More

Gannett Earnings, Ad Revenue Tumble In Q1

Gannett

MICHAEL LIEDTKE   04/18/11 06:04 PM ET   AP

A prolonged slide in Gannett Co.'s newspaper business overshadowed improvements in the company's broadcast and online operations as the publisher of USA Today reported a sharp drop in first-quarter earnings.

The results released Monday marked the 17th straight quarter in which Gannett's publishing division has brought in less revenue than the previous year.

Most other major newspaper publishers also have been struggling during the same stretch, which included the longest U.S. recession since World War II. With the economy slowly recovering, newspapers are still trying to adapt to a marketing shift that has driven advertisers from print to less expensive and more abundant alternatives on the Internet.

Digital revenue from newspaper websites and other businesses grew 12 percent, but that wasn't enough to offset a 7 percent drop in newspaper advertising revenue, the bulk of which still comes from print. Net income fell 23 percent.

Gannett, which publishes more than 80 daily newspapers including USA Today, is the first major newspaper publisher to detail its performance for the first three months of the year. The New York Times Co. is scheduled to release its results Thursday. McClatchy Co., publisher of The Miami Herald and The Sacramento Bee in California, is set to report next week.

To cope with its downturn, Gannett has eliminated thousands of newspaper jobs in the past few years and imposed other cost-cutting measures such as requiring employees to take unpaid furloughs.

Gracia Martore, Gannett's chief operating officer, told analysts Monday that about 1,000 workers at the company's smaller newspapers will take furloughs in the current quarter, which ends in June. That's 3 percent of the company's work force of 32,600.

Gannett imposed more drastic furloughs in the first quarter, when most workers at all its U.S. newspapers except USA Today and the Detroit Free Press had to take one week of unpaid leave. The company did not say how many workers took the leave.

The cost-cutting has enabled Gannett to remain profitable and earned the company's top executives larger bonuses. Gannett CEO Craig Dubow, for instance, received a $1.75 million bonus last year, a 21 percent increase from $1.45 million in 2009.

Shareholders also stand to benefit from the savings. During Monday's conference call, Martore said that with the belt-tightening and an economy that is gradually improving, the company may be able to use its cash to buy back stock or restore part of the quarterly dividend. The dividend had been cut to 4 cents, from 40 cents, two years ago.

That prospect seemed to please investors. After initially falling on the first-quarter earnings news, Gannett shares gained 59 cents, or 4 percent, to close Monday at $15.39. The stock has dropped 75 percent since Gannett's publishing revenue began falling in 2007.

Gannett earned $90.5 million, or 37 cents per share, in the three months ended March 27. Net income was $117 million, or 49 cents per share, a year earlier.

If not for charges to account for staff cuts and facility closures, Gannett said it would have earned 41 cents per share. That figure was a penny below the average estimate among analysts polled by FactSet.

Revenue fell 4 percent to $1.25 billion from $1.3 billion.

Gannett's broadcast division saw revenue decline 2 percent to $164 million, in line with what the company indicated last month.

But the company said television revenue increased 7 percent after excluding about $24 million in revenue it got last year from political campaigns, the Winter Olympics and the Super Bowl. The Super Bowl was on Fox this year, and Gannett doesn't have any Fox affiliates among its 23 TV stations.

Gannett also saw gains from its investments aimed at selling more online advertising and connecting with the growing number of readers on smartphones and other mobile devices such as Apple's iPad.

The company said it had $251 million in digital revenue – online ads sold by its newspapers and TV stations, plus $158 million in revenue from standalone businesses such as online help-wanted service CareerBuilder. That was up 12 percent from about $224 million a year ago.

Gannett, which is based in McLean, Va., will try to spur more digital ad growth with a service called dealchicken.com, a clone of such popular online coupon services as Groupon and LivingSocial. Such services offer different discounts from merchants each day. After testing dealchicken.com at The Arizona Republic, Gannett is linking it to its newspapers and TV stations in 57 other U.S. markets.

