More

Libya Oil Production Falters

Libya News

HADEEL AL-SHALCHI and TAREK EL-TABLAWY   04/ 7/11 04:23 PM ET   AP

TRIPOLI, Libya — Libya's opposition could net more than $100 million from the oil shipment that left the eastern port of Tobruk this week, but it is far from being in the clear. Production is at a standstill following attacks on oil fields, and the complexity of the deal reflects the wariness of traders in dealing with the rebels.

There's a lack of transparency surrounding the deal, which may or may not have been brokered with help from Qatar. Analysts say even in an industry famed for murky deals, it's unusual.

"There is so much cloak and daggers surrounding this shipment, it's unbelievable," said Michelle Wiese Bockmann, markets editor for the shipping publication Lloyd's List in London.

The shipment of up to 1 million barrels that left Tobruk on Wednesday aboard the Greek-owned, Liberian-flagged tanker Equator is a milestone for the rebels – marking their foray into the world of global oil sales. Oil that rebels had sold a few weeks ago was shipped out under contracts that existed before Libya's uprising began Feb. 15.

The vessel, which has a capacity of about 1 million barrels of crude, was believed to be heading, at least initially, to Singapore, though China may be the final destination, according to a Persian Gulf-based oil executive.

The deal was done with a "European trader," the executive said, speaking on condition of anonymity because his company did not authorize him to talk to the media.

With the London-based Brent futures contract at about $122 per barrel, the rebels may have brought in as much as $120 million from the latest sale, assuming the cargo was of roughly the same quality as light sweet Brent and not "distressed" – meaning that it was sold at a sharp discount just to move the barrels.

When the opposition will be able to ramp up production, however, has recently become less clear. Production is frozen following attacks on two key oil fields in rebel-controlled eastern Libya: the 12 billion-barrel Sarir field, the country's largest, and the 3 million barrel Messla field.

The rebels blamed Gadhafi's forces for the attacks. NATO scoffed at the Libyan government's claim that the real culprits were the alliance airstrikes authorized by a U.N. resolution demanding that Gadhafi stop attacking civilians.

The violence that has ravaged Libya for almost two months has battered output from Libya, which is 17th among the world's oil producers and sits atop Africa's largest reserves of oil. Production levels, which averaged about 1.6 million barrels per day before the crisis, plummeted even before the latest oil-field attacks. The rebels produced only about 120,000 barrels a day from three key fields in the east, and output collapsed in the government-held west as sanctions target Libyan state oil activities.

By the rebels' own admission, the 100,000 barrels per day they were producing from Sarir and Messla are temporarily unattainable because of the attacks. The extent of the damage is yet to be fully revealed.

But Greg Priddy, an oil expert with the Eurasia Group in Washington, believes that the only crude the rebels will be able to consistently produce for export in the short term will be about 50,000 barrels per day from Sarir.

The field is wholly owned by the Arabian Gulf Oil Co., which split from the state-run National Oil Co. Since the company is entirely Libyan-owned, there is no chance a foreign oil company will seek a share of the proceeds.

Production issues aside, traders remain uneasy about rebel oil, in part because of the risks, such as potential problems in getting tankers to a Libyan port, finding oil to load and getting clear of Libya's shores without incident.

Then there's the lack of clarity about the forces behind the latest deal.

The rebels' interim council announced last week that it had reached an agreement in which Qatar would market their oil, but the tiny Persian Gulf nation has not discussed the specific details of the deal or confirmed any involvement in the latest shipment. Qatar Petroleum, which is responsible for handling the country's oil sales, again declined to comment Thursday.

"It's a very strange deal. And that's why you don't see European publicly traded companies wanting to buy the cargo," Priddy said.

While Qatar, an OPEC member, is said to be marketing the oil for the rebels, some analysts and oil industry insiders have said that such a role might extend to Qatar actually buying and then reselling the crude.

The reason for such a step would be to encourage secondary buyers, since Qatar would have already absorbed the initial risks related to the sale. It would also include the insurance premiums associated with the deal.

