More

Unsealed Indictment Against Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Reveals Details About 9/11 Attacks

Ksm

By LARRY NEUMEISTER   04/ 4/11 07:32 PM ET   AP

NEW YORK -- The details of the criminal charges against the self-professed mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks and four other defendants became moot for a civilian jury when they were finally made public Monday, just as Attorney General Eric Holder was announcing the men will be prosecuted at a military tribunal instead of in a courthouse just blocks from the World Trade Center site.

U.S. District Judge Kevin Duffy signed an order dismissing the indictment against Khalid Sheik Mohammed as he unsealed the Dec. 14, 2009 document, signed by U.S. attorneys Preet Bharara for the Southern District of New York and Neil H. MacBride for the Eastern District of Virginia, along with a grand jury foreperson whose name was blacked out.

The document describes how the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks were planned, practiced and carried out by hijackers following Osama bin Laden's edicts to kill Americans and use a "jihad" to release the "brothers" in jail "everywhere."

It said al-Qaida leaders, including bin Laden and Mohammed, met in Afghanistan in early 1999 to plan the attacks to cause "maximum casualties and destruction." After a quick study of how to evade airline security, the first 9/11 hijackers were arriving in the United States in January 2000 to begin flight training so they could fly jumbo jets. By late August 2001, Mohammed learned of the date for the attacks and notified bin Laden, the indictment said.

The indictment was originally filed a month after Holder announced his intention in November 2009 to send Mohammed and the others from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to the Manhattan courthouse for trial. The language used in it to describe the history of al-Qaida was identical in parts to that used by prosecutors in the indictment of bin Laden and others in the August 1998 bombing of two U.S. embassies in Africa. Those attacks killed 224 people, including a dozen Americans.

In the Sept. 11 indictment, prosecutors gave a bare-bones, factual description of what they believe Mohammed and his co-conspirators did to plan and carry out the attacks. The indictment said Mohammed suggested the plan in or before 1999 to bin Laden. At one point, it described how Mohammed taught the hijackers to use short-bladed knives to overtake airline crews, something he had practiced with them by using knives to kill sheep and camels.

The document ends with 35 pages listing 2,976 names of those who died as a result of the hijacking of four airliners, two of which were flown into the trade center, one of which struck the Pentagon and a fourth that was smashed into a Pennsylvania field as its passengers tried to take back control of the plane.

The 10 counts described in the 80-page document charged Mohammed, Walid bin Attash, Ramzi bin Al-Shibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and Mustafa Al-Hawsawi with: conspiracy to kill Americans, conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries, acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries, conspiracy to commit violent acts and destroy aircraft, violence on and destruction of aircraft, conspiracy to commit aircraft piracy, aircraft piracy, two counts of murder of a U.S. officer and employee and destruction of commercial property. Only the conspiracy to kill Americans charge did not carry the potential for the death penalty.

The indictment portrayed bin Attash as a key conspirator. It said bin Attash, so closely associated with bin Laden that he had served on his security detail, collected information on matters related to airport and airplane security measures. It noted that he carried a pocket knife as a test in one of the legs of his journey when he traveled first class between Bangkok, Thailand, and Hong Kong on Dec. 31, 1999 and Jan. 1, 2000. It said he traveled under a false identification as he approached the cockpit to test security measures on the airplane.

In a December 2009 request to seal the indictment, prosecutors said secrecy was needed because of security concerns – the U.S. Marshals Service did not want the defendants to know when they might be transferred to New York – and the fear that some of the defendants who have evidence in their cells that could be used at trial might destroy it.

Prosecutors said knowledge of when they might be transferred to New York "may lead the defendants to coordinate with each other in ways that undermine both their security and the security of others."

The indictment described each of the alleged roles of the five men, beginning with Mohammed. It said he first presented the idea of a plot to use airplanes "as missiles to crash into buildings" and later trained the hijackers, including how to conceal short-bladed knives as they went through airport security.

