More

Air Force Looks to China When American Manufacturing Falls Short

Nutsboltsscrews

First Posted: 04/20/11 07:48 PM ET Updated: 06/20/11 06:12 AM ET

Michael Mandel, chief economic strategist at the Progressive Policy Institute, was recently doing some research for a textbook he’s revising when he stumbled upon a surprising entry in the Federal Registry. On March 21, the U.S. Air Force waived the “Buy American” provision of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 for a construction project at Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska. As workers tried to build a few stimulus-backed housing units, it became apparent that a number of simple domestic items couldn’t be procured from American manufacturers – namely, ceiling fans, shower rods, towel racks, toilet-paper holders, and all manner of screws and fixtures.

According to the registry entry, a contracting official

has determined that the above items of manufactured goods are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory quality. The domestic nonavailability determination for these products is based on extensive market research and thorough investigation of the domestic manufacturing landscape. This research identified that these products are manufactured almost exclusively in China.

In fiscal year 2009, more than 44,000 waivers of federal “Buy American” provisions were granted, worth nearly $14 billion. On his blog, Mandel writes that the Air Force waiver in particular “certifies the weakness of domestic manufacturing in America,” though he also questions whether all the household items listed are actually unavailable in the U.S., given that, according to him, the American production of nuts and bolts has been climbing in recent years.

Similarly, the Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM) wonders whether there isn’t a “single American manufacturer” producing the screws required for the Eielson project.

“There’s a great deal of evidence that many agencies, including the Department of Defense, don’t look very wide or deep for procurement,” AAM’s Executive Director, Scott Paul, told HuffPost. “Some agencies are much more aggressive about enforcing it than others.”

But in this case, it seems the collated screws in question are certifiably unavailable in the States. Jennifer Baker Reid of the Industrial Fasteners Institute, a trade group for nuts-and-bolts manufacturers, says such screws are “largely, if not entirely, imports” from China nowadays. The waiver, Reid says, “appears to have been issued appropriately based on market research.”

That’s not to say Reid’s group hasn’t had other bones to pick with federal agencies over the stimulus package’s “Buy American” stipulation. Her group complained to the Environmental Protection Agency over some 2009 waivers granted for fasteners for stimulus-funded wastewater treatment upgrades. In that case, Reid says her group had two U.S. manufacturers who could have supplied the necessary fasteners. “These waivers have come out fast and furious without checking to see if a U.S. supplier is available,” she says.

In the case of the Eielson project, it may be more troubling that the Air Force did its due diligence and still couldn’t find a supplier. “It’s not like China has a competitive advantage in making screws,” says Paul. “Shame on us if we can’t make them.”

Correction: This story originally identified Mandel as chief economist at BusinessWeek. In fact, Mandel left BusinessWeek in December 2009.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Michael Mandel, chief economic strategist at the Progressive Policy Institute, was recently doing some research for a textbook he’s revising when he stumbled upon a surprising ...
Michael Mandel, chief economic strategist at the Progressive Policy Institute, was recently doing some research for a textbook he’s revising when he stumbled upon a surprising ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 410
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
11:49 AM on 05/14/2011
This is laughable. For the sake of quarterly profits results, we have put the econimic life blood of Americans and the security of our Nation at risk.
You want to solve our debt problem? Put Americans back to work and bring back our ability to manufacture in America.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
01:53 PM on 04/22/2011
what goes around comes around , many of the same people cursing the Air Force for heading to China for supplies would also scream loudly about spending too much money if the Air Force bought domestically. cost cutting is not always such a great idea, you get what you pay for is not just a saying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
10:40 AM on 04/22/2011
I saw this coming a long time ago. Most people don't realize the support system needed to produce tight tolerance hi speed steel machined parts. About 25 years ago I was in outside sales of industrial supplies. Everything is connected. The machine shop, the producer of cutting tools and machinery. The same small machine shop that made parts for the military made parts for manufacturers of all kinds. So if we come to a place in the road where the United States wants to stand up to China, where are we going to get replacement parts? Two major concerns to our nation, how much of our debt is in the hands of China, and how dependant are we on China for precision parts?
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
10:18 AM on 04/22/2011
$14billion is a lot of money and US jobs. The military should buy american. And if items are not available, they should set up manufactuing in the US. It is that simple.
photo
gwinegarden
She's an Arctic Wolf
10:05 AM on 04/22/2011
OK, hahahah, the US wants to buy parts for their jets, from us, hahaha, so here's the plan, you know that really crappy steel that we have back there.........
05:09 AM on 04/22/2011
Something is screwy when an item where labor is as miniscule a proportion of the final product as in screw manufacturing cannot be found in America. If they actually bothered to dig into the details of this problem they'd likely find these manufacturers existed in America 10 years ago and many were even operating up until 5 years ago. So why is China the only country making these? The fact of the matter is that China has given its domestic steelmakers, who are all state owned organizations, massive subsidies and these companies were able to successfully dump their product onto the American market to such an extent that domestic manufacturers couldn't compete and were forced to go under or outsource their product from Chinese competitors. China's SEOs don't have to compete in China nor even run at a healthy profit margin but we let them freely trash the American market.

