iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Corporate Profits At All-Time High As Recovery Stumbles

Corporate Profits

First Posted: 03/25/11 05:29 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:40 PM ET

NEW YORK -- Despite high unemployment and a largely languishing real estate market, U.S. businesses are more profitable than ever, according to federal figures released on Friday.

U.S. corporate profits hit an all-time high at the end of 2010, with financial firms showing some of the biggest gains, data from the federal Bureau of Economic Analysis show. Corporations reported an annualized $1.68 trillion in profit in the fourth quarter. The previous record, without being adjusted for inflation, was $1.65 trillion in the third quarter of 2006.

Many of the nation's preeminent companies have posted massive increases in profits this year. General Electric posted worldwide profits of $14.2 billion, while profits at JPMorgan Chase were up 47 percent to $4.8 billion.

Corporate profits steadily increased last year as companies continued holding onto record amounts of cash and other liquid assets while cutting costs, laying off workers and wringing more productivity -- defined as the amount of output that comes from an hour of work -- from remaining staff, even as the recession eased.

To put that in perspective, said Lynn Reaser, the chief economist at Point Loma Nazarene University in San Diego, it's important to note that companies were able to bring production back up to pre-recession levels without hiring any more workers.

"We have now recovered all of the output lost in the recession, but we are still down by 7.5 million workers," she said.

In addition to layoffs, some companies continued to cut wages and benefits last year. Sub-Zero, the freezer and refrigerator manufacturer, told workers last year that factories in Wisconsin would have to be shut down, with 500 employees losing their jobs, unless staff took a 20 percent pay cut, The New York Times reported.

Workers were expected to put in more hours without overtime pay, while staff facing fewer hours of work due to furloughs were expected to do as much as they would have in a full workday, according to NPR.

But, economists said, companies may have squeezed as much as they can out of workers, with a decline in profits for non-financial companies in the fourth quarter of last year suggesting that to improve production, companies will have to start hiring seriously again.

On the whole, Reaser said, corporations have significantly improved their balance sheets since the financial crisis. "It's helped pave the way for a significant gain for corporate capital spending, dividend payouts and corporate buybacks, as well as the significant rise in stock prices," she said.

But while the financial sector continued to recover from its 2008 meltdown -- with profits jumping some $51 billion in the fourth quarter, a gain of 51 percent over the previous quarter -- non-financial firms actually saw profits fall by roughly $10 billion, according to the BEA figures.

Part of the reason, said Reaser, was that although high productivity drove down labor costs, persistent unemployment and pinched consumers left companies unable to charge the higher prices needed to boost profits. More companies will start pushing more aggressively to improve profit margins this year, she said.

In order for those efforts to pay off, she said, many companies will have to start hiring -- and keep hiring.

Until the end of last year, companies were able to boost productivity by squeezing their remaining workers, who were eager to prove they were worth their paychecks. "But," said Paul Ashworth, an economist at Capital Economics, "you can't keep getting more out of workers quarter after quarter after quarter."

To ramp up production this year, Ashworth said, companies have already started hiring modestly. Federal figures show the economy added total of 192,000 jobs in February, the most in nearly a year. The unemployment rate fell to 8.9 percent last month, the lowest since April 2009.

Economic growth figures released on Friday also suggested firms were slowly stepping up production. The Commerce Department revised upwards its projections for gross domestic product growth in the fourth quarter of 2010, to 3.1 percent from 2.8 percent.

The new projection, BMO Capital Markets senior economist Sal Guatieri said, is "consistent with an economy growing fast enough to gradually reduce the unemployment rate." But, he said, most of the increase was in business inventories -- companies producing and stockpiling more -- rather than consumer confidence.

Despite positive signs, economists warned that economic growth could be hit by the twin shocks of high gas prices and the impact of events in Japan, which has hampered auto and electronic supply chains. "There are mild headwinds that will slow growth a little bit," said Nariman Behravesh, an economist at IHS Global Insight, an economic and financial analysis firm. "They're not going to derail the recovery, and we're guessing they'll be temporary."

U.S. consumers appear to be growing nervous, thanks to events in Japan, fears over nuclear power, and unrest in the Middle East and north Africa. That anxiety could take an economic toll, with consumer sentiment falling this month to its lowest level since November 2009, according to the Reuters/University of Michigan index.

"The sharp drop in consumer confidence and Japan-related supply chain bottlenecks will likely translate into real GDP growth of only around 2.4 percent in the first quarter, with a bounce back to the 3.5 percent to 4 percent range in the second quarter," Behravesh said, revising his quarterly GDP growth estimate down from 4.2 percent.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
NEW YORK -- Despite high unemployment and a largely languishing real estate market, U.S. businesses are more profitable than ever, according to federal figures released on Friday. U.S. corporate pr...
NEW YORK -- Despite high unemployment and a largely languishing real estate market, U.S. businesses are more profitable than ever, according to federal figures released on Friday. U.S. corporate pr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,926
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (158 total)
09:07 AM on 04/23/2011
And they are still not hiring? Maybe they just need more tax cuts? Ha!
03:07 PM on 04/03/2011
The corporate greed of Companies like General Electric, Kelloggs and Kraft-Nabisco is destroying our country and putting Americans on the street. They are the homeless people we drive by and that Republicans mutter in disgust that those “Dirty People” should “get a job” on the way to their cozy suburban homes.
Every homeless person this recession has created is a mother, a father, a son or daughter. As long as they get what you want who cares that millions of American Children are living in poverty.
Did you know that General Electric made over 14 Billion in profits last year and paid ZERO in Federal taxes? Corporations like Kelloggs and Kraft-Nabisco pay little or no taxes when they ship our jobs to other countries and put thousands of American children on the streets.
When was the last time you gave a homeless person a dollar?
photo
blinkthink
Tax Wall Street Trades Now
10:39 PM on 03/29/2011
The only thing that will get jobs back here is to restrict our buying power to USA made goods. As an example, find out who makes clothing here, or go to the secondary market, do whatever it takes not to spend unless it was made by someone in this country.

