iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Prison Sexual Assault Reforms Won't Cover Immigrant Detention Centers

Detention Center

First Posted: 04/03/11 09:50 AM ET Updated: 06/03/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Time is running out for the public to weigh in on a proposed Department of Justice rule that would not include immigrant detention centers in corrections-system standards designed to prevent rape and other forms of sexual assault.

Based on a report from the National Prison Rape Elimination Commission created under President George W. Bush, the new policy would apply a broad range of hiring and workplace standards to adult prisons and jails, local-level lockups and community confinement areas, as well as juvenile facilities. The policy would require background checks on new hires, for example, and forbid hiring workers with a history of sexual abuse. It would also mandate the development of systems to facilitate the reporting of sexual assault in such facilities.

But the new standards would not apply to immigrant detention centers or facilities that house unaccompanied immigrant children -- because, the Justice Department says, they are principally under the purview of other federal agencies -- despite reports of sexual assault.

The public comment period on the proposed rule, first released by Attorney General Eric Holder's office in January, runs through Monday. Human rights activists say immigrant detention centers are a key group of facilities in need of tougher standards, arguing that immigrants are particularly vulnerable to rape and other sexual assault and especially likely to leave it unreported.

Human Rights Watch and 10 other advocacy groups sent a letter to President Barack Obama in February asking him to include immigrant detention centers in the standard, and many advocates are submitting comments on the proposed rule.

"Rape is rape, whether in a federal prison, a local lockup, or an immigration detention facility," Jamie Fellner, senior counsel at Human Rights Watch, said in a statement regarding the letter to Obama. "By excluding these detainees, the attorney general's proposed standards put an already vulnerable population at even greater risk than the general prison population."

Justice Department officials did not respond to requests for comment for this report, but have argued that the exclusion is a procedural matter. The Department of Homeland Security operates immigrant detention centers, while unaccompanied, undocumented children are often housed in facilities run by the Department of Health and Human Services.

But logistical issues do not obviate the need for protections against sexual abuse, advocates say. Although there is no empirical data on the rates of sexual assault in immigrant detention centers, there have been numerous reports of such incidents.

Last summer, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials acknowledged that they were investigating reports that a guard at T. Don Hutto Facility in Taylor, Texas, had sexually assaulted a number of women on their way to deportation. One of the women reported the sexual assault when she arrived at the airport, and the guard was arrested in August on five charges.

Many such cases are likely to remain unaddressed, partly because immigrant detention facilities often do not provide detainees information about how sexual assault is defined or how it can be reported, according to Michelle Brané, the director of the detention and asylum program for the Women's Refugee Commission.

"Immigration detainees are particularly vulnerable to sexual assault because their jailer is also making a decision about deporting them," said Brané, whose advocacy group is housed within the International Rescue Committee. "That makes it that much more difficult for someone to say something."

There are also a number of other constraints sexual abuse reporting for immigrants, Brané said. Many do not speak English or fear that reporting abuse will lead to deportation. In the cases where immigrants are deported, they have few options for reporting abuse that occurred while they were in detention.

And on a core level, Brané argued, exempting immigration detention centers sets a "disturbing" precedent. "Basically it is saying it is unacceptable for rape to be occurring in prisons where you're holding people for criminal convictions, but it's not unacceptable for civil facilities holding immigrants who are awaiting deportation," she said.

