More

Just How Long Did Jesus Stay In The Tomb?

Tomb Of Jesus

First Posted: 04/13/11 08:03 PM ET Updated: 06/13/11 06:12 AM ET

By Daniel Burke
Religion News Service

(RNS) As Christians worldwide prepare to celebrate Easter, they will follow a familiar chronology: Jesus was crucified on Good Friday and rose from the dead on "the third day," in the words of the ancient Nicene Creed.

But if Jesus died at 3 p.m. Friday and vacated his tomb by dawn Sunday morning -- about 40 hours later -- how does that make three days? And do Hebrew Scriptures prophesy that timetable?

Even Pope Benedict XVI wrestles with the latter question in his new book, Jesus: Holy Week, about Christ's last days. "There is no direct scriptural testimony pointing to the 'third day,"' the pope concludes.

The chronology conundrum is "a bit of a puzzle," said Marcus Borg, a progressive biblical scholar and co-author of The Last Week, a book about Holy Week.

But Borg and other experts say the puzzle can be solved if you know how first-century Jews counted time, and grant the four evangelists a little poetic license.

For Jews of Jesus' time, days began at sunset, a schedule that still guides Jewish holy days such as Shabbat. So, Saturday night was Sunday for them.

Ancient Jews also used what scholars call "inclusive reckoning," meaning any part of a day is counted as a whole day, said Clinton Wahlen of the Seventh-day Adventist Biblical Research Institute in Silver Spring, Md.

Using these counting methods, a backward calculation from Sunday morning to Friday afternoon makes three days.

Besides, the four evangelists were likely not counting time literally, according to some scholars.

"Expressions like 'three days' and '40 days' are imprecise in the Bible," Borg said. For the evangelists, "three days" means "a short period of time."

Ben Witherington, an evangelical scholar of New Testament at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Ky., agreed.

The phrase "three days," is a colloquialism comparable to "directly" in Southern-speak, meaning "after a little while," he said. It's anachronistic to expect the evangelists to monitor time like modern-day men, Witherington said.

"The Gospel writers didn't walk around with sundials on their wrists the way modern scholars walk around with wristwatches," he said. "They were not dealing with the precision that we do."

But precision, especially when it comes to the Bible, has been a hallmark of faith for many Christians -- especially those who equate truth with historical facts.

Most troubling for these believers is Jesus' own prophecy, recorded in the Gospel of Matthew, that he will rise from the dead after "three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."

Trying to reconcile that prophecy with the Holy Week calendar, ancient Christian theologians such as Gregory of Nyssa and Cyril of Jerusalem counted the eclipse of the sun after Jesus' death as a night, said the Very Rev. John Behr, dean of St. Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary in Yonkers, N.Y.

Didascalia Apostolorum, a third-century Christian treatise, took a more radical approach.

It proposes that Jesus and his apostles followed a different calendar than other Jews and celebrated the Last Supper on a Tuesday, meaning the crucifixion happened on a Wednesday. Some fringe Christian denominations still promote that theory.

Others dismiss historical revisions and say Jesus simply misspoke.

"To be technical, Jesus made a false prophecy, and that's not something most Christians would want to put that way," said Robert Miller, a professor of religion at Juniata College in Huntingdon, Pa.

But the point of Jesus' prophecy is to draw a comparison to Jonah, who was willing to die to save his shipmates (and spent three days in the belly of a big fish), not to set a timetable for the Resurrection, said Witherington.

Martin Connell, a scholar at St. John's University in Collegeville, Minn., calls the chronology conundrum a "never-ending question."

"So unsettled is the evidence, and so elastic, that the debate will likely always continue," Connell said.

The Apostle Paul wrote that the third-day Resurrection accords with the Hebrew Scriptures.

Some scholars, such as Wahlen, think Paul is pointing to a passage in the Book of Hosea, which says God will "heal" and "restore" Israel after three days.

Benedict says that theory "cannot be sustained."

There may be a very practical reason for the Resurrection to have happened in three days after Jesus' death, scholars say.

