iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Birth Certificate Released By White House (PHOTO)

Obama Birth Certificate

First Posted: 04/27/11 10:13 AM ET Updated: 06/27/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The White House released on Wednesday President Barack Obama's "long form" birth certificate, the document whose absence has long been at the heart of the conspiracy-riddled discussion over Obama's legitimacy to serve as the nation's commander in chief.

(SCROLL DOWN FOR PHOTO OF BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND VIDEO OF OBAMA'S RESPONSE)

The move came as a surprise to the press corps, many of whom had not shown up for Wednesday's early-morning White House briefing. By the time word had spread that Obama would be making a 9:45 a.m. statement on the matter, however, the top anchors at all the networks had scurried into the briefing room.

Once there, they received a presidential scolding for their concern with "silliness." Obama began his five-minute statement with the complaint that he wouldn't be able to get the networks to break into their regularly scheduled programming for a speech on policy proposals.

"I know that there is going to be a segment of people for which no matter what we put out, this issue will not be put to rest," Obama said. "But I am speaking for the vast majority of the American people as well as for the press. We do not have time for this kind of silliness. We have better stuff to do. I have got better stuff to do. We have got big problems to solve."

"We are not going to be able to do it if we are distracted, we are not going to be able to do it if we spend time vilifying each other ... if we just make stuff up and pretend that facts are not facts, we are not going to be able to solve our problems if we get distracted by side shows and carnival barkers," the president declared earlier.

The document released by the White House differs from the one that Obama's aides made public during the 2008 presidential campaign. Instead of a "certification" of live birth, this was a "certificate," clearly recording that the president was born on Aug. 4, 1961 in the Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital in Honolulu.

For years, Obama's circle of aides had resisted calls to make the latter form public, noting that a certification is legally sound and what any citizen of Hawaii receives upon requesting documents of birth. And indeed, for some time, that explanation -- supported by a a wide swath of other contemporaneous evidence - seemed to suffice.

But some who challenged the president's citizenship remained unsatisfied, and in recent weeks they found a high-profile megaphone for their cause: business tycoon and presidential flirt Donald Trump.

"This issue was resolved in 2008. It has not been an issue," White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer said during a morning briefing in which he and other officials took care not to mention Trump's name. "None of you have asked about it, called about it or reported on it until the last few weeks ... [not releasing it] would probably be good for the president politically. Despite that, the president said he was struck by how this was crowding out the debate."

Last Friday, the president himself wrote Loretta J. Fuddy, the director of health at the State of Hawaii, requesting "two certified copies of my original certificate of live birth." Fuddy complied. Shortly thereafter, the president's counsel, Judith Corley of the firm Perkins Coie, flew to Hawaii to pick up two copies of the form. The trip was not taxpayer funded but, rather, paid out of the president's personal account. Corley returned on Tuesday at roughly 4 p.m. with the copies. The White House announced a "morning gaggle" for reporters shortly thereafter. One aide explained that they did not want to "hold" on to the documents for release on a later date.

Many members of the press confessed to being "stunned" as it became clear what was about to be discussed. White House press assistants handed out a six-page stapled packet of photocopies showing the new and old birth certificates as well as the White House's legal correspondence with Hawaii's Department of Health.

And yet it was the press that played a large role in forcing the administration's hand. CNN's Ed Henry had pressed White House Press Secretary Jay Carney on the issue just one day earlier, despite the fact that his own network had done a thorough investigation debunking the claims of the conspiracy theorists.

"There will always be some selection of people who will believe something. That is not the issue," Pfeiffer said when asked if Wednesday's move would silence the doubters. "This issue is, this is not a discussion happening just among conspiracy theorists. It is happening here in this room, on all of the networks, and it is something that every major political figure of both parties -- instead of talking about real issues -- is being asked about this. So the president decided to release this."

