iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Chernobyl's Tragic Legacy


First Posted: 04/08/11 08:43 PM ET Updated: 06/08/11 06:12 AM ET

"I want people to see," said photographer Paul Fusco. "For Lida, it has to be as painful as possible." Lida is the mother of Aleysa Beoia, a seventeen-year-old girl who Fusco watched die in 2000, as he was shooting a collection of work called Chernobyl Legacy.

His photographs show horror in black and white: An intelligent, lively four-year-old with almost no lymphatic system, his limbs swollen into monstrous trunks; a toddler whose torso blossoms into a tumor that cannot be removed, since his kidneys are contained within it; a baby born with its brain outside its body; children slithering around the floor, wordless pack animals, groaning and rolling, eating from bowls like dogs.

Fusco spent many months, over three visits, exploring state-run facilities dedicated to taking care of children damaged by radiation. They receive suitable care and affection, but no education. Many were born years after the 1986 accident and handed over at birth by devastated parents.

"Everything, anything that can go wrong with a body was there, and more," says Fusco. "It's astonishing the amount, the different kinds of destruction. It was like looking at a different race."

While his work found an audience in Europe, he says it received little attention from the press in the United States. However, after last month's catastrophe at the Fukushima Da-ichi plant in Japan, some have stumbled upon his Chernobyl Legacy slideshow at the Magnum Photos website, with its haunting music and forthright narration, and, trying to make sense of the situation, linked to his photographs online. (Fair warning: The photos are graphic.)

After viewing the slideshow, a blogger comments, "I can't help but have a fearful heart for Japan." Writes another: "This is so shocking! Disturbing! But real, unfortunately! Why doesn't humanity learn from its mistakes?"

The International Atomic Energy Agency views the accident in Japan as one more serious than the partial core meltdown at Three Mile Island, but says it's nowhere near the scale of the disaster that occurred in Ukraine twenty-five years ago. Yet each day, tests detect more contamination. Low levels of iodine-131 and cesium-137 in the drinking water of several prefectures, albeit "at levels far below those that would initiate recommendations for restrictions of drinking water," are high enough to prompt warnings for infants. The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare has detected very low-level contamination in spinach, leafy vegetables, and some meat. Individuals living within a 20 kilometer radius of the plant have been evacuated, and those who live within 30 kilometers have been asked to leave voluntarily.

The history of nuclear technology is as short as it is inscrutable; victims, witnesses, physicians, and governments can only speak in theory. Only a month after the accident, long-term health risks are described as "patchy" and "unclear," as officials begin testing the playgrounds of schools and nurseries. Just as a precaution.

At three years old, Aleysa Beoia ran out to play in the contaminated rain. At eleven, she was diagnosed with lymphoma, just one of the innumerable, horrific tricks that high-level or long-term radiation can play on the body of a living thing.

Paul Fusco, now 80, spoke to me by phone from his home in San Francisco. He is not a nuclear expert, nor is he an expert on the physical effects of radiation, nor the situation in Fukushima. Rather, he is a professional photographer, and witness to a tragedy that forever changed his life and work. It is from that place he speaks.

"We can't let this happen again, ever," he said. "All these innocent people, all they did was be born and live here. And look at what's happened to them."

His voice still cracks with emotion when he recounts the heartbroken mother sitting at the bedside of her teenaged daughter, so alert, bright, and beautiful just the day before, watching as she slipped into a coma and died.

"I think of Lida a lot," he said. "Because I tried to do her honestly."

He remembers asking her if he could photograph Aleysa, just before she passed away. "Yes," she screamed. "I want everyone to see what they've done!"

"The whole world should see those kids," said Fusco, "Because it's no good for any of us. Everything we make as human beings, nature eventually breaks."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

"I want people to see," said photographer Paul Fusco. "For Lida, it has to be as painful as possible." Lida is the mother of Aleysa Beoia, a seventeen-year-old girl who Fusco watched die in 2000, as h...
"I want people to see," said photographer Paul Fusco. "For Lida, it has to be as painful as possible." Lida is the mother of Aleysa Beoia, a seventeen-year-old girl who Fusco watched die in 2000, as h...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,726
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (34 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:42 PM on 04/27/2011
I invite you to see my picture essay of Pripyat taken this year. Over 100 images are accompanied with excerpts from former residents. There is also a PDF to download if you wish. It is important the story of Pripyat before Chernobyl be known. http://smithjan.com/blog/2011/04/27/pripyat-atoms-wake/
05:15 AM on 04/18/2011
Ukraine remember about Chernobyl!
and Ukraine pray for Japan!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UL_gBqs1Ums
05:55 PM on 04/14/2011
There needs to be more information about the lasting effects at Chernobyl in the news and on TV.