"If the Qataris, with (their) deep pockets, are willing to absorb some of that risk, then they can facilitate the sale," said Priddy.

"Only the government of Qatar can take that risk as the trade has no legal framework," says Roger Tamraz, an Egyptian-American businessman with 40 years of experience buying and selling Middle East oil.

The purchase of oil from Libyan rebel groups would be based on political, rather than commercial considerations, he said. "But a commercial buyer could then buy from Qatar as long as Qatar gives them a hold harmless guarantee," he added, referring to a legal clause absolving the buyer from any liability arising from the purchase.

Qatar may also be helping the rebels set up an escrow account, which they can tap to buy food and supplies. Their purchases do not appear to be restricted since Western governments have indicated that the sanctions imposed on Tripoli don't apply to the opposition.

There are other mysteries surrounding the shipment. The cargo's shipping rate hasn't been disclosed, and at least two separate "fixtures" – which provide details of the shipment – have been circulated, Wiese Bockmann said. One incorrect fixture indicated the tanker involved, which left Tobruk on Wednesday, wouldn't be sailing until April 21.

"There are extreme commercial sensitivities attached to this shipment," she said. "The tanker owner won't confirm the shipment." She said neither had Vitol SA, the Geneva-based trader said to have chartered the tanker.

Olivier Jakob, managing director of the Switzerland-based consultancy Petromatrix, said concerns may ease once the shipments become routine.

"Once there is sufficient oil coming out, you can easily design a framework which would make it easy for the industry to start trading with the rebels," he said.

___

El-Tablawy reported from Cairo. Adam Schreck in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Frank Jordans in Geneva, Sylvia Hui in London and Slobodan Lekic in Brussels contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TRIPOLI, Libya — Libya's opposition could net more than $100 million from the oil shipment that left the eastern port of Tobruk this week, but it is far from being in the clear. Production is at...
TRIPOLI, Libya — Libya's opposition could net more than $100 million from the oil shipment that left the eastern port of Tobruk this week, but it is far from being in the clear. Production is at...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:56 AM on 04/13/2011
Political uprising, oil, economic harship. Its all related. http://greatwavesofchange.org/
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RunningBecky
Runner, nurse, chess player
03:26 PM on 04/07/2011
For those who might actually believe this was a British airstrike, let me remind you that the company with the biggest contrct for LIbyan oil is British Petrolium! Does Gadhafi REALLY think the British government would attack what is essentially BP resources? I don't think so. Huggs Becky
03:18 PM on 04/07/2011
Oil oil everywhere but not a drop to fill up my Gas Guzzler. Iet us liberate Saudi Arabia ASAP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubiconski
NOTE: I advocate for anti-BSL...
03:10 PM on 04/07/2011
The rebel "army" is only like 1000 dudes in pick up trucks :rofl:
03:02 PM on 04/07/2011
Latest report is Libyan, not NATO aircraft, see:

CLASSIFIED: EYES ONLY

AJDABIYA: LIBYAN AIRSTRIKE

http://unifiedprotector.blogspot.com/2011/04/ajdabiya-libyan-airstrike.html
02:38 PM on 04/07/2011
If this war was not about oil I am a ball of Edam Cheese
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
caribindian
02:01 PM on 04/07/2011
If gov't shuts down they might as well drink the oil...
photo
Phemale
In War, Truth Is The First Casualty
01:46 PM on 04/07/2011
BREAKING NEWS!!!

Libyan revolutionaries near Ajdabiya, air strike may not have been NATO
EDIT 18:59 GMT+2: The BBC just reported that according to revolutionaries, the strike on the convoy this morning may not have come from NATO. A statement is expected shortly, perhaps in the next hour or so.

Video: “Hell on earth is an understatement”
As the battle for Misrata continues, one of the opposition leaders says Col Gaddafi’s forces in Misrata “are obliterating everything… and Nato is allowing him to do that”. He speaks anonymously to the BBC’s Tim Wilcox.

