More

Water Supplies In Western U.S. Threatened By Climate Change: Interior Department Report

Water Supplies Us Climate Change

By MATTHEW DALY   04/25/11 06:55 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- Climate change is likely to diminish already scarce water supplies in the Western United States, exacerbating problems for millions of water users in the West, according to a new government report.

A report released Monday by the Interior Department said annual flows in three prominent river basins – the Colorado, Rio Grande and San Joaquin – could decline by as much 8 percent to 14 percent over the next four decades. The three rivers provide water to eight states, from Wyoming to Texas and California, as well as to parts of Mexico.

The declining water supply comes as the West and Southwest, already among the fastest-growing parts of the country, continue to gain population.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar called water the region's "lifeblood" and said small changes in snowpack and rainfall levels could have a major effect on tens of millions of people.

The report will help officials understand the long-term effects of climate change on Western water supplies, Salazar said, and will be the foundation for efforts to develop strategies for sustainable water resource management.

The report notes that projected changes in temperature and precipitation are likely to alter the timing and quantity of stream flows in all Western river basins, with increased flooding possible in the winter due to early snowmelt and water shortages in the summer due to reductions in spring and summer runoffs. Changes in climate could affect water supplies to a range of users, from farms and cities to hydropower plants, fish, wildlife and recreation, the report said.

Western states are growing faster than the rest of the country, with some of the fastest growth occurring in the driest areas, such as Nevada, Arizona and Texas.

"Impacts to water are on the leading edge of global climate change," said Mike Connor, commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, an Interior Department agency that provides water to more than 31 million people in 17 Western states and power to 3.5 million homes.

The report "affirms the urgency of the planning we are engaged in," Connor said at a news conference Monday. "We need to take actions now to plan" for changes that are likely to occur over the next several decades.

The report addresses the expected impact of climate change on eight major rivers basins in the central and Western United States. Besides the Colorado, Rio Grande and San Joaquin, the report also looks at the Columbia, Klamath and Sacramento rivers on the West Coast; the Missouri River Basin in the Northwest and Great Plains; and the Truckee River Basin in California and Nevada.

All eight basins should see an increase in temperature of about 5 to 7 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of the century, the report says. Four basins will see an increase in overall precipitation by 2050: the Upper Colorado, Columbia, Missouri and Sacramento, while four will see a decrease: the Lower Colorado, Rio Grande, San Joaquin and Truckee.

Reductions in spring and summer runoffs could lead to a drop in water supply in 6 of the 8 basins, the report said.

Due to early snowmelt and relatively higher winter rains from warmer conditions, all but the Colorado basin could become more vulnerable to floods, the report said.

Aiguo Dai, a climate scientist with the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., said the report echoes predictions he and other researchers have made that climate change would reduce stream flow rates in Western U.S. rivers. But he said computer models used to assess global trends would not be helpful for small river basins such as the Klamath or Upper Rio Grande.

Even regional models that take local topography into account "still contain large uncertainties," Dai said.

Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., said the report did "a solid job" cataloguing Interior's efforts to respond to climate change. Bingaman, chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, sponsored a 2009 law that aims to improve water management in the West and increase analysis of water-related data. The report released Monday was prepared in response to the Secure Water Act.

"Faced with forecasts of decreased stream flows and increased temperatures, it's more important than ever for communities to actively plan for changing conditions," Bingaman said. "In arid environments like New Mexico, every drop counts, and conservation and efficient water use are essential. Having tools available to accurately monitor existing water supplies, and to accurately predict future scenarios, can provide more certainty to water users and help decrease tensions."

___

Associated Press writer John Flesher in Traverse City, Mich., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- Climate change is likely to diminish already scarce water supplies in the Western United States, exacerbating problems for millions of water users in the West, according to a new governm...
WASHINGTON -- Climate change is likely to diminish already scarce water supplies in the Western United States, exacerbating problems for millions of water users in the West, according to a new governm...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,450
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (105 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:41 AM on 05/25/2011
Do you know that many of the elitist have been buying up the acquifilter properties all along these areas, they have also been investing in "water shares." Check it out yourself.
photo
baxtron
tek phlarpt
05:35 PM on 05/09/2011
time to stop farming in Wyoming, Utah, and Arizona. In future news, Minnesota sells water to western states at $8 a gallon.
photo
Wanderland
Barbie arm candy
11:42 AM on 05/02/2011
Maybe people in the desert shouldn't try to grow lawns?

Yeah, crazy talk, I know.
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
10:42 PM on 04/30/2011
What do you call a society, a culture, a nation, that is more concerned with NASCAR, with the possession of over powered automobile status symbols, and with uneducated right wing talk show hosts who don't believe in climate change, then in planning for a future with inadequate water supplies? What do you call them when they put total trust in their ideological and economic leaders who are saying the opposite of scientists, ignoring the growing evidence that the climate is warming? Never mind what is causing the warming, what changes in habits and infrastructure are being made to meet the challenge of diminished food and water production in the face of a growing population?

Pathetic? Stupid? Dumb?

