More

The Top 10 Tax Breaks -- And How They Help The Wealthy The Most

First Posted: 04/18/11 02:16 PM ET Updated: 06/18/11 06:12 AM ET

Rich People

This is the time of year when we are most aware of our tax burdens. But what we may be less aware of are all the huge tax breaks built into our system. Most Americans benefit from one or more -- but it's the wealthy who benefit the most.

The government spends money through appropriations and writing checks, but it also showers individuals and companies with a astonishing array of special exemptions, credits and deductions that amount to a $1.1 trillion giveaway each year. (For comparison: the big budget fight that concluded last week cut spending by about $38 billion.)

About half of the money lost to "tax expenditures" comes from the 10 breaks listed below.

Few of the biggest breaks directly benefit corporate America. Most are widely distributed among the population and are meant to reward and encourage what is generally considered responsible behavior. Each break also represents a powerful, and in some cases broad-based, constituency.

But in stark contrast to, say, social programs, tax breaks vastly favor the rich over the middle class and the poor.

They vastly favor people who own homes (especially expensive homes), can put a lot away for their retirements, have generous health insurance plans and live in high-tax states. Even something as simple as the deduction for charitable donations favors the wealthy: Because they pay higher marginal tax rate, they get a bigger federal subsidy for each dollar they give.

bar chart

Some of these terms may require a little explanation:

1. Tax-free health insurance contributions. The tax exclusion for employer-provided health benefits is the single largest tax break -- it alone will cost the government $1 trillion in foregone taxes over the next five fiscal years. This huge tax expenditure massively subsidizes the nation's employer-based health insurance system. It also provides an incentive to employers to overspend in health benefits (which are tax free) and pay less in salary (from which, of course, the IRS takes a bite). This tax break only helps families with at least one member employed by an employer who offers them health benefits. Others have to buy health insurance with after-tax dollars.

2. The mortgage interest deduction. The second-largest tax break is essentially the nation's largest housing program. By letting taxpayers who itemize deduct the interest they pay on their home mortgages, the government massively subsidizes home ownership. The more expensive the home -- and the higher the homeowner's tax bracket -- the bigger that subsidy is.

3. Treatment of capital gains at death. When you die, the government forgives your capital gains tax on appreciated assets that you pass on to your heirs. In accounting terms, this is the "step up in basis" on death. From the heirs' perspective, it means that the "basis" going forward (the amount above which anything is considered taxable capital gains) is the value of the asset at the time they received it. So if you buy stock at $1,000 and it's worth $10,000 when you die, your heir gets $10,000 as the basis. No one ever pays taxes on the $9,000 in appreciation. Now imagine a multi-million-dollar stock portfolio and multi-million-dollar homes -- and you're talking real money.

4. Tax-free contributions to 401(k)s. Federal government policy encourages savings for retirement by allowing employees and employers to make tax-free contributions to retirement plans, the most common of which is the 401(k). This break is a big gift to the financial securities industry, which is where most of this money goes, and to the very wealthy. Indeed, the bulk of benefits go to high-income households, while little goes to the lower and moderate income households. There are limits to how much can be contributed tax-free, but the amount of tax foregone through contributions to 401(k) plans, along with employer plans, when combined still make tax-deferred retirement savings the second largest tax expenditure.

5. Exclusion of net imputed rental income. Homeowners don't pay themselves rent. If they didn't own their own homes, they would pay rent -- and whoever received that rent would have to declare it as income and pay taxes on it. But this "imputed rental income" goes untaxed -- another major subsidy to homeowners. The foregone rent is called "imputed rental income," and the White House Office of Management and Budget calculates the foregone tax that results from it at $50 billion a year.

6. Deductibility of state and local taxes. The rationale behind this deduction is that taxes paid to state or local governments reduce a taxpayer's ability to pay federal income tax. But state and local taxes essentially "pay" for services that, if purchased directly by the taxpayer, would not be deductible. The benefits of this deduction are disproportionately enjoyed by the wealthy, property owners, and residents of high-tax states. Because so many of those high-tax states are blue, this is one tax deduction that some conservative activists actually want dead.

7. Acclerated depreciation. The tax code allows businesses to deduct the costs of investing in such things as equipment faster than the objects in question actually wear out. Seth Hanlon writes for the Center for American Progress: "Accelerated depreciation in general should be thought of as a multibillion-dollar federal spending program that subsidizes business investments. And when they single out specific industries for special benefit, depreciation rules are akin to spending 'earmarks.'"

8. Capital gains. Salaries, rents, royalties, interest -- they're all considered regular income by the IRS, and get taxed at marginal rates up to 35 percent. But income from the sale of capital assets held for more than a year is considered long-term capital gains, and gets taxed at a flat 15 percent rate. This is a huge windfall for the investor class -- and represents a quarter of a trillion dollars in lost revenue over 5 years.

