iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Indoor Farming Could Be The Future Of Food Production (PHOTOS)

AP/The Huffington Post     First Posted: 04/11/11 12:41 PM ET   Updated: 06/11/11 06:12 AM ET

DEN BOSCH, Netherlands (AP) -- Farming is moving indoors, where the sun never shines, where rainfall is irrelevant and where the climate is always right.

The perfect crop field could be inside a windowless building with meticulously controlled light, temperature, humidity, air quality and nutrition. It could be in a New York high-rise, a Siberian bunker, or a sprawling complex in the Saudi desert.

(Scroll down for photos)

Advocates say this, or something like it, may be an answer to the world's food problems.

"In order to keep a planet that's worth living on, we have to change our methods," says Gertjan Meeuws, of PlantLab, a private research company.

The world already is having trouble feeding itself. Half the people on Earth live in cities, and nearly half of those – about 3 billion – are hungry or malnourished. Food prices, currently soaring, are buffeted by droughts, floods and the cost of energy required to plant, fertilize, harvest and transport it.

And prices will only get more unstable. Climate change makes long-term crop planning uncertain. Farmers in many parts of the world already are draining available water resources to the last drop. And the world is getting more crowded: by mid-century, the global population will grow from 6.8 billion to 9 billion, the U.N. predicts.

To feed so many people may require expanding farmland at the expense of forests and wilderness, or finding ways to radically increase crop yields.

Meeuws and three other Dutch bioengineers have taken the concept of a greenhouse a step further, growing vegetables, herbs and house plants in enclosed and regulated environments where even natural light is excluded.

In their research station, strawberries, yellow peppers, basil and banana plants take on an eerie pink glow under red and blue bulbs of Light-Emitting Diodes, or LEDs. Water trickles into the pans when needed and all excess is recycled, and the temperature is kept constant. Lights go on and off, simulating day and night, but according to the rhythm of the plant – which may be better at shorter cycles than 24 hours – rather than the rotation of the Earth.

In a larger "climate chamber" a few miles away, a nursery is nurturing cuttings of fittonia, a colorful house plant, in two layers of 70 square meters (750 sq. feet) each. Blasts of mist keep the room humid, and the temperature is similar to the plants' native South America. After the cuttings take root – the most sensitive stage in the growing process – they are wheeled into a greenhouse and the chamber is again used for rooting. The process cuts the required time to grow a mature plant to six weeks from 12 or more.

The Dutch researchers say they plan to build a commercial-sized building in the Netherlands of 1,300 square meters (14,000 sq. feet), with four separate levels of vegetation by the end of this year. After that, they envision growing vegetables next to shopping malls, supermarkets or other food retailers.

Meeuws says a building of 100 sq meters (1,075 sq. feet) and 14 layers of plants could provide a daily diet of 200 grams (7 ounces) of fresh fruit and vegetables to the entire population of Den Bosch, about 140,000 people. Their idea is not to grow foods that require much space, like corn or potatoes. "We are looking at the top of the pyramid where we have high value and low volume," he said.

Sunlight is not only unnecessary but can be harmful, says Meeuws. Plants need only specific wavelengths of light to grow, but in nature they must adapt to the full range of light as a matter of survival. When light and other natural elements are manipulated, the plants become more efficient, using less energy to grow.

"Nature is good, but too much nature is killing," said Meeuws, standing in a steaming cubicle amid racks of what he called "happy plants."

For more than a decade the four researchers have been tinkering with combinations of light, soil and temperature on a variety of plants, and now say their growth rate is three times faster than under greenhouse conditions. They use no pesticides, and about 90 percent less water than outdoors agriculture. While LED bulbs are expensive, the cost is steadily dropping.

Olaf van Kooten, a professor of horticulture at Wageningen University who has observed the project but has no stake in it, says a kilogram (2.2 pounds) of tomatoes grown in Israeli fields needs 60 liters (16 gallons) of water, while those grown in a Dutch greenhouse require one-quarter of that. "With this system it is possible in principle to produce a kilo of tomatoes with a little over one liter of water," he said.

