More

European Union Wants Nuclear Plants Tested Worldwide

European Union Nuclear Power Plants

By RAF CASERT   03/25/11 11:52 AM ET   AP

BRUSSELS -- European Union leaders called for worldwide stress testing of nuclear plants on Friday and committed to putting their 143 reactors through the toughest security checks possible.

France, one of the nations most reliant on nuclear energy, with 58 reactors, said it would immediately close any plant if it failed a test.

At the end of a two-day summit, the EU nations agreed to submit their nuclear plants to tough safety tests by year-end and promised to heed the lessons from the accident at Japan's Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear complex.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said the 27 leaders agreed "on uniform euro stress tests and the highest possible safety standards."

"The experience of Japan has to be reflected in the new stress tests. This is not business as usual," she said.

Merkel's comments come two weeks since a magnitude-9 quake triggered a tsunami that knocked out the Fukushima reactor's cooling system. Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan said Friday the fight to stabilize the plant remains "very grave and serious," as officials said they suspected there was a breach in the core of a reactor that could mean more serious contamination.

The fallout has set off fears of the biggest radioactive contamination since the 1986 disaster at Ukraine's Chernobyl, which spewed radiation across a wide distance and continues to haunt Europeans.

"European stress tests will be prepared in a coordinated fashion," Merkel said after the summit. "The aim is the highest possible safety standard," she said, insisting the EU would press for other European nations to follow suit.

EU officials will follow up the nuclear issue during talks in Ukraine next month. Nuclear energy is key for Ukraine, a country of 46 million. Ukraine today operates 15 reactors at four power plants, which generate nearly half of all its electricity.

"Because the danger does not stop at our borders, we encourage and support neighboring countries to do similar stress-tests," said EU President Herman Van Rompuy. "A worldwide review of nuclear plants would be best."

There are currently 442 nuclear power reactors in operation around the globe, with 65 more under construction. Five are in long-term shutdown.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy said experts will have to work out the details of the tests.

"Independent nuclear authorities will proceed with the controls, will make them public and the EU Commission and nuclear regulators will say whether they suffice or not," Sarkozy said.

In France, Sarkozy said, "we decided to subject all our plants to a stress tests in the light of what happened in Japan. If any power plant fails the test, it will be shut down. That's clear."

The EU had its own small nuclear problem. Slovenia's only nuclear power plant that shut down automatically earlier this week due to what plant officials called a minor incident failed to restart because of technical problems.

There was no danger of radiation fallout during the stoppage or the attempted restart, Slovenian authorities said.

Japan's nuclear accident continued to have political impact beyond Europe.

In New Delhi, some 100 protesters marched to India's Parliament demanding that the government give up plans to build a large number of nuclear power plants because of safety issues underscored by Japan's nuclear crisis.

"The choice is clear – no nuclear," chanted the protesters from the Anti-Nuclear Struggles Solidarity Forum, a coalition of more than a dozen groups.

____

Gabriele Steinhauser, Robert Wielaard and Don Melvin contributed from Brussels, Veronika Oleksyn from Vienna and Maria Danilova from Kiev contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BRUSSELS -- European Union leaders called for worldwide stress testing of nuclear plants on Friday and committed to putting their 143 reactors through the toughest security checks possible. France, o...
BRUSSELS -- European Union leaders called for worldwide stress testing of nuclear plants on Friday and committed to putting their 143 reactors through the toughest security checks possible. France, o...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:42 PM on 04/03/2011
If the disaster in Japan does not make one pause... then I have to wonder about a persons sanity. Too many countries are pushing ahead without even evaluating the consequences of what is going on in Japan.

We all need clean air, clean water and safe food to eat. It looks like the disaster in Japan is polluting all three.

It is time to transition to safe, clean alternative energy. Wind, solar, hydro, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste are the future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kyrose777
10:45 AM on 03/28/2011
I think the EU has proposed logical action. Due to a nuclear reactor ability to destroy, all of them need immediate security testing and safety inspections. This nation should support this agenda.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amy Fleischer
11:01 PM on 03/27/2011
Yet more evidence that Europe is surpassing the US in intelligence. They're greener, care about health care and education, and now want to safe guard their nuclear power plants from something going wrong.

