More

Microsoft Co-Founder Paul Allen Slams Bill Gates In New Book

Paul Allen Memoir Bill Gates

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 03/30/11 03:24 PM ET Updated: 05/30/11 06:12 AM ET

Vanity Fair has reprinted a lengthy excerpt from Paul Allen's controversial memoir, "Idea Man: A Memoir by the Co-founder of Microsoft," and it does not paint a flattering portrait of Bill Gates, with whom Allen established Micro-Soft in 1975.

The book begins in 1968, when tenth-grader Allen's fascination with his school's teletypewriter leads to his first meeting with Gates, "a gangly, freckle-faced eighth-grader" with a "scruffy-preppy look."

Allen describes his early relationship with Gates as somewhat fraternal, with Allen filling the role of the older brother Gates never had. Even as a schoolboy, Allen recalls, Gates had lofty goals and a fierce competitive streak. "He was 13 years old and already a budding entrepreneur," writes Allen.

Allen's portrait of Gates starts to darken after 1974, when Gates convinced Allen to leave college and the two began programming round-the-clock together. Gates, he claims, had a tendency to micro-manage and downplay Allen's contributions to their collaborations.

Allen writes:

I tried to put myself in his shoes and reconstruct his thinking, and I concluded that it was just this simple: What's the most I can get? [...] I'd been taught that a deal was a deal and your word was your bond. Bill was more flexible; he felt free to renegotiate agreements until they were signed and sealed. There's a degree of elasticity in any business dealing, a range for what might seem fair, and Bill pushed within that range as hard and as far as he could.

Allen describes Gates as growing increasingly harsh as Microsoft grew: "[H]e thrived on conflict and wasn't shy about instigating it. A few of us cringed at the way he'd demean people and force them to defend their positions."

Allen goes on to accuse Gates of colluding with newly appointed CEO Steve Ballmer. The event takes place soon after Allen was diagnosed with early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. Allen's recollection reads:

One evening in late December 1982, I heard Bill and Steve speaking heatedly in Bill's office and paused outside to listen in. It was easy to get the gist of the conversation. They were bemoaning my recent lack of production and discussing how they might dilute my Microsoft equity by issuing options to themselves and other shareholders. It was clear that they'd been thinking about this for some time. [...] I helped start the company and was still an active member of management, though limited by my illness, and now my partner and my colleague were scheming to rip me off. It was mercenary opportunism, plain and simple.

Bill Gates, however, remembers the partnership differently. "While my recollection of many of these events may differ from Paul's, I value his friendship and the important contributions he made to the world of technology and at Microsoft," Gates said in a statement, posted on the Microsoft Blog.

The Wall Street Journal elaborates, "The Messrs. Gates and Allen were widely thought by associates to have a warm relationship in the years since Mr. Allen, 58 years old, left Microsoft. Even Mr. Allen says Mr. Gates was one of his 'most regular visitors' when Mr. Allen was recovering from chemotherapy two years ago [in 2009] from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, describing him as 'everything you'd want from a friend, caring and concerned.'"

Carl Stork, a technical assistant to Gates at Microsoft told the Journal, "I am surprised that Paul would have felt that it helps his legacy to express dissatisfaction with the share of Microsoft he received [...] While all of us considered Paul a friend and valued his contribution, there is no question that Bill had a far larger impact on the growth and success of Microsoft than did Paul."

Paul Allen's memoir will be available on April 17. You can read an excerpt at Vanity Fair. The Wall Street Journal has more on the controversy.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

 
 
  • Comments
  • 529
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
05:49 PM on 04/18/2011
What I find most interesting about this is not that Bill Gates is a lot more tempermental than most people realize, but his cold hearted businessman way of looking at things. When I say cold hearted, this also has moral connotations like Gates willingness to cut Paul Allen out of his due share of Microsoft stock. As an educator, it makes me even more doubtful of Gates' involvement with education reform. Education is so much more than running a business. I have to agree with Diane Ravitch (former Asst Secy of Education and author of the recent book "The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education") that Gate's business model approach to education reform is probably causing a lot more damage than good. As Ms. Ravitch stated: "I don't hear any of the corporate reformers expressing concern about the way standardized testing narrows the curriculum, the way it rewards convergent thinking and punishes divergent thinking, the way it stamps out creativity and originality. I don't hear any of them worried that a generation will grow up ignorant of history and the workings of government. I don't hear any of them putting up $100 million to make sure that every child has the chance to learn to play a musical instrument. All I hear from them is a demand for higher test scores and a demand to tie teachers' evaluations to those test scores. That is not going to improve education."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
12:29 PM on 04/18/2011
Exactly how many geniuses can you fit on the head of a pin?
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
10:28 PM on 04/01/2011
The $23 million investment in Monsanto by the Gates Foundation probably deserves more research.
09:17 AM on 04/01/2011
Cry baby cry! where is your foundation?
02:39 AM on 04/01/2011
Billionaires don't become billionaires by having integrity
09:09 PM on 03/31/2011
We already live in a computerized era, why do we still have "income tax season" every year? Why can't taxes just be taken off, deducted by income or balanced as we go along with spending, and receiving by using only ID type of credit cards etc.?
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
10:04 PM on 04/01/2011
Because there is so much money to be made from fines.
05:27 PM on 03/31/2011
Nothing more than some jealous tittle-tattle between ridiculously filthy rich moguls.
04:38 PM on 03/31/2011
Microsoft had a good 30 year run - but like all tech companies (remember Craig computers in the 70's?) - the giants eventually fall to younger more lean companies.