The notion of multistory greenhouses has been around for a while. Dickson Despommier, a retired Columbia University professor of environmental health and author of the 2010 book "The Vertical Farm," began working on indoor farming as a classroom project in 1999, and the idea has spread to several startup projects across the U.S.

"Over the last five year urban farming has really gained traction," Despommier said in a telephone interview.

Despommier argues that city farming means producing food near the consumer, eliminating the need to transport it long distances at great costs of fuel and spoilage and with little dependency on the immediate climate.

The science behind LED lighting in agriculture "is quite rigorous and well known," he said, and the costs are dropping dramatically. The next development, organic light-emitting diodes or OLEDs, which can be packed onto thin film and wrapped around a plant, will be even more efficiently tuned to its needs.

One of the more dramatic applications of plant-growing chambers under LED lights was by NASA, which installed them in the space Shuttle and the space station Mir in the 1990s as part of its experiment with microgravity.

"This system is a first clear step that has to grow," Van Kooten says, but more research is needed and people need to get used to the idea of sunless, landless agriculture.

"But it's clear to me a system like this is necessary."

Netherlands Sunless Farming
1 of 6
Yellow peppers are seen under blue and red Light Emitting Diode (LED) lights at PlantLab, a private research facility, in Den Bosch, central Netherlands, Monday March 28, 2011. Farming is moving indoors, where the sun never shines, where rainfall is irrelevant and where the climate is always right The perfect crop field could be inside a windowless building with meticulously controlled light, temperature, humidity, air quality and nutrition. It could be in a New York high-rise, a Siberian bunker, or a sprawling complex in the Saudi desert. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)
Total comments: 158 | Post a Comment
1 of 6
This Photo
Silly
Brilliant

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Top 5 Photos
loading...
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

DEN BOSCH, Netherlands (AP) -- Farming is moving indoors, where the sun never shines, where rainfall is irrelevant and where the climate is always right. The perfect crop field could be inside a wi...
DEN BOSCH, Netherlands (AP) -- Farming is moving indoors, where the sun never shines, where rainfall is irrelevant and where the climate is always right. The perfect crop field could be inside a wi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 158
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
02:11 PM on 04/21/2011
LEDs will soon save a lot of the world's energy.
How to Design Your Own LED Strobe Light
http://www.ehow.com/how_5126594_design-own-led-strobe-light.html
03:25 AM on 04/18/2011
This makes me a bit sad. It's great research, but if we choose to, or worse, are forced to grow crops or livestock in a building, we are failing. Confinement and greenhouse farming and whatever kind of "farming" you call this non-"green"house method, should be supplementary at best.

Want to see urban farming that works? Google: will allen
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darlie Brewster
HAOL is censored, the truth is not here.
11:29 AM on 04/17/2011
If Monsanto has anything to do with it we will all be dead.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dustin Weida
09:34 PM on 04/21/2011
If that were true we would all be dead right now wouldnt we?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darlie Brewster
HAOL is censored, the truth is not here.
10:00 AM on 04/22/2011
Ask the 250,000 dead farmers in India that Monsanto duped into buying seed that that yields no more than a regular crop but costs them quadruple the price plus they have to use expensive Monsanto roundup pesticide. They aren't allowed to gather the seed , they have to buy new seed. These frauds duped these farmers into believing they would make more so Monsanto tricked them into putting up their farms.

http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/science_and_impacts/science/failure-to-yield.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av6dx9yNiCA
03:08 PM on 04/16/2011
HOLD ON A SECOND! Didn't you just have an article about how indoor pot growers are killing the environment because of the lights they use?