WATCH:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The White House released on Wednesday President Barack Obama's "long form" birth certificate, the document whose absence has long been at the heart of the conspiracy-riddled discussion o...
WASHINGTON -- The White House released on Wednesday President Barack Obama's "long form" birth certificate, the document whose absence has long been at the heart of the conspiracy-riddled discussion o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45,672
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (876 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
02:49 PM on 06/25/2011
Birthers: You know who else wasn't eligible for the presidency? Hitler!
World Net Daily finally asks to see der Fuhrer's birth certificate
by Alex Pareene

http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/06/24/farah_wnd_hitler
10:34 AM on 05/08/2011
Anyone who believes Obama was not born in the U.S., or is "un-American", or is "a Muslim" IS A RACIST.
12:54 PM on 05/16/2011
OMG… ok, for those playing at home, who perpetually push the boundaries of simple logic and basic common sense with never ending references from the leftist publication " Obama: 101 Reasons to Look the Other Way: The Practical Guide to Not Being Labeled a Racist", riddle me this... If you worked for the DMV, and asked for my ID, and I tried to persuade you with my Jedi mind tricks that I didn't need to produce such documents, would you raise an eyebrow? If you were at the military recruiting office and you asked for my birth certificate and I had nothing but a photocopy, would you accept it? If I then agreed to produce a more legitimate document, but that it would take me 3 years to do so, would suspicion levels elevate? And once it was eventually presented, it turned out to be hand written in pencil with traces of erasures, would a single whistle sound or flag be raised? How about if you were in charge of clearing me for my security clearance, and discovered that my history was unobtainable because I wrote large checks in order to keep it that way, would you consider everything on par and nothing awry? Think objectively before rebutting these questions with nonsensical rhetoric, just for the sake of confronting the evil conservative / right wing machine, for the questions are valid.
08:16 AM on 05/21/2011
He presented his BC 3 years ago, the right wing just did not accept it. They asked for it, he produced it, they did not accept it's validity. The State of Hawaii and it's Republican govenor said it was legit, and still, they did not accept it. He produced the same BC that everyone else from Hawaii has, and they still did not accept it. I guess Republicans are for States' rights, except when they aren't.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tenilla
01:25 PM on 05/04/2011
I am unable to link back to this, but I have had this exchange with walkone:

tenilla How odd that his father's name was Barack Hussein Obama, yet you say his given name was Barry Santos.

posted Apr 29, 2011 at 13:35:04 Reply Link


walkone i didn't say it he did in his auto biography....that he changed his name. Have you read the book?
--------------------------
Walkone in her original Comment alleged that the President's real name was Barry Santos --
presumably to prove that the long form birth certificate was fake.

I did read the auto-biography [sic] almost four years ago. the President never went by "Barry
Santos"; he was born Barack Hussein Obama II. He did use "Barry" as a nickname, NOT AN ALIAS. He may have briefly used the last name of his step-father, "Soetoro" -- but he was never adopted by Soetoro.

President Obama never used the name "Barry Santos."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
multidoc
Re-animating the dead since 1922
11:45 AM on 05/06/2011
Well, of course not. Birthers (my brother-in-law is one) hear something, then twist it some more in passing it on, until the whole issue becomes a giant game of Telephone. It's completely absurd, but apparently it give some meaning to their lives.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:42 PM on 05/01/2011
I would very much like for someone to answer for me the simple questions raised in this short video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6n86XAjKcs

Anyone?

I'm waiting.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Billyguitar
Disgusted by politics since John Anderson lost. In
09:33 AM on 05/02/2011
Who is this guy? Is he unbiased? Nope.
 
Answer me this, if there is something wrong with this BC don't you think the CIA, FBI, Secret Service or Justice Department would have done something by now? You probably think they are all in on the conspiracy too, right? Bulloney.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:56 AM on 05/02/2011
It doesn't matter who he is or whether or not he is biased. His questions are valid and you can't come up with a single answer for any of them can you?

It is my guess that the wheels are already turning regarding the validity of the document that Obama presented but it doesn't happen overnight.
09:09 PM on 05/04/2011
Why hasn't he responded? I don't know, maybe he's busy trying to run the country and answering questions designed to distract and degrade him aren't at the top of his list of priorities? Just get over it. He was elected, unlike Bush, by an overwhelming majority of people who were sick of being raped and pillaged. Even if it turns out he was born in Kenya, which is doubtful, what difference does it really make? We elected him to be our president, it's a done deal. Could we just concentrate on moving forward and progressing and evolving please?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacobisrael
teapartying semiticbirther
07:23 PM on 05/01/2011
"Only 38% of Americans said they thought the president was "definitely" born in the United States; 18% said he "probably" was. Nearly one in four, 24%, said he was probably or definitely born in another country. Nineteen percent said they didn't know enough to say."

