iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

J.Crew Sued By Tony Duquette, Inc. Over Leopard Print Sweater

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 04/25/2011 4:55 pm Updated: 06/25/2011 5:12 am

J.Crew is being taken to court for trademark infringement by Tony Duquette, Inc., according to a release on PRNewswire. The clothing chain stands accused of taking the artist's preferred print and re-purposing it as the "Duquette Factory Leopard Print" sweater. From PRNewswire.com:

Tony Duquette, Inc. alleges that J. Crew infringed the Duquette proprietary name and trademarks by producing and marketing a "J. Crew Duquette Factory Leopard Print" sweater. The lawsuit alleges that J. Crew knowingly and willfully used the Duquette trademark without permission or license in connection with a leopard print product because of Tony Duquette's unique association with leopard print in the company's designs and products. Tony Duquette, Inc. has an exclusive licensing arrangement with Jim Thomson, Inc. for a collection of woven and printed textiles including an authorized signature leopard print pattern and with Roubini, Inc. for carpets and tapestries in signature leopard print taken from the Duquette archives. Damages and injunctive relief are sought.

Women's Wear Daily elaborates:

In the Fifties, Duquette began creating and using leopard print designs for fabric, wallpaper, carpet, clothing and furniture. As a result, the print became a “signature theme” of his designs and “still remains such a defining and recurring element” in his history, according to the court papers submitted by TDI [the firm that owns Duquette's intellectual property rights].

On the one hand, J.Crew probably shouldn't have named this thing the "Duquette Factory Leopard Print" sweater. On the other hand, can something like leopard print really be trademarked? Does anyone have an authentic leopard we can ask?

Quick Poll

Does Duquette have a case?

YES! This is a specific print and it was named after him.

NO! Just another absurd trademark infringement case. Yawn.

Unsure.

(Possibly the cardigan in question, via Polyvore)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST STYLE

 
 
  • Comments
  • 42
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
02:28 AM on 04/27/2011
J.Crew used his name. Pay up!
If J.Crew released the "Chanel Factory Suit" or the "Mizrahi Factory Cardigan," I'm sure there would be no question.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZenCrusader
trying to be more zen in a zany world.
05:45 PM on 04/26/2011
JCrew used the name on the print so clearly they realized what they were doing. pay up JCrew.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:58 PM on 04/26/2011
Stupid
01:58 PM on 04/26/2011
I wonder if the Leopards have a class action suit against Mr.Duquette
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CHMB
What's long and brown and sticky? A Stick.
01:54 PM on 04/26/2011
Ick. I think I'd prefer to wear my grandmother's old chesterfield material over that sweater.
01:18 PM on 04/26/2011
JCrew shops the market in Europe and has been going into fabric, shoe, etc archives for reproduction under the JCrew label. If you go to their web site, there are videos that show the JCrew staff copying existing designs. They are quite proud of this. That is until a force and prolific designer & style icon as Duquette caught them and wants to be credited and paid.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Cynth
[Your ad here.]
01:04 AM on 04/28/2011
Many designers and labels go to archives and vintage shops for "inspiration." J.Crew's mistake was in using his name.
11:00 AM on 04/26/2011
I think Leopards should get compensated for J.Crew's use of their pattern in such an ugly manner.

I am not surprised, J.crew is well known for the bankruptcy of ideas and outrageous price for low quality merchandise.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemini68
10:28 AM on 04/26/2011
They used his name and a reference to his signature print without his consent and without compensating him. That is the definition of infringement. They will probably settle out of court because if the case makes it in front of a Judge, J. Crew will probably have to pay millions - including sharing of any profits made on the sweater.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anabelle Whitepaws
The UNITED States of America Has Spoken #TeamUSA
09:12 AM on 04/26/2011
ugly is as ugly does...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crom14
07:36 AM on 04/26/2011
I think the idea came from the Leopard.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Honora
08:25 AM on 04/26/2011
Good one! Bad sweater, good comment. fan crom14
photo
An Independent Woman
Honni soit que mal y pense
10:12 AM on 04/26/2011
My first laugh of the day.... fanned!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:20 AM on 04/26/2011
J Crew is still around!?!?!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
02:13 AM on 04/26/2011
What an ugly sweater.
I'm shocked that either side wants to claim it!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:41 AM on 04/26/2011
haha, I had the same thought
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mitzy
01:45 AM on 04/26/2011
Thank God I've got a little boy who likes to wear leopard print blouses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Damien Lavizzo
I'm only a Democrat cos we have more ice ceam.
11:31 PM on 04/25/2011
They should actually both be ashamed of themselves. Not for the frivolous lawsuit, but J. Crew for putting out a sweater this atrocious and Duquette for actually defending the trademark on it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
selenasade
06:32 AM on 04/26/2011
Ditto! Great post! ROTF!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trekbette
Country Before Party!
11:25 PM on 04/25/2011
It looks like a black sweater with soap bubbles all over it.