First-century tradition held that only after three days could you be sure someone was dead; after four days the spirit was presumed to leave the body.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Daniel Burke Religion News Service (RNS) As Christians worldwide prepare to celebrate Easter, they will follow a familiar chronology: Jesus was crucified on Good Friday and rose from the dead o...
By Daniel Burke Religion News Service (RNS) As Christians worldwide prepare to celebrate Easter, they will follow a familiar chronology: Jesus was crucified on Good Friday and rose from the dead o...
Filed by Josh Fleet  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 522
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Wood
A.T.C.G...(sigh)
10:21 AM on 04/29/2011
Seems like this would be really hard to answer since nothing was recorded about Jesus during his lifetime. The earliest gospel is about 40 years after his death...and was not written by a contemporary. Add the myth creation to the mix and everything becomes purely speculation. The story would have been immeasurably strengthened if someone...anyone, who had been there, would've said " I was there...I saw that stone rolled away and the risen Lord walk out of the tomb ". No one did say that. The story began at least 40 years after the fact. Personally...I suspect anything that requires the suspension of natural law. Since our planet is 4.6 billion years old and nothing has ever been proven to be a supernatural event...probably...supernatural events don't occur...(sigh)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:12 PM on 04/24/2011
Please post my comment that you've been keeping on hold for the last hour and a half, it is the result of many hours of in-depth study of Hebrew and Aramic texts and is completely relevant to the question posed in the article. Thanks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:26 PM on 04/24/2011
Ok, rewrite time.
Jesus was not in the tomb when the Marys got there on their first day, at the very start of their first day. Which is sunset Saturday night as we keep time now. For the phrase " dawn of" translated from the Aramaic means " dawning into, or at the start of", therefore the Marys got to the now empty tomb just after sunset on the first day, Saturday after sunset our time. Additionally, Jewish Burrial tradition, The body of Jesus was not completely prepared according to scripture before the Sabbath came, thereof they went to complete the preparations at their first opportunity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:20 PM on 04/24/2011
The moderator, has choked on truth twice now, hm a new record for them, no but the truth obviously hurt.
Regardless, the three day and three night reference speaks from death to heaven, and Jesus was not entombed for much of that time at all, I'd prove it with scripture but the moderator is hungry for the truth and would eat it once again, to my consternation.
I hope he wash's it down with living water....SIGH.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:33 PM on 04/24/2011
"te epiphõskouse eis" means literally "at the shining into", "at the dawning into", but then figuratively "at the commencing of", this Aramic phrase is used sever times in both the old and new testaments, and is used in the accounts in Matthew and Mark in the resurrection story. The "Marys" go to the tomb, but when exactly time wise does this event take place.
Ok, take everything you know about time, how we count it now and throw it away, it doesn't apply . In the times of Jesus, a day started at sunset and went until the next sunset, this is VERY important to remember. Therefor the Sabbath day, the seventh day ran from our Friday sunset to our Saturday sunset, got it? So , the Marys showed up at the dawn or beginning of the first day, our Saturday after sunset then Jesus was already not in the tomb, on our Saturday night. How can it be determined when on the first day they arrived, one must take Jewish culture and tradition in burial rites into account. to leave a body in a state of uncleanliness was anathema to the Jews, and Jesus was in such a state as scripture says that they didn't have time ( before sabbath began) to complete the preparation of His body. thusly they went to finish, at their first opportunity, and in great haste as well, after all He was their Raboni, teacher. Therefor Jesus rose on Saturday nite, our time.
11:27 AM on 04/22/2011
Don't listen to this article! I have an answer. we dont no exactly wen Jesus was crucified, we remember it on our own calender, he might have been crucified on Tuesday and raised on Friday. so this article is FALSE!!!! hee hee hee :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Quinn M
Feel trickled on yet?
08:13 PM on 04/21/2011
Just How Long Did Jesus Stay In The Tomb?