The above is from a poll at USA Today, the bastian of liberalism. While you afterbirthers huff and puff about how smart you are, how are the great white hope for America, how you represent mainstream thought--it turns out you're an extremist extremely small minority of about a third of the people, at BEST.

That was BEFORE Obama tried to pass off one more fake certificate on we the people. My bet is that we now represent a large enough majority to exile you desparate and profane afterbirthers to the African garden spot of your choice.

Kenya calls for you. Kenya needs you. Why don't you go there?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Billyguitar
Disgusted by politics since John Anderson lost. In
09:34 AM on 05/02/2011
What you really want to say is get the black people out of the Whitehouse, right?
12:15 PM on 05/02/2011
Obama is half white.

Why do some of you have a problem remembering that? You constantly throw the race card when you have no credible source for your arguments. It's getting old and boring. Try another one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elizabeth Hinton
11:22 PM on 05/03/2011
Exactly that is the core of the problem he is a blak man half black r not his skin is dark adn that is in the craw of all these white racists and I an a white person but I am glad I do not harbor the hatred they all do. We are ALL human beings all bleed red and have the same emotions. SO rather than breeding more and more ahtred why not work with our Presient to fix the mess he was left with and quit the childish he said she said gossip an mean spiritedess
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thrashertm
05:54 PM on 05/01/2011
To all the people that are complaining the cert being a fake - does it really matter? Even if Obama stepped down, Biden would take over and the same agenda would continue. It might weaken the Democratic ticket for 2012, but it's unlikely to be material given the problems facing this country.

Hate applying to jobs? Let us do it for you. Human job search assistant - www.jobwaltz.com
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brehas2
04:43 PM on 05/01/2011
There is just one itsy bitsy, tweeny weeny, crumpsy bumsy, crikey brikey, tiny biny thing wrong with the Magician's BC. That is his father's birthplace. It said that he was born in Kenya. Kenya did not exist as a state in 1961. It got its name in 1963 and its independence.
10:17 AM on 05/08/2011
You are COMPLETELY WRONG. In 1920, Great Britain established the "Colony of Kenya" and the "Protectorate of Kenya". These were merged into a single entity, Kenya.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_British_Empire#Africa

Another BIRTHER LIE shot down!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kenyatta J Yamel
10:56 AM on 05/01/2011
Vote LiberWhat? Trump is blacker than ham and cheese? You betcha
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brehas2
04:09 AM on 05/01/2011
The font. Problem with the font. Is this the 1961 font of a typewriter?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:49 AM on 05/01/2011
I saw a site referring to the image in Photoshop and talking about layers and that the document shows signs of editing?
I'm not familiar with Photoshop so maybe an expert can comment on that aspect this COLB.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacobisrael
teapartying semiticbirther
01:31 PM on 05/01/2011
The following video is a bit long, but if you really want to see the truth, it's worth taking the time to see it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCjAmEgjkUc&feature=related
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:08 PM on 04/30/2011
The document is clearly a fake.
As the page rolls back on the left hand side, the green background pattern clearly does not. The pattern is an overlay that runs straight from side to side and does not follow the curve of the page. This is most obvious at the top left corner.
Fake.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Lyons
ENDTHEFED
09:49 PM on 04/30/2011
You're right. And if you look at the B in box 8 in Obama" and compare it to the B in box 1c, they are EXACTLY the same. Pixel by pixel. This wouldn't happen if it was a typewriter.

Look at this video for further proof:

/watch?v=aMLdrrC1-xs
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacobisrael
teapartying semiticbirther
12:03 PM on 05/01/2011
Wow. I've now gone full circle, from thinking it was an obvious fraud, to thinking that scanning a document will separate different parts of the scan so completely that the date "1961" is put on two separate layers, to now realizing that this "b" in "obama" WAS artifically inserted into two different parts of the document.

Whew.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwinX
Avast Ye, Birthers!
08:28 AM on 05/01/2011
It's on the Hawaiian State Website.

Their view is that it's 'Official'...which is the opposite of 'fake'.

Birthers are the worst sore losers in history.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:30 PM on 05/01/2011
Can you explain why this document "did not exist" for two years and then it magically did exist?