9. Deductibility of charitable contributions. The IRS allows taxpayers to deduct charitable contributions from their taxable income. This amounts to an approximately $43 billion a year subsidy to charitable organizations -- and because of progressive taxation, the deduction is more valuable to rich taxpayers than to poor ones. One scholar recently proposed doubling the deduction temporarily to stimulate job growth; but there is actually more talk about reducing or adjusting it instead.

10. Employer plans. This refers to employment-based retirement plans other than 401(K)s. See No. 4.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
This is the time of year when we are most aware of our tax burdens. But what we may be less aware of are all the huge tax breaks built into our system. Most Americans benefit from one or more -- but i...
This is the time of year when we are most aware of our tax burdens. But what we may be less aware of are all the huge tax breaks built into our system. Most Americans benefit from one or more -- but i...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,985
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (102 total)
  1 of 13  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
FunkSands 05:15 PM on 04/18/2011
When something doesn't work and we want to change it
 
It's called class warfare
 
When 9% of our working population is thrown into unemployment due to the global economy collapsing
 
They are called lazy
 
When corporations are the most successful they've EVER been and the stock market is up 60% since inauguration
 
Our president is called a  Read More...
11:27 PM on 04/20/2011
An interesting list to be sure. However, I'm not sure that it's just the wealthy or corporate America that benefits.

1. Tax-free health insurance contributions.

Yep. Who would be the biggest complainer if you cut the benefit? Likely the unions that have "Cadillac" plans for their members. These are major allies of the current program. It makes no sense to treat this tax break differently for different types of taxpayers (employees of large corporation vs. self-insured).

2. The mortgage interest deduction.

Yep. Personally, I'd like to see this deduction disappear but it's likely to tank real estate prices in the short term--not a good idea.

3. Treatment of capital gains at death.

Personally, the government shouldn't receive ANY benefit just from my untimely death. It should only be taxed when it is sold. I have no problem with adjust the basis, but subtract out any effects of asset inflation first.

4. Tax-free contributions to 401(k)s.

So, we don't want to encourage people to save for their own retirement? I full support this one. In fact, I'd go so far as to make it mandatory--but hey, I responsible for my own future.

5. Exclusion of net imputed rental income

Don't know.

6. Deductibility of state and local taxes

Under previous AMT rules, many taxpayers already taxes multiple times on the same money. Residents from CA, NJ, NY, and CT will scream.
photo
John Heckers
Think of it as evolution in action!
10:42 PM on 04/19/2011
This is a VERY misleading article. I'm FAR from "wealthy," but have been able to take advantage, as a very small business owner, of most of these tax breaks (except for the capital gains forgiveness at death, since I'm still alive....at least mostly). These are SOLID middle-class tax breaks, unless Huffpost is re-defining "middle class" to mean "the working poor." Let's have some BALANCE here, folks.
10:13 AM on 04/20/2011
well said
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Klarsonent
Semi-retired landlady, small business entrepreneur
12:27 PM on 04/20/2011
I agree.
photo
Sandman911
Self employed gun toting Bible thumper.
05:38 PM on 04/19/2011
Eliminate the IRS and have a flat 10% consumtion tax. No tax, if you save, no tax if your unemployed, rich pay more for their toys, government recieves higher revenues, everybody wins.
10:14 AM on 04/20/2011
i am not sure 10% would cover it but it sounds like a start
photo
Sandman911
Self employed gun toting Bible thumper.
12:47 PM on 04/20/2011
Imagine no IRS.
02:18 AM on 04/28/2011
A VAT, RST, or GST is still regressive in nature as the 'toys' have a far greater sensitivity to price changes (from taxes) than food and medicine do.. However, it does catch those who skip certain taxes due to capital gains, and its equity can be raised through exemptions of certain items. However there would still be an IRS for administrative duties. Anyway you cut it, though, income taxes are a better measure of ability to pay and shift with economic growth. San Dimas High School football rules!
photo
Sandman911
Self employed gun toting Bible thumper.
09:48 AM on 04/28/2011
My dad lives in the RV park on top of the hill above the airport in San Dimas. LOL
03:22 PM on 04/19/2011
A strange list in some ways: why do they count charitble contributions except to education medical? If I give some money to the cancer society it's one thing but if I give it to the local foodbank it's another? Similarly what's with CGs except for farming, timber, iron ore and coal? If I make some money on an oil field it's one thing but on a coal mine it's another? Or is it actual oil vs. coal? Still puzzling.
12:51 PM on 04/19/2011
45% of Americans aren't paying income tax for last year, yet the tax breaks help the wealthiest more? Seems to me the tax breaks are helping the 45% the most.
photo
Sandman911
Self employed gun toting Bible thumper.
05:39 PM on 04/19/2011
45% are screaming for higher taxes !!! Coincidence ?
10:16 AM on 04/20/2011
then let's raise their taxes........at least they will be paying something
11:45 AM on 04/20/2011
Yeah, raising taxes on someone else.
10:15 AM on 04/20/2011
well said
steveinohio
A small businessman in Ohio doing the best he can
11:25 AM on 04/19/2011
1 (health insurance), 2 (mortgage interest), 3 (Cap Gains step up), 6 (state and local) and 8 (Cap gains preference) should be killed off immediately.
4/10 (Retirement savings), and 9 (Charity) should have limits. Also, "Charity" should be much more narrowly defined.
5 is fine with me. Of course you don't have to pay taxes on your own mortgage to make up for the fact that you aren't paying rent. It's your house, that's the point.
7 (Depreciation) is a good incentive to keep the investment and innovation moving.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Klarsonent
Semi-retired landlady, small business entrepreneur
12:37 PM on 04/20/2011
It's interesting what you say should be killed off, as you put it. Of course, everyone speaks from their own hubris.

