More

Japan Nuclear Crisis: Radioactive Water Leaks Into Sea From Crippled Plant

AP    
First Posted: 04/02/11 03:37 AM ET Updated: 06/01/11 06:12 AM ET

RIKUZENTAKATA, Japan — Highly radioactive water spilled into the ocean off a tsunami-damaged nuclear power plant Saturday, as Japan's prime minister surveyed the damage in a town gutted by the wave.

The Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear complex has been spewing radioactivity since March 11, when a magnitude-9.0 earthquake and ensuing wave knocked out power, disabling cooling systems and allowing radiation to seep out of the overheating reactors. Authorities said the leak they identified Saturday could be the source of radioactivity found in coastal waters in recent days.

Prime Minister Naoto Kan went to the plant and flew over the tsunami-ravaged coast soon after the wave hit, but Saturday was the first time he set foot in one of the pulverized towns.

Dressed in the blue work clothes that have become almost a uniform for officials, Kan stopped in Rikuzentakata, where the town hall is one of the few buildings still standing. All its windows are blown out and a tangle of metal and other debris is piled in front of it.

The prime minister bowed his head for a minute of silence in front of the building. He met with the town's mayor, whose 38-year-old wife was swept away in the wave and is still missing. Officials fear about 25,000 people may have been killed, many of whose bodies have not been found.

"The government fully supports you until the end," Kan later told 250 people at an elementary school that is serving as an evacuation center.

Megumi Shimanuki, whose family is living in a similar shelter 100 miles (160 kilometers) away in Natori, said Kan didn't spend enough time with people on the ground. Kan returned to Tokyo in the afternoon.
Story continues below
Advertisement

"The government has been too focused on the Fukushima power plant rather than the tsunami victims," said Shimanuki, 35. "Both deserve attention."

Saturday's leak was from a newly discovered crack in a maintenance pit on the edge of the Fukushima complex, Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency spokesman Hidehiko Nishiyama said.

The crack was apparently caused by the quake and may have been leaking since then, said spokesman Osamu Yokokura of Tokyo Electric Power Co., which runs the plant.

Measurements showed the air above the radioactive water in the pit contained more than 1,000 millisieverts per hour of radioactivity. Even just two feet (60 centimeters) away, that figure dropped to 400 millisieverts. Workers have taken samples of the water in the pit and seawater and are analyzing them to determine the level of contamination.

Radiation quickly disperses in both air and water, and experts have said that it would be quickly diluted by the vast Pacific Ocean, where even large amounts have little effect. TEPCO is trying to pour concrete to seal the 8-inch-long (20-centimeter-long) crack, spokesman Takashi Kurita said.

"This could be one of the sources of seawater contamination," Nishiyama said. "There could be other similar cracks in the area, and we must find them as quickly as possible."

Radioactive iodine-131 at concentrations higher than the legal limit was first detected in waters off the plant more than a week ago. Readings released Saturday showed radiation in seawater had spread to 25 miles (40 kilometers) south of the plant; the concentration of iodine there was twice the legal limit, but officials stressed it was still well below levels that are dangerous to human health.

It wasn't immediately clear whether workers who have been rushing to bring the reactors under control were exposed. People living within 12 miles (20 kilometers) of the plant have been evacuated, and no fishing is taking place in the waters just off the plant.

Because of the evacuations, the plant workers have been the primary people exposed to the radiation leaks. One crew member described difficult conditions inside the complex in an interview published Saturday.

The plant has run out of the nylon protective booties that workers put over their shoes. Earlier, TEPCO acknowledged that the tsunami had destroyed many of the gauges used to measure radiation, forcing workers to share. More gauges have since arrived at the site.

"We only put something like plastic garbage bags you can buy at a convenience store and sealed them with masking tape," said the worker, who spoke to the national Mainichi newspaper. Such interviews have been exceedingly rare and always anonymous.

The worker also said the tsunami littered the grounds with dead fish that remained scattered throughout the plant, attracting birds.

Radiation concerns have rattled the Japanese public, already struggling to return to normal life after the earthquake-generated tsunami. Three weeks later, more than 165,000 people are living in shelters, while 260,000 households still do not have running water and 170,000 do not have electricity.

