More

UN Still Standing By Controversial Israel Report After Author Backtracks

Richard Goldstone

FRANK JORDANS   04/ 4/11 02:01 PM ET   AP

GENEVA — The U.N.'s top human rights body that commissioned an investigation of Israel's 2009 incursion into Gaza will continue to treat it as a legitimate working document, even though the lead author has backtracked from some of the report's most damning allegations against Israel.

Israel has called for the report to be withdrawn after Richard Goldstone, a former South African judge and U.N. war crimes prosecutor, said in an op-ed piece that he was reconsidering the conclusion that Israel deliberately targeted civilians during the three-week offensive against Palestinian militant group Hamas.

A spokesman for the U.N. Human Rights Council said for the report to be withdrawn Goldstone would have to submit a formal request to the Geneva-based body, which he has not done.

"U.N. reports are not canceled on the basis of an op-ed in a newspaper," spokesman Cedric Sapey told The Associated Press.

Various resolutions passed by the Geneva-based council and the U.N. General Assembly in New York would also have to be repealed by those bodies, he said.

Last month, a majority of the Human Rights Council's 47 members voted to pass the report up to the General Assembly, recommending that it ask the powerful U.N. Security Council to submit it to prosecutors at the International Criminal Court.

Such a move is unlikely to pass the Security Council, where Israel's strongest ally, the United States, has a veto. But the mere suggestion of bringing war crimes charges against Israel has angered the government there.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told his Cabinet that Goldstone's article, published in The Washington Post over the weekend, was a rare instance "in which those who disseminate libels retract their libel."

"This leads us to call for the immediate cancellation of the Goldstone report," Netanyahu said.

Goldstone's decision to reconsider the conclusions of the report came as a surprise to at least one other member of the four-person panel that authored the document.

"I probably didn't expect to see the comments he made, to be honest," Desmond Travers told the AP in a telephone interview, adding he had not been consulted beforehand.

Travers, a former officer in the Irish Armed Forces and an expert on international criminal investigations, said he hadn't seen the Israeli investigative reports that prompted Goldstone to backtrack on parts of his conclusion, though he acknowledged it might be valid to do so.

"But the tenor of the report in its entirety, in my opinion, stands," Travers said.

Reached by email, Goldstone declined to be interviewed.

The Goldstone report, released in September 2009, concluded that both Israel and Hamas committed potential war crimes and possible crimes against humanity. The findings triggered outrage in Israel and a personal campaign against Goldstone – a respected South African Jewish jurist with close ties to Israel.

Israel attacked the Gaza Strip in an offensive known as "Operation Cast Lead" in response to years of almost daily rocket fire from the Gaza Strip at southern Israel.

Some 1,400 Palestinians, including hundreds of civilians, and 13 Israelis were killed during the campaign. Israel has blamed Hamas for the heavy civilian toll, saying the militant group staged attacks from heavily populated residential areas, as well as mosques and schools.

In his article, Goldstone lamented Israel's refusal to cooperate with the U.N. investigation.

"I regret that our fact-finding mission did not have such evidence explaining the circumstances in which we said civilians in Gaza were targeted, because it probably would have influenced our findings about intentionality and war crimes," he wrote.

Human rights groups said regardless of the intention, Israeli officers should still be held responsible for indiscriminately targeting areas where civilians were present.

"If investigations don't progress at the domestic level, then there is a need for international justice," said Julie de Rivero of New York-based Human Rights Watch.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

GENEVA — The U.N.'s top human rights body that commissioned an investigation of Israel's 2009 incursion into Gaza will continue to treat it as a legitimate working document, even though the lead...
GENEVA — The U.N.'s top human rights body that commissioned an investigation of Israel's 2009 incursion into Gaza will continue to treat it as a legitimate working document, even though the lead...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 899
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
09:12 AM on 05/28/2011
Send the Israelis to the Hague! The Israelis are committing nothing short of genocide payed for by my own Aipac controlled government.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OneTop
Uh, is that a beer hall?
01:34 PM on 04/14/2011
Goldstone report: Statement issued by members of UN mission on Gaza war
Thursday 14 April 2011 08.17 BST
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/apr/14/goldstone-report-statement-un-gaza
09:25 PM on 04/06/2011
GOLDSTONE: while Israel's lengthy and nontransparent investigations raise concerns, their conclusions about the cause of civilian deaths would have nevertheless been taken into account and probably influenced our report if Israel had cooperated with our investigation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trollstein
Once you go Schwartz, you never go back baby
05:52 PM on 04/06/2011
Much as I hate to admit it, the UN should not be retracting official documents based on OpEd articles. But Goldstone and/or someone else with standing to do so should request the retraction.
(I still stand by my position that the report was patently flawed from the beginning for about a dozen major and two dozen minor reasons and should have never seen ink.) But now it is official and needs to be officially withdrawn.
Those who think the UN is going to save the world are in for quite a shock. It (if anything) will be like an empty grade school without teachers, where the children spend their days acting out "Lord of the Horse Flies" while their parents (we) think they are safe and being educated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shingo
06:45 PM on 04/06/2011
>> But Goldstone and/or someone else with standing to do so should request the retraction­.

