More

Obama's Election Promises Tangled In Budget Negotiations

Obama Reelection

By BEN FELLER   04/ 9/11 08:43 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama promised to change Washington's ways. Yet he's as caught up in them as ever.

As the week began, Obama kicked off his re-election bid with a sunny video of people talking about their hopes and needs, the very image of life outside Washington politics.

By week's end, Obama was mired in budget negotiations, canceling trips and scrambling to stave off a government shutdown that could only undermine the public's faith in his leadership.

It was the messy business of governing, and how it's going to be come election time for incumbent Obama.

Beyond the vision for economic competitiveness he wants to talk about, Obama is chasing a second term while trying to make a deeply divided government work. He got bogged down in legislative tactics in his first two years, even when he won fights on health care and other issues. The goal now is to avoid all that.

In this test of leadership, the White House says Obama wrangled the budget compromise he wanted, spending cuts he supported without shelving his priorities or accepting unacceptable policy changes.

His administration portrayed it as an example of cooperation under great stress.

Yet the government was on the brink of closing, and many people wondered how that could happen, or why.

This is change?

The showdown was a reminder that for all a president's powers, there's much beyond control. Think Libya, Egypt, Japan's earthquake, not to mention Iraq and Afghanistan.

In this case, the new House Republican majority, led by Speaker John Boehner, seized on a must-pass budget bill to give voice to frustrated voters and tea party conservatives who demanded spending cuts.

Brinksmanship mode again in the capital, where nothing gets done until the deadline. Sometimes not even then.

In public, Obama tried to keep it at arm's length.

"I shouldn't have to oversee a process in which Congress deals with last year's budget," Obama said as the time got short this week.

In fact, he was up to his neck in it.

Obama used a veto threat to make clear he would not accept the scope of GOP spending cuts. He said he would accept no more temporary extensions to keep the government running for a few weeks at a time unless there was a broader deal in hand. He kept saying leaders had to act like grown-ups.

The White House said his strategy was to stay behind the scenes, work the phones and let his senior aides do the negotiating. That type of role provided an opening for Republicans to question his leadership. It also led to rumblings from frustrated lawmakers in his own party who wanted the president to openly attack the cuts Republicans wanted.

The White House figured it would take those hits.

A Gallup poll in late March found declining numbers of people who said Obama was a strong and decisive leader: a little more than half of those polled, compared with 60 percent one year ago and 73 percent two years ago.

The White House believed that a better result would come if Obama didn't try to overheat the issue. Officials believed that people were worried about gas prices, not a spending squabble and that voters didn't hire Obama to be a legislator.

Obama would go public when it meant the most.

That was Thursday.

He said Americans didn't want games but results. The pragmatic approach is what White House strategists believe will bring back the election-turning independents to Obama.

"There are some things we can't control," he said. "We can't control earthquakes; we can't control tsunamis; we can't control uprisings on the other side of the world. What we can control is our capacity to have a reasoned, fair conversation between the parties and get the business of the American people done."

But it wasn't getting done, and his voice was not the only one setting the tone.

"The president isn't leading," Boehner said Wednesday. "He didn't lead on last year's budget, and he clearly is not leading on this year's budget."

Obama met with Boehner and Reid four times in the White House during the week. He did go to the Philadelphia area Wednesday to talk about energy. He looked comfortable, almost carefree, as he laughed with workers at a wind-turbine company about their families and their cars.

By Friday, Washington had sucked him back in. He canceled a trip to Indianapolis, scrapping the attention he wanted to give to clean energy.

He scrapped a weekend getaway with his family to Colonial Williamsburg in Virginia.

While striving to avoid a shutdown, Obama's team privately thought they would come out OK in the public's mind if it came to that.

The thinking was that the president had presented a reasonable case of agreeing to spending cuts without going too far, and that people would frown upon Republicans if the government stopped fully running over a policy disagreement about abortion.

One Gallup poll found that 58 percent of adults, and 60 percent of independents, favored a budget compromise over a shutdown.

But the budget mess showed how government isn't supposed to operate. No matter who's to blame, all will be.