Despite the expansion, Gannett's digital operations still aren't making enough money to compensate for the deterioration in print advertising and circulation.

The company's publishing revenue, which includes ad revenue from the newspapers' websites, was down 6 percent, or $61 million, to $930 million. By contrast, digital revenue for the entire company grew about $27 million; Gannett would not break down the portion from newspapers' websites. The comparisons exclude revenue from The Honolulu Advertiser, which Gannett sold after last year's first quarter.

The falloff in publishing revenue mirrored a management forecast made last month.

Gannett executives didn't forecast when publishing revenue might increase. Dubow and Martore said the biggest problem facing newspapers is the fragile state of the economy in many U.S. markets, particularly in real estate. Automobile and employment advertising were among the bright spots for newspapers.

In a change underscoring the demise of print advertising, Gannett stopped disclosing the number of ad pages sold by USA Today, the nation's second largest newspaper.

Dubow and Martore said showing the volume of USA Today's print advertising no longer is a good way of tracking the newspaper's success because it is pouring more resources into its website and mobile apps. Gannett said USA Today's digital revenue rose 19 percent in the first quarter, although the company would not provide the dollar amount.

___

AP Business Writer Barbara Ortutay contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

A prolonged slide in Gannett Co.'s newspaper business overshadowed improvements in the company's broadcast and online operations as the publisher of USA Today reported a sharp drop in first-quarter ea...
A prolonged slide in Gannett Co.'s newspaper business overshadowed improvements in the company's broadcast and online operations as the publisher of USA Today reported a sharp drop in first-quarter ea...
Filed by Jack Mirkinson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:03 PM on 04/20/2011
Newspapers have been lacking real news for some time now. It's no wonder they're going extinct. The price of newspapers kept going up while the news in them kept going down. It's that old free market eliminating obsolete products. They did it to themselves. Live with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bmattix
Don't label me, bro!
04:44 PM on 04/20/2011
I smell another round of furloughs, layoffs and big executive bonuses! Cheers!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnnyAce Okeke
GRAND MASTER SEN$Ei {{-_-}}â„¢
02:40 PM on 04/19/2011
I miss Gannett's old logo. {{-_-}}
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
02:37 PM on 04/19/2011
What’s a newspaper? I heard people actually read them in the 20th. Century. But that was another millennium.
02:08 PM on 04/19/2011
Congressman Jackson blames the iPad. Maybe they can sue Apple. Sarcasm intended.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wforvendetta
Entitled to my opinion, not my facts
11:49 AM on 04/19/2011
Buy American - buy a newspaper!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ejfreeman
11:26 AM on 04/19/2011
They could try real journalism fluff can be found all day long from a thousand differant sources.
08:13 AM on 04/19/2011
My wife does sales for Gannett. She has had to deal with furloughs, the outsourcing of their ad builders(who always mess them up), and a huge push of online sales.
07:36 AM on 04/19/2011
Gannett's top execs and shareholders continue to profit at the expense of the little guys at the smaller papers who already get paid a pittance and are forced to take unpaid furloughs to delay the next, inevitable round of layoffs.That top execs should get 7-figure bonuses for taking food off the tables of people making $25,000-$45,000 a year is unforgivable. And a side note to "Go Terps": Most of Gannett's papers are non-union. Benefits are minimal. They continue cutting size of staff and papers which results in cutting quality, which results in more advertisers and readers leaving. For this the top execs are given huge bonuses. It's the American corporate way: Milk it dry, drain the assets and the souls of the workers until you can't get any more, then cast them aside and move on to the next company. America is poorer for the experience.
cabinetmaker
made in USA
07:26 AM on 04/19/2011
progressives can't stand profits anyway
08:24 AM on 04/19/2011
Au contraire. Progressives like profits. Unfortunately, Regressives rig the system so only they get to have them, and the rest of us are kept in our place. See: Gannett execs earn seven-figure bonuses for laying off and furloughing low-salaried workers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GoTerps
01:35 AM on 04/19/2011
Gannett should use the Obama model. First, spend more money to stimulate readership. Hire more union workers with outlandish bennies and cut back on the size of each publication. As the debt continues to mount, they should continue to expand their operation.

