iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

JoAnne Kloppenburg To Seek Statewide Recount In Wisconsin Supreme Court Election

First Posted: 04/20/11 10:41 PM ET Updated: 06/20/11 06:12 AM ET

Joanne Kloppenburg Wisconsin Recount Election

MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- Wisconsin Supreme Court challenger JoAnne Kloppenburg asked election officials Wednesday for a statewide recount in her flagging upset bid against Justice David Prosser, a race that marked yet another front in the fight over Republican Gov. Scott Walker's polarizing union rights law.

Final county tallies compiled last week showed Prosser held a 7,316-vote lead over the little-known state attorney. The margin is within one-half of 1 percent of the total votes cast, entitling Kloppenburg to a statewide recount at local governments' expense.

Kloppenburg said at a news conference that her campaign detected "widespread anomalies" in the election around the state. She didn't directly answer questions about whether she felt she could make up 7,000 votes, saying instead she wants to shine light on how the election was conducted.

"Wisconsin residents must have full confidence that these election results are legitimate and that this election was fair," Kloppenburg said.

State election officials said the recount would likely begin next week. They planned to file a request with a judge on Thursday seeking permission to clear voting machine memory cards so local clerks can start counting again.

Prosser's campaign has been pressuring Kloppenburg to give up, saying the margin is too great to overcome and a recount would cost taxpayers. His attorney has said he would challenge any recount request.

Reid Magney, a spokesman for the Government Accountability Board, which oversees Wisconsin elections, said he had no estimates for what the recount might cost local officials. Suzette Emmer, the deputy Administrator for the Milwaukee County Election Commission, says the commission estimates the recount would cost that county alone about $500,000.

"It may well take several weeks and it'll be an immense cost and it frankly begs the question of what the motive is," Prosser spokesman Brian Schimming said Wednesday. "Because there is no statistical, logical, evidence-based or even anecdotal reason to do this recount."

Kloppenburg went into the campaign as a heavy underdog against Prosser, a 12-year court veteran and former GOP legislator. But she got a boost after her supporters and pro-labor groups worked to tie Prosser to Walker and his contentious collective bargaining law, which strips public employees of nearly all their union rights and requires them to contribute more to their pensions and health care.

The law has been a flashpoint of controversy since Walker introduced it as a bill in mid-February. Thousands descended on the state Capitol in Madison to protest against it nonstop for weeks and Senate Democrats fled the state in an futile attempt to block a vote on the measure. Republicans across the country are watching the drama play out as they contemplate cost-cutting moves in their own states.

The law is currently tied up in court and hasn't taken effect. Its opponents hope a Kloppenburg victory would tilt the court to the left and set the stage for the justices to strike it down.

Turnout for the April 5 election shattered expectations. Initial returns showed Kloppenburg had defeated Prosser by about 200 votes.

But the Waukesha County clerk stepped forward two days after the election and announced she had failed to report 14,000 votes. Those votes flipped the race for Prosser.

The clerk, Kathy Nickolaus, worked for Prosser when he was the Republican Assembly speaker in the mid-1990s. Nickolaus has said she made an honest mistake, but the GAB is reviewing her operations.

Kloppenburg on Wednesday filed a complaint along with her recount request asking the board to appoint an independent investigator to look into Nickolaus' practices, alleging problems with her election administration dating back to 2004. Kloppenburg said during her news conference she felt the board has worked too closely with Nickolaus to perform an unbiased review.

Nickolaus' office said she had no comment on the complaint. Magney, the GAB's spokesman, says the board is independent but could choose at its May meeting to hire an outsider.

Kloppenburg also noted her campaign had learned of other problems around the state on election night, including under voting in Milwaukee as well as long lines and even allegations of photocopied ballots. Prosser's "threats" about how much the recount may cost won't stop her from exercising her right to a recount, she said.

"If there is doubt," she said, "we must remove it."