Addiction to ignorance is a tragic and expensive habit.
10:40 AM on 05/01/2011
I think the majority are not dumb or pathetic, but misguided into thinking that the necessary changes we must undertake is a threat to our freedom. Ironically, by choosing a safe and clean future over profit, we are exercising real freedom.
09:56 PM on 05/02/2011
Very well said.
absolument
Debate the policy. But first, LEARN the science.
10:37 AM on 05/08/2011
How could they manage to believe that tripe without first being pathetic & dumb?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
10:52 AM on 05/02/2011
One can scan the annals of history to see where a tradition of anti-intellectualism eventually leads a nation, or a people, and it is rarely, if ever somewhere pretty.
photo
Wanderland
Barbie arm candy
11:41 AM on 05/02/2011
Just look where it's led us already.
11:39 PM on 04/28/2011
Its time to start prepareing for a future unlike the past... http://greatwavesofchange.org/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:36 AM on 04/30/2011
It has always been that time, especially those annual new year's resolutions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
11:08 PM on 04/28/2011
Closed cycle nuclear using thorium in molten salt reactors should give us the energy to desalinate unimaginable amounts of water. The wastes would be only 1/100th that of the kind of nuclear we unfortunately use today and decay back to "safe as lead levels" in 300 years (instead of 300,000 years). There should be no need for dangerous (un)spent spent nuclear fuel ponds, plutonium, high pressures, and water (which turns into hydrogen in contact with the core). The only downfall (besides political) is that such reactors will still need heavy duty and expensive shielding, since they are radioactive. If an earthquake tore a crack in one, the molten salts would simply spill over and cause the thing to shut down - exactly the opposite of today's LWR !
It would be truly unlimited and easier than solar and its energy storage (not to knock solar, though).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BronsonMac
06:50 PM on 04/28/2011
And reading the HP COULD cause brain damage. Sheesh!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
02:38 PM on 04/28/2011
Well one solution is to start building nuclear power plants on ships. With this extra energy we can convert sea water into drinking water and collect some precious metals and rare earth metals at the same time while providing us with electricity. A dozen or so off the California coast.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
02:56 PM on 04/28/2011
It would probably be safer than putting them on land...which is kind of odd.
photo
ABACADABRA RABBIT
VOTE GREEN PARTY 2012
08:31 PM on 04/28/2011
..... Nuclear power plants on BOATS!?~

I dunno man. Have you seen fukushima lately?
photo
CivilDebate10
Practical Independent Libertarian
03:07 PM on 04/29/2011
There are already lots -- every hear of nuclear aircraft carriers?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slackhaus
I like Ike.
03:51 PM on 04/29/2011
I was on stationed on the USS Arkansas (now decommissioned), we had 2 reactors on them.
02:10 PM on 04/28/2011
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/environment/2011-03-03-1Apurewater03_CV_N.htm

This wastewater recycling needs to be rolled out to a much wider area. The treated water will be much purer than the so called "purified water" sold in bottles.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
01:13 PM on 04/28/2011
Somebody tell us a good sea level story.

I haven't any of those for a while.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
photo
Aquest
No one here is exactly what they appear.
07:31 AM on 04/28/2011
Some places will get increased radoactive rainfall, others will decreased radioactive rainfall. I'm not sure which is worse.

The climate-change deniers need to start looking for a new planet to move to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeWebster
Always happy.
04:36 AM on 05/24/2011
Sorry - why is the rainfall radioactive?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
09:42 PM on 04/27/2011
Doubtless the Anasazi had deniers in their midst as well, for all the good it did them. Bottom line is that the drylands can't support their current population, never mind the expansion that boosters claim Americans "want" No doubt the denial crowd will still be arguing over their water "rights" when the s**t hits the fan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
10:31 AM on 04/28/2011
Near the end, Anasazi culture got pretty dark...there is ample evidence of sacrifice and cannibalism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
llstudent
Tax churches now!
06:24 PM on 04/27/2011
But there is no global warming right repubs?
06:10 PM on 04/27/2011
What is it this time? Another mouse. Maybe a new species of tick. No. Maybe its a rare California barking spider that may become extinct if we use the water. LOLOL
02:12 PM on 04/28/2011
No you dip_sheet.......You'll run out of water, period!

There are a few communities upstream which are suing for their share of the water, which have so far been denied to them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Was you ever bit by a dead bee?
03:56 PM on 04/28/2011
You guys WILL run out of water because, jeeze, when you go to the desert, you have to golf, and have a green lawn instead of xeriscaping with native plants. The Future Civil War could be over the Great Lakes.
photo
antonymous
a man of wealth and taste
01:44 PM on 04/27/2011
You still can't have our Great Lakes water, Phoenix.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Was you ever bit by a dead bee?
03:59 PM on 04/28/2011
Someone will and that would get Canada involved. I don't understand why they can't pool money and build desalinizations plants for the region. Oh....thats right....socialism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slackhaus
I like Ike.
03:55 PM on 04/29/2011
Arizona has a coastline? I could see that working in SoCal but how much energy is it going to take to pump water to the desert states.