Vote with your dollars!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stox1994
06:13 PM on 03/29/2011
The US should have a non-hiring tax put on companies that are not hiring. They would hire then because it is better to have employees doing something than to pay out and get nothing.
02:17 PM on 03/29/2011
Not surprising. Capitalism is supported by greed. Where there is no financial incentive, there is no opportunity. The only thing that matters nowadays is the bottom line. Many companies have the means (and sometimes the need) to hire more people. They could even give their current employees a better quality of life so that they can help pump more money back into the economy. But nope... Why do that when you can overwork and underpay your employees and increase profits by x%? That's what the shareholders want. And if the shareholders are happy, upper management's pockets are happy. And they make the final decisions. It's a cycle that is ultimately fueled by investors. Make no mistake, this world is run by investors and no one else.

Humans have a desire for more and they are extremely competitive in nature. After you've reached a certain level of money, it's like a game of pinball where you play just to see the number go up. The money makes no difference, it's about succeeding and saying you succeeded. George Soros and other billionaires have attested to the fact that their wealth eventually turned into a game. They don't keep making money because they need or even want more, but just because they can.

Companies are run by these types of people and they follow the same logic. Welcome to modern day society, enjoy your stay.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Fattonecat
whoops !!
11:07 AM on 03/29/2011
Hence the "stumbing" economy.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
10:04 AM on 03/29/2011
A 90% tax would stop the insanity. It was done before in the US quite successfully. And, it's time to do it again. If you want to sell or provide a chargeable service in the US, you need to pay for the right. Exploitation has a limit.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markas214
03:39 AM on 03/29/2011
SOCIALISM!!! All part of Omama's plan to socialize the nations wealth. Socialized among the top 1% anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eyeful
Virtuous Raconteur
03:07 AM on 03/29/2011
"If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. " – John F. Kennedy
12:29 PM on 03/28/2011
Who made the tax laws? Congress.
If Sen Bernie Sanders,VT (Independant Socialist) does not like the laws...quit crumping and change them!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mary Blickhahn
Is this really the best we can do?
11:24 AM on 03/28/2011
I keep seeing smoke and mirrors, and keep hoping I will magically get how corps have a 35%tax rate when they pay 0 taxes and even get huge tax returns and government subsidies, then keep us unemployed only to hire us back at less competitive wages and at too small of numbers to make a difference. They cry too poor to provide benefits and how we are bad people who take from them. I guess I just don't get big business the way I should...or maybe I just haven't been bought off yet?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:24 AM on 03/28/2011
http://www.businessinsider.com/16-more-profitable-companies-that-pay-almost-nothing-in-taxes-2011-3
16 More Profitable Companies That Pay Almost Nothing In Taxes

"General Electric managed the remarkable task of paying absolutely no taxes on U.S. profits of $5.1 billion.

They're not the only tax dodgers.

Over 100 companies on the S&P500 paid less than 20 percent in taxes, according to a study by Capital IQ and the NYT. That's not even counting 37 companies like Citigroup and AIG that received more in tax credits than they paid. All this thanks to loopholes in the immensely complicate­d tax code.

America's corporate tax rate is supposed to be 35 percent.

We tracked down the data from Capital IQ to identify 16 more large, profitable corporatio­ns that pay less than 5 percent in taxes..."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stox1994
06:06 PM on 03/29/2011
GE's CEO Immelt Obama's job czar. He is probably picking up manufacturing and sending it over to China as I speak. Just remember GE may be able to get by now with manufacturing in China but the Chinese are also tired of long hours and low wages. People are jumping off of buildings their due to the structured lives.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
RealConservativeAmerican
Conservation is Key
10:56 AM on 03/28/2011
Slavery was a pretty good deal for the pre-civil war farming industry. I bet profits were awesome. Slavery was a great deal for Rome too. Just look what they achieved as a civilization! What's wrong with seeking endless growth and ever increasing profit? What could a corporate culture of responsibility and community building do for industry? Will it increase profits?
Anyone remember the Little Shop Of Horrors? Why are we watering this plant? It's going to consume us all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CARLITO101
10:49 AM on 03/28/2011
The U.S. has the 2nd highest corporate tax in the developed nations. When Japan decreases its corporate tax rate this summer then the U.S will have the highest. Corporations have moved out of the Country. They can't bring any money back into the U.S. without paying taxes on all of it. So they are sitting on 1.2 trillion dollars overseas. It has been suggested that there be a tax holiday as in 2005 when they were allowed to bring all that money back to the U.S. and have it taxed at 20%. It brought Billions of dollars into the U.S. Treasury. Obama is against it because it didnt create many jobs. The problem with that reasoning is that there werent several million people unemployed in 2005.Corporations are sitting on 1.8 trillion in the U.S because of the uncertainity of not passing a Budget last year not making a decision on extending the tax cuts. I wont even reason about Obama care as 1000 Corporations have received a waiver.I mentioned earlier that profits were made because there was increased productivity with less workers. This article alludes to it but mentions that most lkely all those profits squeezed out will end soon. Companies and individuals are leaving high tax States such as California for States with no Income taxes such as Texas and Florida. Of course, their profits are going to be higher with cheaper labor and lower taxes or with Labor that costs the same and less taxes.
photo
madinpahuff
Domari Nolo
10:29 AM on 03/28/2011
I'll just toss this in the color me shocked file. †