More

Chicago Public School Bans Home-Packed Lunches

School Lunch

First Posted: 04/11/11 04:24 PM ET Updated: 06/11/11 06:12 AM ET

School lunches aren't what they used to be. At some city schools, ham and cheese sandwiches have been replaced with greasy pizza, burgers and french fries. While some schools have tried to add healthier options to their lunch menus, one Chicago school has taken a controversial approach: it banned home-packed lunches altogether.

The Chicago Tribune reported Monday that the principal of Little Village Academy decided to ban home-packed lunches at the West Side school after watching students bring lunches consisting of "bottles of soda and flaming hot chips" on field trips.

From the Tribune:

Principal Elsa Carmona said her intention is to protect students from their own unhealthful food choices.

"Nutrition wise, it is better for the children to eat at the school," Carmona said. "It's about the nutrition and the excellent quality food that they are able to serve (in the lunchroom). It's milk versus a Coke. But with allergies and any medical issue, of course, we would make an exception."

The Tribune spoke to several students and parents who opposed the policy, saying children don't like the cafeteria food, and that much of it gets thrown away. Other parents said the cafeteria food, supplied by caterer Chartwells-Thompson, is a healthy option and they are happy to have it available.

Though Carmona says the Chartwells-Thompson options are healthy, others disagree.

"It's rare that I see a school, especially a public school, that actually serves food that's good," Susan Rubin, a nutritionist and founder of the Better School Food program, told AOL News. "I get physically sick just looking at it, because it makes me sick that kids are eating this processed crap."

The home-packed lunch ban was put in place six years ago, but the Tribune's Monday story sparked outrage among some conservatives.

"This is problematic for a number of reasons, least of which is probably that a one-size-fits all government brainchild is destined to fail at solving a complicated problem," ChicagoNow blogger Emily Zanotti wrote Monday. " Anyone who's ever met a kid knows that kids are weird. It's a full time job, sometimes, for parents, to figure out how to ensure a child gets necessary nutrition while skirting a number of irrational food phobias. ... A public school, with hundreds of children, could never adequately address the needs of it's bizarre little population of dietary exceptions (not to mention, she clearly foils parents who would send their children to school with certifiably organic or home-cooked lunches)."

While an outright ban may be unpopular with students at Little Village, some Chicago Public School students do want more options when it comes to cafeteria food. Last year, a group of CPS high schoolers addressed the Chicago Board of Education after realizing that a typical lunch in a CPS cafeteria clocked in at 800 calories.

"Parents rely on schools to give their children nutritious meals, not tan-colored slop," one student told the Board.

The Chicago Public School system as a whole does not ban home-packed lunches, but does allow its principals to make such decisions.

"While there is no formal policy, principals use common sense judgment based on their individual school environments," CPS spokeswoman Monique Bond told the Tribune. "In this case, this principal is encouraging the healthier choices and attempting to make an impact that extends beyond the classroom."

Some Little Village students said they would make healthy choices if given the chance.

"They're afraid that we'll all bring in greasy food instead of healthy food and it won't be as good as what they give us at school," student Yesenia Gutierrez told the paper. "It's really lame. If we could bring in our own lunches, everyone knows what they'd bring. For example, the vegetarians could bring in their own veggie food."

Quick Poll

Should schools be allowed to ban home-packed lunches?

Yes. If students are making unhealthy choices, schools should step in.

No. Parents should be able to make decisions about their child's nutrition.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

Filed by Jen Sabella  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,580
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (53 total)
  1 of 8  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
weebils 08:35 PM on 04/11/2011
Ever try to get hold of  the list of vendors selling to your school and how much they charge? They guard that info like Fort Knox. The truth is they get money based on how many children and how much is consumed. A real racket and only half  the money actually goes to food. The rest is pocketed. In the northeast the Philly mob use to control all food services in the northeast area down even to  Read More...
06:01 PM on 04/19/2011
I remember bringing delicious, home-cooked foods to lunch as a kid. It was always delicious, but if my lunches were ethnic, I was sometimes a little self-conscious like Toula in "My Big Fat Greek Wedding."

The idea that food brought from home - even if it's very processed - is worse that what's being served in a school cafeteria is hard to believe. I'd love to see the menu from that school district. Has anyone seen the school lunch blog that a teacher had been posting anonymously??

http://fedupwithschoollunch.blogspot.com/2010/12/day-158-peanut-butter-jelly-sandwich.html
11:49 PM on 04/18/2011
The people in positions of influence remind me of poor Jim Fixx. Mr. Fixx was the iconic fellow who pioneered the passion of running . He wrote " The Book of Running" in 1977 , the bible of running at the time when only high school and collegiate athletes ran on the streets. At the time Jim ran 50 - 70 miles a week as part of his personal regime. Sadly Jim suffered a heart attack and died while running one morning in 1984. . His autopsy revealed two out of three coronary arteries to be totally clogged from plague cause by excessive cholesterol produced by the liver.

By banning home lunches these administrators have shown a omnipotent predilection to nutrition that will one day cause the sudden death of their beloved program. Sadly, like Jim , it will probably cause someone their life by virtue of an undetected allergy or something of the Jim Fixx nature of demise.
photo
butchcliff
The future is unwritten
08:38 AM on 04/18/2011
Fatty,additive-filled foods like pizza or meat pies french fries & gravy or the like,
is what we were offered in school. My kids brought their own lunches & nobody would
force them to eat assembly line food. This is inane
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:05 AM on 04/18/2011
Chicago is looking for free food off tax payers money into the pockets of contracters in the food business.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:01 AM on 04/18/2011
It is assanine also to make other taxpayers pay for your kids' lunch if you chose to have children. I did just fine on PBJs from home with chips and an apple or a boiled egg, etc. What are kids--wards of the state? The gov't should not be in the school lunch business. Give vouchers to hungry kids and let them buy whatever sandwich they want. Why are we cooking dinner for kids?
photo
ElenaOfJersey
And all of y'all are subject to my thrall.
11:40 PM on 04/17/2011
That is the single most asinine thing I have ever read. How dare a school system determine that it knows better than I do what I should or should not feed my kids! What about children with very specific nutritional needs? You mean to tell me that public schools are now equipped to satisfy every single child's nutritional requirements, regardless of their conditions, and can cater to each individual student?