People whose houses are within the evacuation zone are growing increasingly frustrated and some have been sneaking back in. Government officials warned Friday that there were no plans to lift the evacuation order anytime soon.

After the quake, Tadashi and Ritsuko Yanai and their 1-month-old boy fled their home, which is six miles (10 kilometers) from the plant. Baby Kaon has grown accustomed to life in a shelter, but his parents haven't.

When asked if he had anything he would like to say to Kan, the 32-year-old father paused to think and then replied: "We want to go home. That's all, we just want to go home."

Thousands of families are also still awaiting news of their loved ones. More than 15,500 people are still missing.

U.S. and Japanese troops launched an all-out search of the coastline Friday for any remaining bodies in what could be their last chance to find those swept out to sea. They have found nearly 50 bodies since Friday, most floating in coastal waters. So far, 11,800 deaths have been confirmed.

Up and down the coast, helicopters, planes and boats carrying U.S. and Japanese troops scoured for the dead again Saturday.

Some bodies may have sunk and just now be resurfacing. Others may never be found.

Coast guard crews conducting similar searches rescued a dog Friday that was drifting on a rooftop. It took several hours to grab the dog because it initially scampered across other floating wreckage as crews winched down from a helicopter. It was unclear how long the dog had been at sea.

___

Yamaguchi reported from Tokyo. Associated Press writers Eric Talmadge in Koriyama, Jay Alabaster in Natori, and Ryan Nakashima, Mayumi Saito and Shino Yuasa in Tokyo contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

RIKUZENTAKATA, Japan — Highly radioactive water spilled into the ocean off a tsunami-damaged nuclear power plant Saturday, as Japan's prime minister surveyed the damage in a town gutted by the wave.
RIKUZENTAKATA, Japan — Highly radioactive water spilled into the ocean off a tsunami-damaged nuclear power plant Saturday, as Japan's prime minister surveyed the damage in a town gutted by the wave.
Filed by Adam Goldberg  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,046
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (83 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
03:23 AM on 04/04/2011
In case moderation circular canned my page 2

See the video here:

Sacramento Bee
Reexamine the Nuclear Safety Issues of Nuclear Power Generating Stations
Testimony to CA State Senate post Fuchiama

http://vid­eos.sacbee­.com/vmix_­hosted_app­s/p/media?­id=7442911­1

Now, good night!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
03:21 AM on 04/04/2011
Page 2

This is a money issue for Capital investment accumulators who are willing to sacrifice harm to public health so those who invest Capital can make a bundle at the reactor that destroys you.
It’s not rocket science.

To cap the case, look at this testimony given before the California State Senate last week about nuclear safety issues & earthquakes. CA should have never licensed Diablo & San Onofre.
But they used dumb pet tricks of semantics to cover their legal rear-ends in the event of a disaster. You see firsthand the extent to which these regulators play footsie for big money to put you at risk for unsafe nuke power.

See the video here:

Sacramento Bee
Reexamine the Nuclear Safety Issues of Nuclear Power Generating Stations
Testimony to CA State Senate post Fuchiama

http://videos.sacbee.com/vmix_hosted_apps/p/media?id=74429111

Now, good night!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
03:20 AM on 04/04/2011
Page 1
Besides Charles 77 as general proposition aside from specific peer reviewed scientific research that can be validated in this field I would prefer trusting information whose worst motivation is looking out for public health versus yourself who would rather discredit them apparently in favor of trusting your insider industry spokes people since they obviously have a much different motivation which happens to be your view based on your response to mine which is based on the paramount consideration for public health & damage to the environment, because that is what I did for 25+ years.

Any information I post is for your benefit that maybe someday it might hopefully save your life.
Your motivation in support of nuclear power is clearly with a much different motivation which is either harm to the public because I certainly do not know many people not cognizant of the fact that any exposure to radiation can cause cancer.

Yet you seem bent on furthering the use of something that in the face of the obvious that is clearly demonstrated does not pass muster for its adoption when we weigh the risk to public health & environment versus the cost benefit analysis to its adoption, when there are already safer, cleaner, more cost effective alternatives we can implement.
Quite frankly, the technology is obsolete.
photo
flygirl10
Live and let live--pain-free.
02:07 AM on 04/04/2011
"The government fully supports you until the end," Kan later told 250 people at an elementary school that is serving as an evacuation center.

