iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Japan Nuclear Crisis: Officials Raise Crisis To Highest Severity Level, 7, On Par With Chernobyl

Japan Nuclear Crisis

YURI KAGEYAMA and RYAN NAKASHIMA   04/11/11 11:33 PM ET   AP

TOKYO — Japan's nuclear regulators raised the severity level of the crisis at a stricken nuclear plant Tuesday to rank it on par with the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, citing the amount of radiation released in the accident.

The regulators said the rating was being raised from 5 to 7 – the highest level on an international scale overseen by the International Atomic Energy Agency. However, there was no sign of any significant change at the tsunami-stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant.

The new ranking signifies a "major accident" with "wider consequences" than the previous level, according to the Vienna-based IAEA.

"We have upgraded the severity level to 7 as the impact of radiation leaks has been widespread from the air, vegetables, tap water and the ocean," said Minoru Oogoda of Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency.

NISA officials said one of the factors behind the decision was that the cumulative amount of radioactive particles released into the atmosphere since the incident had reached levels that apply to a Level 7 incident.

The revision was based on cross-checking and assessments of data on leaks of radioactive iodine-131 and cesium-137, said NISA spokesman Hidehiko Nishiyama.

"We have refrained from making announcements until we have reliable data," Nishiyama said.

"The announcement is being made now because it became possible to look at and check the accumulated data assessed in two different ways," he said, referring to measurements from NISA and the Nuclear Security Council.

Nishiyama noted that unlike in Chernobyl there have been no explosions of reactor cores at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant, although there were hydrogen explosions.

"In that sense, this situation is totally different from Chernobyl," he said.

He said the amount of radiation leaking from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant was around 10 percent of the Chernobyl accident.

Tokyo Electric Power Co., the operator of the plant, is still estimating the total amount of radioactive material that might be released by the accident, said company spokesman Junichi Matsumoto.

He acknowledged the amount of radioactivity released might even exceed the amount emitted by Chernobyl.

The company, under fire for its handling of the accident and its disaster preparedness before the March 11 earthquake and tsunami, issued yet another apology Tuesday.

"We humbly accept this. We deeply apologize for causing tremendous trouble to those who live near the nuclear complex and people in the prefecture," TEPCO spokesman Naoki Tsunoda said.

In Chernobyl, in the Ukraine, a reactor exploded on April 26, 1986, spewing a cloud of radiation over much of the Northern Hemisphere. A zone about 19 miles (30 kilometers) around the plant was declared uninhabitable, although some plant workers still live there for short periods and a few hundred other people have returned despite government encouragement to stay away.

Meanwhile, setbacks continued at Japan's tsunami-stricken nuclear power complex, with workers discovering a small fire near a reactor building Tuesday. The fire was extinguished quickly, TEPCO said.

It said the fire in a box containing batteries in a building near the No. 4 reactor was discovered at about 6:38 a.m. Tuesday and was put out seven minutes later.

It wasn't clear whether the fire was related to a magnitude-6.3 earthquake that shook the Tokyo area Tuesday morning. The cause of the fire is being investigated.

"The fire was extinguished immediately. It has no impact on Unit 4's cooling operations for the spent fuel rods," said TEPCO spokesman Naoki Tsunoda.

The plant was damaged in a massive tsunami March 11 that knocked out cooling systems and backup diesel generators, leading to explosions at three reactors and a fire at a fourth that was undergoing regular maintenance and was empty of fuel.

The magnitude-9.0 earthquake that caused the tsunami immediately stopped the three reactors, but overheated cores and a lack of cooling functions led to further damage.

Engineers have been able to pump water into the damaged reactors to cool them down, but leaks have resulted in the pooling of tons of contaminated, radioactive water that has prevented workers from conducting further repairs.

Aftershocks on Monday briefly cut power to backup pumps, halting the injection of cooling water for about 50 minutes before power was restored.

A month after the disaster, more than 145,000 people are still living in shelters, and the government on Monday added five communities to a list of places people should leave to avoid long-term radiation exposure.

A 12-mile (20-kilometer) radius has already been cleared around the plant.

The disaster is believed to have killed more than 25,000 people, but many of those bodies were swept out to sea and more than half of those feared dead are still listed as missing.

Aftershocks have taken more lives.

In Iwaki, a city close to the epicenter of a magnitude-7.0 temblor Monday, a landslide brought down three houses, trapping up to seven people. Four were rescued alive, but one of those – a 16-year-old girl – died at the hospital, a police official said. He would not give his name, citing policy.

Around 210,000 people have no running water and, following Monday's aftershocks, more than 240,000 people are without electricity.

In all, nearly 190,000 people have fled their homes, the vast majority of whom are living in shelters, according to the national disaster agency. About 85,000 are from the cleared zone around the nuclear plant; their homes may be intact, but it's not known when they'll be able to return to them.