___

EDITOR'S NOTE – White House Correspondent Ben Feller has covered the Bush and Obama presidencies for The Associated Press.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama promised to change Washington's ways. Yet he's as caught up in them as ever. As the week began, Obama kicked off his re-election bid with a sunny video of people ...
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama promised to change Washington's ways. Yet he's as caught up in them as ever. As the week began, Obama kicked off his re-election bid with a sunny video of people ...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 460
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zetacplus
Conservatism has failed America
04:23 PM on 04/10/2011
When the government is divided as it is everyone must compromise but that's not what's happening. The rich are still getting their tax cuts and the poor are having the social programs they rely on slashed to the bone. We are quickly becoming a plutocracy and those who are voting for these teapublicans will come to regret it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rtx47
08:07 AM on 04/10/2011
What exactly would Democrat alternatives do that Obama is not achieving with Republican fillibuster-prone Party of NO in the Senate; and now a Republican controlled House (thanks to thinking like this article); a 15.5 Trillion debt with a 1.6 Trillion annual budget deficit?

Thanks to Obama's policies, access to healthcare is possible for 97% up from 70%. Stock market has made a comeback, despite headwinds of financial scandals and corruption. With Obama's tax deal with Republicans, working Americans (majority of voters) keep a more of what they earn.

Ted Kennedy running against sitting President Carter gave us Ronald 'Cheery-eyed and Budget-deficit' Reagan as President. Do we want to repeat history or have we forgotten history?

Unemployment numbers are high, but among college degree holders its 4.5%. Many social problems are end-result of several decades of liberal and social writers selling the same Kool-Aid that has gotten us to the present state, which is about when President Johnson started his Great Society.

There is no use just fighting and spinning one's wheels doing the same thing. One has to win! And one needs votes to win. Last election showed Reagan Democrats in ALL Rust Belt states cared little for Obama's bail-out program. It was a landslide Republican victory at all levels. In "Bail-Out State" Michigan, voters replaced Democrat Governor with a Republican­. Now they're getting what they elected.

Tell me one social program Progressives will sacrifice for good (fiscal stability) of the country?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
02:46 PM on 04/10/2011
Are you a paid poster?  Did you even READ the article?  I really don't see the relevance of your post to this article.

I guess the Obama administration has pulled their head out of the sand and discovered there are plenty of Democrats unhappy with this administration?  Don't worry, unfortunately no Democrat will challenge this president. 

BTW, I don't know where you got the 4.5% number, but it is simply untrue.
08:04 PM on 04/10/2011
Seriously. That post reeks of rancid Obama pablum.
07:53 AM on 04/10/2011
Dems first lost the house then barely they kept the senate. Now they have lost Wisconsin. Are there still Obama lovers in control or are there any real democrats to realize how disastrous this president has been for the democrats and progressive. Do you still believe his neo con policies are working ?
10:29 PM on 04/09/2011
"...the budget mess showed how government isn't supposed to operate. No matter who's to blame, all will be."

Well, we all should take responsibility for the mess, but we almost universally refuse adamantly to imagine each and every citizen shares the blame. The problem is constitutional. Yes, Constitutional. The US Constitution provides for representative government. It does not create a republic, and much less the silly "republic of republics" political scientists love to praise it for.

There is not one republic in the USA. There is almost no democracy. The reason for this is also simple. We don't want democracy -- that's too much work, or, as Oscar Wilde put it, "it requires too many meetings." So we completely ignore the democracy part, while pretending that spending a few minutes (or hours) at voting time every year or four is democracy. Nonsense.

Nor do we have a republic. Neither the US Government nor any state, county, city, town, or any other government in the nation is a republic. The reason for this is also simple. Republics require citizens to take responsibility for every decision their government makes. We prefer watching our favorite screen distractions.

After all, it is much easier to ignore the nation's public cancers while blaming whatever goes wrong with every issue we consider important on others.

Now, wanna' switch channels?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
dizmo4
09:00 PM on 04/09/2011
Let me get this straight.  Obama spent the first few months of his presidency showing deference to the GOP when he did not have to because he wanted to change the toxic partisan atmosphere in Washington.  He was attacked for doing so ( in hindsight that outreach looks foolish and probably cost Dems the House in 2010).  

But now he's attacked because he didn't change the tone in Washington?      