Actually, what's left of Him is probably still there.
photo
flinthfp
1John 5:11-12 Eternal Life in flesh
11:04 PM on 04/19/2011
Part of Friday, All day Saturday, Part of Sunday ...not a Full ...24 * 3 ...But rather spanning a 3 day period !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skyleg
unreconstructed liberal
10:04 PM on 04/19/2011
In the myth 3 days. In reality, he wasn't, so he never went there and therefore he could never leave.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matelyan
God's Son, Devil's Nephew
08:04 PM on 04/19/2011
Not long at all. For the Easter Bunny helped Jesus move that stone so he could fly to heaven. I mean how else do you explain the Easter Bunny's inclusion in this holiday?
11:28 AM on 04/22/2011
Lol nice explanation
-whispers- not really
photo
relians
the interconnectedness of all things
05:45 PM on 04/19/2011
if his day is 1000 years long, then it was only a few minutes
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:29 PM on 04/25/2011
Was he being prophetic, for a day is a year and a year is a day is for interpreting prophecy and the prophetic, but you knew that.
photo
Vieux Charles
Educating America, one liberal at a time
10:08 AM on 04/19/2011
You have it all wrong.

Luke 24:7 - The Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, be crucified and on the third day be raised again.

It is the third after He was "delivered into the hands of sinful men", in the Garden of Gethsemane, Thursday evening.

Christ announces the precise moment:

Luke 22:52 - "But this is your hour—when darkness reigns"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chw777
08:47 AM on 04/19/2011
Jesus was crucified on late Wednesday and rose from the dead late Saturday. The scriptures say he was to be in the grave three days and three nights, not three days.
02:32 AM on 04/19/2011
Show us any proof that Jesus as a man existed in the way he was portrayed in the Bible and *then* ask whether he was actually crucified, and then show your proof that he rose from the dead, and then we might actually consider your question of how long he lay in the tomb and being relevant. Until then your question and answer are truly meaningless.
photo
Vieux Charles
Educating America, one liberal at a time
10:13 AM on 04/19/2011
I said the same thing to some misguided dude who claimed Alexander the Great was actually a historic figure.

Everyone knows that if there aren't fingerprints, photographs and affidavits it just didn't happen.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andres64
Religion is a sectually transmitted disease.
02:30 PM on 04/19/2011
There are zero contemporary mentions of him.
12:31 AM on 04/19/2011
Let me get this straight. Ambiguous is good enough for how long the savior lay dead in the tomb? But the exact word of the Bible is demanded to be followed in all other respects? Make up your mind.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:32 PM on 04/18/2011
It seems very appropriate to me that the Lord Jesus Christ would eat the Passover meal according to the older calender that the Egyptians used in the time of Moses; the one the entire Old Testament and it's festivals were based, rather than the new lunar calenders the Jews were using at the time.
It is far from clear as to why the apostle John chose to refer to the newer Lunar calender in writing the account of the Last Supper in his Epistle but he lived to an advanced age, above 90 years old, he doubtless addressed quite difference circumstances, so perhaps with more study the explanation might turn out to be just as simple as all the so-called discrepensies scholarly Bible theologian thought they saw in this one.

But, now that we know that the Last Supper actually took place a day eariler, on Wednesday, rather than the traditional Thursday a day which has been celebrated for the better part of a Millenna, there's going to have to be a whole lot of reworking and adjustments made...not the least of which, there is the problem of all those who have accused Jesus of outright lying, or, as some have more respectfully put it, had misspoke
Himself, that I would love to see a written apology and preferably in an international Newspaper of record!
I would also like to see apologies made by all those who wrote books claiming the Bible was unreliable.
09:00 PM on 04/18/2011
The Bible is still unreliable when you take into account just how much the church of Rome really stands to lose once the truth comes out.

And those more interested in sanctimony than that truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chaapai
just an earthbound misfit, I
07:25 PM on 04/18/2011
in the second decade of the 21st century, it's hard to imagine that we still debate this kind of nonsense and superstition.

Why not ask how many animals really were on Noah's ark? It's a story. Nothing more.

no proof. no evidence: improbable and most likely nothing more than myth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:41 PM on 04/18/2011
...and you are commenting here, for what?

If our interest in the Bible is so irritating to you, why even read it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chaapai
just an earthbound misfit, I
07:54 PM on 04/18/2011
I, as an atheist, spend several hours a week reading not only the bible but the book of Mormon as well. I should actually take a peak at the Koran but i just have no use for it.

I find it important to know and understand my enemies and I fully, and truthfully see the evangelical xian movement as my enemy.

Let me just close by saying: I am not an atheist because I haven't read the bible. I am an atheist because I HAVE read and reread the bible. Once you see it for what it is, you can never go back to mindlessly following it.