The WTO is a total joke about such issues, if these small American companies want to compete they need to hire expensive legal advice and it can take months-to-years to get anything done. Then once action is take and damage was found the Chinese exporters find ways to evade duties by moving through 3rd countires while customs has proven completely ineffective at fighting back. It pays to be a WTO trade manipulator and China knows it.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_d05e4250-f792-50c4-b93b-23aa1360e878.html
09:20 AM on 04/22/2011
Hmm, WTO and WTO membership - well, pretty much all international institutions - are a two- edged sword. Yes, China is gaming the system to their favor, but let's be honest, so does every nation there. Three things stand out, though:
- China is not recognized as a market economy so far - a limitation which allows the "full members" to place additional tariffs on Chinese goods and to somewhat bend the rule of "most favoured nation".
- Matter of fact, if emerging or developing countries try to play by the exact same rules as the established industrialized nations do, they will hardly catch up (see Doha round).
- since most of these institutions were founded by the western nations, among which the US is the largest and was at the time of founding the economically most powerful the US has, often as the only nation, a veto position. I do not think that this imbalance can be upheld given that China and India with billions of people will hardly like to play along the US tune.
02:39 PM on 04/22/2011
True, although not being labeled a market economy only matters when a company actually has the legal resources to fight a trade case; and China isn't a market economy, the role of SOEs is far greater than any other country I know of that is considered a "market economy".

The accepting the black and white WTO developing status protections was one of American's huge mistakes. Though it may have applied at the time, and still applies to many smaller nations, today in the majority of industries a company in China has access to all the same technology, infrastructure, and often easier financing than their American counterparts. While large sections of China are still terribly undeveloped the parts we're actually competing against are highly developed industrial zones.

We now have a situation where small American industries have to make hard decisions between a costly fight back against manipulation or giving in; many take the easy path and give in. This scenario can see an entire small/medium American industry wiped out and Chinese monopoly come about by illegal subsidization without a case ever reaching a trade panel.

Certainly America manipulates areas like agriculture (though Europe and many others do as well) but that doesn't mean we should have to accept blatent violations of WTO regulations in industries we've opened to "fair competition".
09:21 AM on 04/22/2011
Regarding foreign trade and lawyers: Doesn't the US governmet offer legal (and other) support to SMEs if they choose to open shop abroad? It would be odd if you didn't.
12:14 PM on 04/22/2011
You'll get a brochure and a handshake. They're not going to drop a million dollars to retain a top 10 law firm on your behalf. Doing business in other countries is not for small businesses without significant resources.
03:38 AM on 04/22/2011
I am not surprised. The US has become so hostile to businesses that many of the small to mid size companies that make such items have simply given up.

We recently got a request for bids on a small solar project nearby - about 20kw. We turned it down because it was under that same "buy American" provision, and it simply was not worth it for us to file for exemptions, nor to pay the California based union wages it demanded (this is in Arizona).

The project finally got done, at a cost of about 3x what we installed a slightly larger private project nearby for. And the taxpayers paid for that difference.

And the funniest part was, we ended up making more money fixing that installation so it would work than we would have on the original contract bid.