My children eat only organic food that I prepare at home for a reason. I know what goes into that food, and I know they're not getting something loaded with chemicals and preservatives. My eldest is allergic to just about everything under the sun; I can't risk him eating school lunches because of the additives. I highly doubt any public school is in a position to say the same thing, and the fact that ANY public school in the US would try to override a parent's judgement on what goes into their child's body is extremely disturbing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:03 AM on 04/18/2011
I agree. It's none of the school's business what my kid eats as long as it is legal.
06:46 PM on 04/17/2011
So my son eats an all organic diet made from scratch, no canned food or packaged in any way. Are they stating that the school provides a better diet than this? Think not! No way no how what I tolerate such a ban.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
04:53 PM on 04/17/2011
Ah... my political beginnings! In elementary school (4th grade), they wanted more kids to support the school lunches so the teacher said, "All those who buy their lunch can sit at the table with me and those who don't must sit at another table." It didn't take long and I had most of the kids sitting at "my" table eating a lunch from home and the teacher with her couple of apple-polishers sat alone. LOL. I simply appealed the the kids that their parents could save a lot of money and they would eat better with home-acked meals. Their parents obviosuly agreed. They elected me as a student rep on the PTA (I was 9 years old!) and later changed it to the PTSA ("S" for students) at my suggestion and brought the kids into the organization!!
04:57 PM on 04/16/2011
I can't belive this. Even in high school, I absolutely HATED the school lunch. It was nothing but sloppily made pizzas, already cold french fries, and fruit that has probably been there for days. I would have much rather brought my lunch. Not only that, but maybe SOME families don't have the money to spend on a school lunch. It's much cheaper to bring your own.
01:16 AM on 04/21/2011
I've only in my life had about 6 students who didnt qualify for free lunch, and half of them had reduced price lunch. Chartwells is making money off every meal. Some are okay, but most are loaded with preservatives.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlueZoo
Independent voter, Independent thinker!
02:11 PM on 04/16/2011
I've yet to see any curriculum for aspiring teachers that lists nutrition as a required course. I thought, wrongly I guess, that teachers are supposed to teach and parents are supposed to feed the children. I find this continuous intrusion by government into our daily lives (and into our bedrooms!) an abomination! Don't educators have enough problems without government injecting food requirements into their lives too? Good grief!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
04:57 PM on 04/17/2011
Wait'll they get sued by students' parents for a myriad of things like "not nutricious enough", "not enough food", etc. Those who seek control have to accept the responsibliy that comes along with it. "With great power comes great responsibility"
07:52 PM on 04/17/2011
couldn't agree more!
01:54 PM on 04/16/2011
My school district is experimenting with a vegetarian option for lunch this month. This is this weeks choices:

Pizza or baked beans
Chicken Tenders with Belgian Waffle sticks or grilled cheese
Tacos or Veggie Wraps
Cheeseburger or Mozzerella sticks with marinara sauce
Popcorn Chicken or Man 'n Cheese

Next weeks options include hot dogs instead of the tacos. I think no more needs to be said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
04:58 PM on 04/17/2011
"Man 'n Cheese"

For the Canibals?
photo
ElenaOfJersey
And all of y'all are subject to my thrall.
01:21 PM on 04/18/2011
I'd say "Oh, at least Veggie Wraps" but I'm betting those veggies are loaded with pesticides and the actual wraps are chock full o' preservatives. :|
photo
AgathaX
Senior Analyst
11:04 PM on 04/15/2011
If you want to get junk food and other processed foods out of the diets of a lot of children, make it impossible to buy them with food stamps.
10:38 PM on 04/15/2011
If my child was taking a coke and a bag of chips to school and claiming it was lunch she was bringing from home, I would want someone to tell me.
10:12 PM on 04/15/2011
After that first quote from the school, I stopped reading. I haven't read so much BS in a while. I just got out of High School, and if I learned anything there is that the lunches are disgusting and covered in oil, poorly cooked, luke warm and stuck together. Not to mention complete lack of flavor.

This is appalling to read. I'll admit that kids eat a lot of junk food at home, but can't they just put a rule in the syllabus saying, "in order to help us fight childhood obesity, please refrain from giving your child chips and sodas in their school lunches." Instead of banning them all-together? It's not like the school lunches are any better!

Has ANYONE seen that TV show where that guy tries to fix the school lunches, and so many refuse to do so? Isn't that a sign?!
09:31 PM on 04/15/2011
This is a perfect example of how progressives lose the hearts, minds, and votes of middle America! You may change people's habits and behavior by regulation but they won't thank you for it and they probably won't ever like you for doing it. Meanwhile, I'm sure that Rush and his "ditto heads" are having a ball railing against the "nanny state" that this exemplifies! Keep it up and the Conservatives will have absolutly no problem winning everything in 2012!
photo
ElenaOfJersey
And all of y'all are subject to my thrall.
11:42 PM on 04/17/2011
"This is a perfect example of how progressiv­es lose the hearts, minds, and votes of middle America! "

Except for the part where progressives are just as disgusted by this policy as you are, right?