Huffpost Politics
Dan Froomkin Headshot
Jake Bialer Headshot

How 'Independent Expenditures' Are Remaking Elections

Posted: Updated:
Super PACs like Karl Rove's American Crossroads are using corporate money to back conservative politicians | AP

WASHINGTON -- The 2010 midterm elections were the first of a new era, one in which campaign finance rules no longer limit the amount of money special interests can raise and spend on political advertising.

In the wake of the Supreme Court's dramatic Citizens United ruling in January 2010, much of the initial attention was focused on the possibility that corporations -- suddenly freed from key restrictions -- would start to spend enormous amounts of money directly from their treasuries on political advertising.

But that didn't happen. Ahead of last November's election, only three companies spent a total of $54,500 that way, according to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP).

Instead, it turns out the big money is flowing into third-party organizations first.

As long as they operate independently of political candidates, Super PACs, a new kind of political action committee legalized last year, can accept unlimited donations -- and they did so in the 2010 election cycle, to the tune of a whopping $65 million. Corporate treasury money accounted for about $15.5 million of that; the rest was individual donations, the CRP estimates.

Add that amount to the spending by preexisting advocacy groups, and the result was that outside spending on elections was almost as high in the 2010 mid-terms as it was during the 2008 presidential election cycle -- and more than four times what it was in the previous mid-term election.

Total Outside Spending

Most groups are still obliged to disclose their donors.

But the most striking aspect of the 2010 cycle was the growth of the so-called "non-disclosing groups." These are nonprofit organizations that are allowed to engage in political campaigning, but don't have to tell the Federal Election Commission who their donors are. These groups used to be barred from explicitly advocating for or against specific candidates. But now they can do pretty much anything, as long as they don't coordinate with a candidate's campaign. And spending has shot up.

The spending of untraceable money has become particularly popular with conservative organizations like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which spent almost $33 million in the 2010 cycle; the American Action Network; and Karl Rove's nonprofit organization, Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies.

Heather Torres, the chief data scientist at AOL, contributed to this report.

Around the Web

Banking on Becoming President | OpenSecrets

Total campaign spending may hit $4 billion -

The 'big dog' in campaign spending -

Campaign Spending by the Numbers - But Which Numbers? -

Court Rolls Back Campaign Spending Limits -

Outside Groups Increase Campaign Spending - CBS Evening News - CBS ...

Does unlimited campaign spending help the economy? - By Brian ...

2010 Set Campaign Spending Records - US News and World Report

How to spend a billion: Obama will lavish on ads

  Obama Romney
Obama Romney
332 206
Obama leading
Obama won
Romney leading
Romney won
Popular Vote
33 out of 100 seats are up for election. 51 are needed for a majority.
Democrat leading
Democrat won
Republican leading
Republican won
Democrats* Republicans
Current Senate 53 47
Seats gained or lost +2 -2
New Total 55 45
* Includes two independent senators expected to caucus with the Democrats: Angus King (Maine) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.).
All 435 seats are up for election. 218 are needed for a majority.
Democrat leading
Democrat won
Republican leading
Republican won
Democrats Republicans
Seats won 201 234
Click for Full Results