Many young people today know little of nothing about the effects of this disaster.

I understand that the containment building around the Chernobyl plant needs to be rebuilt or at least another one put over the old one. The cost for this disaster goes on and on FOREVER.
How many lives have been impacted and how many more will suffer from nuclear power gone wrong. People and technology do FAIL.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
We built America without BO
04:48 PM on 04/12/2011
These images are heartbreaking. Hopefully the evacuations and regulations on contaminated food and water will help protect the residents from these types of cancers in Japan. I am less convinced that there is anything that can be done about the non-cancer or related diseases, however, since I have seen nothing to indicate these issues have been linked to radiation exposure by anything other than unsubstantiated speculation, and I have never seen any figures that indicate these diseases and birth defects appear in Chernobyl with any more frequency than in other areas of the world. If these photographs bring more attention to the children suffering and those like them around the world, my hope is that this could result in more funding for research and care that is desperately needed. If, as I suspect based on the evidence (or lack thereof), many of these horrible, lifelong diseases are not a result of radiation exposure but other things entirely, these children are being horrendously exploited, whether the perpetrators of this misinformation are aware of their ignorance or not. What will happen to medical research funding if so many childhood diseases are attributed to a singular, and likely incorrect, cause?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raven1970
Do not be a pre-checked box, opt out
12:33 PM on 04/11/2011
I could not contain the tears or pain I felt watching this slideshow, I have two boys of my own and we live very close to Indian Point in NY, this thought made me shutter....we always think it can't happen to us, but it can.
photo
Pandoras Folly
This Micro-bio is of legendary quality
09:32 AM on 04/11/2011
Build thorium reactors, use them to transmute the remaining nuclear waste as we dismantle the old Plutonium/uranium reactors and build other renewable options in their place.
02:59 PM on 04/11/2011
It's happening in India:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium

but petroleum and coal financial interests are fighting it tooth and nail politically in the US. So, it isn't going to happen at any great speed in the US - until we have another tragedy like Japans'. The much safer advantages of thorium have been known since the 60s. One more sign of the utter failure of our gov. to its people through political greed, corruption and basic incompetence. However, given the threat of nuclear accidents and the threat of incompetent, corrupt, and criminal politicians - the latter has a far greater probability to the destroy the nation as we know it... and the have and are.

Having a scientifically illiterate voter population with no voter qualification test - dooms any modern democracy. We require a license to operate a personal motor vehicle to insure basic stability and directional control, but no kind of tests for voters (or politicians) to insure they are capable of making the necessary decisions for the stability and direction of a nation. It's beyond ludicrous, beyond basic greed and incompetence, but it's dead on the mark for criminal negligence.
photo
french queen13
my beloved is mine and I am his
03:42 AM on 04/11/2011
And the goddamn nuclear industry and their filthy shills say there were hardly any victims of Chernobyl, that it's all clear now, that it happened so long ago and everything's hunky-dory with nuclear power ... they should all go and live in that hospital!
photo
thereisonlyoneparty
more amazing than you
01:08 AM on 04/21/2011
The legacy of Chernobyl and the damages caused say more about the problems of government than nuclear power.

There were problems with the reactor design (which is why it is no longer used), but the actions of the state following the disaster did not help anyone.  The government refused to acknowledge the problem and after initial attempts at fire fighting and what not declared that it has been conquered.

All forms of energy generation and transmission are potentially dangerous.  But so is everything.  There is risk everywhere.
01:32 AM on 04/11/2011
This is a very unfortunate event. We've had 50 years of history showing us severe catastrophes that nuclear radiation can cause. I've even heard that some brave Japanese workers have given their lives to help clean up the mess. I salute them for their bravery in a toxic situation. I am also praying for this mess to be dissipated quickly and not harm many people. I hope people do take some precautions so they don't get sick though.

http://homeopathicmedicines.biz/herbs-for-nuclear-radiation-poisioning-and-protection/

We all need to help each other and knowledge is one of the greatest gifts.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:20 PM on 04/11/2011
hi jim,
here's an article about the workers and the situation they are in.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/10/world/asia/10workers.html?pagewanted=1

it's very difficult to read but also very important to understand what is really going on in this situation.

thanks for your post. it is truly compassionate and caring.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
himaui
12:54 AM on 04/11/2011
absolutely heartbreaking. there are no words to how wrong all of this is.
03:02 PM on 04/11/2011
Sure there are. I can think of two without trying - "criminal negligence."
photo
janie@atthelake
Keep Austin Weird
05:10 PM on 04/12/2011
fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBadExample
Friends call me ‘exampleicious’
09:56 PM on 04/10/2011
ShamsT   25 minutes ago (7:11 PM)
29 Fans
Become a fan
Unfan
So when is promoting something that's good for our country supposed to be a bad thing?

