More

FCC.gov Gets Its First Major Makeover In A Decade

The Huffington Post     First Posted: 04/05/11 10:50 AM ET   Updated: 06/05/11 06:12 AM ET

FCC.gov is swapping blue and gold for new and improved.

Tuesday morning, the Federal Communications Commission unveiled a revamped FCC.gov website, updating the site for the first time since 2001.

The 1996-era FCC homepage, a text-heavy blue, yellow, and white page littered with lists, jargon, and acronyms, has been traded for a tidier, teal-colored homepage that hides links behind tabs and mouse-overs and welcomes users with a interactive slideshow showcasing news and features.

A search bar and "take action" button--inviting users to "comment," "discuss," "help," or "complain"--is locked at the top of the page, and the right hand side of the page is dedicated to other ways users can engage with the FCC, from filing a public comment to following the agency's Flickr photostream. Additional features include the ability to embed livestreaming video from FCC announcements, an "FCC Encyclopedia" that defines terms like "slamming" and "narrowbanding," and an "Our Work" tab organized by subject area, rather than by bureau, as it was before.

In revamping the website, FCC managing director Steven VanRoekel says the commission learned from private sector standards and practices, such as focus groups, in its effort to present information in a more accessible way, better solicit user participation, and more effectively share data.

The new website is "not innovative in the private sector, but it is innovative in government," VanRoekel told the Huffington Post. "Looking at consumer sites, consumer experiences online, I saw that the expectations of people are growing at breakneck pace. When you go to a social media site, or an online shopping site, you expect to find a certain level. The government has never kept pace with that."

The FCC.gov redesign, which began in October 2010, cost $1.35 million. VanRoekel says the expense is justified as the new site, and a host of new technical features, will "pay for itself" in 12 months by automating certain tasks.

See FCC.gov's "before and after" below. The FCC is still A/B testing certain elements of the site and has invited users to submit their feedback on the redesign. Tell the agency what you think of the new look here.

Rate This Slide

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Current Top 5 Slides
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:24 PM on 04/06/2011
I just love everyone's comments on how they, or someone they know could do a much better job for way less $$... it's obvious none of them has any experience building huge database driven websites...
07:04 PM on 04/06/2011
Government websites are not cheap. Unlike simple companies, the US government puts a lot of research into building things. You might consider this research a waste of money or wasteful, but for a government website the $1.35 million is actually pretty much in the ballpark.

It is not mentioned also if they bought new equipment to host the website. An average server costs $600-$2500. For such a large organization they will need racks (racks hold 42-45 servers fully packed) of servers, and that's not cheap. The new website template's larger images requires significantly more bandwidth than the previous website, meaning less people can connect to a server to grab a copy at the same time. This means they would have to buy more servers for reliability reasons. Look up load balancing.

If you breakdown the costs you realize that its not really that shocking. If you really want to see the monetary breakdown you will need to submit a Freedom of Information Request.

This is all guess work from an IT person, so take it with a grain of salt.
04:37 PM on 04/06/2011
Wow, it only took them 10 years to change their website.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
uncc49er
Only the truth and nothing more
03:38 PM on 04/06/2011
this is a very simple example of how government wastes tax payers money. this project could be done at a fraction of the price.
07:28 PM on 04/06/2011
why don't you enlighten us on how this could have been done for a fraction of the price?
02:57 PM on 04/06/2011
over 1 MILLION dollars for a virtual website. wasteful. reckless. spending. who was this web developer? isnt America in a recession?
01:27 PM on 04/06/2011
The new site is better and more in tune of what they need... but 1.35 million? I need to change the client base.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bkerensa
Evangelist at Ubuntu
01:07 PM on 04/06/2011
Really sad because I know good web developers that could do the new look or even better for half a million less.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
08:36 PM on 04/05/2011
The design is clearly an imrovememt. but over a million dollars for a site redesign?
03:34 PM on 04/05/2011
Perfect example of failure by committee. Terrible design. Looks 8 years old.
07:26 PM on 04/06/2011
another ignorant comment... 8 years old... ridiculous.
photo
Harvey32
Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart
10:30 AM on 04/05/2011
I actually like the new site.