Key words--"until the end"___may the gods smile upon us all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James McGill
03:34 PM on 04/04/2011
Japanese is a highly idiomatic language that often defies translation to English.
11:30 PM on 04/03/2011
It's why having nuclear power stations is like living near a volcano that hasn't erupted in forty years. See http://ofthisandthat.org/03302011zzz.html for all the ramifications.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James McGill
03:35 PM on 04/04/2011
I'd happily live the rest of my life within sight of Kilauea, but people aren't exactly giving away houses around there.
10:51 PM on 04/03/2011
Radioactive water found leaking into sea from pat at Japan nuclear plant. This can be devastating to say the least to all humankind! The effects of radiation sickness and poisoning include cancer, genetic and reproductive damage, hormonal damage, and thyroid blockage (that's why they want you to take potassium iodine, another dangerous toxin) but I wouldn't. There are much safer substances like Zeolites.

A couple good articles on radiation sickness protection that shows what you need do to test radiation levels, treat water, and what to take internally to not get sick:

Radiation Sickness

http://thehealingfrequency.com/japan-reactor-fukushima-nuclear-radiation-protection/

Water Purification

http://thehealingfrequency.com/nuclear-radiation-and-water-purification-tablet-adya-clarity-minerals/
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
07:48 PM on 04/03/2011
Miyagi Prefecture Environmental Monitoring Results

NOTE:(Requires your browser translator)

http://www.pref.miyagi.jp/gentai/Press/PressH230315-3(sokutei).html
07:41 PM on 04/03/2011
Medical voices on the disaster in Fukushima

http://www.ippnw-students.org/medicalvoices/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
07:24 PM on 04/03/2011
PAGE 3 of 3

"This means that the government is not justified in deregulating nuclear power and weapons waste—releasing it to regular trash or "recycling" it into everyday household items as proposed by 5 US federal agencies at the behest of nuclear waste generators hoping to save money," stated Diane D'Arrigo, Radioactive Waste Project Director at Nuclear Information and Resource Service Radioactive (NIRS).

"This also means that remediation of radioactive sites should be done to cleaner levels and that nuclear transport standards should be strengthened."

http://www.nirs.org/press/06-30-2005/1
charles77
Just the Facts Please
07:39 PM on 04/03/2011
LOL!

The nirs is an anti-nuclear activst group. They are not a science based group of any kind. They make all their money from fundraising from people opposed to all nucklear power. Check your sources before you quote then as a factual source.

http://www.nirs.org/about/nirs.htm
07:58 PM on 04/03/2011
So...you are in favor of "deregulati­ng nuclear power and weapons waste—rele­asing it to regular trash or "recycling­" it into everyday household items as proposed by 5 US federal agencies at the behest of nuclear waste generators hoping to save money?"

What specifically do you dispute in the comment?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
07:59 PM on 04/03/2011
It's pretty clear then this is not your field as it was mine for over 25 years. Iam not about to pull all my caes studies out from working at INEL the Idaho National Engr. Lab North Americas premiere Research DOE Facility where I worked.

You don't work in the Nuclear Risk Management field asI have for so many years of personal war stories to completely discredit your statement which is why this is the last rent space I will give you on this but suffice it to say that as Technical Engineering for Emergency Response Training & Preparedness the facts speak for themselves.

Anything as inherently harmful to public health had better have people looking out for public health interests, because the industry will not. Anyone who would build that many reactors that in the event of a crisis is unable to evacuate 147 million people is not looking out for your the health & safety of human health risk as your certainly not.
Too much epidemiology is out there now for you to have any credibility. Your one liners won't hold water in the face of the obvious facts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
07:23 PM on 04/03/2011
PAGE 2 of 3

The BEIR VII risk numbers indicate that about 1 in 100 members of the public would get cancer if exposed to 100 millirads (1milliGray) per year for a 70-year lifetime. [1]

Essentially the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's allowable radiation dose for members of the public.

In addition, 1 in about 5 workers [2] would get cancer if exposed to the legally allowable occupational doses [3] over their 50 years in the workforce. These risks are much higher than permitted for other carcinogens.