___

Associated Press writer Jason Smathers in Madison contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- Wisconsin Supreme Court challenger JoAnne Kloppenburg asked election officials Wednesday for a statewide recount in her flagging upset bid against Justice David Prosser, a race t...
MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- Wisconsin Supreme Court challenger JoAnne Kloppenburg asked election officials Wednesday for a statewide recount in her flagging upset bid against Justice David Prosser, a race t...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,229
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (68 total)
photo
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
03:36 PM on 05/23/2011
Well it looks over; and the lib chick lost.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PETV9TJpwUA&feature=player_embedded
05:38 PM on 05/13/2011
As long as someone else is paying for it the liberals will spend it
photo
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
03:35 PM on 05/23/2011
So true.
Let me be your first fan.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MCWAY
03:04 PM on 05/04/2011
It ain't looking good for Kloppenberg right now. About a million of the 1.5 million votes have been recounted and Prosser's lead is STILL over 7,000, dipping only slightly by 178 votes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eLucida
Liberate Fitzwalkerstan, defeat A.L.E.C.
02:21 PM on 04/28/2011
Interestingly, the absentee ballot allegedly cast by WI Sen. Sheila Harsdorf (R) is rejected for lack of a witness signature.

http://twitpic.com/4qlt5s
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
VirginiaJeff
Waiting for the "Jennifer Government" movie
02:40 PM on 04/27/2011
Prosser was for a recount before he was against it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Meister
11:16 AM on 04/27/2011
Over 7000 votes is hard to make up. The fraud will have to be bigger than the extra trunk load found that put Al Franken in office even though his vote counts exceeded the number of registered voters in at least one precinct. Does Wisconsin have a Soros backed Secretary of State to certify the recount?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Ergon
Man From Atlan
09:52 AM on 04/30/2011
It has a Koch backed SOS :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theidel
03:09 PM on 04/26/2011
This woman needs to get a clue. On election night she made a statement that even though she only supposedly won by a few hundred votes that Prosser shouldn't waste taxpayers money on a recount. Now that she is down over 7000 votes, she wants a recount. Typical hyopocrite demohead.

BTW... Did you ever notice Kloppenburg's resemblance to Jigsaw?

http://entertainmentbuzz.info/files/1e878_saw-5-200x300.jpg
photo
ClarkOHrepub
BO & Co have Gotta Go!
05:43 PM on 05/08/2011
Plug a couple electrodes to her neck and she could star in Return of Bride of Frankenstein!
01:24 PM on 04/23/2011
Researching problems from other recount elections with the type of optical scanners used by Wisconsin reveals an error rate of 4-8 percent. It seems that the dust build-up from paper ballots that are fed through the scanners and the calibration of the sensors are the problem.

Every ballot should be hand counted; and Kathy's computer forensically examined. Inquiring minds want to know what has been happening with Waukasha elections since Kathy has been involved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
09:44 AM on 04/23/2011
Conspiracy to compromised an election?

http://bradblog.com/Docs/Kloppenburg_NickolausComplaint_Exhibits_042011.pdf
photo
evergreengirl
Stick with the truth
11:56 PM on 04/23/2011
Thanks for posting this link. It was very interesting reading. F&F..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
01:29 AM on 04/24/2011
You Welcome,fanned back.
photo
Olethea
Life may be sweeter for this- I don't know.
09:34 AM on 04/24/2011
Thanks for this! Provides some interesting insight. A special investigator is certainly needed. I thought the letter from the guy calling for Kathy's resignation was too snarky. I agree with him, but it was unecessarily nasty.

Anyway, great post. Refanned! ;)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
12:05 PM on 04/24/2011
I agreed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
09:43 AM on 04/23/2011
Kathy Nikolaus and her shenanigans

http://bradblog.com/Docs/Kloppenburg_NickolausComplaint_042011.pdf

Whatever ,a federal investigation is necessary,the whole election is compromised.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Meister
11:12 AM on 04/27/2011
How much union money was wasted here?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
11:31 AM on 04/27/2011
Do you are a sucketpuppet machine,my post is Four days old -I know you are
answering posts that are 7 days old,,,,,,are you okay..........

Carry on babbling!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
09:37 AM on 04/23/2011
"Meanwhile, across the state, 100% unverifiable Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-screen) voting systems are also used, mostly for optional use for disabled voters, but also in the case where paper ballots may have run out on Election Day, as they did in a number of districts across the state on April 5, due to higher than expected turnout"

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8486

It means they were using the machine without a paper trail.

Lastly Wisconsin is a state with Mixed Paper Ballot and DREs with VVPAT

VVPAT=Without Paper Trail

http://www.verifiedvoting.org/verifier/map.php?&ec=allall&year=2008&state=Wisconsin

How many immunities Kathy will be need?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
itschuck2c
12:48 PM on 04/23/2011
Wisconsin law, §5.91(18), Wis. Stats., requires that all direct recording electronic (DRE) voting systems produce a complete, permanent paper record showing all votes cast by the elector. The voter-veri­fied paper audit trail (VVPAT) is considered the official ballot and is to be used in a recount of each vote cast by the elector."

http://ele­ctions.sta­te.wi.us/d­ocview.asp­?docid=118­19&locid=4­7
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
12:02 PM on 04/24/2011
Yeah,Wisconsin law ,blah blah why Kathy Nickolaus broke the law,there
will be a recount ,why?

