More

America's Richest Taxpayers See Federal Taxes Dramatically Drop

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER   04/17/11 04:02 PM ET   AP

Champagne

WASHINGTON -- As millions of procrastinators scramble to meet Monday's tax filing deadline, ponder this: The super rich pay a lot less taxes than they did a couple of decades ago, and nearly half of U.S. households pay no income taxes at all.

The Internal Revenue Service tracks the tax returns with the 400 highest adjusted gross incomes each year. The average income on those returns in 2007, the latest year for IRS data, was nearly $345 million. Their average federal income tax rate was 17 percent, down from 26 percent in 1992.

Over the same period, the average federal income tax rate for all taxpayers declined to 9.3 percent from 9.9 percent.

The top income tax rate is 35 percent, so how can people who make so much pay so little in taxes? The nation's tax laws are packed with breaks for people at every income level. There are breaks for having children, paying a mortgage, going to college, and even for paying other taxes. Plus, the top rate on capital gains is only 15 percent.

There are so many breaks that 45 percent of U.S. households will pay no federal income tax for 2010, according to estimates by the Tax Policy Center, a Washington think tank.

"It's the fact that we are using the tax code both to collect revenue, which is its primary purpose, and to deliver these spending benefits that we run into the situation where so many people are paying no taxes," said Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the center, which generated the estimate of people who pay no income taxes.

The sheer volume of credits, deductions and exemptions has both Democrats and Republicans calling for tax laws to be overhauled. House Republicans want to eliminate breaks to pay for lower overall rates, reducing the top tax rate from 35 percent to 25 percent. Republicans oppose raising taxes, but they argue that a more efficient tax code would increase economic activity, generating additional tax revenue.

President Barack Obama said last week he wants to do away with tax breaks to lower the rates and to reduce government borrowing. Obama's proposal would result in $1 trillion in tax increases over the next 12 years. Neither proposal included many details, putting off hard choices about which tax breaks to eliminate.

In all, the tax code is filled with a total of $1.1 trillion in credits, deductions and exemptions, an average of about $8,000 per taxpayer, according to an analysis by the National Taxpayer Advocate, an independent watchdog within the IRS.

More than half of the nation's tax revenue came from the top 10 percent of earners in 2007. More than 44 percent came from the top 5 percent. Still, the wealthy have access to much more lucrative tax breaks than people with lower incomes.

Obama wants the wealthy to pay so "the amount of taxes you pay isn't determined by what kind of accountant you can afford."

Eric Schoenberg says to sign him up for paying higher taxes. Schoenberg, who inherited money and has a healthy portfolio from his days as an investment banker, has joined a group of other wealthy Americans called United for a Fair Economy. Their goal: Raise taxes on rich people like themselves.

Shoenberg, who now teaches a business class at Columbia University, said his income is usually "north of half a million a year." But 2009 was a bad year for investments, so his income dropped to a little over $200,000. His federal income tax bill was a little more than $2,000.

"I simply point out to people, `Do you think this is reasonable, that somebody in my circumstances should only be paying 1 percent of their income in tax?'" Schoenberg said.

Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said he has a solution for rich people who want to pay more in taxes: Write a check to the IRS. There's nothing stopping you.

"There's still time before the filing deadline for them to give Uncle Sam some more money," Hatch said.

Schoenberg said Hatch's suggestion misses the point.

"This voluntary idea clearly represents a mindset that basically pretends there's no such things as collective goods that we produce," Schoenberg said. "Are you going to let people volunteer to build the road system? Are you going to let them volunteer to pay for education?"

The law is packed with tax breaks that help narrow special interests. But many of the biggest tax breaks benefit millions of American families at just about every income level, making them difficult for politicians to touch.

The vast majority of those who escape federal income taxes have low and medium incomes, and most of them pay other taxes, including Social Security and Medicare taxes, property taxes and retail sales taxes.

The share of people paying no federal income tax has dropped slightly the past two years. It was 47 percent for 2009. The main difference for 2010 was the expiration of a tax break that exempted the first $2,400 of unemployment benefits from taxation, Williams said.

In 2009, nearly 35 million taxpayers got a tax break for paying interest on their home mortgages, and nearly 36 million taxpayers took the $1,000-per-child tax credit. About 41 million households reduced their federal income taxes by deducting state and local income and sales taxes from their taxable income.

About 36 million families cut their taxes by nearly $35 billion by deducting charitable donations, and 28 million taxpayers saved a total of $24 billion because their income from Social Security and railroad pensions was untaxed.

"As a matter of policy, there would be a lot of ways to save money and actually make these things work better," said Leonard Burman, a public affairs professor at Syracuse University. "As a matter of politics, it's really, really difficult."

