iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Judge Rules 'I Heart Boobies' Bracelets Are OK For Students To Wear

By MARYCLAIRE DALE   04/12/11 07:48 PM ET  AP

PHILADELPHIA -- Breast cancer fundraising bracelets that proclaim "I (heart) boobies!" are not lewd or vulgar and can't be banned by public school officials who find them offensive, a federal judge in Pennsylvania said Tuesday in a preliminary ruling.

The ruling is a victory for two Easton girls suspended for defying a ban on their middle school's Breast Cancer Awareness Day.

"The bracelets ... can reasonably be viewed as speech designed to raise awareness of breast cancer and to reduce stigma associated with openly discussing breast health," U.S. Judge Mary McLaughlin wrote in a 40-page ruling issued Tuesday. She added that the school district had not shown the bracelets would be disruptive in school.

The American Civil Liberties Union, representing the girls, had sued to overturn the ban and stop the school from punishing their clients. McLaughlin issued a temporary injunction Tuesday that bars the Easton Area School District from banning the $4 rubber bracelets until the case goes to trial.

The judge heard testimony from the students and school administrators in December.

Easton school officials argue the slogan suggests a sexual double entendre and leads to in-school distractions. They also suggested two boys had tried to touch the girls inappropriately.

District solicitor John Freund said he was "very disappointed" with the ruling. He said no decision has been made on an appeal.

"We find it very difficult to believe that the judge could not find that there was a sexual double-entendre in the message," Freund said. "If the ruling stands, certainly the educator's job is going to be that much more difficult in deciding these issues with the court second-guessing them."

Easton is one of several school districts around the country to ban the bracelets, which are distributed by the Keep A Breast Foundation of Carlsbad, Calif. The nonprofit has said it sells the bracelets to engage young people in breast cancer awareness.

Students Brianna Hawk and Kayla Martinez testified that they did not intend the message to be sexual. They received in-school suspensions last fall but hope to have their disciplinary records expunged.

Martinez fought the case in memory of a late aunt who battled breast cancer, she said. Friends have told her that teachers have called the lawsuit a waste of time.

"I thought it was worth my time," Martinez, 13, told The Associated Press on Tuesday. "In our generation, all the teenagers ask me about the bracelet. So it shows the bracelets teach a lot to kids."

The Keep A Breast Foundation – which concedes their message isn't for everyone – gets $1.50 from each bracelet sold by an outside retailer and $4 from its own sales.

Schools from Florida to California have banned the bracelets. One Oregon high school said the message was getting lost on the ninth-grade boys who were wearing them.

The ACLU has intervened in similar school disputes across the country, including a second case in Pennsylvania and one in Wyoming. But the Easton families are the first to file suit

Freund has argued that some in the community perceived the "boobies" message as sexual, even if the girls did not.

McLaughlin, in her ruling, noted that the school itself used the word "boobie" in announcing the ban on the intercom.

"If the phrase 'I (heart) Boobies!' appeared in isolation and not within the context of a legitimate, national breast cancer awareness campaign, the school district would have a much stronger argument," McLaughlin wrote. "This is not the case here. One of the bracelets ... did not even contain the word 'boobies,' but rather said 'check y(heart)ur self!!'"

ACLU lawyer Mary Catherine Roper cheered the judge's decision, which referenced Supreme Court case law on the limits of student speech – and school censorship.

"She rejects the school district argument that it's really just for the school district to decide what is and isn't appropriate language to use in school," Roper said. "You look at it in context. It isn't written on a bathroom wall. It's a breast cancer awareness bracelet."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

Filed by Erica Liepmann  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 545
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andman0121
09:28 AM on 04/15/2011
God I hate these bracelets. Kids wear them in my class because it is "funny" and absolutely not because of the charitable aspects. To say otherwise is a complete and pathetic joke.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Morrison
Proud Dad, Engineer, Aspring Geophysicist
05:55 PM on 04/14/2011
Courts are micromanaging the schools, and putting school administrators in a no-win situation.

In a few months, I imagine, the same school district will be sued for sexual harassment for allowing students to talk about female body parts.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tom Joad
"While there is a lower class, I am in it "
08:35 AM on 04/14/2011
Anna Rachnel 07:55 AM on 4/13/2011
10 Fans
Become a fan
Unfan
I suppose you're all AWARE that not one cent of the sale proceeds from these bracelets actually goes to research that might help us eradicate breast cancer? Are you also AWARE that mortality rates from breast cancer haven't significan­tly changed in decades and that breast cancer incidence is rising, despite all this AWARENESS? So what exactly are these bracelets doing for breast cancer?
_________________________________________
so, 'IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH'?...survivorship from breast cancer and many other forms of cancer have improved quite dramatically during the last few decades; in the 1960's, a diagnosis of cancer was almost a certain death proclamation; in the 1980's, mortality from ovarian cancer was above 90%; today, survivorship is above 90%. Awareness of breast cancer such as that promoted by these bracelets encourages women to check themselves; self-checks often result in early detection and diagnosis - cancer in its earliest stage is often very treatable using advances developed during the last few decades. The increase in incidence mentioned above is largely due to increased awareness and early detection. Why would knowledgeable person oppose efforts to increase awareness of any form of cancer? I 'heart' boobies, too!
08:44 AM on 04/14/2011
I have no idea why you brought this to the forefront, but you've definitely given us a lot of opportunity for conversation.

