iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Paul Ryan Budget Proposal Passes House Vote

By ANDREW TAYLOR   04/15/11 02:26 PM ET   AP

Paul Ryan Budget Proposal House Vote

WASHINGTON -- The House has passed a Republican budget blueprint proposing to fundamentally overhaul Medicare for future beneficiaries while combating out-of-control budget deficits. It would impose sharp spending cuts on social safety net programs like food stamps and Medicaid.

The GOP proposal passed 235-193, with every Democrat voting "no." The nonbinding plan lays out a fiscal vision cutting $6.2 trillion over 10 years from the budget submitted by President Barack Obama.

It calls for transforming Medicare from a program in which the government directly pays medical bills into a voucher-like system that subsidizes purchases of private insurance plans. People 55 and over would remain in the current system, but younger workers would receive subsidies that would steadily lose value over time.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

A bold but politically risky plan to cut trillions of dollars from the federal budget steamed toward a party-line House vote Friday, as insurgent Republicans rallied behind the idea of fundamentally reshaping the government's role in health care for the elderly and the poor.

The GOP plan proposes a federal budget totaling $3.5 trillion next year, while promising more than $6 trillion in accumulated spending cuts over the next decade compared with the budget that President Barack Obama offered in February. It relies on stiff cuts to domestic agency accounts, food stamps and the Medicaid health care program for the poor and disabled.

The GOP's solution to unsustainable deficits that presently require the government to borrow more than 40 cents of every dollar it spends is to relentlessly attack the spending side of the ledger while leaving Bush-era revenue levels intact. It calls for tax reform that would lower the top income tax rates for corporations and individuals by cleaning out a tax code cluttered with tax breaks and preferences, but parts company with Obama and the findings of a bipartisan deficit commission, who propose devoting about $100 billion a year in new revenues to easing the deficit.

The Republican plan "disavows the relentless government spending, taxing and borrowing that are leading America, right at this moment, toward a debt-fueled economic crisis," according to the document.

Democrats and many budget experts say this spending-cuts-only approach is fundamentally unfair, targeting social safety net programs like Medicaid and food stamps while leaving in place a tax system they say bestows too many benefits on the wealthy.

Republicans shied away from tackling Social Security shortfalls, steering clear of a political minefield.

But their budget plan calls for transforming Medicare from a program in which the government directly pays medical bills into a voucher-like system that subsidizes purchases of private insurance plans. People 55 and over would remain in the current system, but younger workers would receive subsidies that would steadily lose value over time.

"The changes being proposed would not affect one senior citizen in America, not one. Anyone 55 years and older will not be affected by any of these changes," said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. "But if you're 54 and younger, those Americans understand that if we don't make changes, the programs won't be there."

Virtually every budget expert in Washington agrees that projected Medicare cost increases are unsustainable, but the GOP initiative – attacked by Democrats as ending Medicare's guarantee as we know it – has launched a major-league Washington imbroglio.

The primary author of the GOP plan is unfazed by the Democratic attacks.

"The biggest threat to Medicare is the status quo and the people defending it," House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., told The Associated Press on Thursday.

Democrats countered with official estimates showing the GOP plan would provide vouchers whose value would steadily erode.

"They end the Medicare guarantee," said top Budget Committee Democrat Chris Van Hollen of Maryland. "They force seniors to leave the Medicare program and go into the private insurance market where costs continue to rise day in and day out."

The House began debate on the measure Thursday and continued Friday with the easy defeat of two liberal budget alternatives. In a tricky vote Friday, a plan offered by the conservative Republican Policy Committee failed, 136-119, in a tally which most Democrats withheld their votes. The Democratic strategy was to force some Republicans to vote against the conservative plan, which was being "scored" by anti-tax groups like the Club for Growth, which supports economic conservatives in GOP primary races. Had the conservative plan actually passed, it would have derailed the underlying GOP budget.

