More

DCCC Video Says Republicans 'Lied' About Protecting Medicare

Dccc

First Posted: 04/25/11 09:23 AM ET Updated: 06/25/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Democrats are ramping up their campaign to frame a couple dozen targeted Republicans and GOP leaders as enemies of Medicare, contending they lied when they promised to preserve the health care program.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is firing off a Web video today highlighting several of those Republicans, featuring footage of their promises in the 2010 campaign to save Medicare from the Democrats' health care overhaul.

At the time, Republicans seized on the plan to cut the privately run, government-funded Medicare Advantage by some $500 million, portraying it as an assault on Medicare. In Medicare Advantage, the government pays private insurers to deliver health services. Costs are typically higher than in Medicare program itself.

Nearly all Republicans voted earlier this month for a budget resolution that would shift all Americans 55 and under into a program where private insurers deliver Medicare services -- a plan that likely would resemble Medicare Advantage.

Among those singled out in the spot are Reps. Dan Benishek (R-Mich.), Scott Tipton (R-Colo.) and Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.), all freshman members who rode fear of health care reform and alleged cuts to Medicare into office.

"SociaI Security and Medicare are a promise we made to our seniors, and I will keep that promise," Benishek says in an excerpt lifted from one of his own ads.

"I'll never put our seniors' future at risk," said Tipton in a similar clip. "No cuts, no privatization and no scaring our seniors."

"Cutting Medicare $500 million to pay for ObamaCare -- that's wrong," says Ellmers in one of her ads.

“House Republicans promised to protect Medicare. They lied,” the DCCC alleges in the script.

WATCH THE VIDEO

The DCCC is rolling out the new spot in spite of criticism from Politfact. The well-regarded fact-check team finds Democrats' claim of an impending, Republican-backed end to Medicare is not true. Politifact notes that budget resolutions are rarely carried through, and even under the recent resolution, there would still be some sort of a program called Medicare.

Democrats called Politifact's verdict splitting hairs, and noted that the plan in the budget resolution written by Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) would replace Medicare with a federally subsidized private program. They also note that seniors expenses in the program would end up rising by more than $12,000 over 10 years, instead of the $6,000 they are expected to go up under current law.

Noted one Democratic strategist: "The only thing worse than voting to end Medicare would by getting caught on tape lying to your constituents about it."

The DCCC is also planning to release a document detailing the statements of all Republicans that it alleges lied in campaign ads.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Democrats are ramping up their campaign to frame a couple dozen targeted Republicans and GOP leaders as enemies of Medicare, contending they lied when they promised to preserve the healt...
WASHINGTON -- Democrats are ramping up their campaign to frame a couple dozen targeted Republicans and GOP leaders as enemies of Medicare, contending they lied when they promised to preserve the healt...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,730
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (54 total)
  1 of 9  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
tissa 10:16 AM on 04/25/2011
This message needs to get out there, and this is the first step in doing so. The uneducated Tea Party operates with 2 components: the rich corporate one, and the retired seniors in the three pointed hats with tea bags hanging down.   They don't expect that they will get shafted in all of this, but the coporate master has other  Read More...
 
Seniors--the main members of the Tea Party are in fact angry about this....as soon as someone comes looking for THEIR payday, they get mad.
 
Before when it was Suzy the Teacher, and Firefighter Bob being picked on the Tea Partiers felt all warm and fuzzy inside.
 
Honestly, I wish they would cut medicare and social security.....let's see how they would like it...I have a feeling tea bags would fly.....
 
Reality is about to strike the Teabaggers!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
artistdavid
The artist
02:09 PM on 04/27/2011
LOW LIFE LYING RIP-PUBLICANS,,,,,, GET THESE PIECES OF MOOSE CRAP OUT OF GOVERNMENT.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crosshatchaz
The meaning of life is to give life meaning.
08:35 PM on 04/26/2011
I've NEVER heard a reasonable argument how dismantling Medicare, the mainstay of the Republican party since it's beginning), and turning it into some sorta voucher program makes ANY sense. Ever hear of Medicare Advantage? People already have a choice to move from traditional Medicare to privatized insurance. And guess what? 85% (roughly) decide to stay with Medicare. Hmmm...I wonder why? Because Medicare is better run and covers all. Managed care programs that try to "buy" Medicare patients away are incentivized by ONE THING: Profit. They will take government dollars to provide "better" risk-managed care. And guess what? They simply won't cover anything that goes beyond the Medicare allowable expense. I mean, after they pay all the middlemen, the care dollars available are much much less.
Please explain to me, Teathuglicans, how this voucher "health-care-for-profit" scheme is a good idea. I'm desperate. Anyone? Anyone?

Thought not.

Its like trying to wrap your brain around why criminals perform heinous, cruel acts. You CAN'T understand it because they are insane. Just like destroying medicare for this health-for-profit scheme.

Anyone? Anyone?
photo
Ldyforce6
Don't Tread on the U.S.A.
01:23 PM on 04/26/2011
It is not PRIVATIZING Medicare...it is PROFITIZING Medicare.