At what point did America just go, "Eh...f*** it,"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seachange525
All will be well...I just don't know how yet :)
08:18 PM on 03/29/2011
Well, Amy, I think America began saying that when President Jimmy Carter tried to get us to invest in alternative technology & Reagan became president. He undermined unions, said trees polluted the environment (about as sensible as Ann Coulter's 'radiation is good for you' rant), and created the trickle-down economic theory that has put us in this recession and redistributed most of our wealth to 2% of the population.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
05:27 PM on 03/26/2011
Planning the closure of all reactors makes more sense than throwing money at what will be an industry whitewash.
Closure plans allow utilities and governments to focus on those that will temporarily stay open, while forcing a resolution to the toxic waste piling up all over the world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
02:04 PM on 03/26/2011
Alternatives to new and later to existing nuclear plants are being born.

An inexpensive, green, Low Energy Nuclear Reactor (LENR) invented by Andrea Rossi is now in production.

It is inherently much safer than existing nukes and uses non-radioactive Nickel, not radioactive Uranium, as fuel.

Power cost is projected at one penny per kilowatt hour.

No nuclear waste is produced.

See Cold Fusion at www.aesopinstitute.org to learn more.

A one Megawatt heating plant has been approved to open in Greece, in October. A similar plant is under negotiation for construction in the USA.

A nuclear scientist has said when these compact modular units, which can be linked like solar panels to produce any desired power level, begin producing inexpensive electricity it will start a "stampede".

Several competitive designs are being developed. Regulatory approval has been received in Greece and may prove possible here.

These technologies will cost-competitively undercut any need for new Uranium fueled nuclear plant production and allow the replacement of existing installations as rapidly as mass manufacturing and concerned parties will permit.

LENR designs have no possible chance of a meltdown!

They can be a building block for decentralized energy generation.

Big is fragile and ugly. Small is still beautiful.

A video of the demonstration of the Rossi reactor in Italy a few weeks ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCdxpt86fv4&feature=related
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
10:37 PM on 03/26/2011
This would be so wonderful.  No nuclear waste.  No co2 emissions.  Buy nickel futures.  But.... was that tin-foil i spotted in the bottom film?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
01:28 AM on 03/27/2011
No. So far it seems quite real.

See Cold Fusion at www.aesopinstitute.org to learn more about it than you probably want to know.

The tin foil hats should be on the heads of those who arrogantly sold us on Uranium fueled nuclear plants.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
P51MUSTANG
From the planet Sarcasia
02:02 PM on 03/26/2011
Nuclear power always has been, and always will be a good idea --- in theory.

It's as you grow older and wiser you realize that theory and reality seldom collide, and no where so violently as in the field of nuclear energy.
photo
thereisonlyoneparty
more amazing than you
02:22 AM on 03/27/2011
Wrong.

Nuclear power is very safe (mostly because of the possible dangers involved--the amount of monitoring is nuts.)

This is just like people being all up in arms after a plane crashes.  "Oh noes, we need to do something!  A few people died and there is a bit of an environmental mess.  Yeah, it is minor and terribly infrequent, but we need to do something.!"
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
02:39 PM on 03/28/2011
The risk and expense is too great for the return.
photo
vmf211
Fighting against Liberalism everyday
02:28 AM on 04/05/2011
we need more nuclear plants here because windmills and solar cost 4 to 8 times more than nuclear to produce
photo
Kassandra
Idiot savant artistic genius
12:41 PM on 03/26/2011
And from the US....crickets
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
Women, their rights & nothing less ~ SusanBAnthony
11:33 AM on 03/26/2011
If only the USA would take the initiative on alternative clean green energies: Solar, wind, wave, tide, vortex based math, hemp, etc. and would encourage new solutions that haven't been thought of yet. 

If only the NRC hadn't just renewed the license for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant, built 40 years ago.

If only we had a President dedicated to making progress in our country in this vital area of clean green renewable energy. I thought President Obama was the one. He has invested in solar, but he is a proponent of nuclear power and his Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar, is a major coal proponent, having just opened up 750 million tons of Wyoming coal to mining.... so depressing ☮

“The last time new construction on a nuclear power plant in the US was ordered, and ultimately built, was back in 1973, when President Obama was a seventh-grader at the Punahou School on Honolulu. The Three Mile Island disaster in 1979, and the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, effectively shut down new commercial nuclear projects in the US.

