iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

The 2012 Campaign Starts Now

Obama Budget Speech

First Posted: 04/13/11 07:42 PM ET Updated: 06/13/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON – Forget the Republican primary battle. It’s so boring even Donald Trump can’t make it interesting.

But in case you didn’t notice, the 2012 general election campaign began this week. It’s going to be about taxes and Medicare.

President Obama used Wednesday's budget speech to try to set the 2012 framework, making plain on cable TV what he and his aides say to each other in private: GOP Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) handed them the keys to a second term.

The president's aides think they are in a win-win situation. If Obama can cut a budget deal this summer that preserves the essence of Medicare, he'll get credit as a deal-maker. If he doesn't, he has a winning issue for 2012.

After the speech, members of the administration held a background briefing in an ornate War Department office in the Old Executive Office Building. Complete with models of gunboats in the hallway, it seemed an appropriate venue for their essentially combative message.

Here’s the campaign “frame,” as Obama and his staff want us to see it:

“Of course everyone wants to cut the deficit. The president wants to do it by raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans while maintaining 'Medicare as we know it' as an open-ended entitlement program. Republicans, under Ryan’s plan, would waste $1 trillion by holding the wealthiest harmless, and would dismantle Medicare, the epitome of national community, by turning it into an underfunded, easily-downsized voucher plan."

Obama and his aides believe their approach not only has the virtue of being the right thing to do, but is also a political winner. Tax increases, always risky, are encased in a $4 trillion deficit reduction plan; an impassionate defense of Medicare is a good way to soothe his angry Democratic base. The program is deeply popular, especially with seniors and Democrats.

Bottom line: the president is willing, even eager, to have this year’s budget debate extend past the October 1 deadline and linger on into the spring of 2012.

According to background interviews with top White House officials, here is roughly how Team Obama envisions the political-fiscal warfare of the next year:

A final, successful vote this week on a budget for the rest of the fiscal year, ending October 1. The president, Democrats and Republicans agreed on substantial cuts, estimated to be anywhere from about $25 billion to $38 billion, depending on your ideology and arithmetic.

A vote, in late May or early June, on a bill to raise the amount of money the country is legally allowed to borrow. According to White House insiders, GOP leaders have said they won’t hold the bill hostage to another shutdown. “We can’t afford to have a ‘countdown clock to default,’” one Obama aide told them in a private meeting today.

But, as part of this debt bill or another enacted at the same time, the White House hopes GOP leaders will accept a “framework” that would set a target for deficit reduction –- about $4 trillion over 10 to 12 years –- and include specific budget cuts and tax measures.

The Obama crew is under no illusions that they can reach a full, comprehensive deal done as part of the debt-ceiling vote, and it sounds as though they don’t really want to get one by then. Instead, they expect –- even hope –- to argue about tax rates and Medicare for the rest of the year and into the next, if the GOP is willing to do so.

“I’m not saying I want to be debating these two matters in the middle of the 2012 campaign,” said a top White House official. “But if we are, so be it.” He was smiling.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON – Forget the Republican primary battle. It’s so boring even Donald Trump can’t make it interesting. But in case you didn’t notice, the 2012 general election campaign began this ...
WASHINGTON – Forget the Republican primary battle. It’s so boring even Donald Trump can’t make it interesting. But in case you didn’t notice, the 2012 general election campaign began this ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,018
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
05:36 AM on 05/04/2011
It is welcome development let us heat the road
05:35 AM on 05/04/2011
That is good all looking forward to it
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dhhh
11:17 AM on 05/01/2011
The world must acknowledge that radioactive mutation disturbs the delicate balance of not only the human body but the worlds ecosysytem and the balance so delicate that protects life on this planet. Only those who are not from this planet would dare to disturb that balance.The wages of sin are death. The wages of sin against the ecostructure is the end of life on this sacred planet
02:58 AM on 04/15/2011
In the end this election campaign will be about nothing but prohibition. And it will end with the election November 2012.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trublulu
12:04 AM on 04/15/2011
The president's speech really ruffled the feathers of the Teapublicans. Poor Paul Ryan was just so "hurt" by the president completely destroying his pathetic excuse for a budget plan.
Joe Scarborough was in a huff because Obama invited Ryan to his speech to "insult him". Micah replied "Isn't it better to tell him to his face so he knows exactly where the discussion is going?" Joe just cut her off without a reply and kept up with his shock that the president would dare to call out Ryan directly on his excuse for a plan.
Obama was absolutely correct saying that Ryan's budget was a plan to dismantle Medicare as we know it. Ryan's plan is all about cutting programs for the poor and lower income individuals while giving tax breaks to his wealthy backers into perpituity.
Boehner's orange face turned red with outrage upon hearing that Obama actually asked the most wealthy folks to pay their fair share.
"But, but, we can't create jobs if we tax the upper income people...." so the Republican line goes. How many of the super rich have been creating jobs during the last 10 years? And, not all millionaires and billionaires are in a position to create jobs. Entertainers, sports personalities, lobbiests, etc. are wealthy independently and don't necessarily create jobs.
Instead of giving tax breaks for richest among us, why not give tax breaks only to those who actually create jobs?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allen Jenkins
Virtual Ferroequinologist
11:19 PM on 04/14/2011
A president that actually proclaimed we did not become a great nation until 1965?