Goldstone has just told the AP in an interview that he doesn't see any reason to retract it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trollstein
Once you go Schwartz, you never go back baby
07:31 PM on 04/06/2011
Lovely. The USA is a member of the Human Rights Council and should ask for it to be retracted.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths2/exclusives.html#a154
""Goldstone now accepts that “civilians were not intentionally targeted [by Israel] as a matter of policy” and that in the aftermath of having thousands of rockets and missiles fired at its cities, Israel had the “right and obligation to defend itself and its citizens against such attacks.” In fact, as Colonel Richard Kemp, former Commander British Forces in Afghanistan, testified to the Goldstone committee in 2009, “The IDF did more to safeguard the rights of civilians in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare.”
Jews are not judged based on other human conduct. We are judged based on some (false) alligation that we claim to somehow be superior and therefore must greatly surpass the conduct of all other nations.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shingo
10:09 PM on 04/06/2011
>> The USA is a member of the Human Rights Council and should ask for it to be retracted.

On what grounds? Israel has not shared any of it's evidecne with them and until it does, it's heresay. The Independent Committee of Experts have concluded that the investigations are structurally flawed and unlikely to yield effective measures of accountability and justice.

In other words, it's a witewash.
05:24 PM on 04/06/2011
I sincerely wish for one thing only: peace between the state of Israel and the state of Palestine. There can be no other solution. There must be peace.
10:42 AM on 04/10/2011
That's the real issue statehood. Palestine is working on gaining just that. Israel will do anything in it's power to prevent it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
03:02 PM on 04/06/2011
In terms of the UN so-called human rights council, let's remember the following facts (from wikipedia):

.

The General Assembly established the UNHRC by adopting a resolution (A/RES/60/251) on 15 March 2006, in order to replace the previous CHR, which had been heavily criticised for allowing countries with poor human rights records to be members.[1][2]

According to human rights groups, the council is controlled by a bloc of Islamic and African states, backed by China, Cuba and Russia, who protect each other from criticism.[3] UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon and former High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson have criticized the council for acting according to political considerations as opposed to human rights. Specifically, Secretaries General Kofi Annan and Ban Ki Moon, the council's president Doru Costea, the European Union, Canada and the United States have accused the council of focusing disproportionately on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.[4][5][6]

Here are some of the human rights luminaries on the council: Saudi, Jordan, Nigeria, Russia, Cuba, and China.

So, let's have some perspective both about the original report and about the credibility of this council to do anything with the Goldstone report now that he has disavowed one of its most serious allegations against the Israeli government at the time.

Not to say Israel shouldn't strive for doing better and better limiting civilian casualties. They should. But Israel is not the monster its detractors like to think.

Current human rights luminaries on the council:
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shingo
10:09 PM on 04/06/2011
Irrelevant.

Next...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
09:51 AM on 04/07/2011
Only to a closed mind.
05:28 AM on 04/07/2011
You are barking up the wrong tree.
Go back and look up the actual members who investigated and authored the report.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
12:51 PM on 04/07/2011
And consider their environment, fellow co-workers, pressure to tow the line, and their ultimate audience: the council as a whole.

Go to a university faculty, or a business conference. There's a mindset to adhere to, and it's hard to escape.

Israel is a middle eastern country. People forget that because it strives to be better and more like Europe and North America. Good on them for that. But Israel is not in Europe or North America. And its people are neither North American or European. Yes, it has American immigrants, but they are a minority. Yes, its earliest founders in the 1800s were middle class Europeans, but that was a long time ago. Yes, it had a massive influx of Europeans after WWII, but they were mostly eastern Europeans. And they were followed by an equally massive influx of Jewish Arabs expelled from their homes.