Sometimes, the indictment described the careful preparations that went into planning the attacks, including frequent air travel to test airplane security measures and their ability to circumvent them. It noted that al-Qaida instructed the plot participants to avoid signaling their religious beliefs by shaving their beards, dressing in "Western" attire, carrying no Islamic literature and bringing cologne and cigarettes, which are generally forbidden in Islamic culture.

The indictment said the men were instructed to use fake names and codes in internal communications. For instance, it said, "wedding" was used to describe an impending terrorist operation and "honey" signified explosives and weapons.

Al-Shibh, it said, tried to become one of the pilot hijackers but failed to obtain a visa for entry into the United States and instead managed the plot, sending money to the hijackers. Aziz Ali also sent money to hijackers, the indictment said.

Al-Hawsawi helped the hijackers travel to the U.S. and facilitated their efforts once they arrived, the indictment said.

In court papers, prosecutors said the attorney general had directed that they seek dismissal of the indictment and that the case be referred to the Department of Defense to proceed in military commissions because "a timely prosecution in federal court does not appear feasible."

It was notable that Duffy signed the order. He presided over the 1990s trials of men charged in the 1993 bombing that killed six people and injured more than 1,000 others.

Those convictions included the mastermind of the bombing, Ramzi Yousef, Khalid Sheik Mohammed's nephew. Yousef, serving a life prison sentence, was captured in Pakistan in 1995, two years after fleeing the United States on the night of the Feb. 26, 1993 bombing. When he was flown over the towers in a helicopter as he was returned to the United States, an FBI agent pointed to the towers and noted that they were still standing.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
NEW YORK -- The details of the criminal charges against the self-professed mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks and four other defendants became moot for a civilian jury when they were finally made publ...
NEW YORK -- The details of the criminal charges against the self-professed mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks and four other defendants became moot for a civilian jury when they were finally made publ...
Filed by Adam Goldberg  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 288
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:35 PM on 04/06/2011
Probably doesn't mean much to anyone else, but I have always wonderer why 11 September was chosen as the fateful day.
11:03 AM on 04/06/2011
Americans used to not be fraidy cats. We used to try terrorists in open feeral court, convict them and send them to prison.

When did we lose our courage?
04:05 AM on 04/07/2011
When you felt you had something to hide…..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftheaded
Cognitive scientist, researcher, professor
10:20 AM on 04/06/2011
Wait, it doesn't say how they obtained access to Nano-thermite? Weird. That seems pretty important.
04:08 AM on 04/07/2011
Sigh… i suppose this pres. won't be bothered to look into that either.

I often "wonder" if he, and other high ups, don't truly know about the oddities that surround that fateful day or if he's been instructed not to bring it up….
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
anothervoice
The eighth deadly sin is willful ignorance.
09:51 AM on 04/06/2011
It's the judgment of the universe that we'll always remember this guy from this photo...
07:05 AM on 04/06/2011
Did he profess to masterminding it before or after being waterboarded?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mgrant33301
07:35 AM on 04/06/2011
ask bush.
07:56 AM on 04/06/2011
Apparently can't… O8ama won't allow anything of the sort….
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ligligl
feelthy liberal! ...and not just a pretty face!
03:17 AM on 04/06/2011
Convicting ANY defendant using waterboarded confessions puts the lie to everthing this country is supposed to stand for. I am ashamed.
04:55 AM on 04/06/2011
And rightly so.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftheaded
Cognitive scientist, researcher, professor
10:30 AM on 04/06/2011
Careful, if you oppose certain obvious lies you might be labeled a "truther."
12:46 AM on 04/06/2011
May 16-17, 2001: US Warned Bin Laden Supporters Are Inside US and Planning an Attack

May 30, 2001: FBI Is Warned of Major Al-Qaeda Operation in the US Involving Hijackings, Explosives, and/or New York City