And you didn't know that companies lobby to influence legislatio­n? That'a a story? Isn't this how our system of government works?
Favorite (0) Flag as Abusive
Permalink  | Share it

========
who died and left the pro-nuke forces in charge of deciding what's the Best thing for this country? Is it the same PR guys that said there was no danger to smoking? that what was good for GM was good for America?
03:31 PM on 04/11/2011
Actually, the only thing that died was the critical thinking process - in education and especially in our public schools. The result was a scientifically and technically illiterate voter population that will likely be the voting majority for several generations. Tragedies like Japan are the result of a "faith" based society's decisions to have blind faith in their government an insufficient critical thinking skills to affect the needed changes when those governments fail to effectively serve the needs of the people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:21 PM on 04/11/2011
Absolutely right analysis. Thanks for posting this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBadExample
Friends call me ‘exampleicious’
08:42 PM on 04/10/2011
ShamsT   25 minutes ago (7:11 PM)29 FansBecome a fanUnfanSo when is promoting something that's good for our country supposed to be a bad thing?And you didn't know that companies lobby to influence legislatio­n? That'a a story? Isn't this how our system of government works?
============

And who exactly left you and the pro-nuke apologist crowd in charge of deciding what's 'good' for the country? The tobacco guys thought their products were good for the country and covered up all the health problems. GM's president once said "what's good for GM is good for America" and now we're bailing them out because they don't know how to build a car that anybody wants.

Nobody died and left the pro-nuke crowd in charge of what's "good for this country".
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
07:19 PM on 04/10/2011
You know what I've noticed. This thread about Chernobyl is much more active than the Japan thread. Is Japan off everyone's mind these days? Geez....
07:23 PM on 04/10/2011
Afterall, Japan is still MAJOR disaster.
An ongoing CATASTROPHE lasting forever eh?
06:49 PM on 04/10/2011
Despite its risks, nuclear is here to stay. Other alternate energy technologies are not developed enough to supply the world's energy needs yet. In many areas, alternate energies are just not viable and the only options available are coal or nuclear. People tend to forget what all is involved with the development of "clean" energy sources. The physical damage to the environment required for any solar, wind, or tidal farm is far greater than that of any nuclear plant. Nuclear plants are, in general, only a problem when they fail, unlike other methods which continuously harm their surroundings, just by existing. However, the aftereffects of a nuclear disaster are far more gruesome and noticeable than the consequences faced with other technologies. With 3-Mile we have shown that a properly run system can keep the damages well below that of coal plants. I would greatly prefer another energy source, but for the moment, there is no other viable option.
07:02 PM on 04/10/2011
If we demanded it, we WOULD see change. As it stands now, most Americans are glued to DWTS and don't give THIS one iota of thought. That's what has to change: AMERICAN'S IQ'S and we're generation's away from that...if ever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
09:50 AM on 04/11/2011
"Despite its risks, nuclear is here to stay. Other alternate energy technologi­es are not developed enough to supply the world's energy needs yet. "

Total nonsense. The fact is that nuclear power is not economically viable and that can be seen as follows. Try to build a nuclear plant somewhere, anywhere, and get insurance for it on the open market. You won't be able to. Anywhere. No for profit insurance company will touch a nuclear power plant. They are thus all subsidized by various governments. They are subsidized in other ways as well of course. But unlike things like solar and wind nuclear power never makes it in the free market.

Of course it would take massive re-engineering efforts to get us off of fossil fuels and on to true renewables but the technology is there. So far the US has just lacked the will to really exploit it. For example, we still give huge tax subsidies to oil companies to encourage them to drill for oil. How ridiculous is that? Oil has never been more expensive. There are more than enough economic justifications for any company to drill for it. We need to start channeling those kinds of subsidies to renewable energy.
09:43 PM on 04/11/2011
I'm from SC, over half and up to 70% of our energy comes from 4 nuclear plants, all of which are privately insured, though there is some government backing, just like most private insurance agencies, regardless of what they insure. Of course alternate technologies will improve, but there are some places they will never be able to work. Lets look at the in the Piedmont of SC. We've already ruled out coal and oil as an energy source, there is heavy cloud cover throughout the year so no solar, it's inland so you can't go tidal, and wind power won't work because there is very little land suitable for a windfarm. All that is left is nuclear. If you have something else, I'd like to know.