Specifically, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission allows members of the public to get 100 millirems or mr (1 milliSievert or mSv) per year of radiation in addition to background. The BEIR VII report (page 500, Table 12-9) estimates that this level will result in approximately 1 (1.142) cancer in every 100 people exposed at 100 mr/yr which includes 1 fatal cancer in every 175 people so exposed (5.7 in 1000).[4]

The risk of getting cancer from radiation (in BEIR VII) is increased by about a third from current government risk figures (FGR13): BEIR VII estimates that 11.42 people will get cancer if 10,000 are each exposed to a rem (1,000 millirems or 10 mSv). The US Environmental Protection Agency Federal Guidance Report 13 estimates that 8.46 people will get cancer if 10,000 are each exposed to a rem.

The Nuclear Information & Resource Service interprets this as further evidence that unnecessary radiation exposures should be avoided.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
07:20 PM on 04/03/2011
PAGE 1 of 4

All Levels of Radiation Confirmed to Cause Cancer.
http://www.nirs.org/press/06-30-2005/1

Among the reports conclusions are:

There is no safe level or threshold of ionizing radiation exposure.

Even exposure to background radiation causes some cancers. Additional exposures cause additional risks.

Radiation causes other health effects such as heart disease and stroke, and further study is needed to predict the doses that result in these non-cancer health effects.

The "bystander effect" is an additional, newly recognized method by which radiation injures cells that were not directly hit but are in the vicinity of those that were. "Genomic instability" can be caused by exposure to low doses of radiation and according to the report "might contribute significantly to radiation cancer risk." These new mechanisms for radiation damage were not included in the risk estimates reported by the BEIR VII report, but were recommended for further study

The Linear-No-Threshold model (LNT) for predicting health effects from radiation (dose-response) is retained, meaning that every exposure causes some risk and that risks are generally proportional to dose.

The Dose and Dose-Rate Effectiveness Factor or DDREF which had been suggested in the 1990 BEIR V report to be applied at low doses, has been reduced from 2 to 1.5.

That means the projected number of health effects at low doses are greater than previously thought. RADIATION RISKIER THAN THOUGHT-- RISKS TO PUBLIC and NUCLEAR WORKERS
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
07:14 PM on 04/03/2011
PAGE 1 of 2
Despite clamor, fallout study still unreleased
By Peter Eisler, USA TODAY

“A wide range of highly radioactive elements, some of which remain dangerous for hundreds of years, fell over large swaths of the country. "Any person living in the contiguous United States since 1951 has been exposed to radioactive fallout," the study reports, "and all organs and tissues of the body have received some radiation exposure."
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/02/28/usat-nuke-sidebar.htm

All Levels of Radiation Confirmed to Cause Cancer.

Among the reports conclusions are:
There is no safe level or threshold of ionizing radiation exposure.

Even exposure to background radiation causes some cancers. Additional exposures cause additional risks.

Radiation causes other health effects such as heart disease and stroke, and further study is needed to predict the doses that result in these non-cancer health effects.

http://www.nirs.org/press/06-30-2005/1

Cesium fallout from Fukushima rivals Chernobyl
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20305-caesium-fallout-from-fukushima-rivals-chernobyl.html
http://www.newscientist.com/special/fukushima-crisis

IAEA says Fukushima fallout warrants more evacuation
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20324-iaea-says-fukushima-fallout-warrants-more-evacuation.html

THE CARCINOGENIC, MUTAGENIC, TERATOGENIC AND TRANSMUTATIONAL EFFECTS OF TRITIUM

CITIZENS AWARENESS NETWORK
A P R I L 1 9 9 4
Updated January 2001
http://www.ipsecinfo.org/Tritium.htm
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
charles77
Just the Facts Please
08:46 PM on 04/03/2011
The USA Today story DOES NOT say "All Levels of Radiation Confirmed to Cause Cancer" at all, I just read it.

It says:

"In the most-affected counties, the fallout exposure for an average person would be roughly equivalent to receiving one chest X-ray for every year of residency since 1951. Just one such X-ray is more radiation than doctors typically recommend for infants and pregnant women."

"Many areas that weren't thought to have suffered much fallout from the nuclear trials at the Nevada Test Site, including parts of California and the Pacific Northwest, now appear to have suffered significant fallout from nuclear tests in the Pacific and the former Soviet Union. Moreover, some areas that suffered substantial amounts of fallout from the Nevada tests, such as parts of north and central Idaho, actually were hit with additional fallout from the tests in other parts of the world."