Your "green jobs" government at work.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
02:34 AM on 04/22/2011
for over 50 years now the US, with the help of some large corporations and using USAID and the IMF and world bank have worked hard to get countries into huge debt by issuing loans. more correctly is by lying and deceiving them into taking these huge loans. Which we then use a leverage to extort these countries into doing things which favor our ivy greed capitalist. They are conned into borrowing billions to have US contractors build power plants, roads, airports, etc... leaving their countries own people in poverty and the countries owing billions they cant afford cause the promises of prosperity never materialized. And they never will. So the US can say,, you give us this, or do that for us, and we will forgive a small percentage of your loans.
So now China, who has learned a lot from us , is using our own tactics back upon us. So what. We owe the Chinese trillions of dollars. If they tell us to buy their bolts and nuts , we buy them. What can we do? say no? they would cut off the money and then where would we be? WHo would pay for our wars? our bailouts? our tax breaks for millionaires? Who ? Not us,they'vee already raped us raw, we have nothing left to give.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
02:04 AM on 04/22/2011
I can understand that. After all, it was the ivy greed capitalist of America who not only showed China how to make all these wonderful things we use to make, but they handed them the start up capital, personal trainers, accountants, everything they personally needed to not only compete, but to completely take over. The Ivy Greed Capitalist however didnt even think about this when they were flocking to China to set up these manufacturing firms. They were only seeing dollar signs and profits from exploitation of cheap labor.
Now, they cry unfair, when it was the Ivy Greed Capitalist who made this all possible. And for what? A few years of huge profits, and to destroy the American work force, middle class, working person, and the American family and dream. Now that China is just doing what the Ivy Greed Capitalist showed them, the Ivy Greed Capitalist are screaming unfair and demanding bailouts, tariffs and more. They, who demand gov stays out of business, demand the gov to do something about it. Iike a bunch of spoiled brats that they are. Remove the Ivy Greed Capitalist Cancer that is destroying our country , and we might yet have a chance to survive. But I have faith in the American people so I know nothing will be done to stop the ivy greed capitalist who are k illing us all.
03:40 AM on 04/22/2011
Yes we all know that the Chinese were not capable of figuring out how to make nuts and bolts by themselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
11:21 PM on 04/21/2011
The People's Republic of China has purchased some aviation companies and one of those companies has a contract to sell "trainer"aircraft to the Air Force Academy. So US taxpayers will buy airplanes from the government of China, to train future US Air Force pilots.

Also this same company has the intellectual property for, and the capability to very quickly tool up for mass production of airframes and skins for drones. Yep, now we can't even train our own pilots in our own aircraft, and could have US designed drones watching us.

How's that for keeping our manufacturing and innovation home? ;)
10:42 PM on 04/21/2011
The problem is the Chinese will make stuff for LESS money.

Of course Americans can make things....but nobody wants to pay them a fair wage.
03:42 AM on 04/22/2011
No, it is because this administration hates business, especially small business. But for some reason Liberals have a problem connecting jobs & businesses actually making a profit and not having to put up with thousands of stupid regulations.
photo
cef911f1
Dog loving, liberal old white guy living in SC.
04:54 AM on 04/22/2011
Your focused on a very small part of the problem and the "Buy American" provision is an attempt to counteract the root cause of the problem and to help the unemployment rate in this country. I'm sure that like many government programs, it has problems. However, the root cause of all of this is Western Greed and the exploitation of cheap Asian labor.

Working for a multinational manufacturing company that has several Asian divisions, I see this first hand on a daily basis.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
10:03 PM on 04/21/2011
Well, that does it, the USA simply cannot have a war with China, that is the nuts and bolts of the situation ...
06:41 PM on 04/21/2011
China a True Friend Long Live the US-Chinese Friendship
05:39 PM on 04/21/2011
Quote -- " fiscal year 2009, more than 44,000 waivers of federal “Buy American” provisions were granted, worth nearly $14 billion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

You would think that some American Company might see a $14 billion dollar opportunity here to start manufacturing these goods here at home.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
06:32 PM on 04/21/2011
Not for the same prices derrived by using Chinese and other foreign labor costs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lock Piatt
07:50 PM on 04/21/2011
Not with our energy costs - no more aluminum smelters or mining capacity, no more foundries to cast parts, no machine center capacity, no more tool and die makers, no more small companies doing this kind of work because they can not afford to comply with regulations. No not in America anymore unless it is a mega Corporation because they have joined the Political class and raised the cost of entry into any manufacturing business out of the small business borrowing ability.

America has a negative industrial policy make regulations that insure that all manufacturing [heavy industrial] can not be performed in the USA and compete with even the Germans. If we desire to restore our industrial base and the middle class we must change a lot of laws and eliminate regulations.
05:17 AM on 04/22/2011
For some items perhaps, but for the items above this is not about labor but direct subsidization. Cheap labor alone could never make up the difference in transportation costs on items like screws.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_d05e4250-f792-50c4-b93b-23aa1360e878.html
03:43 AM on 04/22/2011
You would think that with 44,000 waivers someone would figure out that "buy america" provisions don't work.
photo
rikster
buy the ticket-take the ride
04:53 PM on 04/21/2011
they got us now....!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
02:14 AM on 04/22/2011
and we gave it to them. In the ivy greed capitalist search for cheap labor and high profits.
03:44 AM on 04/22/2011
No, the government gave it to them by making it so difficult to do business in the US.