A first lady that freely admitted she did not realize we were a great nation until 2008?(no wonder they don't let her speak publicly on political matters!)

A president that hates the Constitution of the United States of America because it does not guarantee entitlements?

A president that hates capitalism enough to tax industries into leaving for other countries?

Even Adolf Hitler hated Social Democrats & Marxism...well defined in the new book "Mien Kampf, A Ford Translation." He well recorded history so much every dictator has read the original book. But everyone that tried to avoid the mistakes of Social Democracy & Marxism but desired to implement the failed doctrines, have failed miserably & unfortunately their nations were incurably destroyed by them.

When your talking billions of dollars, your not even putting a noticeable dent in the interest owed.

If you taxed the wealthiest percentage 100%, you would not make a noticeable dent in the debt, but you would soak up money used for investment in more industry.

As a democrat, I would be embarrassed to vote for a person that did everything he said he would not do, did not accomplish anything he said he would do! That's a recipe for a republican white house, senate & house!
05:44 AM on 05/04/2011
that is a matter of your opinion others is not
06:44 PM on 04/14/2011
Ya know, a real leader should lead and not blame everyone and everything else for their incompetence, lousy polices and inability to lead. Obama is not a leader but, an inexcusable failure and unAmerican disaster. Nov. 2, 2012...Independence Day from Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pine Cleaner
04:22 PM on 04/14/2011
Obama put some great ideas out there yesterday

I like his idea - `"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need"
04:33 PM on 04/14/2011
Which means he's a lousy Marxist! No thank you! Nov. 2, 2012...Independence Day from Obama.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whoknew---
05:41 PM on 04/14/2011
Ha!

Swing and a miss---

Bet you don't even know what a "Marxist" is?

duh....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katherine10
07:46 PM on 04/14/2011
The Communist Carl Marx said this. Redistribution of income is what Obama was saying, a socialist mantra. Take from those who work the hardest and give it to those who do not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
05:09 PM on 04/15/2011
Obama was arguing an old-fashioned lassiez-faire concept that those who had wealth should share with those who don't. It isn't marxist or a socialist concept per se but rather an admonition to the wealthy, particularly in England, to be concerned for others in society.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whoknew---
04:01 PM on 04/14/2011
ITS OFFICIAL----PROGRESSIVES NEED TO GET OUT AND BACK UP PRESIDENT OBAMA---

VOTE DEMOCRAT 2012---VOTE FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA!!!!
photo
johngary66
Accused of heresy and decided to go with that.
05:11 PM on 04/14/2011
It's official, real progressives need to find someone to challenge Obama so that our choice in 2012 will not be two Republicans. Anyone who still trusts Obama simply hasn't been paying any attention at all. He is Bush III, a Corporatist who abandoned his promise to restore rule of law as soon as he was elected. He put American Citizens on a CIA hit list thus expanding Presidential power even beyond Bush's power grab. He expanded the war in Afghanistan further draining the treasury. He has been an environmental disaster, allowing BP to continue drilling in the Gulf and not forcing them to pay what they promised. Rather than point out that Social Security and Medicare have always paid their own way when they were not being borrowed from by politicians, he puts them on his deficit reduction block. Rather than talk about jobs, he talks about deficit reduction. He's is not a wimp as some people say, he is a willful Republican. If he is reelected he will be a lame duck and there is nothing stopping him from appointing a Wall Street approved Supreme Court Justice. After all, anyone paying minimal attention knows he almost always sides with them. Why not? They gave him huge amounts of money in 2008. He talks about a $1 billion dollar 2012 campaign fund. Where do you think that will come from? Don't forget he promised to use public funding in 2008. This is not a man who deserves trust.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whoknew---
05:32 PM on 04/14/2011
That's right....let's split the ticket and let the GOP won....isn't that how Bush won?.....