There are many more unanswered questions. Here...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6n86XAjKcs
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:45 PM on 05/02/2011
Can you explain the irregularities on the document itself.
Did you see the last signature? Can you read it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacobisrael
teapartying semiticbirther
06:16 PM on 04/30/2011
Poll right off the hot press:

Do you believe Obama to be constitutionally eligible for the presidency? (2653 votes)

No, and it's perhaps the most shocking political scandal of the 21st century 51% (1347)

No, it has always been the birth father who conferred natural-born citizenship 17% (441)

No, every day I see more evidence he is not 12% (307)

No, eligibility is decided by more than just a U.S. birth 11% (303)

The jury is still out on the validity of the documentation 4% (110)

Not sure 1% (38)

Other 1% (36)

Of course, he was clearly born in U.S. 1% (29)

Only nitwits and right-wing extremists can doubt his eligibility now 1% (23)

If you're not convinced now, nothing will persuade you 1% (19)

so you afterbirthers don't have a corner on personal opinion. There are LOTS of normal Americans who disagree with you, particularly when you resort to calling everyone you disagree with "racists".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacobisrael
teapartying semiticbirther
02:46 PM on 04/30/2011
All you afterbirthers who still have problems understanding that having a British SUBJECT in our White House has nothing to do with race and everything to do with LAW, whose unsavory racist comments are now an indelible part of our public record, need to read and study and understand in infinite detail the following article:

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292901
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tenilla
12:47 AM on 05/01/2011
No one comes to Huffington Post to read World Net Daily.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwinX
Avast Ye, Birthers!
08:29 AM on 05/01/2011
YOU are the 'after-birthers', not us.

People without enough shame to crawl under a rock three years ago when the President released his COLB, and unwilling to dig to get under the rock for 3 years since.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacobisrael
teapartying semiticbirther
02:10 PM on 04/30/2011
The definition of natural born citizen actually says nothing about race. It only claims that BOTH parents of any race must be American citizens for the offspring to qualify for the natural born citizenship for presidency.

There are of course multiple other serious problems with this putateive presidency which are independent of this drop dead problem.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Billyguitar
Disgusted by politics since John Anderson lost. In
06:21 PM on 04/30/2011
You need to back up the BOTH parents statement. To my knowledge, the number of parents is never stipulated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacobisrael
teapartying semiticbirther
07:10 PM on 04/30/2011
Natural born citizen is not a legal term, it's a religious term. And in every religion on the planet, for an offspring to be a natural born citizen of any organized society, both parents must be citizens.

Our codification of the term in the US Code (see U.S. Code: Title 8, 1401), does not and cannot ever change the religious meaning. The authors of the 14th Amendment made the distinction very clear between a citizen and a natural born citizen. This was reconfirmed most recently when Congress agreed that McCain, even though he was not born IN the Continental US, was still a natural born citizen (not simply a 14th amendment creation) ONLY because BOTH parents were AMERICAN citizens.
05:26 PM on 05/01/2011
Actually, it's a "Divine Law" term founded in "British Common Law" it is actually a term synonymous with their contemporaneous understanding of science and the self evident expression of the Divine as nature unfolds and reveals itself in accord with the laws of the Divine. It is God revealing his order and rule through nature as it expresses and unfolds itself devoid of man's intervention! An amalgamation of science and their views on the "laws of nature" and "natural law" as they are expressed by the Divine via "empirical" self evident expressions in nature untainted by man's statutes, not a religious term but a scientific term at least from their perspective!

Thus one who intrinsically contained a particular "nature" or characteristic without the intervention of any of man's written statutes at birth were considered by "natural law" to be a "natural born ______" , fill in the characteristic!

Therefore if one required a statute to make one a "subject" they were not according to "nature law", a "natural born subject" because as nature unfolds and reveals itself by the Divine, nature never yields capacity for such capricious and willful intervention by man! Natural Law stipulates you are simply the sum of your parents makeup via nature and no more! Their contemporaneous view of nature gave no allowance for man by his will and actions to alter the characteristic of an offspring!

Simply put a "natural born ______" becomes such because they are the production of 2 "natural ______" progenitors! Period!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aprilglaspie
08:02 PM on 04/30/2011
In what universe? You are imagining things.
09:30 AM on 04/30/2011
JUst because most blacks, many whites, Asians, and Hispanics voted for Obama, it doessn't make them racist! Odd thinking. If this same group voted for McCain, would that make them 'White Supremicists'??? What are you getting at?