More

Law Firm Fighting For Defense Of Marriage Act Faces Backlash From Legal Groups, Colleges


First Posted: 04/22/11 09:50 AM ET Updated: 06/22/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Members of the LGBT legal community are seriously considering breaking ties with the firm King & Spalding in light of this week's news that one of its partners, former Bush Solicitor General Paul Clement, has signed on to defend the federal ban on same-sex marriage on behalf of House Republicans.

Despite the firm priding itself on creating a diverse and welcoming workplace, leaders of gay and lesbian legal groups already predict a backlash against the firm that is poised to rake in up to $500,000 in taxpayer dollars to support the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defines federal marriage as between one man and one woman.

Jon Davidson, legal director of Lambda Legal, the nation's oldest and largest legal organization working for LGBT equality, had one word on the firm's decision to take the case: "Depressing."

"I think it's going to hurt them in their recruiting of future lawyers," he told The Huffington Post.

King & Spalding has touted its ties to Lambda Legal in recent years. In 2006, the firm announced it was a national sponsor of the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund. In its 2007 "Achievements in Diversity" report, the firm boasted, "Among other programs aimed at diverse law students, King & Spalding is a national sponsor of Lambda Legal, provides pro bono work for Lambda, and sponsors the organization in New York and Atlanta."

Davidson said in light of the DOMA announcement, he is no longer comfortable working with King & Spalding on cases.

"As legal director, I would take the position that we should not use them as cooperating attorneys with us -- that is, people who work with us on a pro bono basis in cases," said Davidson. "I wouldn't want to team with them, so long as they're actively harming our community by defending DOMA."

D'Arcy Kemnitz, the executive director of the National LGBT Bar Association, an affiliate of the American Bar Association, said the group has been hosting a career fair for law students to connect with law firms and other potential employers for nearly a decade. King & Spalding has attended the event annually -- a fact it boasts on its "LGBT Lawyers" website.

But now, says Kemnitz, the association may evaluate whether to change that relationship moving forward.

"That would be a policy decision that would be coming from our board of directors," she said. "That would be something that decision-makers would decide between now and Sept. 8. That decision has not yet been made. If and when it is made, we will send out a note to everybody so they know."

What troubles Kemnitz the most, however, is not King & Spalding taking up the case, but a provision of the contract between the firm and the House Republicans that left sexual orientation and gender identity out of its nondiscrimination clause.

That provision sends a starkly different message than the language on the firm's website about its efforts to appeal to LGBT students:

King & Spalding actively recruits LGBT law students and seeks opportunities to partner with LGBT student organizations to help their members successfully navigate the process of moving from law student to lawyer. The firm annually attends Lavender Law, the National LGBT Bar Association’s conference and career fair. Recently, an LGBT Summer Associate received the King & Spalding Diversity Fellowship, which provides $10,000 in recognition of outstanding academic achievement and leadership to candidates from a diverse background.

Administrators at some of Washington, D.C.'s top law schools said it is too early to tell whether King & Spalding's role in defending DOMA will sour students from potentially joining the firm; they also couldn't say whether anything could change with their university's recruitment practices. But they did say they take the concerns voiced by their student bodies very seriously.

Tedi Mason, the recruitment coordinator for American University’s Washington School of Law, said the school's gay and lesbian student group Lambda Law Society is “very active” on campus and if they brought complaints, the administration "would certainly consider” what they had to say. She predicted protests and student groups “putting up a big to-do” if and when the firm comes to the campus to recruit students.

Gihan Fernando, Assistant Dean for Career Services at Georgetown Law, said King & Spalding has been recruiting at the university for years and said he expects more recruiting in the future. But if students are upset about their presence and want to air complaints to the administration, he said the school is welcome to hear them.

“We always try to be responsive to students,” Fernando said. “It doesn’t mean we always do what they want us to do. But there will clearly be a process through which we could go to listen to their concerns.”

The George Washington University Law School's career services office declined to comment following repeated requests, citing an ongoing review of the matter.

Though King & Spalding doesn't have a large number of LGBT attorneys, the firm does have a non-discrimination policy that "prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity" and offers benefits to same-sex partners. The Human Rights Campaign has given King & Spalding a rating of 95 out of 100 on its Corporate Equality Index.