Images: BBC-In Misrata

http://www.libyafeb17.com/

LIVE: Libyan Unrest: Tripoli resident says he heard 2 explosions at about 11:30am

6:15pm: Karl Stagno-Navarra tweeted:
“Former #Libya Minister #Shatwan: #NATO is a disappointment, it is letting so many Libyans die. It was better with #US #UK #France”
“Former #Libya Minister Shatwan: Misurata is destroyed, many have been killed, under seige for 48 days and where is #NATO?”

5:45pm: Al Jazeera’s Sue Turton visits a weapons bunker near Tobruk to look at the ammunition pro-Gaddafi forces have had to rely on

5:30pm: Feb 17 voices tweeted: “LPC #Zintan: Opposition fighters were able to recapture Qal’a but there are still some Gaddafi forces in Kikla #libya #feb17”

“LPC #Zintan: people are frustrated, coalition planes just seem to be watching and doing nothing #libya #feb17”

http://feb17.info/
01:35 PM on 04/07/2011
You know, I was originally behind Obama on this (conversely, Obama's certainly left me behind on nearly everything). But even when he is right (A US led removal of a madman, not merely protection of civilians), Obama has to talk out of both sides of his mouth. Just tell us you are trying to kill Quadaffi and get it done. Then move onto Bahrain and Saudi Arabia . . . oh what was I thinking . . . that's different, and it's more important to keep the troops in Iraq. As long as the Iraqis ask us nicely, Messrs. Obama and Gates will let them stay. How sweet. Where is the lib anger at that? I guess it's not all that important anymore.
photo
Phemale
In War, Truth Is The First Casualty
01:32 PM on 04/07/2011
$5 a gallon, here we come...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Schmid
01:59 PM on 04/07/2011
libyan oil should not affect the world market by that much - the oil industry just uses it as excuse to up the price.
photo
Phemale
In War, Truth Is The First Casualty
02:01 PM on 04/07/2011
Your preachin to the choir...

I'm with you all the way.
02:39 PM on 04/07/2011
Yes the American companies are raking in windfall profits on speculation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
josephking
01:07 PM on 04/07/2011
The rebels ae now claiming that NATO has bombed them...don't worry guys...it was "humanitarian".
photo
songoftherushes
I can think, I can wait, and I can fast
01:09 PM on 04/07/2011
Euthenasia.
01:48 PM on 04/07/2011
and the military "humanitarian" mission in Iraq can now be extended indefinitely if the Iraqis "ask us". God be praised. And Obama, too!
photo
Yank in France
Thomas Paine, expat in France 1792-1802
12:43 PM on 04/07/2011
I am sorry to say this but the jury is out on this Obama/Sarkozy intervention: This effort was ill-conceived from the beginning. If they wanted to depose Khadaffy, they should have been prepared to do so. They were not prepared to oust him, they should have not intervened at all.

Now we are in a prolonged conflict with no plan B. Hell, forget plan B, apparently there never was a plan A!!
02:39 PM on 04/07/2011
Sorta like Bush in Iraq and Afghanistan..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
03:24 PM on 04/07/2011
Bush had plan A "Steal the OIL" its happening now as 4 major oil companies are sucking Iraq dry.
Bush plan B...make him a War President which will look good in his new book and memoirs
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ethiopia1a
I want to take Lady Karma out for drinks and treat
12:40 PM on 04/07/2011
Wait a minute....the UN Resolution allows a military operation in Libya "in order to protect civilians". How is bombing an oil field "protecting civilians"? Is Britain breaching the UN Resolution? Why is there no comment in this AFP article about the legality or illegality of this action?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ethiopia1a
I want to take Lady Karma out for drinks and treat
12:40 PM on 04/07/2011
thats old formats, american, british ,canada including deaf of france ,, you bought amination for rebels to fight their government ,,,while you went to stolen their oils ,gold etc ,,
what do you think your doing? its not crime....you peoples a criminals,,