“The US remains the largest producer of commercial nuclear power in the world. The 104 licensed commercial nuclear plants are old, close to the end of their originally projected life spans...â€
~ Amy Goodman, Calling Time on the Nuclear Age, 3-16-11
07:31 AM on 03/26/2011
Ever own a fish tank, there is a very delicate tipping point in the tanks water if it gets to that point the whole tank, fish and all die almost without warning.
442 existing reactors and 65 under construction!!!
When I was a kid the big scare was a nuclear war with Russia and the ensuing fallout from it.
We are engaged in a war for our planet right now and the enemy is greed!!
But its my precious!!! Just like the totalitarian dictators falling in the middle east these nuclear thugs need to go and go now the sooner the better.OMHO
photo
Kassandra
Idiot savant artistic genius
12:44 PM on 03/26/2011
Actually, it seems we are engaged in a war AGAINST our planet.

And yeah, I remember the "duck and cover" days and the Cuban missile near-end of days scenario. I had nightmares about it for years
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seachange525
All will be well...I just don't know how yet :)
08:23 PM on 03/29/2011
Dear greenturtleman and Kassandra, I'm with you. I particularly like the allusion to TOlien's Lord of the Rings ('my precious') and those ridiculous days when we were taught to take refuge under our school desks in the event of nuclear war. Fanned both of you :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:32 AM on 03/26/2011
Some statistics from the US Dept. of Energy website:

In 2005, California's two nuclear power plants, San Onofre and Diablo Canyon, were responsible for 19% of all of the electricity produced in the state.
In the same year, non-hydro renewables were responsible for 20% of the electricity produced in the state.
Again - in California, in 2005, renewables 20%, nuclear 19%.

In the United States as a whole, in 2005, nuclear was, again, responsible for 20% of the electricity produced, but non-hydro renewables were responsible for only 2%, and if California is subtracted from the equation, renewables nationwide produced less than 2%.

If California, as of 2005, was able to get more electricity from non-hydro renewables than what it got from nuclear, then what is holding up the rest of the country?
photo
Kassandra
Idiot savant artistic genius
12:45 PM on 03/26/2011
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GaryNMaine
Words offer the means to meaning...
12:53 PM on 03/26/2011
Yes, money from non-renewable energy industry who are NOT looking out for the interests of the citizenry, only their own pocketbooks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:27 PM on 03/25/2011
Nuclear power should be banned. Once again the profit motive and nuclear power have proven to be a deadly combination. Just how many more times do we need to see this demonstration...
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:49 PM on 03/25/2011
FF. no kidding, how many cities do we need to lose?
photo
thereisonlyoneparty
more amazing than you
02:27 AM on 03/27/2011
How many cities have "we" "lost"?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:36 AM on 03/26/2011
When I was a kid most well-meaning people, in all honesty, thought that nuclear power was a fantastic idea. Today, I think it is time we admitted we were wrong, and move away from nuclear as rapidly as practical.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
04:59 PM on 03/25/2011
I hope people do not allow the Japan disaster to be glazed over like previous disasters, and keep the pressure on for closing nuclear power stations as soon as replacements allow. And do not build any more nuclear power plants. They are not even economical. Several renewable energy sources cost less with no potential for widespread disaster. Even if the cost is higher for some technologies we need to move to cleaner power sources.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fiberoptimist
04:50 PM on 03/25/2011
More than review these nuclear plants, we need to re-examine the very assumptions upon which they were designed. In Japan, they assumed a 9.0 quake would never happen, a Tsunami would only be 16 feet, the backup generators could provide cooling, ad nauseum. ALL WRONG. How many other false assumptions are out there putting entire populations at risk?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
Women, their rights & nothing less ~ SusanBAnthony
11:39 AM on 03/26/2011
F & F ~ Couldn't agree more ☮

“The Administration, just months ago, asked Congress to provide a $4 billion loan guarantee for two new nuclear reactors to be built and operated on the Gulf Coast of Texas â€” by Tokyo Electric Power and local partners.  As if the Gulf hasn't suffered enough…

The failure of emergency systems at Japan's nuclear plants comes as no surprise to those of us who have worked in the field.â€
~ Greg Palast, 3-14-11, t r u t h o u t / Buzzflash
03:34 PM on 03/25/2011
The cost for Nuclear energy is too high. We still have not come up with a way to
dispose of the waste that needs to be stored FOREVER. What will that cost?
People and technology do FAIL.

It is time to transition to safe, clean alternative energy. Wind, solar, wave energy,
hydro, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from waste, cellulose and algae
are the future.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
04:35 PM on 03/25/2011
How would corporations make their big profits if we convert to alternative energy? Isn't that the most important issue for our so-called leaders? Just like the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, corporate profits are more important than human life.