iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

How The Grand Canyon Was Formed: Anomaly Gives New Clues

How The Grand Canyon Was Formed

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 04/27/11 07:03 PM ET Updated: 06/27/11 06:12 AM ET

Just how the Grand Canyon was formed has been hotly debated by scientists and tourists alike almost since its discovery.

But new evidence has potentially shed light on the gigantic canyon's origins, according to LiveScience. The finding of a large anomalous structure beneath the Colorado Plateau suggests that at one point it rose up about 1.2 miles, was invaded by magma, and then eroded away into deep valleys, producing the canyon we know today.

However, while this behavior is commonly found in mountain belts, it's unusual to see on the relatively flat Colorado Plateau, according to LiveScience.

Previously scientists largely attributed the canyon's formation to the Colorado River, which was thought to have slowly cut through the layers of rock over millennia, according to Discovery. This new data suggests a more recent time of formation than other theories have posed -- in the last 6 to 7 million years.

"Anyone who goes to the Grand Canyon and looks down should think, 'What is it that made it this way?' The most immediate answer is water, that a river cut this canyon, but what is it that made the rock it lies in, the earth, move up?" Alan Levander, a structural seismologist at Rice University, told LiveScience.

In the lithosphere under the Grand Canyon and much of the western half of the Colorado Plateau, scientists discovered an anomalously cold, dense region more than 120 miles (200 km) deep sinking into the Earth. This anomaly is apparently pulling off the lower part of the crust above it, activity that might lead to a major part of the unusual geological history in and around the Grand Canyon.

The next step in researching the canyon's creation will be to appropriately image the anomaly using more seismology stations. Better imaging may lead to a better understanding of what caused magma to rise.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Just how the Grand Canyon was formed has been hotly debated by scientists and tourists alike almost since its discovery. But new evidence has potentially shed light on the gigantic canyon's origins...
Just how the Grand Canyon was formed has been hotly debated by scientists and tourists alike almost since its discovery. But new evidence has potentially shed light on the gigantic canyon's origins...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 530
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
JaxReader
Hear reason, or she'll make you feel her.
12:35 PM on 05/16/2011
I am so very astounded that so many people believe in 6,000 year old creation in light of scientific evidence.

Can you imagine how Copernicus, Galileo, etc felt when they tried to explain the earth was not the center of the universe.

I love how people can scoff at evolution, yet completely be okay with the notion that Noah got 2 of every insect animal etc, on one boat... and had them all survive to repopulate the earth. (Except the dinosaurs of course which don't exist.)

Craziness.
06:06 PM on 04/29/2011
It looks to me just like mud when water has drained over it.

Just say'n.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:20 AM on 04/30/2011
Solid rock isn't "like mud".
04:17 PM on 04/29/2011
This is almost silly. If you look at it from space it appears to follow a lichenberg figure. That which is left from a lightning bolt. Given the dendric appears, lack of material from the excavation in the vicinity, the material was most likely lofted space-ward. This would account for all anomalies of how a small river flowed uphill then down, or left sharp relief instead of gentle sloping erosion as we would expect.

Of course, you can blame it on any number of unknown interesting internal planet things, but it likely was carved in less than 1 minute. Probably when the 'myths' tell us, approximately 3114 BCE. Odd that all cultures agree on that date...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Oceras
Tax High Incomes!
06:07 PM on 04/29/2011
Excuse me. I'm due back on planet earth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wanderland
Generic white guy
08:03 AM on 05/03/2011
"Odd that all cultures agree on that date."

If by "all" you mean "a few creationists," you'd be correct.
photo
randyman99
My micro-bio is almost full.
04:14 PM on 04/29/2011
I'll go there in a few weeks and check it out for myself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
JaxReader
Hear reason, or she'll make you feel her.
12:18 PM on 05/16/2011
Let us know what you find.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
outwest06
Liberal and SURREAL American.
03:50 PM on 04/29/2011
I wonder how long it will be before the Arizona State Legislature passes a decree declaring the Grand Canyon to be proof that Noah's flood really did happen?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pita143
Virtue mine honour
08:33 PM on 04/29/2011
That stunt was already tried by one of the People working at the Grand Canyon, he was fired very quickly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
12:28 PM on 04/29/2011
Just a brief word about creation, the Bible and God.

Is your God so weak that He couldn't work evolution into His plan? Did you not read that to God a thousand years may be as a day? Don't you know that the Old Testament is allegory?

Please if you're a fundamentalist just stick to loving your neighbor and try not to think too much.
photo
Snerdgronk
co(R)po(R)atoc(R)acy plutoc(R)acy
02:32 PM on 04/29/2011
Al a glory!? ... Why does Gore get all the glory?

Snerd
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pita143
Virtue mine honour
08:36 PM on 04/29/2011
I agree. People try to paint Darwin as the person who said that Man came from Apes, when in fact it was Lamarck in "Philosphie Zoologique" in 1809, the year Darwin was born. Darwin's idea was that GOD did such a good job of creating wildlife that he allowed for small minute changes over the course of time to adapt to the changes that take place in the wild. Darwin was a very religious Man.
12:24 AM on 05/01/2011
Not that religious. He thought evolution occurred pretty much at random.
12:18 PM on 04/29/2011
----.
When NASA and other scientists tell us a massive flood on Mars carved the canyons there (on a planet that is bone dry)
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20927994.500-gushing-flood-formed-giant-martian-sinkhole.html.
it would taken a massive amount of water to carve the Grand Canyon.
----.
The erupts of Mount St. Helens carved new canyons in a matter of days (not millions of years) leaving fine layers of deposits.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mB4J14KnE-E.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jRriIqU4Vs&feature=fvst.
----.
This points back to the flood of Genesis as a likely source of the creation of Grand Canyon..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
12:22 PM on 04/29/2011
With in the 6,000 year biblical time frame???
photo
Snerdgronk
co(R)po(R)atoc(R)acy plutoc(R)acy
02:36 PM on 04/29/2011
Who Ussher'ed in the 6k theory ... ?

