Cindy Crawford Tries Pantsless Trend On Vogue Mexico Cover

Seems like Cindy Crawford is having a moment (if she was ever not having a moment).

The 45-year-old supermodel struck a pose for Vogue Mexico's May issue in lingerie and a studded leather jacket -- the perfect spring outfit, if we do say so ourselves.

Most recently, Cindy talked about her sex life and confessed to Parade magazine that she feels like an outsider in the modeling world.

Don't worry, C. -- only top models make it onto the international editions of the glossy...everyone knows American Vogue uses exclusively celebs as cover girls. Duh.

Take a look and tell us what you think.

Quick Poll

Cindy's cover:

RAD! She looks hawt.

BAD! She looks weird.

Share your vote on Facebook so your friends can take this poll

Comments

[philestate]

04:52 PM on 05/09/2011

She's 45 with 2 kids, no matter how much botox or plastic surgery she's had, most of you haters out there wished you looked that good. Remember every picture you see is photo-shopped, she doesn't look like that in person but she is still very strikingly beautiful in person! Good for her!! Botox here I come!!!

[MamacitaOfLove]

11:39 PM on 04/29/2011

She looks like her face hurts.

[logic123]

05:57 PM on 04/29/2011

She looks like she's getting ready to beat someone up.

[Niasia]

04:41 PM on 04/29/2011

The lack of pants is not the probelm her body looks fabulous...now her lips...what's going on here?

[doglove]

01:22 PM on 04/28/2011

Her real beauty was her sparkling eyes and her expressive face

She looks like a zombie now. A zombie without wrinkles

[Levittown]

10:53 AM on 04/28/2011

I think a mustache would have added elegance and defiance. Good show Cindy.

[ruskie44]

10:50 AM on 04/28/2011

whatever happened to aging gracefully? botox is just so obvious.

[doglove]

01:19 PM on 04/28/2011

her whole face looks asleep

I wonder if she can speak

[jachavez]

10:06 PM on 04/27/2011

I hope this trend catches on in the US :)
http://realesttalkblog.blogspot.com

[sabrinaqedesha]

09:27 PM on 04/27/2011

Unflattering pose, unflattering lighting, unflattering angle, unflattering outfit.

[whiteconch]

09:50 PM on 04/27/2011

totally agree. surprised she let this get by.

[Sol Rosenberg]

09:03 PM on 04/27/2011

More hot broads ought to be sporting this look.

[Comeplayinmyreality]

05:49 PM on 04/27/2011

I met her in person about 2 years ago and she is still very stunning, I can only wish when I am her age I look that amazing.

[markie G]

05:05 PM on 04/27/2011

hideous---and i'm not talking about the lack-o-pants

[esolesek]

02:50 PM on 04/27/2011

A straight man photographer and a gay man will give you the real honest opinion about a woman's looks.

I dont know what's going in the face, but it's not good. If this is the best shot they could get, and they must've airbrushed, then her youth cream is doing what all youth creams have done - very little.
Her face was always pretty bright, and structurally its lost it to gravity, regardless of the tone of the skin itself. The mole really does look droopy. Her eyes look good, but that's an easy airbrush.

Her body looks good; she always had a fantastic lower body, but it's not like it's really available to see anyway.

I dont understand the point of these exercises. Gorgeous people don't stay gorgeous forever, especially past 45, and then they have to compete against their previously great looks. Eventually, biotech is going to change that, and the world will be strange.
THen they'll make a movie about the circus freak times back in the turn of the millenium when freakish women mutilated themselves.

She doesnt look like she's done that, although she does look quite different, which is often a tipoff.

[leorangerie]

02:49 PM on 04/27/2011

Um...what's up with her face? Looks weird. Is it because they covered the mole?

[JaneQCitizen]

02:20 PM on 04/27/2011

Too much plastic surgery. They forgot to pull up the mole, though.