July 5, 2001: Bush Asks for Reports on Domestic Terror Threats

August 4-30, 2001: Bush Nearly Sets Record for Longest Presidential Vacation

(August 4-5, 2001): Phoenix Memo Agent Vets Bush PDB, Fails to Add Relevant Information, Does Not Contact Phoenix Office


August 6, 2001: Bush Receives Briefing Titled ‘Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US’


August 6, 2001: Bush Tells CIA Regarding Bin Laden Warning, ‘You’ve Covered Your Ass, Now’

August 6, 2001: Bush Misled on Number and Extent of FBI’s Bin Laden Investigations

Between August 6 and September 11, 2001: No High-Level Meetings to Discuss ‘Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US’ Memo

August 7, 2001: Version of Bush’s Al-Qaeda Briefing Is Incomplete, Poorly Distributed

Between August 6 and September 10, 2001: ’Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US’ Memo Is Not Acted Upon

Between August 7 and September 10, 2001: Ashcroft Supposedly Does Not See ‘Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US’ Memo before 9/11

May 15, 2002: Bush’s ‘Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US’ Warning Is Leaked to Public


More;

http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?warning_signs:_specific_cases=complete_911_timeline__strike_in_us__pdb&timeline=complete_911_timeline
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftheaded
Cognitive scientist, researcher, professor
10:33 AM on 04/06/2011
You missed the two appearances on al Jazeera between 9/12 and 9/16 in which Bin Laden emphatically denies any involvement, before the CIA finds a "confession" tape at some house in Afghanistan.
12:33 AM on 04/06/2011
Constituti­onal protections are, for the most part, reserved for American nationals, citizens and otherwise. Captured enemy combatants come under a whole different set of rules and, like it or not, that's what he's subject to. Don't mix him up with an American national.

Nevertheless, he does have rights. Given his status, he has the right to be tried before the tribunal which will actually be trying him. His rights don't rise to the level of an American but he does have a modicum of rights and they are being observed. It's not like he's a common criminal.

He is getting that process which is due.

And let us not forget that this is the guy who murdered Daniel Pearl by cutting off Perl's head while Pearl was alive and kneeling on the ground. You can easily find these pictures and videos and audios yourself on the internet. This is one of the least sympathetic characters that you'll ever come across. They can't mete out as much as this guy has coming to him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ligligl
feelthy liberal! ...and not just a pretty face!
03:21 AM on 04/06/2011
Regardless of the rationalizations he has a god-given right not to be tortured and by violating this right we are no better than they are and have lost our right to assert the moral high ground.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hershobr
08:07 AM on 04/06/2011
We didn't torture him. Torturing is what the Chinese do to people, what the North Koreans do to people. Waterboarding one high level prisoner because he knows about imminent threats to the nation is not the same as pulling peoples fingernails out and electro-shocking them- that would be torture.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Lucie-Smith
Art historian, photographer, poet
04:35 AM on 04/06/2011
Er - torturing 'enemy combatants' is OK? Using the evidence obtained by torture is OK? Doesn't sound much like due process to me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftheaded
Cognitive scientist, researcher, professor
10:35 AM on 04/06/2011
Then look at the definition of an enemy combatant. It's anyone the president declares to be an enemy combatant.... for any reason he deems appropriate. Scary.
10:29 PM on 04/05/2011
After being waterboarded something like 180 times, I would have to think whatever "information" obtained was not only inadmissible, but had to be what the interrogators wanted to hear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Sandlin
We see the world not as it is, but as we are.
11:50 PM on 04/05/2011
Yep. That's what he said, too.

And several years later, he (KSM) confirmed that he had done everything he's accused of, from planning 9/11 to beheading Daniel Pearl (adding "for any who would like to confirm, there are pictures of me on the Internet, holding his head.")

http://www.defense.gov/news/transcript_isn10024.pdf
09:18 PM on 04/05/2011
This article is all lies. "Jihad" means "internal struggle to better oneself".
12:34 AM on 04/06/2011
Oh. I thought "jihad" meant "orgy of terrorism and murder just because you don't believe as I do".

