More

D.C.'s Noyes School Joins Others Under Investigation For Suspicious Standardized Test Patterns

Standardized Testing

First Posted: 03/29/11 08:59 PM ET Updated: 05/29/11 06:12 AM ET

UPDATE:

Since this story was first published, Michelle Rhee has acknowledged that some cheating may have occurred, the Washington Post reports. This comes after her comments Monday that USA Today was one of the "enemies of school reform" who didn't believe Washington, D.C. scores could improve without cheating. In backing away from these comments, Rhee told Jay Mathews of the Washington Post that some of her comments were "stupid" and that strong precautions should be taken in safeguarding tests from potential tampering.

“You have got to have really strong test-security protocols at the district level and at the state level,” said Rhee, who contacted Mathews. “The vast majority of people will not cheat, but there will be exceptions here and there.”

------------------------------------------------

In the last few years, Crosby S. Noyes Education Campus in D.C. has become the poster child for education reform, with its remarkable increase in standardized test scores. But Monday's investigation by USA Today about the possibility of cheating on the school's standardized tests may burst that bubble.

USA Today reports that from 2006 to 2008, the percentage of Noyes students who scored "proficient" or "advanced" on math standardized tests increased from 10 percent to 58 percent; reading scores followed the same trend. The dramatic improvements prompted a number of accolades: the U.S. Department of Education named the school a Blue Ribbon School; then-Chancellor of D.C. Schools Michelle Rhee rewarded Noyes' staff with bonuses for boosting scores and made the school a symbol of how her education reform strategies could transform schools; and last year, D.C. schools won an extra $75 million in federal monies in the U.S. government's Race to the Top competition, which factored in test scores.

However, in a detailed description of their investigation, USA Today reveals that for the past three school years, most of Noyes' classrooms had extraordinarily high numbers of erasures on standardized tests; wrong answers were erased and changed to right ones at a statistically improbable rate. It reports:

On the 2009 reading test, for example, seventh-graders in one Noyes classroom averaged 12.7 wrong-to-right erasures per student on answer sheets; the average for seventh-graders in all D.C. schools on that test was less than 1. The odds are better for winning the Powerball grand prize than having that many erasures by chance, according to statisticians consulted by USA Today.

In 2007-08, six classrooms out of the eight taking tests at Noyes were flagged by McGraw-Hill, D.C.'s testing company, because of high wrong-to-right erasure rates (measured by the same scanners used to score the tests). The pattern was repeated in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 school years, when 80 percent of Noyes' classrooms were again flagged by McGraw-Hill.

There are other explanations for multiple erasures besides cheating, such as educators advising their students to go back and check their work. But, as Thomas Haladyna, a professor emeritus at Arizona State University who has studied testing for 20 years, told USA Today, in cases like Noyes' -- when whole classes at schools with dramatic increases in test scores show statistically rare erasures -- there's a need for thorough investigation.

This is the latest in a multitude of standardized test investigations coming to light in the last several months. A USA Today investigation of the standardized tests of millions of students in six states -- Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Michigan and Ohio -- and the District of Columbia found a large number of irregularities:

The newspaper identified 1,610 examples of anomalies in which public school classes -- a school's entire fifth grade, for example -- boasted what analysts regard as statistically rare, perhaps suspect, gains on state tests.

According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, similar indications of potential cheating in Atlanta schools prompted an investigation by federal authorities into whether Atlanta Public Schools illicitly boosted scores on standardized tests. Since then, the district has been under fire for allegedly using intimidation to dissuade potential witnesses.

At Charles Seipelt Elementary School in Ohio, teacher Scott Mueller was accused of giving his fifth-graders the test questions prior to the test; investigators concluded that Mueller had looked at questions for fifth-grade math and science tests in advance -- a violation of testing rules -- and then used identical questions in his study guides.

Also, earlier this month, the Los Angeles Board of Education voted to revoke the charter of six schools that cheated on last year's state standardized tests, reported the Los Angeles Times.

The conditions that inspired cheating in these schools are similar to D.C. -- high praise and bonuses awarded for good scores; loss of hundreds of thousands in federal dollars and teachers and administrators jobs for failure to meet standards.

According to USA Today, while most school districts retain the power to hire and fire teachers, 10 states now require that student scores be the main criterion in teacher evaluations -- one of the many pressures on educators to get their students to score higher.

Some states and districts reward educators for raising scores; a teacher may earn a bonus of as much as $25,000 in Washington, D.C., if his or her students' scores climb. [No Child Left Behind] also puts principals' jobs on the line if students' scores don't improve. Most of the 130 Detroit public schools closed since 2005 were cited for having low test scores... By 2014, the law dictates, 100% of public school students must be 'proficient' in math and reading. If not, a school can face replacement of its entire staff.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

UPDATE: Since this story was first published, Michelle Rhee has acknowledged that some cheating may have occurred, the Washington Post reports. This comes after her comments Monday that USA Today w...
UPDATE: Since this story was first published, Michelle Rhee has acknowledged that some cheating may have occurred, the Washington Post reports. This comes after her comments Monday that USA Today w...
Filed by Victoria Fine  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 316
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
01:48 AM on 04/08/2011
In the late 90s early 00s I was working at a brand new middle school. The principal told us that our test scores would be invalid for that year and the following two years because one of our 8th grade teachers cheated on the test. He had photocopied problems from the test and sent them home as homework.