MAKE UP YOUR MIND!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
We built America without BO
09:27 PM on 04/23/2011
I guess if the indoor pot growers switched to LED lighting, their bills would go down and the environment would be better off for it. And those big electric bills that tip of the power company would be a thing of the past. Of course big pharma will be growing it outdoors legally once they lobby and legalize it for themselves..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Acebass
Progressive Liberal any questions?
05:12 PM on 04/14/2011
LOL you have one article talking about pot and it's carbon foot print because it's now being grown indoors then you have another article extolling the benefits of growing indoors.
The word hypocrisy comes to mind...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spikemus
Bacon-wrapped cubes of Kobe beef
09:19 PM on 04/15/2011
The word "ignorant" comes to mind for your comment since pot-growing operations are illegal and unregulated, existing in small and inefficient setups. None of those are run with this level of technology or professionalism- not to mention the fact that LED lights are vastly more energy efficient than the multi-spectrum sunlamps a pot grower would often be using.
03:10 PM on 04/16/2011
It's legal in certain states so the ignorance gets thrown back in your lap. And those states where it is legal will more than likely hold the most folks growing indoors.
05:23 AM on 04/17/2011
I would say that you are doubly ignorant for assuming that this is not the exact same thing that indoor pot growers are doing. They have access to LEDs and the average "normal" greenhouse where you would go and buy your flowers are using multi-specturm sunlamps as well. People in glass houses shouldn't throw around the word "ignorant".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
09:47 AM on 04/16/2011
Sort of like we allow pharmaceutical companies to sell narcotics, and punish unlicensed people who do the same thing, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Acebass
Progressive Liberal any questions?
03:05 AM on 04/20/2011
No it;s exacftly like that...fan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ted Bouklos
U can have ur own opinions but not ur own facts
01:52 PM on 04/14/2011
this could dramatically deduce the energy needed to grow marijuana being that it consumes 1% of the power consumption in this country and being that most people that partake in said activities care about the environment this technology should be welcomed news.
04:58 PM on 04/13/2011
After a nuclear power plant blows up and spreads radiation in the air, water and soil we may all have to change to indoor gardening. The people of Japan may be doing a lot of innovative things in the future.
02:26 PM on 04/13/2011
Might be the only way to get away from GMO contamination. It's almost too late for most corn seed.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
10:26 AM on 04/13/2011
Actually kinda shocking.

Think of the unintended consequences-yep we don't need farmlands anymore so let's build more urbanity on it and oh yes you can have as many kids as you want. All that farmland can be used
to house all those extra people. It'll be much like 'The World Inside' google it.
EvolveorPerish
R E anna what have you done?
12:48 AM on 04/16/2011
This is totally weird. How divorced from our planet can we get?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
09:49 AM on 04/16/2011
The thing is, population growth is not slowing, and we're doing all that ANYWAY. This is a way to help address the more immediate concern of climate change - reduce food transportation by having cities feed themselves, and turn what is now farmland into carbon sequestration.
photo
dubbleplusgood
turned off CNN, turned on CurrentTV
09:26 PM on 04/12/2011
While this may be a small solution for some areas, people forget topsoil is not wet sand. It's full of organics, organisms and minerals. And it's disappearing from the surface of this planet at breakneck speeds.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
midwesthousewife
10:20 PM on 04/13/2011
Thank you for reminding us of the living richness of real soil. Isn't there speculation that a number of "civilized" diseases may be due to the lack of exposure to soil micro-organisms, too little dirt in the diet? What might be the unintended consequences of a diet grown without sun or soil?
EvolveorPerish
R E anna what have you done?
12:49 AM on 04/16/2011
Yes, like beneficial bacteria. I guess we can all just buy yoplait!
07:47 PM on 04/12/2011
I wonder about the flavor of these foods. The land something is grown on--with the minerals and other nutrients in the soil--contributes to the flavor of grapes wine is made from (hence the term "terroir") and just as much to the flavor of anything else grown there. If these plants aren't grown in anything like real dirt, will they be just as flavorless as hothouse tomatoes or farmed fish?
photo
dubbleplusgood
turned off CNN, turned on CurrentTV
09:21 PM on 04/12/2011
not just flavor-less, nutrient-free.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
10:25 AM on 04/13/2011
Indeed!