1) Ovarian cancer -- You're wrong about survival rates. 62% of cases of ovarian cancer are not detected until they have spread. The survival rates are dismal. There is no effective screening tool for ovarian cancer.

2) Awareness is not the same thing as a cure. ANY breast cancer can metastasize - from stage 1 on. A breast cancer detected early isn't a cure. And some early stage breast cancers might never progress. The same thing is true of prostate cancer.

3) By the time a lump is palpable, it has probably been there for 5 years. That's not really early detection.

You are conflating issues here. First off, AWARENESS has limited benefits, yet it receives all of the attention (and money). Second, you have have AWARENESS without using the word boobie.
08:53 AM on 04/14/2011
If you'd really like to delve into the issue of survival rates, instead of just assuming that everything is just hunky dory, I suggest you read this by Paul Krugman. http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/24/cancer-survival/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrportman
08:22 PM on 04/13/2011
For those that would like to see this organizations 2009 tax return: http://www.keep-a-breast.org/financial-reports/2009_990.pdf
06:45 AM on 04/14/2011
Well the exec only earns $44,000.00 Per Annum for 25 hours a week - not a bad paycheck - and she seems to be bringing in the money - my concern is that they are teaching girls how to prevent BC - perhaps they should let us in on that secret - scientists have been looking for that one for years. I am offended by cutesy trivializing BC - Stage IV to stage 0 - none of them are cute - they are not yet preventable or curable - we do not know how a stage 0 suddenly presents with stage IV, so we need funds for stage IV research. We need early stage BC patients to know the truth about this.I might send the exec to Metavivor.org so she can educate herself. End of rant.

Stage IV research funding warrior.

Linda
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrportman
10:43 AM on 04/14/2011
Agreed - her pay isn't bad, but it's far from great (annualized for a 40hr work wk is $70k). It would be difficult to make the argument (based on their '09 990) that they are actually operating for profit as some have stated in this thread. Further, this was acutally their best year. Notice the difference between beginning and ending assets? No one is to say that the money they raised this year won't be used in the future for education or the like.
07:54 PM on 04/13/2011
As an 18+ year breast cancer survivor, I find these bracelets repulsive. There's a difference between what's legal and what's right, and these are simply not right. I expressed my opinion in great detail in a piece I wrote for NJ.com last December when this issue first emerged. http://www.nj.com/parenting/guest_bloggers/index.ssf/2010/12/i_heart_boobies_the_perspectiv.html
08:50 PM on 04/13/2011
Another blogger posted a link to this today. Well done and thank you for sharing!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freevo
Hey hey NRA how many kids were shot today
05:28 AM on 04/14/2011
A new subscriber here! Enjoyed your body of work !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Uncle Bill
ex-lawyer and teacher
02:37 PM on 04/13/2011
Perhaps some of the venom here could be redirected to the corporate outfit that peddles their pink ribbons as a corporate marketing gimmick that produces huge profits and a pittance in actual contributions and sues other cancer charities who use the phrase "for the cure" as if no one else but the Kommen foundation should be able to promote curing cancer.
04:17 PM on 04/13/2011
While I agree with you about Komen, I don't think this organization should be given a free pass. After all, it made over $1 Million in revenues in 2009. All as a not for profit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Uncle Bill
ex-lawyer and teacher
05:28 PM on 04/13/2011
Katie- I see your point. F&F for that and your other comments here.
08:37 PM on 04/13/2011
Thanks! I agree that Komen deserves a LOT of scrutiny.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
02:02 PM on 04/13/2011
The question of what is lewd, offensive, harrassing, hostile, etc. is too subjective to answer. I prefer to see the issue in terms of the students being in school to learn, and anything that distracts from that is not allowed, whether style of clothes, speech, or behavior. The right to an education creates a special situation in a public school environment where rights to speech, dress, and behavior can be restricted in order to preserve the right to an education. Out of school, students can fully exercise freedom of expression. In school, anything that doesn't detract from education should be allowed, but whatever distracts or detracts should not be allowed.
01:49 PM on 04/13/2011
Living near Easton,pa I heard the Whole story....boys were going up to girls wearing those bracelets and saying" I love boobies too! "And then grabbing their chests,it pissed off a lot of parents.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Bike Commuter
No More Hurting People
02:31 PM on 04/13/2011
I'm calling buII on this one. If a boy did that he would be quickly suspended.
04:24 PM on 04/13/2011
I don't know if it's bull or not, but I hope you don't sincerely believe that is how the system works.
11:58 AM on 04/13/2011
Having written about this topic, I wanted to add my 2 cents. Of course, we need free speech. People are just as free to say the silliest, most inaccurate, trivilializing, sexualizing, and mean-spirited things as they are to say evidence-based, loving, respectful, and compassionate things. I'm concerned about taking breast cancer seriously, respecting the diagnosed, getting accurate information out to the public about breast cancer, and acknowledging what these campaigns can do and cannot do. What we need here is true education about the topic. Teach students about the realities of breast cancer. Explain to them that BSE has not been found to find tumors early or reduce mortality. Ask them where the money goes for the things they buy? Encourage them to think about their assumptions, how to evaluate information, and what is important to them about their health and the health of those they care about. If you're interested in learning about some of the caveats of the boobies campaigns, read this. http://gaylesulik.com/?p=6605
12:15 PM on 04/13/2011
Intelligent, reasoned and articulate. Yes, yes, yes!
01:08 PM on 04/13/2011
As always, Gayle is able to accurately articulate the things that many of us feel about this topic. Thanks Gayle!
02:06 PM on 04/13/2011
I understand, but really (and you all may have a different opinion since I am assuming you are ladies...) MOST, no, almost ALL 13 year old boys who would wear these bracelets to school would not be doing it to promote breast cancer awareness, and I would imagine that a fair amount of the girls would only wear them as attention getters.