We were outraged and we wanted him fired. All of us. Because he cheated and his dishonor reflected poorly on the teaching profession and on our school.

Did he get fired?

No. He begged the principal to please spare him and he was only censured and I think was suspended for a week without pay. But he kept his job and remained a teacher.

So much for principals doing their job. (It isn't the first instance in which he did NOT do his job. He also refused to document another math teacher to start the process for dismissal. Told me point blank.)

One of the science teachers (a male) said to me that if it had been a woman, the principal would have had her fired that day.

So much for it's all those it's all the union's fault. It's the teacher's fault. They're all lazy, greedy and incompetent.

This principal refused to fire a teacher that clearly did not have the ethics and morals to be a teacher. In fact, the principal intervened on his behalf with the district in order that he NOT be fired.
photo
rdsathene
Pedagogy of the Oppressed by Paulo Freire
05:12 PM on 04/06/2011
For the mendacious woman to even hint that she may have misspoke is probably the closest she'll ever get to telling the truth in her life.
10:25 PM on 04/04/2011
More Rhee-diculousness and hipocricy I see...smh
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angie Sullivan
Students are my special interest.
01:27 AM on 04/04/2011
Many students across the United States can do well on standardized because their parents have had them enrolled in preschool or some kind of formal school preparation since age 2. Since the day many students were born - their families began preparation and activities to prepare them for academic learning.

My students are compared to these students. My at-risk school students have been at home with relatives who don't speak English. Their families love them but do not know how to create a reading ready environment. They haven't received formal literacy at home nor will they during their school career. Research shows that it takes between 5 to 10 years for the average student to gain the academic language required to compete in school. Their families are poor and struggling - no time, no money, no know-how. Yet they are immediately compared to families and students who started an academic career the day they were born. Without support to parents/communities, 90% of a student's life will not include any academic support. Yet they will be compared continuously with student's who receive academic support outside of school.

That is why teachers feel the need to erase answers to get their pay for performance. So many things keep students from being successful that are beyond a teacher's control. It's not OK to cheat, but that is why teachers do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angie Sullivan
Students are my special interest.
01:20 AM on 04/04/2011
The Nevada IDMS test which is correlated to standardized tests - is given 2 months into the 1st year of school of 1st grade, which is the first required year of school in my state. The students have to be able to write 4 readable complete sentences, on topic, with capitalization and punctuation. They have to read - identifying sounds within words. They have to hold a pencil and write on a test - when some have very little experience with a pencil. They have to add when a story problem is read to them. They have to identify numbers and number words.

You might as well ask my kids to walk on water. I love them. I want to help them - but I'm not Jesus Christ and I can't pull a reading readiness miracle out of my hat. They were failing before the first day of public school. I will continue to love them, but its very likely that once they start this path of failing, they will continue. Schools don't have enough staff to help remediate all the students that come from homes that didn't prepare them for school and/or can't support them academically at home.

That is why teachers feel the need to erase answers to get their pay for performance. So many things keep students from being successful that are beyond a teacher's control. It's not OK to cheat, but that is why teachers do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angie Sullivan
Students are my special interest.
01:15 AM on 04/04/2011
Every year - all or almost all of my students are behind. They assess as low as a 2 year old level. I've had 15 out of a classroom of 20 be more than 3 years behind the first day of first grade. Some don't respond when I call their name. Some cannot recognize their name spelled on the desk. Most need remediation in identifying letters and numbers. Many cannot hold and cut with scissors. They are years behind before they ever started public school when their data is compared on standardized tests. Who can be blamed for that? The schools weren't even involved? Do you want to blame the public school teachers still?

That is why teachers feel the need to erase answers to get their pay for performance. So many things keep students from being successful that are beyond a teacher's control. It's not OK to cheat, but that is why teachers do it.
10:02 AM on 04/05/2011
You bring up some excellent points, Angie. I would add that most school curricula and state states are developmentally inappropriate - especially for at-risk students who don't enter school with the same cultural capital as their affluent, white, and/or suburban peers. I went to preschool before kindergarden, and during both I spend most of my time playing. I am shocked that today students are expected to read and write in kindergarden, when each year more and more of our students come in with less and less. Children have to have experiences that allow them to develop fine motor skills, social skills, listening skills, and the ability to articulate themselves verbally BEFORE they begin formal training in reading/writing. Without these valuable skills, teachers are basically trying to build a house without a foundation. I do think that all students are capable of meeting more rigorous educational (testing) standards, provided they start off on the right track. Why can't more students spend 2-3 years in kindergarden, if they need it? The educational research suggests that they will catch up if they have foundational skills. Unfortunately, the one-size-fits-nobody model dominating educational accountabilty policies ends up leaving every child behind.
10:04 AM on 04/05/2011
*state tests
02:52 PM on 04/02/2011
Whenever the stakes are greatest, many are tempted to create an edge in favor to their direction. In California, not too many years ago, an incentive ($10,000 per teacher) was given to schools with the largest academic increases. Some schools did well on their own. However a number of schools were suspect, which led to investigations and lawsuits.... The pressure to improve class test scores is huge. Ms. Rhee's need for great results put everyone under her control on the chopping block. Unfortunately the results may have been created behind closed doors by adults, not the students. Maybe being a good teacher today also includes developing the covert skills typically used by business or political world. Welcome to the new world of manipulated data.
researcher
researcher
08:12 PM on 04/02/2011
you missed the point.