He's not the only player here.  Both sides plus the special interests need to be willing to change Washington and unfortunately the GOP is not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clayton139
Fight The Right-Wing (R) Spin Machine! VOTE 1% OUT
09:20 PM on 04/09/2011
YES, you are correct !

I am ready to VOTE for real CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN !
11:48 PM on 04/09/2011
By your comment....sure doesn't sound like that Hopey, Changey Thing is working out for you?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
baileywick
08:05 PM on 04/10/2011
"Hopey Changey" is Your Dear Beloved Sarah. You h8 mongers will never change.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
murphthesurf3
Proud to be an independent progressive
08:39 PM on 04/09/2011
Part of the Big (and Difficult) Budgetary Discussions On the Horizon: Raising Revenue

STARVE THE BEAST OR EXPLODE THE DEFICIT?
THE EFFECTS OF TAX CUTS ON GOVERNMENT SPENDING
Christina D. Romer
David H. Romer
University of California­, Berkeley
May 2007

It explores the relationsh­ip between taxes, government spending and economic growth/dec­line. Very interestin­g. Looking at their argument it seems that there is a delicate balance in this.

And here is another interestin­g discussion­:

www.mea.or­g/tef/pdf/­2toptenrea­sonswhytaxdontgroweconom­y.pdf

Top 10 Reasons Why
Tax Cuts Don’t Grow the Economy
NEA

It's a crucial matter.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
08:36 PM on 04/09/2011
Greetings Citizens...

You Can Avoid Evil, But You Cannot Avoid The Consequences of Avoiding Evil....

It is clear that many reasonable independents and hopeful progressives made a mistake the last Presidential election by voting for a an illusion full of promises and lies; then there are the followers who just did not know and voted like their friends...Unfortunately, those of us who knew what evil the man would bring try to avoid that evil by supporting a poor alternative provided by the Republican party. Hence we all ended up with the consequences of avoiding evil...

Now that we have had three long years of a President that never had a clue...I hope we can be smart enough this time to select a President that seeks to embrace liberty and a smaller and unobtrusive government....

Warm regards,

Michael Winters
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
murphthesurf3
Proud to be an independent progressive
10:31 PM on 04/09/2011
And who would this liberty loving, small government savior be? Sounds like the same trap to me.
photo
Chlowina
We're skrwd
10:56 PM on 04/09/2011
I too am waiting for an answer.
12:04 AM on 04/10/2011
You mentioned liberty loving, small government....So I knew you were'nt talking Obama.
Then you went and mentioned "Savior".....so you were talking Obama !!!
photo
Danish5666
What makes life worthwhile isn't measured by GDP
11:06 PM on 04/09/2011
Impressive amount of BS.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
murphthesurf3
Proud to be an independent progressive
11:13 PM on 04/09/2011
My thought too. Sounds good. Makes little sense given that there is ample proof that the GOP has its own agenda and very little of it has to do with what's good for the everyday guy.
11:56 PM on 04/09/2011
Hey D566:
Impressive amount of BS....so you 're talking Obama here???
07:36 PM on 04/09/2011
The Budget negotiation strategy of the Republicans is so incredibly predictable and so explicit in its purpose of painting Pres Obama as weak and as the big-spend president that it's going to be just as successful as the 1995 attempt to paint Bill Clinton in similar ways. Americans will finally figure out that appropriations bills to keep the government running and the country open for business, that those bills are not appropriate excuses to re-open policy/funding debates that were lost in decades and years earlier. And this current debate certainly hasnt gotten me to forget which president and which party jacked up the deficit to record levels. And I'm not going to forget the State of the Union list of to-do's that included streamlining government and its agencies. And I'm not going to forget which President and which party established those priorities. Nor am I going be bamboozled into believing that it's the GOP that gets things done in Washington.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:50 PM on 04/09/2011
"And I'm not going to forget the State of the Union list of to-do's that included streamlini­ng government and its agencies. And I'm not going to forget which President and which party establishe­d those priorities­. Nor am I going be bamboozled into believing that it's the GOP that gets things done in Washington­."

You mean the President who immediately supported Congress increasing the federal budget by 20% when he took office? Now he plans to streamline government and those agencies. Let's pretend the One supports a 5% decrease in federal spending. You will jump for joy but those of us who are sane will remember the 20% increase.