If viewed on an equal plane: Israel is the best country in the middle east on human rights, freedoms, treatment of minorities, conduct during war, avoidance of war crimes etc. Can it do better? Absolutely. Is the occupation bad? Yep. But the Arab world currently has nothing on it in any of these areas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wisdo
semantics shamantics
12:30 PM on 04/06/2011
Controversial only in Israel and the US.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:35 AM on 04/06/2011
Richard Goldstone said, he did not intend to seek the report's nullification.

"As appears from the Washington Post article, information subsequent to publication of the report did meet with the view that one correction should be made with regard to intentionality on the part of Israel," the judge said. "Further information as a result of domestic investigations could lead to further reconsideration, but as presently advised I have no reason to believe any part of the report needs to be reconsidered at this time."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:21 AM on 04/06/2011
The report should remain as is forever as a glorious example of UN policy towards to Israel: That accuracy and truth are not as important as condemnation for the sake of condemnation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:40 AM on 04/06/2011
Wow! I suppose that accounts for the emigration.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wisdo
semantics shamantics
12:31 PM on 04/06/2011
read the report : it calls for investigation into claims of war crimes, it does not make any judgements as it is not in itself meant to replace a real investigation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shingo
02:42 AM on 04/06/2011
it looks like ISrael jumped the gun on this one.

Goldstone won't seek Gaza report nullification
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20110406/ml-israel-un-report/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:04 AM on 04/06/2011
Doesn't really make a difference... The report was always just symbolic and equally dubious. Now that it's lack of credibility is on record, its symbolism is even greater. Something like the minutes of the trial of a cow in a butcher shop.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shingo
03:27 AM on 04/06/2011
Wishful thinking

Now that the dust has settled, people are asking how it is that a man who prides himself on being so meticulous in his investigations has accepted the investigation of the IDF by the IDF at face value, when the evidence has not been shown to him or the public.

What's behind Goldstone's flip-flop?
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinionla/la-ed-goldstone-20110404,0,4784231.story
05:35 AM on 04/07/2011
550 pages are symbolic?
I suppose you are even handed in your rejection and discount all instances of Hamas misbehavior as well?
01:23 AM on 04/06/2011
It was irrelevant then, and it's irrelevant now. I don't why anyone should care about what comes out of that snake pit.
The UN is a place for toiletless, dress-wearing men, who are dictators of third world countries to trash democracies who feed their people. It's a far cry from the ideals it once represented, and has finished it's historic role. It's time to pull out of there and form a club for democracies, with population based representation.
Dictatorships can be observers if they'd like, but would not be able to use the taxpayer money of western nations to fund a pulpit from which to trash democracy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shingo
01:58 AM on 04/06/2011
>> The UN is a place for toiletless­, dress-wear­ing men,

Thanks for confirming your rabid racism.
02:32 AM on 04/06/2011
Being a third world hellhole is not reserved to any race or ethnicity. it comes from whites in Belarussia and Moldova, to Asians in Burma, and Africans in Congo. It's a global multi-ethnic problem.
But I can understand how someone who see the world only in terms of races can fail to make that distinction. This shows more about you than it does about me.
02:13 AM on 04/06/2011
“The prohibitio­n ‘Thou Shalt Not Murder’” applies only “to a Jew who kills a Jew,” write Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur of the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar. Non-Jews are “uncompass­ionate by nature” and attacks on them “curb their evil inclinatio­n,” while babies and children of Israel’s enemies may be killed since “it is clear that they will grow to harm us.”

From a nation with a grand history of assassinating United nations representatives
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
10:15 AM on 04/06/2011
If you're referring to Folke Bernadotte, He was a nazi collaborator. His assassination in Israel was the result not of his role as a UN mediator but of his role in the Holocaust.
He was in a position to rescue people out of concentration camps but refused to rescue Jews, viewing Jews as an enemy.

Some context hasn't hurt anyone so far.
01:14 AM on 04/06/2011
“The prohibition ‘Thou Shalt Not Murder’” applies only “to a Jew who kills a Jew,” write Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur of the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar. Non-Jews are “uncompassionate by nature” and attacks on them “curb their evil inclination,” while babies and children of Israel’s enemies may be killed since “it is clear that they will grow to harm us.”