We'll be able to feed the world but the food will have no flavor at all.
New version of Soylent Green.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skate Free
Run if you can, fly if you must!
01:53 PM on 04/12/2011
Why is it that providing for yourself is a good idea when it's about promoting locally grown foods, but a bad idea when it comes to providing for your own health care? If collectivism is good for keeping health care costs down through 'economies of scale' then what about food production costs?

LED lighting home grow systems? About $1000.00 to get started. Those are for the idle rich to grow pot or hot peppers at home. Poor folks grow their weed and food in dirt.
10:32 AM on 04/12/2011
what's the purpose here? doesn't the energy used in " farming"this way outweigh any posible beneit?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fogy
RIP, ignorance
12:06 PM on 04/12/2011
Consider the cost of fuel for farming equipment, the cost of wasted water and chemical pesticides. There is an initial investment for the buildings that can be spread out over decades. Also consider the high yield compared to the norm, both in growth speed and a reduced loss to environmental and pest damage.

Etc.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
10:28 AM on 04/13/2011
Actually it's already done for livestock in CAFO's.-same thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deweydecimal
@DeweyMai on Twitter
06:33 PM on 04/13/2011
Right because farming in the desert scrublands of California using aquifer water from Nevada is so much better.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
10:30 AM on 04/12/2011
Good reason to have Evergreen solar panels on your roof.

Evergreen Solar ES-A-210-FA3 210 Watt...
$581 Infinigi, Inc.
MORE electricity
LESS impact

Our mission is simple: Deliver more electricity with less impact on our environment. That means engineering as much electricity as possible out of our String Ribbon® solar panels, while reducing the silicon consumption and carbon emissions that go into making them.
http://evergreensolar.com/en/
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
10:29 AM on 04/13/2011
La Spam!!!!!!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
04:16 PM on 04/13/2011
Here is more SPAM I just ate this places applewood smoked bacon YUMMMY!!!

http://ncsmokehouse.com/
02:37 AM on 04/12/2011
I dunno... I agree this sounds really groovy (especially with the disco lights and all), but then again so did margarine when it first came on the scene.

It just worries me when I see food production taken even further away from the people who eat the food. I mean if we think that corporations have disproportonate control over our diets now, just wait until all farming is all done this way. It becomes something you need a master's degree to understand, when it should be a basic right of human existence.

I also just think that ultimately technology is not gonna get us out of the predicament that we're in. Fundamentally, we are just putting more people on this planet than it can handle. And every step we take towards a technologocal fix just allows our population to grow further, which really makes the problem worse not better. It's like we're all trying to come up with new gizmos to deal with feeding 8, 9 10 billion or more people, but we never stop to ask if a world with that many people on it is still worth living on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deweydecimal
@DeweyMai on Twitter
06:36 PM on 04/13/2011
While I agree with your sentiments on overpopulation quite honestly you have next to zero conception of how industrialized and artificial agriculture is right now in the US. California fields are irrigated with water from rapidly diminishing aquifers hundreds of miles away. It is an untenable situation. Arable land is in short supply and is only getting scarcer. It may be that solutions such as these are going to be needed when the nation starts to feel just how precious a resource freshwater and arable land really are.
07:36 PM on 04/13/2011
Oh I have a pretty good understanding of how mechanized farming works in this country, and you make a good point that it would be fairly hard to create a system that would be less sustainable than that one already is. And I suppose since we've already pretty much surrendered control over the food system to giant agri-corporations, they might as well explore ways to use fewer resources.

I guess I don't really have a problem with the technology per se, I just shudder whenever I hear people saying how this or that new groovy thing is going to fix everything, when it's patently clear that it will only really make things worse. I mean, where does it end? Will everyone in the future live like this: http://kawaiikakkoiisugoi.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/capsule-hotel.jpg

I guess it just seems to me that we'd be much better off focusing our energies on reducing our population and living in concordance with the earth's systems rather than trying to outsmart it at every turn. 'Cause you know... Mother Nature always wins.