This is the only way the company will survive. After all, look how the Obama plan is working for America; it's bound to do the same for (or to) Gannett!

(Sarcasm off!)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tellthetruthalways
05:39 AM on 04/19/2011
Let me see if I get this right. Bush and Republicans run the country into the ground, destroying the middle class and decimating the poor in the process. For eight years, they run up unprecedented deficits and national debt. Obama arrives on the scene as Bush tells America and the world that the sky is falling and we are at the end of civilization as we know it. Obama fights the evil Republicans, who attempt to block his recovery plans at every turn. Somehow, despite the best efforts of Republicans to stop him, he manages to stabilize the economy and get it moving in the right direction. But rather than sing the president's praises, you Republicans still manage to blame him for the economic collapse that pre-dated his presidency. A collapse, I should point out, that is a direct result of rightwing, nut-job Republican policies that cater to the rich at all cost. Policies you would like to bring back. And yet you insist on blaming the president. Give me a break. (p.s.) I hate to confront your political duplicity with facts, but that is all I've got.
cabinetmaker
made in USA
07:25 AM on 04/19/2011
while dems controlled house (purse) 74 of last 100 years you take a snapshot of ten years and try to hang your hat on that
dems voted for every spending bill Pres W offered up
dems should love meds for elderly
dems have controlled house (purse) since 2007
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ann Oid
12:07 PM on 04/18/2011
Well, Gannett killed my 35 year habit of reading a morning paper when they stopped daily home delivery of the Detroit Free Press.

Great business plan they had...increased pricing, decreased both frequency and amount of content, killed the local component in favor of wire service stories, and then wondered why they lost even more subscribers.

It sucks because I love a physical paper...the occasional discovery of adjacent stories that I wouldn't have sought out, ads, the comics. I survive without it, buying the occasional single copy, but how is it smart to alienate your core business?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spike5
Let's go forward, not back to an imaginary past
11:43 AM on 04/18/2011
Maybe Gannett's poor results are related to the fact that they have crappy newspapers. My local newspaper was taken over by Gannett years ago. Each year since then it's gotten progressively worse. Less and less news content, less and less analysis, more and more coverage of local businesses which, coincidentally, are big advertisers. And the web site keeps the same non-stories up for days. Sure, the newspaper business is changing. But when a news junkie only gets the local paper for the entertainment section and the advertisements, that's the publisher's fault.

I finally cancelled my subscription yesterday when the front page of the web site featured a poll asking 'do you believe Obama was born in the US?'--with no follow up questions, nothing that could have provided data for a story analyzing the poll, just fodder for the right wing readers who keep complaining that it is too liberal (trust me, it never gets farther left that moderate conservative).

Gannett took a local newspaper which was first published in 1884 and destroyed it during a period when the local community was growing at a tremendous rate and increasing the subscription base and prospective readers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
proudloudlib
"I'm not deaf. I'm ignoring you."
01:11 PM on 04/18/2011
That's "news you can use" to them. I used to work for Gannett in Reno. I'll never forget when they bought one of the two Little Rock newspapers, intending to run the other one out of business. After messing up a perfectly good newspaper with front page pie charts about peach pie (!! I'm serious!!) they ended up in the tank, the other paper bought them out, and Gannett left Arkansas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spike5
Let's go forward, not back to an imaginary past
01:43 PM on 04/18/2011
Ah, if only that could happen here. I guess I can dream....
05:28 PM on 04/18/2011
Westchester?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spike5
Let's go forward, not back to an imaginary past
08:03 PM on 04/18/2011
Fort Myers Florida. Guess that means it's not just here that they've destroyed a perfectly nice newspaper.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slogward
10:12 AM on 04/18/2011
TOP UK PHONE-HACK LAWYER SAYS 'TRUTH WILL OUT' ABOUT MURDOCH IN THE END

http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/hackgate-day-92-murdochs-head-on-block-says-lawyer/