Facebook has long been a tool for testing the romantic waters, with the cycle going something like: You send a friend request, you gain access to a profile and then, you stalk.
Flat out asking someone if they're interested isn't all that necessary when you can glean so much through the site's natural constructs. You can view your crush's relationship status, overanalyze body language in their pictures for evidence of a significant other, and then send a seemingly effortless message that actually took two hours to compose.
Adding to the veritable toe-dips of Facebook dating is a new app called iWould, a crush wish-list of sorts launched last month by Columbia University MBA graduates Jon Budish, 28, and Tariq Chaudhri, 27.
The app allows you to go through your friend list and select anywhere from one to ten people you'd be interested in romantically. The application cross-references your list with those of your friends also using the app. If someone you selected put you on their list, you'll both get a notice of the match.
"We're trying to help people connect with someone they're having a hard time connecting with, someone in your life," Mr. Budish said. He argued, rather ironically, that starting a relationship with someone can be hard if you kind of already know them, "Sometimes that's the most difficult part of dating."
The app aims to rule out the potential for rejection with its provision that if the interest isn't mutual, your crush will never know: Lists are kept private to the users. Downloading or "liking" the app is public though, so your friends will know you're using iWould.
Though the app is open to anyone on Facebook, its team is currently targeting marketing efforts to eight colleges and universities, including Cornell, Duke and Columbia. Mr. Budish, who once worked at Facebook, said a slow rollout is part of his strategy. Currently, the app has more than 3,000 monthly users and it has been responsible for 163 matches. The company recently received a valuation of $750,000 from a private investor.
Dating-based applications have taken on countless iterations across social media platforms recently and they've proved quite popular. In February, a break-up app notifying users of changes in a crush's relationship status gained 3.6 million users in less than a week before being shut down because a Facebook automated screening system allegedly deemed it spamlike.
The dating website Zoosk started out as a Facebook app and saw 5 million unique visitors last December, according to ComScore. And Luv@FirstTweet, launched in January, matches users based on information people provide in answers to questions on Twitter.
iWould hopes to distinguish itself from the others by making matches happen only with those on your friend list. Online dating industry consultant David Evans said the app does seem to offer a new angle.
"It's an interesting take; I like the double-blind situation," he said.
Still, Mr. Evans predicted that iWould will face the same challenges as other dating apps, including the costs of advertising if the app doesn't spread to enough people on its own, and the one-hit- wonder pitfall.
"You use it once or twice and then you never go back to it again," he said. "What are they going to do to sustain engagement?"
For iWould to be useful in the first place, the idea has to catch on with your friends. If they aren't using it, there's no chance of a match. On the other hand, if your friends were to use it and keep rotating people through their lists to figure out every person who is interested in them, they'd be eliminating part of the app's appeal.
Mr. Budish said there are delays in place to prevent beating the system (that's also why lists are limited to ten people).
"We wanted to make a match mean something," he said, adding that otherwise, "I could make a list of 500 girls. I obviously am not interested in all 500."
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.