People like you do not have a clue about "mortgage interest" write offs, because you've never been a landlord/lady. You have no idea what it's like to pay all of the "property taxes" insurance, HOA dues, and mortgages on rental property. And then, you have to contend with the tenants walking out on their leases (if you want to pursue them, you have to hire lawyers $$$,duh ). Not to mention - fixing up a rental after the tenant moves out is another huge expense. Landlords/ladies deserves the resultant tax breaks.

Additionally, by eliminating "mortgage interest" write offs, it will only put one more nail in the coffin of the already plummeting housing market.

Learn to think beyond your own backyard.
steveinohio
A small businessman in Ohio doing the best he can
11:45 AM on 04/21/2011
I have to think beyond my backyard because you don't like how the law could affect you. That's cute.

Anyway. 2 Things:

1) You think you deserve special tax breaks because running a rental business has expenses? Welcome to the world of business. Turning a profit is hard, and harder in other industries than in yours. In fact, you've picked one of the businesses where the math up front is pretty straightforward. As long as you don't overpay for the property in the beginning, you can be reasonably sure you'll come out ahead. You don't even really have to make money to make it. Go cash-flow neutral long enough, and eventually you are sitting on a valuable, appreciating asset free and clear. It's a long-run game, but it's not a hard one to play.

2) That whole point is unnecessary anyway since removing the deduction we're talking about wouldn't affect you at all. It's surprising to me that you don't know the difference between a business expense and a personal deduction. The mortgage interest deduction in question is for people, not businesses. Interest expenses incurred while running a business would continue to be a business expense. Klarsonent Incorporated can still deduct interest expense. You can relax.

Maybe you should lay off the criticism of my lack of experience, lack of knowledge, and general myopia and focus on ridding yourself of that entitlement mentality.
photo
dfranz
With Liberty and Justice for all
10:52 AM on 04/19/2011
Our tax system is dysfunctional and the world’s credit markets know it. Add to that the dysfunctional government ever since the President was elected due to absolute Republican obstructionism and attempts to destroy the social safety net and you have a mess. I don't believe that there is a real solution available for the country's financial woes as long as cutting revenues and giving tax breaks to already very wealthy people is the only solution the Republicans will allow. All we are doing is digging a deeper hole, no matter how much money they take away from the middle class and retired people.
12:56 PM on 04/19/2011
Progressives had 4 years of a majority in both houses and 2 years with the legislature and the executive branch including a super majority for 1 of those years.

If you want to lay blame on the conduct of the republicans for the first 6 years of the bush era, then you have every reason as they had total control. If you want to lay blame for the last 2-4 years on them then you're barking up the wrong tree.

I see little difference between republican and democrat. Both cater to business at the expensive of the individual.
01:55 AM on 04/20/2011
Except for the fact that Republicans filibustered everything in the Senate so no substantial change could happen, you might be right.
photo
Sandman911
Self employed gun toting Bible thumper.
05:41 PM on 04/19/2011
Obama is increasing debt 27 times faster than ever recorded in U.S. history. That might have something to do with it ya think ?
01:59 AM on 04/20/2011
He ought to be increasing debt much faster than that. We needed a bigger stimulus due to the Bush recession, the Bush unpaid for and unnecessary wars, the Republican unpaid-for tax cuts - well, should I go on?
10:47 AM on 04/19/2011
Warren Buffett said his secretary pays more tax than he does. The tax code has more loops than a winter sweater. Corporations like GE who paid zero taxes; Exxon paid zero and got back a rebate of $156 million; Chevron rebate $19 mil. They have thousands of employees offshore who pay no income tax in America.