BTW, in the current budget negotiations, the One's plan was a freeze in federal spending. A FREEZE OF THE 20% INCREASE.

Yes, you have been bamboozled.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IamfromTexas
If you disagree with me, simply insult Texas.
08:51 AM on 04/11/2011
I agree. We cannot have a conversation around phisical responsibility without Starting at a 20% reduction. We have to make real spending cuts.

I hear these folks scream that we just need to tax the rich and the world will be great. The rich don't make enough to cover the spending this president wants. To be serious we must cut spending and it must hurt.

Once we control spending we will then need to add some taxes on EVERYONE to cover the rest of the deficit. but if we cannot make serious cuts in spending, then everything else is a blame game set to maintain the class warfare that we see now.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
06:54 PM on 04/09/2011
Obama's Election Promises Tangled In Budget Negotiations....

Besides being the referee between the elephants and jackasses the president should be the one to lead.... and when is he going to do that.......after he's out of office?
05:55 PM on 04/09/2011
He can't be serious about 'trying' to sit in the White House again ---- CAN HE!?!?
05:22 PM on 04/09/2011
What about transparency? He promised it, he failed to deliver it in so, so many ways. that has nothing to do with the budget.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mike dougles
07:54 PM on 04/10/2011
No one really believed he was telling the truth.
I mean who really thought he was going to close GITMO.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimtodd
Unrepentant child of '60s
04:50 PM on 04/09/2011
wow, this guy is supposed to be a professional journalist? This article is factually incorrect and just plain stupid as a perspective. These so called negotiations had nothing to do with finance and everything to do with the hateful agenda of the TP/GOP.
04:35 PM on 04/09/2011
Everything Obama said he would do he didn't, except screw up health care! the first thing he was going to do was close up guantanamo bay. We all know it wont be closed were going to have trials there now!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brandon Baier
Independent and stuck in the middle.
04:58 PM on 04/09/2011
Its rather disturbing isnt it. I dont like to bash Obama, and I dont exactly like him either, but he really seems at times to caught in one of those Kennedy situations, its quite bizarre.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
murphthesurf3
Proud to be an independent progressive
08:42 PM on 04/09/2011
16 WH house efforts to close Guantanamo. Each block at the Congressional level (some by the GOP, some by the Dems). The defunding of any effort to transfer prisoners to the mainland was the result of GOP pressure which led to a Dem amendment on a spending bill.

Things like this require a lot of parts to cooperate and it just did not happen.
lesleypalmer
Happy to be alive.
04:12 PM on 04/09/2011
I think Obama's presidency has been a mixed bag. I like his stand on some things and I am unhappy with other things. So what? Isn't this the way every Presidency unfolds? He has been in office for 2 1/3 years and some big things have been done, no thanks to the GOP. Has he reneged on some promises?...yes. Has he followed through on others?...yes. I think he is doing just fine, given the continuing series of crises that have dogged these years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Merritt old car guy
Loves Nostalgia Dragsters
05:24 PM on 04/09/2011
I was so sure when President Obama was running that things would get done fast and those Wall Streeters and Bankers would soon be in jail. Reality has set in and I didn't see the healthcare that I was promised and I didn't see the corporations that outsource jobs be punished. We didn't see the oil company subsidies canceled and we didn't see the Bush Tax Cuts die like they were supposed to. Now I've said all that and I will say this loud and clear as a Democrat I have to look at what I can accomplish and to allow more Republicans to enter either the Senate or the House will be a disaster for all of America. Lets quit fighting Obama and what he didn't do and make sure that Nancy is the House leader in 2012 and we have a super majority in the senate with no Blue Dogs. If you have ever seen pictures of the Hooverville shanty towns of the Depression era that is what we have in store for ourselves if we don't vote Democratic in 2012
lesleypalmer
Happy to be alive.
06:46 PM on 04/09/2011
I am completely with you...going to work the phones to turn out the vote.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
1088
03:58 PM on 04/09/2011
Here are all his entanglements!

http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/
photo
Chlowina
We're skrwd
11:00 PM on 04/09/2011
I've posted this and no one still wants to believe he did anything. Major problem with our country. Instead of looking at the positive, too many listen to the talking heads who direct their attention to the negative and lies.