Where the Wisconsin law "where paper ballots may have run out on Election Day, as they did in a number of districts across the state on April 5, due to higher than expected turnout"

Wisconsin law?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
itschuck2c
12:54 PM on 04/23/2011
Also the second link shows the Wisconsin counties..in that picture any county without verified voting would be in red..as per the legend. All counties in that picture are green..meaning that they use verified voting or paper ballots.

Once again your own link shoots down your argument.
This is a capital W..
This is 2 capital v's..VV
Notice the difference? VV= Voter verified.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
12:00 PM on 04/24/2011
As always thank you for your clarification and density.

"Meanwhile­, across the state, 100% unverifiab­le Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-scre­en) voting systems are also used, mostly for optional use for disabled voters, but also in the case where paper ballots may have run out on Election Day, as they did in a number of districts across the state on April 5, due to higher than expected turnout"

http://www­.bradblog.­com/?p=848­6
08:39 AM on 04/23/2011
THIS WOMAN SHOULD TAKE HER FINGER OUT OF THE LIGHT SOCKET. MOW THAT MOP
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theidel
03:10 PM on 04/26/2011
It is Jigsaw...

http://entertainmentbuzz.info/files/1e878_saw-5-200x300.jpg
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnlcallen
05:32 AM on 04/23/2011
Her chances of overturning the election results are slim and none, with the latter being the most likely. This isn't about changing the results of the election. This is about using taxpayer money to score political points. She is just playing the role of puppet to the monied interests on the left right now. I guess this pretty much proves that the best person did actually win the election.
photo
evergreengirl
Stick with the truth
12:00 AM on 04/24/2011
If you believe what you have written, it is a sad commentary on how you view this election. The recount isn't about Joanne Kloppenburg overturning the election. It is about verifying that the results that were reported were accurate.

Kathy Nickolaus has a history of oopsies and this one was just a little too convenient.

Your attempt at logic is illogical. She isn't a puppet for anyone, and the fact that she has requested a recount doesn't have anything to do with who is the best person.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
delfleming
11:57 AM on 04/26/2011
Did I not see in the news that the Dems.said this was a screw up, but the count was right, that there was no error found.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
01:02 AM on 04/23/2011
Gov. Walker planning ‘financial martial law’ in Wisconsin
by David Edwards

"...Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) is reportedly following the lead of Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R) by preparing a plan that would allow him to possibly take over municipalities that don't pass a financial stress test.

"[T]he Walker legislation would empower the governor to insert a financial manager of his choosing into local government with the ability to cancel union contracts, push aside duly elected local government officials and school board members and take control of Wisconsin cities and towns whenever he sees fit to do so," according to Forbes..."

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/19/gov-walker-planning-financial-martial-law-in-wisconsin/
08:40 AM on 04/23/2011
GOOD CANCEL THE MAFIA CONTRACTS
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
08:50 AM on 04/23/2011
Good? Your answer means that you support fascism.
09:24 AM on 04/23/2011
JoAnne Kloppenburg smoked one to many dubbies
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
10:40 PM on 04/22/2011
itschuck2c 1 minute ago (10:08 PM)
128 Fans
Become a fan
Unfan
You would have to have every optical scanner networked.­.or have a multitude of people in on the scam. Now the scanners are not networked.­.so I guess that leaves lots of people involved..­which makes it very complicate­d.
But how do you change the paper ballots???
OOppps there goes that theory.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- To change information in a network only one need to have administrator privileges.

2- There are not scanners ,they are voting machine,scanners reproduce images,
voting machines don't reproduce ballots only count ballots.

3-Ballots doens't need to change ,only votes .
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
itschuck2c
10:45 PM on 04/22/2011
1.. There is more to it than admin privileges.. then there is the matter of the scanners not being networked.
2.. Scanners actually read something from a source..printers reproduce images or documnets.
3.. You would have to change the actual ballot that is fed into the optical scanner..or the scam would be found fairly quickly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ObamAtomic
10:48 PM on 04/22/2011
You are barfing!