Comments can be submitted online via Regulations.gov.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Time is running out for the public to weigh in on a proposed Department of Justice rule that would not include immigrant detention centers in corrections-system standards designed to pre...
WASHINGTON -- Time is running out for the public to weigh in on a proposed Department of Justice rule that would not include immigrant detention centers in corrections-system standards designed to pre...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:19 AM on 04/04/2011
This objection belongs to the category 'not helpful'. Rape is bad whenever it occurs, but only a cretin should object to law that addresses one context because it fails to addresses all others,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cornel
wuf wuf
11:06 PM on 04/03/2011
And I thought that anybody on US soil was suppose to have a right to be safe ! I guess I watch too much Law and Order ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
moutonnoir
iconoclastic demagoguery
02:07 AM on 04/04/2011
the world view of law and order is the one that views "criminals" as being a black and white thing.. they are a thing, not people.

here in reality all criminals are also people.. though they may not seem it.. furthermore not all incarcerated people are "guilty" of anything.. and most importantly: the culture we have thrives on these stories of prisonrape.. to our society it makes perfect sense to further traumatize people that, if we dont help them while they are part of an orderly system - they will just victimize us again!
08:34 PM on 04/03/2011
Maybe I read the article wrong, but the detention centres mentioned don't seem to be only for illegal aliens. They seem to be for immigrants whose cases haven't been DECIDED yet. They're not waiting to be deported; they're waiting to hear whether they're going to be accepted as landed immigrants.
Now this should have LESS than no impact on their treatment. They're human beings, they're on US soil, and they're totally dependent on the staff of the facilities - common decency, not to mention some pretty hefty legislation, demands that they be treated as human beings, not as animals. Notwithstanding, some people seem to think it makes a difference, or else they wouldn't have brought up the topic. And, although it makes little sense to argue about something irrelevant to the main issue, I do feel I need to point it out to these people: the immigrants in question are NOT illegal; they are awaiting the decision as to whether they can stay. As such, they are not criminals, and a number of them may well be your fellow-citizens someday. If we're all willing to admit that prisoners convicted of crimes don't deserve to be sexually assaulted (and they don't!), how can anyone then argue that people who HAVEN'T been convicted of crimes deserve any less protection?
04:12 PM on 04/03/2011
Let's hope this oversight gets corrected asap. Anyone else having visions of abu ghraib?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SLS11
Its all there, if we just open our eyes...
08:37 PM on 04/03/2011
Having just read this article, I am actually speechless.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:36 PM on 04/03/2011
I suppose Justice stops the moment DHS steps in. What a disgraceful legacy Holder and co. are leaving- fully as shameful as their predecessors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lawrence Kurnarsky
Wriiter, film director, teacher.
02:53 PM on 04/03/2011
"The policy would require background checks on new hires, for example, and forbid hiring workers with a history of sexual abuse. It would also mandate the development of systems to facilitate the reporting of sexual assault in such facilities." Now why wouldn't all involved parties simply state that they are in favor of this policy for all prisons and all detention centers? Is there anyone in power in favor of sexually assaulting anyone, including children, anywhere? If so, they should just man-up and say so.

Otherwise, no one should have any other policy than taking all necessary measures to stop all the sexual assaults in prisons and detention centers, which are, as nearly everyone will, at least, privately, acknowledge, are common occurrences, and are even employed as almost conventionally as a means to reward, control, intimidate, and punish inmates, as well as a perk for guards.
12:30 PM on 04/03/2011
I don't think DoJ did anything wrong here. DoJ adopted policies that apply to the organizations under DoJ purview (e.g., BoP). DoJ can't impose its rules on ICE/Homeland Security. It's up to the President to adopt the DoJ rules across the executive branch, which he can and should do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brandon Baier
brandon_baier
01:41 PM on 04/03/2011
WOW if you didnt hit the nail on the head there. Think about what your admitting to as long as the Private Prison Lobbies exist to provide money to pass legislation that leads to incarceration for income.
"DoJ can't impose its rules on ICE/Homela­nd Security"
So why then does it throw millions at and in favor of Arizona's SB 1070? Because in theory they can operate outside the DoJ jurisdiction, and as long as they send the money to Washington... Washington looks the other way. Now this is a scary thought also, and even I have been a proponant of Ron Paul, but talk of removing the DoJ and similar government agencies is being tossed around Capitol Hill lately and I wonder at that point... Who runs the prisons? The private sector right? Hmmmm the same Private Prisons who Lobby incarceration fpor income? Isnt that Fascism... minus the dictatator, and if the leader is controlled by the lobbies (Obama got alot from Goldman-Sachs lol, twice as much as McCain roughly) and now Corporations can spend at will to get people in office. Since they all have the same interest (making money) passing legislation becomes simple, "do what makes you more money", could that lead to thought crime (forgive the Orwellian it popped in there)?
Befor you go saying I am paranoid, I have posted plenty of articles and references to proove my point, this dehumanizing is the begining. "First they came." google it.
02:22 PM on 04/03/2011
You're not making much sense here. DoJ is adopting certain policies (which you presumably favor). The original author is criticizing DoJ for not applying those policies to the Department of Homeland Security. DoJ doesn't have the authority to impose its policies on other federal agencies, but the President does. Accordingly, the correct target of criticism is the President, not DoJ, in this instance. You don't really address that argument.