And this story is about Nuclear BOMB tests in the atmosphere! NO ONE is suggesting we do that!

The newscientist and IAEA links are creditable, but they DO NOT say, "All Levels of Radiation Confirmed to Cause Cancer".

Only the anti-nuke protest group says that. Find a creditable link before you make such extreme claims, and if it were true, you better get away from that computer screen fast!
charles77
Just the Facts Please
03:02 PM on 04/03/2011
Discussion on energy policy with Pickens and Richardson coming up on CNN in a few minutes.
05:32 PM on 04/03/2011
"The crack was apparently caused by the quake and may have been leaking since then, said spokesman Osamu Yokokura of Tokyo Electric Power Co., which runs the plant."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/02/japan-nuclear-plant-radioactive-water-leak-sea_n_8439

charles77 on Mar 27, 2011 at 15:08:50
“Well you do realize these plants survived the eartquake just fine don't you?

They shut down, backup power started for cooling and everything was fine.

Then the wave flooded the backup generators­­, because they were on the ground, not one a roof like they should have been. That will be fixed.

This had NOTHING to do with an earthquake damaging these reactors, they withstood it perfectly.­”
charles77
Just the Facts Please
06:22 PM on 04/03/2011
What I said is true. Dr Chu gave a interview and his information is that the plants operated with no problems until the power ran out in the backup batteries. The crack is in an underground concrete electrical conduit that is only designed to protect the electrical cables, not be water tight. The entire electrical conduit underground network was flooded with the millions of gallons seawater poured over the reactor and spent fuel rod pools.

If the backup generators would not have been flooded and functioned, these conduits would not have water in them. That is the truth as I understand it. We will find out, this will be studied at length.
charles77
Just the Facts Please
06:33 PM on 04/03/2011
I am glad you are here I wanted to make a couple of points to you to think about.

I realize you would be willing to make do with less power and pay more for it. Most are not and Obama and all political leaders must deal with that reality.

There was a survey done during the AGW UN conference, when concern was the highest.

People were asked, do you support switching to green energy, 78% said yes.

And all supporters of green energy took that number and ran with it. But the survey asked more questions.

Would you support green energy if electric bills go up 10%….65% Yes
Would you support green energy if electric bills go up 20%….57% Yes
Would you support green energy if electric bills go up 30%….45% Yes

Most people will not accept less energy, and they will not support paying much more for it.
There is only one way to switch the 75% of our electricity generated from fossil to CO2 free power without raising costs much, I think you know what that is.

That is why carbon taxes could not be passed even with that Dem super majority last year. That is why all climate talks fail. All would raise energy prices. And every political leader, in every part of the world, knows the people will fight back.

I am going to give you some examples from very liberal places in another comment, I am out of words.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
07:30 PM on 04/03/2011
They need an unbiased epidemiologist from the European Union specializing in the Dose Response characteristics of exposure to ionizing radiation to engage in that discussion
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
termgirl
terminate nuclear power
05:28 PM on 04/04/2011
Thank you for all of your posts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlteSoldier
My Micro is micro
03:00 PM on 04/03/2011
More information about situation on the ground in Japan......

http://www.fairewinds.com/updates
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James McGill
03:50 PM on 04/03/2011
So when is the Fairewinds guy going to visit the site and assess the damage firsthand? He is claiming to be one of the few people qualified to do that, has he offered to go? Was he refused?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
07:31 PM on 04/03/2011
Was that the fella yesterday who was willing to donate his 60k frequent flyer miles to the first taker to go?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
02:37 AM on 04/04/2011
Hey Arnie Duncan is an outstanding informative guy in this field. I remember him from the 3mi days.

He has been on DemocracyNow.org periodically. That video update on spontaneous nuke reactions going on giving off neutrons to workers in the area is not good news. It also even though he did not specifically allude to it means if it is not addressed could possibly lead to fire & explosion.

I am beginning to get the feeling Reactor#1 may in fact become the dark horse devil in all this if TEPCO does not remedy this situation ASAP. Kudos for the Update by AD. Gracia's.

F & F