Catholic Bishops Stand Behind Criticism Of Book

By Daniel Burke
Religion News Service

WASHINGTON (RNS) Under fire for criticizing a popular theologian, the U.S. Catholic bishops said they must occasionally assume the role of referee and rule wayward thinkers out of bounds.

"Once ideas are written and published by a theologian, they must stand on their own," Cardinal Donald Wuerl, chairman of the U.S. bishops' committee on doctrine, said in a statement. "It is the bishops who are entrusted with the office of referee, who must call the play."

Earlier this month, Wuerl's committee criticized a book by feminist theologian Sister Elizabeth Johnson that is widely used in Catholic universities and colleges. The book, "Quest for the Living God: Mapping Frontiers in the Theology of God," criticizes and revises traditional church teaching, the bishops said.

The public back-and-forth debate between the bishops and theologians, while rare, has increased in recent years, as the bishops seek to guide a large and sometimes unwieldy church.

Johnson has said the bishops misrepresented her work, a charge echoed by the Catholic Theological Society of America, which Johnson once served as president.

The CTSA also said the bishops' criticism of Johnson "seems to reflect a very narrow understanding of the theological task."

Wuerl, in his 14-page response, said the CTSA "seems to misread the legitimate and apostolic role of bishops is addressing the right relationship of theologians and bishops."

"It is the responsibility of the bishop to make the call and to declare, if necessary, certain notions out of bounds, the bounds of Christian revelation," Wuerl said.

Comments

[Hysterian68]

07:54 AM on 06/01/2011

The U.S. Conference of Bishops would sleep through the Sermon on the Mount. These arrogant and pompous bugger-protecting old cross dressers know what side their bread is buttered on and will do EXACTLY what Rome dictates to them.

[schnauzergirl]

02:07 PM on 04/21/2011

It might have been nice to have the article actually mention what the Bishops have an issue with. Or at least a few examples.

[Singe Mansoor]

02:48 AM on 04/23/2011

I wasn't sure what it was either. Apparently they have a problem with the idea that nobody, not even them really knows the true mind of God. I would have thought that for any serious Deist, that would be a given.

I'm left of the opinion that Wuerl and the other bishops are obvious liars. They don't know any more about God than anybody else. The fact that they expect us to believe their lies doesn't say much about their opinion of all of us non bishops.

The Sister that wrote the book simply assumed that none of us really know the entire nature of God, as would anybody that thought at all about it. It isn't the main treatise of the book.

Why would any one belong to a religion run by old, self loathing, deeply closeted, pseudo celibate hypocrites like these bishops.