pay for performance will create such an outcome every time.

it fails to understand the many variables in an educational system.

students test scores are just one variable.

every business school teachs pay for performance as a leadership model but only in their ignorance. it is a carrot and stick approach based in fear and therefore will self destruct.

it is skinnerism defined for humans. if you want to be a rat or chicken go for it; with humans it has failed every time, if valid data is collected. most of the time the data is fudged to protect the pay for performance paradigm. ie rhee will defend it to the end. paradigm thing.

rhee thinks she knows because college professors taught her this ignorance. they know not. her performance in DC will come back to haunt her. already she will not come on CNN.

but she will continue this ignorance due to her thinking she can buy best in class performance. she cant nor can anyone else.

study deming to find out why these types of skinnerisms dont work. every business school in america is teaching this ignorance.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdecisneros
my micro bio is empty because I went to the micro
10:30 AM on 04/02/2011
Read Freakonomics how they prove that teachers changed answers to cheat on tests.
10:45 PM on 04/01/2011
My kids take their state tests under a watchful video camera, on a computer, with 12 different versions of the test popping on the screens, with two adults proctoring. Really? This is teaching? The Geneva Conventions would call it torture, and we do it to kids from age 8-18, twice a year.

C'mon, we have to get smarter than this.
researcher
researcher
01:23 AM on 04/02/2011
this is america, smarter is not part of the deal.

we have wars for corp profits and you want smarter.

we make mega profits off the sick and needy and you want smarter??????

we have one in seven americans without health insurance and you want smarter????

we have pre existing medical conditions to enhance corp profits and you want smarter?

we have open borders not out of compassion but for cheap labor and you want smarter?

we have a reelection system based on corp money and you want smarter?

need I say more, americans are not smart get over it.
06:53 AM on 04/02/2011
Couldn't have said it better myself.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elmos mom
02:39 PM on 04/01/2011
Gee this is surprising. Who would have thought that putting people under enormous pressure to perform or get fired would lead to cheating? I think that happened in the financial world, where the drive to sell more CDOs led to cheating from mortgage lenders to rating agencies to security sales people.

Michelle Wei may be the new tough czar of the Washington School system but she still needs an education.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftbehind2000
Occupy Your LIFE.
12:22 PM on 04/01/2011
What do you expect from someone who would destroy a honeybee just to make a point?
photo
fredpa
I will try again tomorrow.
08:23 AM on 04/01/2011
This is what happens when someone who doesn't understand learning is in charge of learning. There are two ways to get a 50 point hop. One, the whole 50 were poised just a fraction below the cut score, and they all improved a year and a fraction. In this case, a leader with integrity does not take the credit and sets the record straight. Way two involves cheating. In this case a leader with integrity addresses it as such and goes to work on it, as well as the needed program improvement. Sadly, we have here a leader who leans more to political exploitation than program improvement.
photo
poeticjustice4all
Past = Prologue
07:19 AM on 04/01/2011
There's no news here. America's schools have been cheating poor children and children of color for centuries.
08:06 AM on 04/01/2011
Either do something or be quiet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Mann
Do you want to be on the opposite side of Progress
11:01 AM on 04/01/2011
But this time it is the people YOU support doing it...just can't win eh?
And I second the other comment. You make a lot of noise and don't really do much.
photo
poeticjustice4all
Past = Prologue
06:04 PM on 04/01/2011
This sort of bizarre, childish nonsense pretty much sums up the mindset of most of the teacher workforce.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:56 AM on 04/01/2011
I believe the teacher's union have found their future offensive play against any reformer. "Do things our way or we'll cheat on standardized tests and cause a scandal."
08:06 AM on 04/01/2011
Look at cheating scandals. It's usually an administrator since they have the most to gain from this. If you want to hate on something so much, the least you could do is know what you're talking about.
photo
fredpa
I will try again tomorrow.
08:26 AM on 04/01/2011
No, you're wrong. It's generally the teachers that do it, but administrators are part of the conspiracy of silence. The principals don't know enough about what it takes to improve a program. They see improved scores and program improvement as the same thing. Can happen, but usually not the same thing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftbehind2000
Occupy Your LIFE.
12:17 PM on 04/01/2011
Um, huh? Seems to me, the faux reformers are the cheaters in this story. But I guess it doesn't matter what the facts are - union haters will twist any story to make a point...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:37 PM on 04/01/2011
It's unclear who cheated here, if there was cheating. But ask yourself, who had direct access to the test and were in a position to do the erasure? Was it Rhee? Or was it the teachers and principal of the school? Who benefited most by cheating?