lame----
05:46 AM on 05/04/2011
yes please
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
julescator
Just the FACTS, Por Favor!
03:39 PM on 04/14/2011
I could just scream. I turned on CSPAN and what is the HOUSE talking about? Abortion and Planned Parenthood. They actually have yet another bill on the floor to repeal Health Care. AGAIN????

The GOP is trying to run down the clock. They are NOT serious about creating jobs. NOT ONE JOBS bill! This is an outrage!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CR90
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
03:20 PM on 04/14/2011
I have a little piece of patriotic volunteer work for all on here. Contact your Senators & House members and ask that they help reduce our debt by changing laws so Hospitals & clinics can not spend money for Ads on Television, Radio, Newspapers or Magazines so our medical costs can be reduced. And the other part of this, demand that the Senate & House must change laws and forbid Hospitals & Clinics from paying doctors by the number or amount of tests and procedures they perform and by the prescriptions they order. Unnecessary procedures & prescriptions and media Ads drive up the cost of health care for everyone.
03:26 PM on 04/14/2011
Let's see, I live in New York state, 23rd district. I'm gonna call Schumer, Gillibrand and Owens and ask a bunch of dems to reduce the debt? I have a better chance of winning the PowerBall even while not playing it. That's the odds of that happening! I'm a conservative born and living in NY state and I feel cursed having to suffer with these dems, I have NO voice of common sense here. Kinda like living in Gulag.
photo
johngary66
Accused of heresy and decided to go with that.
05:19 PM on 04/14/2011
Peekskill, you said "I have NO voice of common sense here." Then you proved it. Duh!
03:16 PM on 04/14/2011
Funny! I thought the reelection campaign started Jan 21, 2009 the same exact day the Republicans started to campaign against him!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry Dennis
personal decisions, personal consequences
03:15 PM on 04/14/2011
Obama and his re-election team are delusional if they think that deficit reduction is
"their" issue. How short their memories are! Wasn't it just November when the electorate turned out in force to say "ENOUGH!"
That the message- a very strong message- was one of big government is not working, the existing "wash my back" methods are over if new electees have anything to say about it.
Add that the more Obama and ilk push for more of the same, motivation arises in more "tea party" type candidates to add their name to races, even those of Republicans perceived as ineffective. If the Republicans can come up with a candidate who truly reflects America's dwindling-majority desire for real change and fiscal responsibility, WATCH OUT Obama!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
dizmo4
03:21 PM on 04/14/2011
When have the GOP been fiscally responsible?

Bush cut revenue by trillions and increased spending as part of his adventure in Iraq and Medicare part D.

Reagan slashed taxes ( revenue) and increased spending on the military creating the nations first real structural debt. 

The only Republican that was anywhere near responsible was George Bush Sr who raised taxes and cut defense spending.
03:14 PM on 04/14/2011
Obama has never stopped campaigning. Thats all he knows what to do. He certainly doesn't know how to lead a country. After he loses in 2012, he should go back to block party organizing in Chicago.
03:08 PM on 04/14/2011
These are our hiring choices to protect our wealth: Obama the con artist or Repub crooks.

Either way the middle class gets their money stolen.

Are we really going to accept This????????
03:42 PM on 04/14/2011
Let's see. If these two choices are all I have, I'll go with the Repub crooks. They're busy creating wealth which doesn't hurt me and possibly I could work for them. On the other hand, Obama the con artist and unAmerican wants to confiscate what I earn and redistribute it to people who refuse to work, Repubs don't want to. As a conservative and working man, I'll go with the ones who would enrich me, not screw me.