Middle Americans pay payroll deductions and fed tax. Someone making $30,000 with two children will probably pay nothing and receive a refund because they would be below the poverty level. The gap between these two examples must close or our country cannot prosper. 8 million jobs that the GOP promised in their last campagin would help.

Another good reason the gap has to close is that the government owes the SS trust fund trillions of dollars (which is part of our deficit). The following link is to the government website for the Trust Fund. The box labeled "Certificates of Indebtedness" means IOU's for the money "borrowed" from the fund.

http://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/investseries.cgi
11:39 PM on 04/20/2011
Strangely, I'll bet that Mr. Buffett's secretary wouldn't trade places.

While it may or may not be true that Mr. Buffett pays a lower effective tax rate, I'll bet that even a minuscule percentage on tens of millions is still many times more than his secretary's entire tax bill, measured in absolute dollars.

Your SSA link is interesting. It's also interesting to see that SS returns have decreased since the 1980s when SS bought long-term gov't debt with very high interest rates. This dates back to when Reagan/Volcker raised rates to tame rampant inflation.
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/ProgData/intRates.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:31 AM on 04/19/2011
Tax-free contributions to 401(k)s.
"This break is a big gift to the financial securities industry, which is where most of this money goes, and to the very wealthy. Indeed, the bulk of benefits go to high-income households, while little goes to the lower and moderate income households."

Total Bunk. 401k's are a primary means for low and middle class folks to save for their own retirement with the added benefit of their employer matching the amount contributed by the employee. The bulk of this money accumulates and grows in value over time - which directly benefits the employee and reduces government assistance that may be needed in the long run. In the short run, this money is invested directly in the economy without any *government* spending. If it also benefits the financial services industry, so be it. It's win-win for the economy.

The mind-set that any private money the government doesn't grab a slice of is somehow a bad thing can only be reconciled if one views the economy through the eyes of corporatist fascism.
11:02 AM on 04/27/2011
Great answer - but just add this to it - it is tax deferment not elimination as the author of this article implied - we will be taxed on this when we begin to use it.......!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
american-dolt
Truther since 2004
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:10 AM on 04/19/2011
Spin Alert!

The authors say, "This tax break only helps families with at least one member employed by an employer who offers them health benefits."

Or.... in other words:

This tax break helps all families with at least one member employed by an employer who offers them health benefits.

The whole idea that any money* that is NOT collected through taxation is a government *expenditure* (aka expense, spending) is pure unadulterated double-speak. It's not the property of the government to start with and *no* money becomes government spending until it's actually confiscated as a tax and actually spent on something else.

(*in this instance, a percentage of the monetary value of health insurance)
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
09:51 AM on 04/19/2011
Defense spending for the U.S. was 800 billion for 2010. why don't we cut that in half, stop the wars, and everybody, except a few war mongers and Blackwater would be a lot happier. then we could start fixing the medical world and have doctors stop ordering severe treatments at the end of someone's life,and save another few hundred billion...at least. Just some constructive ideas, other than bitching at the rich all the time.
10:00 AM on 04/19/2011
a dea th panel
10:15 AM on 04/19/2011
Congress just voted down the People's Budget

108 Dem's voted against it, find out why they voted no, and you'll answer your question
12:08 PM on 04/19/2011
Because they don't want to have to step over all the corpses lining the street on their way to work?
letsbepeaceful
oh no, my micro-bio is now full...
01:28 PM on 04/20/2011
Because the cuts in it are so harsh as to be unrealistic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:17 AM on 04/19/2011
these tax breaks help the "wealthy" more because the wealthy pay nearly all federal income taxes to begin with. In fact, 47% of American taxpayers pay zero federal income taxes at all.
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
09:26 AM on 04/19/2011
F & F
photo
Sandman911
Self employed gun toting Bible thumper.
05:43 PM on 04/19/2011
And 47% just happens to be the number of people demanding higher taxes !! Coincidence ??
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BJHenton
08:54 AM on 04/19/2011
Lets face it. Some folks just don't want to pay taxes. They will make any excuse. Blame is on Obama (they were silent during the "w" years), blame it on poor people, they just don't want to pay.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:12 AM on 04/19/2011
I agree, but wouldn't go so far as to "blame it on poor people". But there IS a large contingent in America that expects goodies from the government and has grown up making short term personal decisions counting on a "safety net" - without consideration that ALL money from the Government was earned by someone else.

"A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicity."
- - Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address