___

Online:

Array

Array

Array

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- As millions of procrastinators scramble to meet Monday's tax filing deadline, ponder this: The super rich pay a lot less taxes than they did a couple of decades ago, and nearly half of U...
WASHINGTON -- As millions of procrastinators scramble to meet Monday's tax filing deadline, ponder this: The super rich pay a lot less taxes than they did a couple of decades ago, and nearly half of U...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9,011
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (113 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulubelle1956
09:46 PM on 05/03/2011
Time to take it back from the rich and corporations and give it to the people who need it, called "pigs and hogs" by the GOP/TP:

Florida Senate approves business tax cut that shrinks unemployment ...
May 3, 2011 ... The Florida Senate approved a tax cut for businesses that will shrink unemployment ... “Pigs get fed, hogs get slaughtered,” Detert said. ...
www.miamiherald.com › News › Legislature
photo
dmsdzinr
Progression wit a twist of sarcasm.
07:58 AM on 04/21/2011
And so Americas wealthy just keep getting richer on the backs of the Middle Class and the Poor. And here I am foolishly thinking, isn't this one of the MAJOR reasons that America was founded? To get away from a wealthy ruling class to a new country that was supposed to give every citizen at least the CHANCE at the America Dream???? That American Dream has now dwindled into the American NIGHTMARE!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jstrate
09:43 PM on 04/20/2011
The complexity of federal income taxes is disgraceful. Members of Congress have become boot-lickers for our wealthiest citizens and the latter must be laughing all the way to the bank for the sheer stupidity of the average American who puts up with all this nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chevalier Dupin
03:50 PM on 04/19/2011
Why should income taxes be punitive?
photo
MovieGuy2010
You can't fight in here..this is the war room!
06:53 PM on 04/19/2011
Who says it is intended to be?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chevalier Dupin
08:02 PM on 04/19/2011
Who said anything about intent?
03:14 AM on 05/02/2011
What do you mean by punitive? If you mean that the tax rate increases for higher incomes, that is not punitive, but instead progressive--based on the idea that there are certain basic living expenses that all have that are much more easily afforded by those with higher incomes, so they can afford to pay a larger share of tax on the higher portion of their income. Note that the first (lowest) segments of everyone's income are taxed at the same rate.

So who says that is punitive?!

If, instead, you mean that it is punitive to lower income people that they pay a much higher effective tax rate than higher income people because of payroll taxes (soc. sec, medicare) and sales taxes, yes that is inequitable, agreed. I don't know that that is punitive though; it only reflects the fact that those with more money have a lot more lobbying together.
photo
dmsdzinr
Progression wit a twist of sarcasm.
01:07 PM on 04/19/2011
Hey TP/GOP THIS IS your Revenue Problem!!! It is NOT just about spending.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Potato Potato
01:06 PM on 04/19/2011
Of course the cronies all got their TAX CUTS...They already bought and paid for them fair and square, right ? Thanks Washington, DC ! Time to partay !!!!!!!!!
12:00 PM on 04/19/2011
With the average tax rate at 9.3%, it's rather clear that we are not being "taxed to death". The number one complaint with the income tax is that it is too complicated. There is an easy way to "uncomplicate" it: backload all deductions and exemptions. Everyone pays the same amount of tax on the same amount of pay (no more one guy getting a larger paycheck for the same amount of work because he has more deductions), and the tax taken from that check is all that will ever be owed on that money. At the end of the year claims for dependent deductions etc, could be made by using a postcard size form. Everyone gets the same amount for each dependent back from the government. Other deductions would be handled in the same manner. No more having to fill out complicated forms with additions and subtractions and percentages. Taxes would still be progressive because a progressive income tax is the only "fair" income tax.
11:42 AM on 04/19/2011
Hope and Change We Can Believe In !
photo
MovieGuy2010
You can't fight in here..this is the war room!
11:51 AM on 04/19/2011
Wow, you really have nothing, do you?

Same quote used on a Libya thread. Get some new material, I know with Beck signing off you clowns are scrambling, but there is always Rush?
12:03 PM on 04/19/2011
And you Stooges will be left with The Messiah, who in another 4 years will show you inepititude and corruption that even Bush will smile at !
11:23 AM on 04/19/2011
Everyone should be obligated to pay a minimum per person amount, there are freedoms, basic services and protections that come with being an American, legal or illegal, each of us should be obligated to pay our fair share. Deductions can carry over if you have met your write-off total that puts at your minimum tax contribution. If you want you can pay a higher tax amount but you have more basic services added for your use. Lower income individuals would benefit from paying higher taxes or giving all their income and receiving educational opportunities, healthcare and retirement services in addition to food, water, clothing, and shelter to secure the basics of survival in our modern world, we don't do things they way we used to so now our outline for the infrastructure that is the backbone of opportunity for freedom to reign must adapt. We must not only adapt, but implement a system that will adapt fluidly with the ever-changing times. Evolution will require that we always adapt the way we do things to support ourselves and to promote survival of the species.
11:20 AM on 04/19/2011
And we are about to see our share of the federal tax burden rise even more. The coming Tax Reform initiatives by both the GOP and Obama will roughly follow the same pattern and rhetoric moving us closer to a flat tax structure. When this occurs many of the exemptions for lower income Americans will disappear (dramatically lowering the 47% figure quoted in the post) while higher income taxpayers will pay even less. The Middle Class will as usual be hit the hardest. People have a very short memory - it was Reagan that came up with the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). This happened specifically to cover the revenue gap created when he gave the first round of massive cuts to the wealthy. The AMT was most anti-middle class tax policy in 100 years - so why does the middle class keep voting for these folks? The gameplan hasn't changed any - we will get asked to pay for the next round of giveaways - again...
08:40 AM on 04/20/2011
Stephen, your history of the AMT is incorrect. The origins of the AMT go back to 1968 when Lyndon Johnson commissioned a tax reform study with a goal of raising revenue to pay for the Vietnam War. Then Treasury Secretary Joseph Barr led a study that later resulted in the enactment of a minimum tax by President Nixon in 1969. Subsequently, under President Carter, the 1978 Tax Reform Act created the structure of the present day AMT. Under President Reagan, the Tax Reform Act of 1986 added a Corporate AMT and modified the rules on the AMT for individuals and actually LOWERED the impact of AMT on wealthy individuals.