Your invoking SB 1070 in this instance does you no credit, since the DoJ (and ICE, for that matter) position is that SB 1070 is unconstitutional, with DoJ having won an injunction prohibiting enforcement of many of its provisions pending a decision on the merits. See United States v. Arizona, et al., U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona Case No. CV 10-1413-PHX-SRB. See also the filings at the end of this page: http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/July/10-opa-776.html.

You may find a copy of the injunction here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/34999529/Ruling.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
Black Democrat
09:40 AM on 04/03/2011
I have a question, we are talking about illegal alien detention centers, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Beth Hefty
If I didn't laugh I'd slit my wrists
10:15 AM on 04/03/2011
Yes, but that doesn't mean that they are any less deserving of protection against sexual assault. Rape is rape no matter who the victim.
photo
Soule23
Anti-micro-biol
11:56 AM on 04/03/2011
Spy doesn't tend to regard undocumented detainees as human beings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atexasdem
Pointing out the foolishness of republican voters.
12:48 PM on 04/03/2011
I think that spy tends to regard these places as a "resource".
photo
Soule23
Anti-micro-biol
12:21 PM on 04/03/2011
Whatever happened to ILLEGAL is ILLEGAL? Rape is every bit as ILLEGAL when committed against undocumented detainees as when committed against US Citizens. Your depravity knows no bounds.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
01:11 PM on 04/03/2011
RAPE is RAPE ~ MURDER is MURDER for all illegal foreign nationals, no matter in what country?

http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/report/widespread-abuse-migrants-mexico-human-rights-crisis-2010-04-27
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brandon Baier
brandon_baier
01:20 PM on 04/03/2011
Legal is a relative term now didnt you know. Relative to the Fascist interest that is. Take a look at who is spending money on the legislation regarding the incarceration. The Private Prison Lobbies, who do nothing but perpetuate incarceration for income, a blatant conflict of interest when considering the legislative power of one of the biggest and fast growing Lobbies in America, and their very existence is evil.
in Texas:
http://www.texasprisonbidness.org/tags/private-prison-lobby
in Arizona:
http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2010/10/28-2
http://news.change.org/stories/private-prison-lobby-behind-arizonas-immigration-law
http://tucsoncitizen.com/cell-out-arizona/2010/10/28/linking-the-private-prison-lobby-to-arizona-yet-again/
In California:
http://www.capitolweekly.net/article.php?xid=yl82yoctf9d1au
In Ohio:
http://www.correctionalnews.com/articles/2011/02/2/ohio-gov-s-former-advisor-lobby-state-cca
in New York:
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=867

And just in general:
http://www.judgejimgray.com/ (who wrote a book that was endorsed by Ariana Huffington hersefl)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8289

One of the articles even references Gulag type pratices, so anyone who doubts that the Fascist agenda is a growing force in America either cant read or doesnt want to look at the Obsurd things the DHS can arrest you for these days, rally its as simple as that. To be honest, they could arrest me for posting this thread with the right litigator, FFT.