those applicants with excellent skills and backgrounds. You would find it impossible to find any negatives for many of these people- and the issue would be deciding which of those excellent candidates to hire. Such a decision might boil down to salary history and who would work for the least amount of money.

You assumption that every person has their "negatives" rules out those who are excellent at what they do and have always lead law abiding lives. There are lots of us out there. For those marginal people - or those who were marginalized by crimes they committed, they have a long hard road to getting back the trust they lost from society. In many cases if not most, this seems only logical if not fair.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:40 PM on 03/26/2011
You just mention the word Meth and no one wants to hire you. It isn't fair that just one mistake and you pay for it your entire life and this just isn't right. People who do Meth are just as responsible as anyone else and are as honest as any one who works on wall street.

Employers shouldn't be able to invade others privacy by doing background checks, calling past employers, doing background checks or pre hire drug screening. None of this is relivant to how a person will preform on a job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rightlygay
Already EQUAL
07:08 AM on 03/27/2011
Calling former employers and background checks are pretty relevant to the employer for past and future behavior....An employer going to invest 1-2 million dollars (at least) over thirty years......needs this information also to determine if the person being hired is worthy of the investment....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnfkennedyjr
Look to my left & to my right, I'm in the Center!
01:46 PM on 03/27/2011
I agree with you except that what employee gets to work for any company over 8 years let alone 30?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnfkennedyjr
Look to my left & to my right, I'm in the Center!
02:37 PM on 03/27/2011
I think Dana1982 was being sarcastic. Well done Dana! :-)
09:53 AM on 03/26/2011
Let's say today at work, one of your coworkers physically assaults you resulting in serious injuries. The next day you will:
1. Call the company president and thank her for not background screening since everyone has a right to work don't they?
2. Tell your friends what a great place your company is because they provide a second chance to people down on their luck.
3. Call your attorney to explore filing a negligent hiring lawsuit against your employer since your injuries will result in at least 6 months of lost work and wages and they created a dangerous work situation by hiring someone with a history of workplace violence.

Background screening is about providing information to a potential employer so that they can make informed decisions about whom to hire based on their business. Most importantly, it protects the workplace by creating a safe environment for employees. This article is filled with claims that are without basis and completely one sided. Screening can be taken too far, like anything, but that's the exception not the rule.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:37 PM on 03/26/2011
Easy for you to say. You probably weren't caught when you were younger.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnfkennedyjr
Look to my left & to my right, I'm in the Center!
01:57 PM on 03/27/2011
Or maybe when he was younger he never did anything to get caught. What kind of people did you hang with as a kid?
02:45 AM on 03/26/2011
Background checks discriminate, preventing people from working.
By preventing people from working, America's economic recovery is delayed.

Whether anyone wants to acknowledge it or not, minorities are arrested and convicted at higher rates than any other race. It is not that these people do more crime, but of them being singled out for disparate treatment.

Ever hear of the “crime” DRIVING WHILE BLACK?
How about BLACK IN THE WRONG NEIGHBORHOOD?
-- All are apparently “crimes” as police make arrests for such everyday.

Another problem is no standardization. Background checks include any number of things - not just criminal, but civil cases; EEOC complaints, Bankruptcy, Foreclosure, slow credit, IRS liens, schools, neighbors, MIB (Medical Information Bureau), and so on and so on. But how much of that is really relevant to whether you can do a job?

Also, there is no requirement that what is reported about you is true - lots of incorrect information out there. The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports 11.7 million persons were victimized by Identity Theft in 2008 -- Do you think these folks got the job?

Finally, there is strong evidence Background Checks do not reduce workplace crime. Embezzlement (stealing) cases increased by 39 percent between 1990 and 2000, according to Department of Justice statistics.

If someone wants to work, they don't want to rob you!

You may never have committed crime, but you are out of luck and out of work.

We need to stop fearing each other.
Stop Background Checks and Start the
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:40 PM on 03/26/2011
Right, just mention you were arrested selling meth just once and the interview is over. Instead of wanting the best employee they rather take the safe choice. That isn't right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnfkennedyjr
Look to my left & to my right, I'm in the Center!
02:02 PM on 03/27/2011
There is legitimate "discrimination." When applying to be a pilot, your eyesight must be excellent. When applying for credit, the history and credit score must be good. When joining the army, you must be able to pass a physical. When working in construction, you can't be in a wheelchair. If your butt ugly you can't date a girl that looks like Jennifer Aniston and if you're poor, you can't go to Monte Carlo for the weekend. Okay, omit the last 2 as true as they are...

and if a person breaks into my house, I may discriminate and shoot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
01:47 AM on 03/26/2011
"About 65 million Americans -- that’s one in four adults -- have an
arrest or conviction that can show up on a routine criminal background
check." And that is just the 1 in 4 that got caught breaking one or more of the hundreds of thousands of laws we are forced to comply to. The average American breaks 3 laws a day. We are all criminals in the eyes of the state. Free country? Where?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
returnofthejedi
Trolls have no chance!
05:54 PM on 03/25/2011
He that leads into captivity will himself be lead into captivity!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:40 PM on 03/26/2011
Is that verse from the koran?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
returnofthejedi
Trolls have no chance!
06:16 AM on 03/27/2011
Actually it's from the King James version of the bible.