___

Associated Press writers Shino Yuasa and Noriko Kitano in Tokyo and Eric Talmadge in Soma contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TOKYO — Japan's nuclear regulators raised the severity level of the crisis at a stricken nuclear plant Tuesday to rank it on par with the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, citing the amount of radiation ...
TOKYO — Japan's nuclear regulators raised the severity level of the crisis at a stricken nuclear plant Tuesday to rank it on par with the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, citing the amount of radiation ...
Filed by Adam Goldberg  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,327
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (87 total)
04:14 PM on 04/16/2011
Fukushima doesn't really compare to Chernobyl. We won't know how bad the situation is for years but just because they're both a level seven doesn't necessarily mean they're equivalent.

http://www.jerkscorps.com/2011/04/so-fukushima-has-gotten-worse.html
10:45 AM on 04/16/2011
I still think that fossil fuel-generated energy claims more lives and that nuclear has an important role to play in future energy policy. However, nuclear power plants should not be built in earthquake zones and those that do exist in such places should be decommissioned.
http://www.allergycosmos.co.uk/blog/how-is-our-air-quality-affected-by-the-japan-disaster/
photo
zelda777
transcend the B. S.
11:24 PM on 04/14/2011
Like the Global Warming Deniers, the Nuclear Danger Deniers will continue to insist that none of this really matters, it's just the liberal media, and big business really is the best.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
04:55 PM on 04/16/2011
The nuclear alarmists of the green movement have been ignoring science in the same manner they accuse "global warming deniers" of doing, they have just been doing it longer. It is an article of faith that "nuclear is bad" despite evidence that the opposite is true. Don't trust the experts is a common theme of both camps.
http://www.monbiot.com/2011/04/04/evidence-meltdown/
professor
Correkt the Spelling and Pick on the Moniker
07:01 PM on 04/14/2011
These informative posts are hard to read for hitandrunners on the go. Can you summarize?
photo
Aquest
No one here is exactly what they appear.
06:06 PM on 04/14/2011
If the highest level of this scale is 7, how would bigger accidents be rated?

For instance, if one of this plants (or some other plant in the world) blew up and throw radiation that covered the planet, would it still just be a 7?

If so, then what good is this scale?

The only way it would seem to make any sense is that above 7 everyone is dead so a scale would no longer matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBadExample
Friends call me ‘exampleicious’
06:41 PM on 04/14/2011
Above 7 it's time to get on a spaceship bound for Mars and hope there's enough atmosphere there to start over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seachange525
All will be well...I just don't know how yet :)
06:52 PM on 04/14/2011
I think they would use something Orwellian, like "Number 7 double-plus ungood."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ABACADABRA RABBIT
09:11 PM on 04/14/2011
:D
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brandon Baier
brandon_baier
04:13 PM on 04/14/2011
I have been called crazy, I have been called a "Foil Hat" wearer but hopefully empyrical logis will prevail.
http://www.riseearth.com/2011/04/haarp-magnetometer-data-shows-haarp.html
That article was posted on April 13th since then and just a little prior to that HAARP's website went down.
Why would they...WATER. Im trying to get all biblical but seriously, water in some countries is becoming Blue Gold, instead of black gold. Bio-fuels are the next big thing, and solar power.
As such this quake has done two things, Caused doubt in Nuclear power, stemming increases already in alternative and bio-fuel production, and polluted fresh water supplies for thousands of miles in all directions. Radiation is spreading all over the northern hemisphere, bio-fuels NEED water. Sugar cane, corn, everything that creates a bio-fuel needs to be grown.
According to "Blue Gold" a book written by experts in the Water Commodities World, European Water Cartels in combination with American corporations, like Nestle, are doing there best to monopolize the worlds water as a commodity.
The Bush family purchased 300,000 acres in Paraguay near the Guarani Aquifer, I smell another P.T. Boone. There is the evidence and a possible reason, but when something like water is being assaulted like it is from Japan right now, we have a major issue, and it doesnt seem like anyone is looking at the whole picture.
http://www.lund.irf.se/helioshome/magnetometerdata.html
Nordic "HAARP" data
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Time Before
06:52 PM on 04/13/2011
It is neat the way the information stopped coming out. Global Research's web page has lots of video on it and data. The question as we found out with TMI how much has been hidden from view? The GR TV x- nuke industry man stated that they should be evacuated 50 miles out at least that by his understanding one melt down is happening possibly two. The spent rod_____________with the pelts ... . . . . . . . . . . . blew up and through PL, 239, 238 ......3 miles away. The rods were exposed for 20 to 30 hours: At TMI they were only exposed for 8 and they lost 70% of them. Sea water and heat made the ______________rods brittle enough to be broken with your hand.

Internal emitters of Pl 239, Cs 137 (>>>>... ..you........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
06:35 PM on 04/13/2011
FYI

If time allows for you please watch both video links below.

Video #1 Presentation by Dr. Steve Wing @ Fairewinds.

"Dr. Wing teaches epidemiology at the University of Northo Carolina-Chapel Hill and conducts research on occupational and environmental health.