Not that anyone at King & Spalding is coming forward to tout that record: The Huffington Post put out more than a dozen calls to attorneys at the firm—some of whom are openly gay, some of whom sit on the firm’s Diversity Committee—and none were returned, save one, which ended abruptly when the lawyer learned whose call she was returning.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Members of the LGBT legal community are seriously considering breaking ties with the firm King & Spalding in light of this week's news that one of its partners, former Bush Solicitor Gen...
WASHINGTON -- Members of the LGBT legal community are seriously considering breaking ties with the firm King & Spalding in light of this week's news that one of its partners, former Bush Solicitor Gen...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,444
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (44 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
shirlyujest 10:31 AM on 04/22/2011
We get to vote every day of our lives in one situation or another.
Vote with your feet, folks.  I was surprised to read in the article that while "...King & Spalding doesn't have a large number of LGBT attorneys, ...it... does have a non-discrimination policy that "prohibits discrimination  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kathleen Morse
05:41 PM on 04/25/2011
Don't we have a Justice Department paid for by taxpayers to . You know what I'm not even going to finish this. Someone must stop them. This is bizarre behavior and I'm not so sure that these people who will not stop no matter what don't have some really serious mental problems. LGBT people are covered under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and someone in this government with some guts has got to tell these people that the Scientific community knows for a fact that sexual identity is not a choice and they may no longer use that lie to defend their positions that LGBT persons choose their lifestyle and therefore are not entitled to the same Civil Rights all Americans are guaranteed by birth. Enough bulls**t. And no more taxpayer money for this nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
10:42 PM on 04/28/2011
Fanned and faved.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KenClay
REPEAL DOMA
02:32 PM on 04/24/2011
I REALLY REALLY REALLY DESPISE republicants
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KenClay
REPEAL DOMA
01:22 PM on 04/24/2011
JOBS JOBS JOBS leave US Alone..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KenClay
REPEAL DOMA
11:57 AM on 04/24/2011
they always are a quick cure for constipation...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KenClay
REPEAL DOMA
11:56 AM on 04/24/2011
Anything to get off reason why they can't do ANYTHING!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KenClay
REPEAL DOMA
11:55 AM on 04/24/2011
Stay OUT of OUR Bedrooms and LIVES and Create Jobs Like you were supposed to you HYPOCRITES!
photo
mpilkanis
Attitude Adjustments Done Here
08:53 AM on 04/24/2011
DOMA violates the Establshment clause. Odd that we aren't hearing about this from the teabag 'constitutionalists' and various other windbag 'originalist' deep-thinkers.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MCWAY
02:47 PM on 04/26/2011
Maybe it's because a ruling has already been made that defining marriage as a one-man-one-woman union doesn't violate the Establishment Clause or any other clause of the Constitution.
 
See Baker v. Nelson (1971).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
talkstocoyotes
10:05 AM on 04/27/2011
See Plessy v Ferguson. That one has been flushed down history's toilet too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donns
08:11 AM on 04/24/2011
What is so unusual about lawyers playing both sides against the middle? They do it all the time. That's why so many of our elected, "so-called", leaders are lawyers isn't it? They are in anything solely for their personal gain, the thoughts of actually helping someone else is alien to them. As always, watch the flow of money to see where it trickles to and pools for answers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KenClay
REPEAL DOMA
07:54 AM on 04/24/2011
Feed the Poor!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Kellerman
Let's have more sanity toward each other
12:37 AM on 04/24/2011
This thread is about "The Orange Guy is playing politics with Gay Rights" using Taxpayer money

IF YOU ARE ABOUT CONVINCING FOLKS THAT "GAY IS OK", YOU OFFEND ME
THE RIGHT TO EXIST MUST BE DEMANDED,
NOT PLEADED FOR, EXPLAINED, ETC, LIKE 40 YEARS AGO

"GAY" does NOT have to be justified or explained -- everyone with half a brain has figured out that Gays exist. I personally find the comparison to animals weak and ineffective, but my main point is that it sets off long threads about
JUSTIFYING, LOOKING FOR ACCEPTANCE, MUTUAL SELF CONGRATULATION

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE "BAD GUYS" WANT -- spinning of wheels, not insisting on what we want, It comes across as "Please understand me Mommy"

Those who watch mainstream TV pretty much get the point that Gays are part of society and feel poorly treated. If they watch Fox, etc, they do so because they need to keep closed minds.

THE RIGHT TO BE TREATED EQUALLY IS THE POINT -- and there are some reasonable folks who don't yet understand it
What seems to work is actual human examples -- "My Gay brother's relationship is better than my marriage, but he cant get married." And specific stories about damage done for the lack of ability to legally marry.

BUT NO ONE WILL CONVINCE THE FAR RIGHT, MORMON LEADERS, ETC
Because they have other purposes for "keeping Gay down"

STAND UP, BE COUNTED, AND BE STRONG -- explaining and justifying don't get it
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
12:13 AM on 04/24/2011
This whole bruhaha is because the fundamentalists of one religion wishes to forced its definition of marriage on the rest of the country. Christianity is NOT the only religion in this country. Why should my religion, which would gladly offer legal marriage to same sex couples but cannot because of the blatantly discriminatory and unconstitutional DOMA. What about the relgious right of my faith to legally marry same-sex couples?