The GOP plan isn't actual legislation. Instead, under the arcane and decidedly imperfect congressional budget process, the measure sketches out a nonbinding blueprint each year for running the government. The resolution doesn't require the president's signature, but it does set the framework for changes to spending or tax policy in follow-up legislation.

The most immediate impact of the GOP plan would be to cut the $1 trillion-plus budget for appropriated programs next year by $30 billion, following on $38 billion in cuts just adopted. That would return domestic agency accounts below levels when George W. Bush left office.

Friday's voting comes on the heels of final congressional action on a long-overdue plan to wrap up the 2011 budget year. That measure claims $38 billion in savings but just $20 billion to $25 billion in lower deficits because illusory spending cuts comprise a big portion of the measure.

The Democratic-controlled Senate has yet to produce its alternative plan as the Budget Committee chairman, Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., and other members of Obama's independent fiscal commission pursue a bipartisan "grand bargain" blending big spending curbs with new revenues flowing from a simplified tax code.

The budget deficit is projected at an enormous $1.6 trillion this year, but more ominously, current projections show an even worse mismatch as the baby boom generation retires and Medicare costs consume an ever-growing share of the budget. But there's a standoff between House Republicans and Obama over the president's plan to raise taxes on upper-income people.

For the long term, Ryan's 10-year plan still can't claim a balanced budget by the end of the decade because of promises to not increase taxes or change Medicare and Social Security benefits for people 55 and over.

But eventually annual deficits are projected to fall to the $400 billion range, enough to stabilize the nation's finances and prevent a European-style debt crisis that could force far harsher steps, Ryan says.

The GOP plan seeks to cut $5.8 trillion from the budget. But that amount is inflated because, like Obama, the Ryan plan underestimates the likely costs of military operations overseas to produce $1 trillion in iffy spending cuts.

The GOP measure also comes after Obama on Wednesday promised stiffer deficit curbs than contained in his February budget.

Obama proposed reducing deficits by $4 trillion over 12 years, with $3 trillion coming from spending reductions and $1 trillion from additional revenue. He would leave Medicare and Medicaid intact but with new cost controls.

But after Ryan asked the White House budget office for more details, he was pointed to a news release.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The House has passed a Republican budget blueprint proposing to fundamentally overhaul Medicare for future beneficiaries while combating out-of-control budget deficits. It would impose s...
WASHINGTON -- The House has passed a Republican budget blueprint proposing to fundamentally overhaul Medicare for future beneficiaries while combating out-of-control budget deficits. It would impose s...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,590
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (80 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kome Chris-ukoko
03:57 PM on 05/27/2011
http://socyberty.com/politics/paul-ryans-america/

great article with more updates and a deeper look at the ryan plan
11:56 PM on 04/20/2011
ONLY IF YOU LIVED ON MARS