Thanks for the enlightenment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hershobr
08:08 AM on 04/06/2011
Yeah and the swastika is a Hindu peace symbol. Give us a break.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Padman McMenamin
91 CSSB Warrior, Supply Coy, Geelat Soldier!
12:14 PM on 04/06/2011
Does it not have roots back to Hinduism and Buddhism in that regard? Was it not a symbol misappropriated by Hitler?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwmellott
08:33 PM on 04/05/2011
I still think he looks like John Belushi.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ligligl
feelthy liberal! ...and not just a pretty face!
03:27 AM on 04/06/2011
I think it is always telling that any pictures released show him as a bedraggled, sneering animal. Can we also have a picture of a similarly disshevled, badly clothed and lit Obama to go alongside him.
I hold no brief for this man, especially in the Daniel Pearl matter, but in this country he stands innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cliffhammond
Onward through the fog!
08:18 PM on 04/05/2011
Are they still beating this dying horse? Okay, so you've got your man. Now lets clear out of Afghanistan. It was illegal to go in anyway. And Iraq? This is all rather obvious. The FBI continues to maintain there is no evidence to arrest Osama bin Laden. Robert Gates has admitted there is no more than 50 "al-Qaeda" operatives left somewhere in eastern Afghanistan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftheaded
Cognitive scientist, researcher, professor
10:37 AM on 04/06/2011
Wait, you think this is really about terrorists? We aren't leaving. We are there to secure that pipeline to Caspian Sea and too steal all of their Lithium from the mountains.
06:19 AM on 04/09/2011
to protect China's copper mining in Afghanistan......
06:28 PM on 04/08/2011
I'm interested in hearing more on one of the things you said. "Illegal to go in anyway." Illegal to go into Afghanistan? Violating which laws?

-Card-Carrying American
http://cardcarryingamerican.blogspot.com/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Card-Carrying-American/149565408390518
07:02 PM on 04/05/2011
This is also the man that admitted to killing reporter Daniel Pearl "with my blessed right hand".
Justice to this man should be done the same way....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftheaded
Cognitive scientist, researcher, professor
10:37 AM on 04/06/2011
Again, not "admitted" until he was waterboarded 187 times.
07:01 PM on 04/05/2011
Finally the truth comes out that the whole 9/11 disaster could have been avoided if Bill Clinton was actually doing his job and Madeline albright wasn't shopping while sec of state
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Sandlin
We see the world not as it is, but as we are.
07:03 PM on 04/05/2011
What??

Right.
07:11 PM on 04/05/2011
try reading the article ad then you'll understand
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Nagano
"TK" Copy to Come
07:12 PM on 04/05/2011
I thought 9/11 happened under the George W. Bush Administration:

"The One Percent Doctrine, which is based largely on anonymous accounts from political insiders.

In the book, after describing the presentation of the PDB, Suskind wrote: “And, at an eyeball-to-eyeball intelligence briefing during this urgent summer, George W. Bush seems to have made the wrong choice. He looked hard at the panicked CIA briefer. ‘All right,’ he said. ‘You’ve covered your ass, now.’†August 6, 2001

[SUSKIND, 2006, PP. 2; WASHINGTON POST, 6/20/2006] - TK
07:23 PM on 04/05/2011
The wash post?? the same paper that its news bureau chief Bob Woodward had a 1 hour meeting in the hospital with the head of the CIA while he was comatose and then wrote a book??
9/11 happened while W was president but the ground work to plan the act was all done while bill was president and refused to take binladen
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
05:51 PM on 04/05/2011
Unsealed Indictment Against KSM Reveals Details About 9/11 Attacks...

Extreme makeover couldn't make this guy look salvageable......he looks like what he is.........garbage..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Sandlin
We see the world not as it is, but as we are.
06:39 PM on 04/05/2011
Extreme makeover - Guantanamo Edition:

http://pubrecord.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Khalid_Sheikh_Mohammed_image_widely_published_in_September_2009_-a.jpg

Nice try .... but I still agree with you.