More

Bat Disease, White-Nose Syndrome, May Increase U.S. Farm Pesticide Use: Study

Bat Disease Pesticides

By DAVID MERCER   04/13/11 03:08 AM ET   AP

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. -- A group of researchers says the threat posed to bats by a fatal disease isn't just a threat to the animals but to American agriculture, one they believe farmers and consumers alike scarcely appreciate.

Bats save American farmers at least $3.7 billion a year in pest-control costs by eating insects that feed on crops, a benefit that could be in jeopardy as a disease that has killed more than a million bats in the Northeast spreads to the Midwest, the researchers said in a paper published in the April 1 edition of the journal Science. They and others fear the disease could eventually affect fruit- and vegetable-growing areas in the West as well.

"Almost daily, we get the question of why should we care about bats," said one of the paper's authors, biologist Paul Cryan of the U.S. Geological Survey. "We don't feel we have much time to get the word out that bats are important and why they're important."

White-nose syndrome has devastated the populations of migratory bat species such as the little brown bat in the Northeast since it was discovered in New York in 2006. Since then, the fungus that causes the disease has spread south and west to 16 states and parts of Canada. More than a million bats have died, according to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.

But agriculture is a much smaller business in northeastern states like New York than it is in the Midwest. Just last month the disease was found in Ohio, one of the country's larger producers of corn and soybeans. It's also recently turned up in Indiana – another big corn and soybean state – while suspected cases have been reported in Missouri. White-nose syndrome also has been found this year in North Carolina, a big Southern farm state.

Some West Coast farmers and organic growers have talked for years about the effectiveness of bats as a means of pest control.

Cryan and the other researchers set out several years ago to measure that benefit, a task they and others say is very difficult. They began by looking at what bugs bats ate in the cotton-growing areas of south-central Texas. They were particularly interested in whether bats ate cotton boll worms, and they found they did – a lot of them. In all, each bat ate up to 8 grams (about the weight of two grapes) of bugs each night.

Earlier research the Science paper draws on indicates bats in the Midwest eat a range of pests – stink bugs, root worm moths and many others.

Using the consumption rate they found in Texas, the authors figured bats save farmers anywhere from $12 to $173 an acre a year in pesticide costs, depending on the crops they grow, pesticides they use and other factors.

The researchers consider their $3.7 billion estimate conservative, but they expect some skepticism.

"We expect there to be some people to disagree with the details of this, and we hope that that starts a broader scientific discourse," Cryan said.

He and his research partners also noted that, to a lesser extent, they're concerned about bats being killed by electricity generating wind turbines, particularly since the windy, flat Midwest has many.

Phil Nixon, an entomologist at the University of Illinois, works with corn and soybean farmers on crop protection and shares the authors' concerns about bats and white-nose syndrome. He just isn't sure bats could eat enough to cut down much on the many pests found in the millions of acres of corn, soybeans and wheat across the Midwest.

"I'm sure all of these would be impacted by bat feeding, but how much it is it's hard to say," Nixon said. "My guess is relatively small."

But bats are already playing a significant role in pest reduction in some Western crops.

University of California Extension Service entomologist Rachael Freeman Long works with numerous central California farmers who grow crops like walnuts and hang bat houses to attract and keep the mammals.

"Farmers love their bats in this area," Long said. "When you go onto the farm level and you talk to farmers, their idea is every pest that a bat eats is one less that they don't have to take care of."

Bob Borchard is one of those farmers. He says he and his bother Joseph have about 20 bat houses scattered over their 400 acres of walnut trees near Winters, Calif., primarily to get rid of a common pest called the coddling moth.

"They do a really good job," he said, explaining that bats take care of most of the brothers' pest-control needs. "It's about 80 percent."

No one knows how quickly white-nose syndrome could spread across the Midwest, Cryan and fellow bat-paper author Gary McCracken said, or whether it will eventually reach the West. But they worry that because the disease has moved quickly so far that it could drastically reduce bat populations in just four or five years – and force farmers to spray far more pesticides than they now do.

Until now, "It's not really been in the bread basket, so to speak," said Gary McCracken, a University of Tennessee professor of ecology and evolutionary biology.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. -- A group of researchers says the threat posed to bats by a fatal disease isn't just a threat to the animals but to American agriculture, one they believe farmers and consumers alike ...
CHAMPAIGN, Ill. -- A group of researchers says the threat posed to bats by a fatal disease isn't just a threat to the animals but to American agriculture, one they believe farmers and consumers alike ...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 81
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:03 AM on 04/23/2011
"Almost daily, we get the question of why should we care about bats," said one of the paper's authors, biologist Paul Cryan of the U.S. Geological Survey."