Snerd
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Angie Tyne 1
I want my disagree button!!
03:04 PM on 04/29/2011
We knew it was just a matter of time. (pardon the poor pun)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Front Row Joe
Obamacare Romneydon't
11:14 AM on 04/29/2011
Give me a break! More left wing spin. EVERYONE knows that the Grand Canyon was formed during the 40 day flood of the Noah's ark era. You know the era where one old man and his family were able to somehow convince two of every animal, including termites, to get on a wooden boat in the pouring rain. Lucky he built a smaller boat to be towed behind the bigger one for the two skunks to ride out the storm.

If you don't believe me, there is a Creation museum in Kentucky that tells this whole true story.http://creationmuseum.org/whats-here/exhibits/

From their website (NO joke)
See the scaffolding, smell the freshly-cut timbers in the busy work site of Noah’s Ark. Delve into the belly of the Ark and imagine the stalls full of animals, in close quarters. Listen to the sounds of thunderous, driving rains and the pounding of water against the sides of the great Ark.
I told you so.
photo
renocrapshooter
Only 512 years until the year 2525
11:56 AM on 04/29/2011
Them weren't skunks, them were Trumps!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dbos
Single payer universal health insurance agent
04:59 PM on 04/29/2011
then took that boat 5000 miles to the middle east so the bible writers could tell the story
05:48 AM on 04/29/2011
I made you made.Kant we all just get along.Oh ya were aminals
12:36 AM on 04/29/2011
This is more of that 'science" stuff. Much easier to just say the earth is 6,000 years old and the Sky Fairy did it all. Much easier to remeber as well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Front Row Joe
Obamacare Romneydon't
11:17 AM on 04/29/2011
Yes much easier to understand a man living in the belly of a whale, fire wheels burning in the sky, a wooden ark with two termites on it, a giant hand writing on a stone wall, enough bread and fish to feed thousands, water that actually looks and tastes like wine, a zombie who comes back to life. So much easier to believe those stories.
photo
L I Beral
Here kittykittykitty
01:07 PM on 04/29/2011
Joe, might you be suggesting that these stories might not be absolutely true? But....but....but millions of gullible people would have to actually THINK if there is a variation on what they know to be TRUTH. It must be true, Joe, if its in print and someone read it to them, like on a Sunday morning, say.
That ark must have smelled just swell.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pita143
Virtue mine honour
08:41 PM on 04/29/2011
So what I do not understand, is if GOD did all that...........is he on Vacation? Is he busy building another Planet someplace? If GOD did all of that before Youtube, where has he been?
10:23 PM on 04/28/2011
I'll bet any of you that your local Jesus freak will be referencing this within 3-4 weeks and conveniently forgetting/leaving out the 6-7 million years part.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
09:30 PM on 04/28/2011
Hmmm debate between scientists and tourists? That should have been interesting.
The lava flow through the canyon has been known for some years and has been a way to date the canyon's formation. The 'flat' Colorado Plateau is a giant block of uplifted sediments. A giant bulge. That happened long before the Grand Canyon was formed.
The anomoly sounds interesting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
08:52 PM on 04/28/2011
Isn't plate tectonics when you you get your ribs broken and they regrow crooked?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck02k6d-_nI
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
outwest06
Liberal and SURREAL American.
03:39 PM on 04/29/2011
No, you are thinking of chiropractic
.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pecadillosam
08:37 PM on 04/28/2011
Um....actually, this "news" is not new news at all....

As a geologist, I can say that we have known for at least the last thirty years that recent regional uplift (less than five million years - "recent" in geologic time) in the Southwest is responsible for the formation of the Grand Canyon and other canyon lands in the region, as well as the extensional (pulling apart, which creates "normal" faulting) tectonics of the Basin & Range province that encompasses Nevada, western Utah, northern Arizona, and Eastern California. The general mechanism is plate tectonics, which was described in detail and validated in the 1960s and 1970s, and has revolutionized the geologic sciences ever since. But perhaps this story provides more clarification to the actual timing and sequence of events that caused the regional uplift.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onwisconsin
Trust women; protect choice.
09:08 PM on 04/28/2011
Yeah, I'm not a geologist but I have several in my family and as friends. I have heard of this for a long time!
04:22 PM on 04/29/2011
Plate Tectonics needs work.
12:27 AM on 05/01/2011
Of course! That's why there are geology departments!
08:36 PM on 04/28/2011
"Previously scientists largely attributed the canyon's formation to the Colorado River, which was thought to have slowly cut through the layers of rock over millennia..." That sentence is horrifically misleading. The river cut the canyon as the plateau was uplifted. No one is disputing that. They're talking about the uplift of the Colorado Plateau being caused by a mantle drip. The reason the plateau was uplifted as a large, mostly undeformed block is not well understood.

This poorly-written article makes it sound like magma formed the canyon. Durr.