That is why we need more govt oversight to protect the public from new companies/technology.
We the people are too dumb to choose - we nee the govt to protect us from business and our selves.
02:36 AM on 04/01/2011
Companies are so lean today they are practically emaciated
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
12:26 PM on 04/18/2011
I don't agree. The problem is that computers, vis a vis the consumer, are very dependent on standardization and compatibility, which is no doubt a blessing and a curse.

Had no one come to the fore like MS did, I suspect computers would be no where near where they are at today.

Or, have I successfully re-hashed the obvious here? :)
03:27 PM on 03/31/2011
In Microsoft’s early years, Gates poured over biographies of Napoleon. He said that Napoleon was his hero; he once went to a costume party dressed as Napoleon. Microsoft owes much of its elephantine success to Gates’s applying Napoleon’s maxims of fighting. All this is splendidly laid out in Sweet’s The Principles of Fighting, which shows the degree to which Gates emulated Napoleon.

Did Allen think that someone whose hero is Napoleon would treat him well and fairly?
photo
SunEarth
is holding out for the macro-bio.
02:23 PM on 03/31/2011
Does Gates look kinda yellow in the pic or is it my laptop?
photo
PenguinLinux
got root ?
01:32 PM on 03/31/2011
root@microsoft:# rm -rf *gates *allen* && apt-get install linus rms shuttleworth
11:25 AM on 03/31/2011
Bill Gates donates his money through his own foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, that allows him to avoid taxes.

To ensure his foundation stays tax exempt, the foundation must give away at least 5% of it's assets on a yearly basis. The rest of the money is invested in other corporations to make more money. For the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, some of these include Governments, Merck, and oil companies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:49 PM on 03/31/2011
You only get very tiny tax deductions from donating large sums like that...it is to prevent super rich people from forming fake charities.

Feel free to post the IRS links on limits on donations and educate us all to your false claims.
03:01 PM on 03/31/2011
Where is the false claim?
11:24 AM on 03/31/2011
Another Trustee besides Bill and Melinda is their friend Warren Buffet, who donated most of his money to the Foundation. The Population Research Institute reports:

Most of Buffett's share of the charitable donations (over $100 million) went to his Buffett Foundation, which supports the most radical aspects of the population control movement. In 1994, Buffett provided $2 million in funding for the Population Council, which was used to fund clinical trials of Mifepristone (RU-486). Buffett also provided $2 million to Family Health International for the distribution of quinacrine hydrochloride, a chemical with sterilizes a woman by burning her fallopian tubes. Quinacrine is illegal in the U.S., but is used, often coercively, in Vietnam, India, and other nations. In the late 1990s, Buffett committed to a $20 million grant to International Projects Assistance Services (IPAS) which manufactures and distributes manual vacuum aspirators, used for performing abortions in the Third World. 3
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnSawyer
arglebargy
05:50 AM on 04/05/2011
On the other hand, these methods of birth control can be seen as giving people ways of controlling their family size, if used judiciously through personal decision, so they're not swamped by obligations to too many children that keep them in poverty. The fact that any of these methods are used by force, is distressing, and should be addressed separately, instead of by denouncing them altogether.
nanjemoy
first, check your satire-o-meter.
10:37 AM on 03/31/2011
The anti-social network.
LittleGirl
Ala Shakes - "Hold ON"
10:05 AM on 03/31/2011
Praise in public, criticize in private.

You learn that in your human resources class. That's a manager's rule that seems to be missing in many of my former supervisors, as well.
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
12:12 PM on 03/31/2011
That doesn't apply here. They're no longer working together.