Since 1988 he has collaborated on epidemiological studies of radiation exposures to workers at U.S. nuclear weapons plants. His 1997 and 2003 articles published in Environmental Health Perspectives describe impacts of radiation from the 1979 nuclear accident at Three Mile Island on cancer rates near the plant. His recent studies examine impacts of industrial animal production and environmental injustice".

Video#2
By Arnie Gunderson @ Fairewinds.com
"Three Mile Island Alert"
Title: Three Myths of Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident

http://www.tmia.com/march26

I recommend this one because in Mr. Gunderson's latest video info update he provides important information to learn about the 3 myths being propagated by the Fukushima incident that are cross referenced in the 3 mile incident, meaning a pattern of behavior endemic to the nuclear power industry which does a great disservice in the interests of public health & information dissemination important to the public when these emergencies occur.

Reference:

Epidemiologist Steve Wing discusses increases in cancer rates after the Three Mile Island Accident
http://www.fairewinds.com/content/seven-wing-presentation-tmi-health-effects

These talks were recorded live at the Pennsylvania State Capitol on March 26, 2009.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
10:32 PM on 04/13/2011
I hope they have stopped cherry-picking the data like the "tooth fairy" project.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rich misty
Greed is not Patriotism
04:22 PM on 04/14/2011
You mean by burying every shred of evidence that conflicts with the industry "not one single person was harmed" propaganda line?
05:29 PM on 04/13/2011
Arnie has a new video out. New to me, anyway.
www.fairewinds.com
04:22 PM on 04/13/2011
I'm pretty sure that it won't be long till TEPCO will declare bankruptcy (their stocks are nosediving already and there are huge claims from the plant's neighbours yet to come) and they'll simply refuse to clean up their mess, leaving it unhandled as it is now...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
03:38 PM on 04/13/2011
This is an interesting & ingenious way to help the people doing risk mgmt. on Fukushima.

Flight risk: Russia in search for radioactive birds
Published: 13 April, 2011, 21:17
http://rt.com/news/prime-time/radioactive-birds-russia-east/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
03:29 PM on 04/13/2011
PAGE 5 of 5

I also believe it’s important to examine what this incident will do to millions of people who depend on sustainable future agricultural economies of Japan & risk to public health at the local level.

So simply ask yourself when doing a hazard analysis risk assessment in terms of the accumulative damage I believe a rational sane person would have to agree we need to wrap up this obsolete technology and move on to what works for us without the risk.

Simply ask yourself the obvious question; why is nuclear power generators not insurable?

Fukushima should put that argument to rest I believe.

The liability for the power generator comes from you and I being held as taxpayer bond holders where the US Government underwrites the liability insurance.

Here is the link for the informative interview with nuclear physicist Professor Michio Kaku & Amy Goodman

DemocracyNow.org April 13, 2011
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/4/13/expert_despite_japanese_govt_claims_of

Kudos,
Enjoy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
03:28 PM on 04/13/2011
PAGE 4 (replacement-original was a fractured draft-I apologize for my haste in getting it up)

What will be the total amount of radiation into the environment from all 3 reactors at Fukushima versus Chernobyl?

It’s unknown at best & a rough approximation at best, but will certainly exceed Chernobyl in my professional assessment.

What makes this incident so harmful & plays right into the devils playground is when it gets into the entire biospheric food chain network of the air, soil, & waterways that will have an enormous detrimental effect on every living system on the planet to varying degrees, for which the total impact is incalculable.

That in itself is why this technology is not insurable and why adopting this technology is madness in light of the fact we already have more cost effective means to deliver our energy requirements that are cheaper, cleaner, and safer and thus do not pose the risk to our public health & the sustainability of our planet’s living systems.
03:24 PM on 04/13/2011
On Eco-mobility.tv we are having a debate on nuclear energy and the future of green mobility after the Fukushima disaster. Please feel free to leave your comments by following this link: http://ecomobility.tv/forums/topic/ev-death-nuclear
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
04:04 PM on 04/13/2011
Thanks, will do!
Kudos
I will be your 1st Fan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
03:14 PM on 04/13/2011
PAGE 4
What will be the total amount of radiation into the environment from all 3 reactors at Fukushima versus Chernobyl" Unknown at best a rough approximation but will certainly exceed What makes it so harmful & plays into the devils playground is when it gets into the entire biosphere food chain network affecting every living system on the planet to varying degrees. Chernobyl's total discharge.
Also, think what this will do to the future local agricultural economies of Japan & risk to public health.
And what most people are not aware of is that Nuke reactors are not insurable & never have been. The liability for the power generator comes from you and I being held as taxpayer bond holders where the US Government underwrites the liability insurance.

Posted below is the link for the informative interview with nuclear physicist Professor Michio Kaku & Amy Goodman.

DemocracyNow.org April 13, 2011
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/4/13/expert_despite_japanese_govt_claims_of

Kudos,
Enjoy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brandon Baier
brandon_baier
04:21 PM on 04/14/2011
Please see my post related to HAARP and the world's water supply, after your assesment which seems spot on, you might find the evidence and purpose rather compelling.