Asan educator I understand that breast cancer awareness is important, but so is keeping distractions out of the classroom. So my final decision would be to ask students not to wear the bracelets to school, at least after there were any types of incidents based on them.

I wouldn't have suspended the girls though.
11:55 AM on 04/13/2011
The school official should be banned for wasting time and District solicitor John Freund should made pay for the legal coasts.
11:45 AM on 04/13/2011
I got so sick of the "cuteness" of the whole "Boobie" thing that I created a Page on Facebook called "Breast Cancer Isn't Cute." Fee free to join me there if you'd like:

https://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/BreastCancerIsntCute
11:24 AM on 04/13/2011
Here at http://www.ihatebreastcancer.wordpress.com we also have bracelets. Many different styles, each comes with a personalized tag bearing the name of either 155,000 people in the US living with metastatic breast cancer or the 45,000 who died last year.

Please choose from the following:
I hate breast cancer because my old dog has more energy than me
I hate breast cancer because taking a crap is always on my mind
I hate breast cancer because my wig sucks.
I hate breast cancer because the mind I have left is always on cancer. I seem to be able to forget every other details but I never forget I have cancer.
I hate breast cancer because I don't enjoy s*x anymore
I hate breast cancer because my children will likely grow up without their mom.
I hate breast cancer because I have to go to the cancer center every week for chemo.
I hate breast cancer because I cannot be cured.
I hate people saying "how are you" in "that" tone of voice.
I am angry for all the things that were taken from me, for the pity I see in everyone's eyes.
10:54 AM on 04/13/2011
I think a problem with this is it makes the disease sound CUTE. But I bet that you ask anyone who's mother or daughter is dying, has died from it and I think they would not take it so light heartedly. It's not cute or funny, it is a serious problem among women and calling it "boobie cancer" devalues the seriousness and also degrades women at the same time by sexualizing this disease. Does our immature culture have to sexualize everything? Dying
I think a problem with this is it makes the disease sound CUTE. But I bet that you ask anyone who's mother or daughter is dying, has died from it and I think they would not take it so light heartedly.
11:03 AM on 04/13/2011
Ask me. I had it. It's not cute at all and I have the scars to prove it. People telling me here that I don't have a sense of humor or need to lighten up... it's pretty insulting. Here's the logic...

HEY, lighten up, We're supporting Breast Cancer! And if you had breast cancer and disagree, we're going to insult you! We're supporting breast cancer the way WE want breast cancer to be. Cute and pink and full of boobies.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EmmaDarian
All in all, I'm loving every rise and fall (RHCP)
11:26 AM on 04/13/2011
But you're ok with other survivors who don't disapprove of the bracelets, yes? You're not saying all survivors must feel as you do, right?

Not being argumentative or disingenuous. I'm asking if you're ok with survivors who don't mind the bracelets.
11:36 AM on 04/13/2011
My Grandmother had it as well and there is nothing cute about it. I wish you nothing but the best!
11:34 AM on 04/13/2011
Not sure why the post started to repeat itself...
11:36 AM on 04/13/2011
I think I'm the one repeating myself.
10:49 AM on 04/13/2011
What if they had bacelets for testicular cancer? "I heart b@lls". Wonder how that would go over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PolitiConservative
reasoned debate welcomed here
11:19 AM on 04/13/2011
OK, I will be laughing for days now ....

Thanks, you made my day!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EmmaDarian
All in all, I'm loving every rise and fall (RHCP)
11:26 AM on 04/13/2011
You can find a lot of things printed with humorous slogans about testicular cancer. There was even a tongue-in-cheek PSA that aired on primetime network TV about men getting the "family jewels" checked as a Valentine's Day gift for their partners.
11:37 AM on 04/13/2011
Yeah, well, I haven't heard any stories about bracelets/schools and the ACLU about this.