We do not need private insurance companies, and thier need for profits, to be between doctors and thier patients. We need the clean, lower overhead, non-profit form of administration of payments for healthcare. Doctors could save a TON of money if they did not have to hire staff to make thier way through the private insurance landmines. The idea that a doctor won't take Medicare merely shows that they don't understand that they can see 10 patients and make the same money as, perhaps they can make on 5 with private insurance, but the cost to file that must be considered as well. Those that state that doctors don't want to take Medicare fail to realize that they don't take other kind of insurances either...thier choice. And if Medicare is able (because of the numbers of people in thier program) for lower payments...this is bad, why? This is what private insurance companies do all the time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
akrazyrunner
Without healthcare, freedom is just a theory
12:39 PM on 04/26/2011
I'm disappointed in poltifact's assessment of the advertisements the DCCC is currently running because they're spot on. While, yes, there will be something called Medicare if the ill-conceived Ryan plan were to ever be put into place, it would certainly not be Medicare as it has been since Lydon Johnson signed the bill into law and handed the first card to Harry Truman. One of the biggest things despite all of it's shortcomings that Medicare does is control costs. There is a Medicare fee schedule and under the Ryan plan that will no longer exist (amongst other things). Without the fee schedule, costs are going to skyrocket and the things depicted in the advertisements will not be that far off from reality. I subscribe to Comcast and they now call it Xfinity and it's the same terrible service. I was a Bell Atlantic customer and they changed names to Verizon and the service was just as lousy, here they're keeping the name and removing any value to the service and stating they're saving it. Saving it from what? Providing service
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean777
12:01 PM on 04/26/2011
Ironic ... Tea Baggers campaigned for Republicans to take control over the Congress by criticizing Obama for the Health Care reform claiming that it will reduce the quality of Medicare and now the GOP wants to eliminate Medicare all together
09:11 AM on 04/26/2011
Republicans flip-flopping again? Does this surprise anyone anymore?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hershobr
08:29 AM on 04/26/2011
Considering no one over 55 sees any changes to their Medicare, I think this is a pretty irresponsible ad by the Dems.
photo
dannypt
Out of kindness I suppose.
11:00 AM on 04/26/2011
And those under 55? It's even more cowardly to put the problem in our grandkids hands.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hershobr
08:42 AM on 04/27/2011
Those under 55 have time to make adjustments.
02:36 AM on 04/26/2011
Did anybody seriously think the Repugs would protect medicare (like they said in 2010)?

Some of us knew better.

Too bad others did NOT know better and voted for them.
12:51 AM on 04/26/2011
Do politicians ever tell the truth?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberalcynic
An Australian political scientist
12:11 AM on 04/26/2011
This just makes me so angry, it would just be better if we were all taxed, and all had universal care. the state being the single payer, like in the UK or Taiwan, or Australia where is there is great, and cheap health care. I study political science in Australia, i'm doing US politics, and i just don't understand why no one has replaced health care with a system like the UK's or Australia's it works, it's cheaper and far far better.
http://youtu.be/GBTetqOUZe4
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hershobr
08:30 AM on 04/26/2011
Places like the UK and Australia use US technology for their hospitals. If there was universal care here, there would be much less research, and medical technology wouldn't be close to where it is today.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:02 PM on 04/27/2011
The UK and Australia both have significant drug development and biotech industries. Their technologies are also used in the US.

What's your evidence that there would be less R&D here if we had universal health insurance coverage?

Health care in the US is higher cost and worse outcome than most of the rest of the developed world. It's simply not true, at least not anymore, that we have the best system.
10:20 PM on 04/25/2011
I think it is past time that the am.people decide to take one day off of work across the county just to let those in power know that it really takes people to bring them thier money.Of course were not talking about the money they have gotten through ill gain.What do you think? What would the impact on them be?They do not seem to care about us-- just saying fair play....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
senatortruth
Fox keeps me "INFROMED"!
10:17 PM on 04/25/2011
Tribal Knowledge

That's it? That's all you have?
***********************

The TRUTH is ALL I NEED!!

To you people, it is like SUNSHINE to a VAMPIRE...

It makes all of your kind CRAZY!!

ESPECIALLY those LYING "congresspeople" in the ad, huh?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
10:07 PM on 04/25/2011
"But if the progressive proposal has all these virtues, why isn’t it getting anywhere near as much attention as the much less serious Ryan proposal? It’s true that it has no chance of becoming law anytime soon. But that’s equally true of the Ryan proposal".

"The answer, I’m sorry to say, is the insincerity of many if not most self-proclaimed deficit hawks. To the extent that they care about the deficit at all, it takes second place to their desire to do precisely what the People’s Budget avoids doing, namely, tear up our current social contract, turning the clock back 80 years under the guise of necessity. They don’t want to be told that such a radical turn to the right is not, in fact, necessary".

"But, it isn’t, as the progressive budget proposal shows. We do need to bring the deficit down, although we aren’t facing an immediate crisis. How we go about stemming the tide of red ink is, however, a choice — and by making tax increases part of the solution, we can avoid savaging the poor and undermining the security of the middle class".

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/25/opinion/25krugman.html?_r=1

Congressional Progressive Congress:

Links to read and the bill itself:

http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=70

Rachel Maddow:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwFkuNQYYDo
09:56 PM on 04/25/2011
Tribal Knowledge 1 minute ago (9:53 PM) 268 Fans
Become a fan Unfan
Hahahahah!­!!! Koo Koo!!! Koo Koo!!! Koo Koo!!!

I bet you have those googley eyes, too, huh
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is a post from a real rocket scientist. It's brilliant, not.
09:49 PM on 04/25/2011
Lie Detectors should be installed at each seat in Congress and the podium, and everyone should be required to be hooked up before they speak. Then everyone could watch the big screen and watch the needle jump and yell "Liar". In other words.. cut the crap and tell us the truth now. They'd probably get things done a lot quicker without all the bull.