If the Christianists do not wish to marry same-sex couples in their churches that is their right. However, they should not have the right to forbid legal CIVIL marraige to same-sex couples. As for this legal firm, people have every right to protest and attempt to get others to boycott them. If they want to fight to promote bigotry, then they can deal with the flack.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
segdae22
Progressive and proud of it!
03:56 PM on 04/26/2011
Maybe thats how we should start approaching this fight. Instead of saying its a civil rights issue, maybe we should start saying that its a freedom of religion issue. I belong to a religion that supports same sex marriage, however it cannot perform a legally binding same sex marriage due to discrimination by the federal government! :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
10:44 PM on 04/28/2011
I think that this might not be a bad idea. Goddess knows it's the truth. I want to know why one religion's laws should inform the secular law of this country.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MCWAY
07:56 AM on 05/04/2011
That pitiful arugment doesn't fly. For starters, we have Muslims here in America. By rule, in Islam a man can have up to 4 wives. Yet, in America, polygamy don't fly.
 
And why is it that polygamy isn't legal, federally? Because the definition of marriage is ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN.
photo
pphhrogg
domestic clown goddess
05:34 PM on 04/23/2011
So let me get this straight...Kelsey Grammar can end a 15 year marriage by phone, Rush Limbaugh is on his 4th marriage, Glenn Beck on his 2nd marriage, Larry King can be on divorce #9, Britney Spears had a 55 hour marriage, Jesse James and Tiger Woods...while married...were having sex with EVERYONE. 53% of Americans get divorced and 30-60% cheat on their spouses. yet, somehow, same-sex marriage is going to destroy the institution of marriage? r\Really?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Kellerman
Let's have more sanity toward each other
03:11 AM on 04/24/2011
A PERFECT ILLUSTRATION that the "it will destroy marriage" is not coming from logic, and is not literal
--- it is a straw man for "I don't want you creepy FXXXXXS to think you are as good as me"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KenClay
REPEAL DOMA
02:33 PM on 04/24/2011
REALLY F&F
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
efffox
The truth is NOT halfway between right and wrong
03:07 PM on 04/23/2011
I've posted this before, but it's worth repeating:

Homosexuality is found in over 450 species. Homophobia is found in only one. Which seems more unnatural?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Onion Man
Campaigning against pants since 1982.Vive la toge!
03:13 PM on 04/23/2011
F&F

The h8teful are an unusually fearful bunch.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:01 PM on 04/23/2011
"When two parties wish to enter into a contract of marriage, they will, before such contract be binding, furnish notarized proof that their genitalia correspond in such a way as not to preclude coital sexual intercourse between said parties."

Without going into the full reductio ad absurdum . . . am I wrong in viewing this as -- at least! -- an unconstitutional violation of my personal privacy? I mean, for the purpose of a contract that doesn't specifically require certain sex acts to be performed, what business does the government have in even NOTICING my maleness? (Unless.... It's not the government but the ironically sex-obsessed conservative church that has its hand in my pants.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maxom
Just flew over the coo coo's nest
03:29 PM on 04/23/2011
It's the TSA....They are in your pants
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:36 PM on 04/23/2011
No it's definitely the church again. TSA always asks first.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
talkstocoyotes
03:42 PM on 04/23/2011
Yeah, I can just imagine recorders' offices all over the US requiring a strip search of both prospective marriage-ees before issuing a marriage license. And hey, they could always get the sheeple to go along with it by claiming that they're just trying to keep the Amurrricun peepul safe from.... well, we don't know what exactly but *safe*.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Married Gay Pagan Man
04:10 PM on 04/23/2011
Sadly I think you are right. These days a large portion of the US population seems to want to trade freedom for security.
photo
Razzer
When the moon is in the 7th house, and Zyra collid
12:46 AM on 04/24/2011
You've cited that for its absurdity and extremism: but honestly, I wish the law actually would require that, for the express purpose it would make a powerful impact on 100% of the marrying public. The general public, too, would suffer the injustice of a government acting against its own citizens' best interests. They would see, exposed, what a corrupt, wasteful thing it is when laws and leaders pry into individuals' deeply private, intimate matters. And some of them would get angry. And some of them even vote.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Cabo600
Mongo only pawn in game of life.
01:36 PM on 04/23/2011
I am so sick of the GOP's attacks. These people are nucking futs. Where in the heck are the jobs, guys?!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Onion Man
Campaigning against pants since 1982.Vive la toge!
01:41 PM on 04/23/2011
Afternoon Cabo.

These are the jobs. The GOP has made jobs for an entire firm of unconstitutional lawyers. :P
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Cabo600
Mongo only pawn in game of life.
02:28 PM on 04/23/2011
Word.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
talkstocoyotes
03:44 PM on 04/23/2011
The GOP has a vested interest in keeping unemployment high and nudging it even higher by November 2012. After all, no one they deem important will be hurt.
photo
Razzer
When the moon is in the 7th house, and Zyra collid
12:49 AM on 04/24/2011
Pawlenty is toasting right now to all the poor folk he scr#wed as chief exec of my fair state.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MCWAY
08:05 AM on 05/04/2011
And what was the Dems' vested interest, when we had 10% unemployment and they had the House and a Supermajority in the Senate?