The reason that the AMT is impacting more and more of the Middle Class is not because it was originally intended as a Middle Class tax - it wasn't. The reason is that the AMT has not been indexed for inflation. The $200K earners targeted back in 1969 equates to earners making about $1.2M in 2011 on an inflation adjusted basis.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GandenT
11:06 AM on 04/19/2011
Our government has given up all reasonable and proper priorities in order to work exclusively as a mercenary for the wealthy, regardless of nationality, in their global class war against working people and the poor. Consequently, all our systems, institutions, national projects, and infrastructure are collapsing into ruin along with our economy, job market, and quality of life while simultaneously ultra rich layabouts and their institutions are reaping record breaking profits year after year. As long as ordinary people can still borrow beyond their means and assets in hopes of turning the proverbial corner they still seem willing to believe the absurd fantasy that it's all just a coincidence, an act of God, or perhaps just a reflection of the supposedly superior "work ethic" of people who don't actually work for a living (my personal favorite chunk of class warfare psy-ops).
10:09 AM on 04/19/2011
As long as politicians like obama are elected this will continue. obama pretends to be for the working poor but at the same time wants a tax break for himself, the rich. What he tells his voters in public is not the same thing he tells his rich friends who will be affected by tax increases. I don't think many poor folk will be in attendance of the 36,000 dollar a plate fundraiser, this is for the elite who obama is protecting while he lies to his poor voting base.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LegallyPalin
needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few
10:46 AM on 04/19/2011
Yes, vote republican. I'm sure they won't look after the rich like those democrats do. ;-)
photo
MovieGuy2010
You can't fight in here..this is the war room!
11:58 AM on 04/19/2011
You're much more at home in your raging homophobic posts. Stick to what you are good at, your attempt to paint Obama while YOUR hero once famously said "Some call you the Elite, I call you my base" when talking to people paying >100K per plate is ludicrous.
12:41 PM on 04/19/2011
That line was said at a press corps (corpse if you speak obama) roast. Al Gore was there sitting right next President Bush when he said the joke. That's what they do at roast, recite jokes written by professionals. So know what you are talking about before you vomit some anti Bush rhetoric while trying to defend an obama (short for lazy welfare deginerate).
photo
justsayno
All politicians lie
08:57 AM on 04/19/2011
This article suspiciously omits the 5-6k rebates given to low income earners for the making work pay entitlement… I wonder how many of the 47% that paid zero income tax was also rewarded with 5-6k as well.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Librick
May the four winds blow you safely home
09:01 AM on 04/19/2011
You suspiciously omit a link to your 5-6K number.
photo
justsayno
All politicians lie
09:36 AM on 04/19/2011
google it
photo
justsayno
All politicians lie
09:45 AM on 04/19/2011
Earned income - Making work pay, child exemptions’ = big money in rebates for low income families

Who qualifies?
Many people think the credit is available only to parents. It's not. But the amount the IRS will give back is greater for eligible low-wage taxpayers with children. The amount is adjusted for inflation each year.

Tax year 2010 maximum credit
$5,666 with three or more qualifying children.
$5,036 with two qualifying children.
$3,050 with one qualifying child.
$457 with no qualifying children.


Read more: Earned income tax credit could pay off http://www.bankrate.com/finance/money-guides/earned-income-tax-credit-could-pay-off-1.aspx#ixzz1JybGQEUZ
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
07:26 AM on 04/19/2011
Are we going to punish the rich people as they are rich ?
http://www.ommrudraksha.com
08:57 AM on 04/19/2011
Yes, if they did it on the backs of the poor.
10:04 AM on 04/19/2011
So did obama.
10:59 AM on 04/19/2011
How exactly are we going to punish the rich? The richest 400 pay an average of 16% of their income in Federal taxes. The rest of us pay 12% in SS and Medicare plus 15% or so in income tax.
11:28 AM on 04/19/2011
Simple; get rid of Bush tax cuts.