Because our country is overrun with stewpid, po dunk, backward, Hannitized, Bush-billies!

Gee, d'ya think they know what "bees" do?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
Question Authority
01:30 PM on 04/16/2011
Humans are suicidal.

There is justs no getting around it, it's a fact.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:04 AM on 04/23/2011
Yes, we have a lot in common with cancer.
10:05 AM on 04/15/2011
It is perfectly natural for various forms of viruses, fungi and bacteria to attack every species in the world. It is the way mother nature works. Its called survival of the fitest and in the long run it makes the species much stronger. It is very possible that there will be certain bats within the population that will be resistant to the fungus and the population and once those genes expand into the population the numbers of bats will expand according to their food availability and the quality of their habitat.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
03:52 PM on 04/14/2011
Bats sick, more pesticides, bats get sicker....
12:49 PM on 04/14/2011
This is something new to me. I have never realized how much bats help our society. I will have to do more research on this topic, but thanks for the information.

Stacy Ayiers
Green blogger for AZ Big Media
http://aznow.biz/green/paradise-valley-gets-first-ever-leed-certified-home
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
08:09 AM on 04/14/2011
Let's determine the top 10 foods for human consumsion and raise that.
Walnuts and cherry's are top of the list. Plant the prairie full of them
and solve out drought and erosion problems.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
08:03 AM on 04/14/2011
Well of course. Any new excuse to poison us some more
will be a good one.
07:45 AM on 04/14/2011
If a tax was added to support the preservation of our natural pollinators and other species, i'd pay, and gladly. I'd rater my tax dollars go to supporting the environment than a pointless war and irresponsible agriculture subsidies.
07:25 PM on 04/13/2011
Swifts and spiders also eat a lot of farming pest.
07:05 PM on 04/13/2011
You can buy bat houses at http://www.batconservation.org/

It seems like one thing those of us who live in the suburbs or rural America can do to support the health of the crops on which we all depend, is buy a bat house and/or set up some bee hives. The latter is somewhat complicated (and perhaps unwelcome by neighbors), the former is easy and cheap.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mississippi Red
Stoke City: ugly football that works
07:46 PM on 04/13/2011
Thanks for the link!
photo
mikey09
Living off the grid.
05:37 PM on 04/13/2011
Some scientist think cell-phones and that type of tech is responsible for the decline in the honey bee populations and now we have a problem with bats....not good, sometimes what seems great for man can be very bad for animals and insects and I promise in the end, we will need bee's more than the cell phones
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mississippi Red
Stoke City: ugly football that works
07:44 PM on 04/13/2011
We do need bees more than cell phones... we are captive to our technology instead of using it to create a higher quality of life. Oh, yes--- a higher quality of life has nothing to do with how many storage units you can fill up with crap from China or how its so easy to socialize with dozens of people all by yourself... instead of hearing the birds and realizing what a great morning it is to be alive.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:43 PM on 04/13/2011
Bat houses are easy make and they discourage the kind of crowding seen in caves, barns, etc that can spread white-nose. How much of a difference would it make if more of us living in rural and suburban communities put them up? Who knows? But it certainly can't hurt and who doesn't want more bats in their yard?
photo
mmsuki
Fine; I evolved, you didn't.
03:02 PM on 04/13/2011
Maybe the heavy use of pesticides is connected to the plight of the bats.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chaguru
02:56 PM on 04/13/2011
I've read time and time again that organic farming can prevent the heavy use of pesticides.

Between the erosion of our soil and the low quality of our industrialized farm foods, it really is time to go back to a more sustainable agriculture.

I am sure that this could also help recreate a good habitat for many local species.
07:25 AM on 04/14/2011
Yes, organic farming and avoidance of monoculture would help solve many problems at once. It would reduce vulnerability to pests, reducing the need for fertilizer, reduce nutrient depletion in the soil, and provide a much more hospitable habitat for pollinators and crop-friendly animals such as bats and bees.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harvo
Corporations are not people, they don't pay taxes.
02:49 PM on 04/13/2011
The corporations manufacture the pesticides, the corporations want more money, the corporations run the government.
So, there WILL be more pesticide use.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mississippi Red
Stoke City: ugly football that works
07:40 PM on 04/13/2011
This seems to be true. I shop at the farmer's market- but most folks do not have access to one like I do.

And leaving other animals to the side, pesticides and other chemicals finding their way into people over the past 5 or 6 decades- at increasing rates- is already a health issue that will continue to increase. Monsanto is not trying to feed the world so much as it is trying to increase its sales, and the governments aren't trying to feed their people for their well being so much as they are trying to quell the mob...

I'll plant some more tomatos this weekend!