“The King’s Torah (Torat Hamelech), Part One: Laws of Life and Death between Israel and the Nations,” a 230-page compendium of Halacha, or Jewish religious law, published by the Od Yosef Chai yeshiva in Yitzhar, garnered a front-page exposé in the Israeli tabloid Ma’ariv, which called it the stuff of “Jewish terror.”

Read more: http://www.forward.com/articles/123925/#ixzz1IiVeup8P

Yet, both Metzger and his Sephardic counterpart, Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar, have declined to comment on the book, which debuted in November, while other prominent rabbis have endorsed it — among them, the son of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, Sephardic Jewry’s preeminent leader. Also, despite the precedent set by previous Israeli attorneys general in the last decade and a half to file criminal charges against settler rabbis who publish commentaries supporting violence against non-Jews, Attorney General Menachem Mazuz has so far remained mum about “The King’s Torah.”

huh..but they scream bloody murder about anti-semitical remarks...
11:20 AM on 04/10/2011
We hear so much about the evils of Sharia law and so very little about Halakha.
11:13 PM on 04/05/2011
Horowitz finds the Experts’ Report says something very different:

“This claim is directly contradicted by the experts’ report. In fact, they point to Israel’s unwillingness, and in fact inability, to investigate the policies of the Israeli military as the greatest fault of the Israeli investigation to this point. The report specifically says, “The Committee reiterates the conclusion of its previous report that there is no indication that Israel has opened investigations into the actions of those who designed, planned, ordered and oversaw Operation Cast Lead.” This implies the entire question of policy has been left unaddressed. This is really disappointing from Judge Goldstone, and will most likely be used to attack the one of the Goldstone Report’s most important charges that Israel executed an intentional strategy to attack Gaza’s civilian infrastructure.”
photo
SaneUSA
American, Jew, Zionist.
12:23 AM on 04/06/2011
Geez slow down there Captain Cut 'n Paste.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
11:05 PM on 04/05/2011
A nice scathing editorial in the Boston Globe

"Goldstone’s investigation was a one-sided sham"
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2011/04/06/goldstones_investigation_was_a_one_sided_sham/
11:25 PM on 04/05/2011
written by Jeff jacoby a noted anti-islamists and zionist...shocking
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
10:20 AM on 04/06/2011
And absolutely factual and correct on each point.
11:36 PM on 04/05/2011
also written by Jacoby...

"Statehood for Palestine? Take a good look"
"The undeniable Jewish state"
"Welcome to Camp Hate"
Arafat the monster"

In 1999, he became the first recipient of the Breindel Prize, a $10,000 award (since increased to $20,000) for excellence in opinion journalism awarded by Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation. In 2004, he received the Thomas Paine Award of the libertarian law firm the Institute for Justice, an award presented to journalists "who dedicate their work to the preservation and championing of individual liberty."[1] In December 2009, he was presented by the Zionist Organization of America with its Ben Hecht Award
10:57 PM on 04/05/2011
“Many things that were originally part of the report are still out there as nagging questions for Israel to answer,” said Sarit Michaeli, spokeswoman for B’Tselem, an Israeli human rights group. “Most Israelis don’t know about what happened in Cast Lead. There is still the need for an independent and effective inquiry into our conduct there.”

Others, even among harsh critics of the report, acknowledge that the report did push the Israeli military into more rigorous investigations. “Clearly, the Goldstone report was the catalyst,” Gerald Steinberg, a political science professor and director of NGO Monitor, a pro-Israel advocacy group that tracks the work of nongovernmental organizations critical of Israel, said of the military investigations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cyrus Trance
10:55 PM on 04/05/2011
Obvious bias by the UN, the same UN that holds Israel to a higher standard than any nation in the world ten times over.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shingo
11:59 PM on 04/05/2011
>> Obvious bias by the UN, the same UN that holds Israel to a higher standard than any nation in the world ten times over.

I agree. They should definitely apologize to Iran for the sanctions it has inflicted on them and for the apapaling double standards is has displayed by not sanctioning Israel, India an Palkistan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cyrus Trance
02:27 AM on 04/06/2011
"I agree. They should definitely apologize to Iran for the sanctions it has inflicted on them and for the apapaling double standards is has displayed by not sanctionin­g Israel, India an Palkistan."

Iran should first apologize for holding Americans hostage and for supporting Hezbollah. The same Hezbollah that murdered 241 US marines in Lebanon in 83.

BTW, Israel, Pakistan, and India are not signatories to the NPT, Iran is.