America witness today Republican Paul Ryan couldn’t get white people in his Town Hall meeting to buy his BS! Americans also saw that Ryan couldn’t answer hard question about his deficit reducing plan! When asked why aren’t the rich and the super rich not tax more” Ryan reply. My plan does… Some in the audience laugh and replied BULL!!!! Only if you lived on Mars would you believe that Republican would vote Republican. After a Republican President and a Republican house receive a 800 surplus! Then turn a 13 trillion debt over to Democrat President Obama! Then charge President Obama with run away spending! GO FIGURE!! Only if you live on Mars!!! What Republican Ryan believe is that he can sell his lie to white people. Who he thinks hates President Obama because he is black! So his plan WOULD NOT really matter! Just promote hate and divide…White people would buy his BS! WRONG! There may be some whites that couldn’t careless whether Ryan plan is legit! They just hate Obama! Ryan problem is the midterm election whites did that! Today it is backfiring on WHITE PEOPLE! 8 Republican are under recall and many more are coming! The Republican politician are responsible for 13 trillion dollars of the 14.5 trillion dollar!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wakeupyouall
01:39 AM on 04/18/2011
And it goes to the senate where it dies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Igotgasbaby
Hi, My Name Peggy
06:10 PM on 04/17/2011
I think the first spending cuts should take away all the benefits and perks of being in Congress. Make them pay for their own health insurance, 401(k), etc. Lower their salaries to median average American income and see if they can survive on what they expect everyone else to survive on. just sayin' ...
realmystical
repubs - bad for children & other living things
09:26 PM on 04/16/2011
Will there be any dream left for my grandchildren? The America I once knew learned from Vietnam, valued education and instituted programs to make sure that a good education and higher education was financially available to the majority of our children, our elderly were revered and taken care of (especially those who served their country), teachers were respected, working people were not maligned and politicians sometimes succeeded in representing their constituents, the American people. I used to laugh at these republicans taking themselves so seriously and not recognizing that they do not offer enough, are not smart enough, do not have leadership qualities, have no presidential temperament, and have no hearts or souls for the people. Tonight for some reason, it just makes me sad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
antmousie
11:34 PM on 04/16/2011
Actually, I believe that a whole lot of the snark that goes on is to cover up extreme sadness for the reasons you mentioned. I know mine is.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justan Olfrend
Liberal, Progressive, Independent, American
04:57 PM on 04/16/2011
If they will offer their glass jaw by threatening Social Security and Medicare, then it would rightfully be considered political malpractice not to hit it. Hard. Let's hope the Democrats can do this with such an easy pitch across the plate. The future of the middle & working class hangs in the balance.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ConsensusReality
RootenTootenZooten
02:55 PM on 04/16/2011
Votes for Ryan's budget will be Booger Men in 2012.
02:13 PM on 04/16/2011
Vote Republican if you want the US to look like Somalia. Toothless government, low taxes and uncontrolled guns. Why not just send them there and we'll continue to perfect the union here?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Igotgasbaby
Hi, My Name Peggy
06:12 PM on 04/17/2011
Or Arizona, without the low taxes
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
connie o
An Independent Thinker
12:20 PM on 04/16/2011
As usual, the GOP just wants to generate new business for the insurance companies that support them. I can understand that everyone including the rich and corporations wants to be represented in Congress. I just can't understand how middle class Americans can vote for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kurt
Creates: sculpture. Loves: husband & chihuahuas. V
09:59 AM on 04/16/2011
Republicans desire to return to 19th societal values. Sell-outs to big money all, everything the Republicans do including Paul Ryan's proposed budget attempts to destroy Johnson's Great Society and Roosevelt's New Deal, without even balancing the budget, and continues the trend towards an inequality of American income that would embarrass Queen Victoria.

The Republican Supreme Court gave corporations pre-20th century influence in politics. Many Republicans would rewrite the 14th amendment to keep kids of undocumented workers from citizenship. Still more would stop unemployment insurance and like AZ Governor Jan Brewer jail undocumented workers in privately run prisons.

I admire many things about the 19th century -- abolition of slavery, intellectual curiosity, the progressive movement, neo-classical architecture, workers rights... Yet, I would never want to return even in part to the morality, health care, social structure, and income inequality of that complex culture.  

Those Republicans  wanting to shrink the federal government to Coolidge-era size and influence, I think, kill that which made our society great - a movement up and up in terms of income euqality, human rights, a strong federal system, free education for all, and a spirit of exploration... All  incompatible with the mid-Victorian legal, moral & state rights values, the worst of the 19th century, Republicans seem to love and which the rest of us discarded 150+ years ago.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dwright
Religion is man-created.
07:03 AM on 04/16/2011
What this will do is stop anyone from climbing out of the working class to middle class to upper middle class etc.  It will stop the rise out of class in its tracks.  It takes generations to work your way up in America anyway for the typical family.

Right now the way to build wealth is by the transfer of property from one generation to another - by not allowing parents the ability to have anything left to transfer to their offspring makes it so that each working class person starts from ground zero over and over again. Rising Medical costs and bankruptcy's due to medical treatments have cause this.

The wealthy transfer their wealth over and over again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
connie o
An Independent Thinker
12:21 PM on 04/16/2011
f&f. Good analogy!
photo
olehippie
expect nothing and you will never be disappointed
04:16 PM on 04/16/2011
Already a fan; keep it up!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mad as heck
Just say No to lobbyists
02:08 AM on 04/16/2011
Just to clear up a couple of things: The voucher doesn't go toward medical costs. It goes toward premium and is paid directly to the insurance plan of choice. So you won't "run out" of voucher money, but you many reach the cap on certain services, or the voucher may have fewer benefits or more out of pocket costs. Ryan's plan doesn't stipulate an amount for the voucher, just that sicker beneficiaries would get a higher amount, and low income seniors would get assistance with out of pockets. Also, any plan participating in the Medicare exchange would have to agree to take all comers (as long as the premium is paid).

The bottom line is, it doesn't compute that the government can save money by laying off healthcare insurance costs on private, profit-making insurance companies for a fixed amount per person, and still provide the comprehensive care seniors have come to expect under Medicare. Something's go to give, and it will be the coverage, care and costs for the individual. Sure, Ryan touts the benefits of the free market to drive down costs, but where has that worked in the current free market private health insurance industry? Color me deeply skeptical.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mad as heck
Just say No to lobbyists
02:11 AM on 04/16/2011
Meant to say, "the insurance plan" may have fewer benefits or more costs, not "the voucher."
08:13 AM on 04/16/2011
Democrats need to drive home the point that "voucher system" is just another word for "privatizing Medicare," and is just the latest attempt by the GOP to make the idea palatable to people by changing the semantics.

As for the GOP argument that the free market "drives costs down," it doesn't take a rocket scientist to do the math. By privatizing Medicare, we would be turning it over to the for-profit insurance industry, adding middlemen, such as UnitedHealth Group, which was famously reported to be compensating one CEO, Stephen Hemsley, to the tune of $819,000 per day, or roughly $103,000 per hour. Privatizing Medicare turns it over to a for-profit industry, which -- during the health care wars of 2009, waged a $1.5 million per-day campaign to extoll the evils of universal health care, and which spends spend 1 out of every 3 health care dollars on lobbying, PR and executive compensation packages. How many of of their insured members were denied care to provide these obscene profits? How many people died for lack of coverage when they needed it most?

The insurance industry knows that insuring people can be an obscenely lucrative business, and they want a monopoly on this. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that -- by spending the remaining 2 out of every 3 dollars on health care, instead of on lobbying, PR and CEO pay -- such a system might actually be able to break even AND provide actual health care.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
connie o
An Independent Thinker
12:24 PM on 04/16/2011
f&f. This is a great argument! Keep it out there.
photo
budanatr
US Expat in EU
02:02 AM on 04/16/2011
$5,000 voucher per year for a $36,000 per year policy. Now that is sounds like an interesting deal.
Any senior that votes GOP deserves that deal.
photo
budanatr
US Expat in EU
01:48 AM on 04/16/2011
The spin and propganda machine begin. The right wing now does what it does best. Propaganda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kibibi
those on the right continue to be wrong
01:14 AM on 04/16/2011
guess Alan Grayson was right, when the money from the voucher runs out, after ooooh let's say one hospital visit,,, the only choice poor old people will have is to either, don't get sick, but, if they do, hurry up and die fast,, those compassion righties showing so much love to we let's fortunate Americans,, that's your trickle down theory at work
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
antmousie
11:42 PM on 04/16/2011
Actually since the voucher amt would be paid directly to your insurance company, they could simply decide that you have reached your max benefits and your on your own. They also want to revert back to allowing insurance companies to impose annual and lifetime caps, and denials of coverage based on pre-existings, cancellations of policies for unintentional or made up technicalities with original applications. In the end, yes, Alan Grayson seemed to have it correct. That said, it would also lower the Soc. Sec. responsibility. Win-win for GOP.