More

Dems' Oil Subsidy Repeal Push Puts GOP On Defensive

First Posted: 04/27/11 07:24 PM ET Updated: 06/27/11 06:12 AM ET

Harry Reid
Reid reaches out to Republicans for help in cutting oil subsidies.

WASHINGTON -- Democrats are gleefully charging ahead with a proposal to end multi-billion-dollar oil and gas subsidies, seeing an opportunity to redirect the public’s ire over gas prices from the White House to Big Oil and its loyal Republican backers.

On Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) vowed to set up an early vote on the issue. His decision comes one day after President Barack Obama called for "immediate action to eliminate unwarranted tax breaks for the oil and gas industry, and to use those dollars to invest in clean energy to reduce our dependence on foreign oil."

“I think he's right,” Reid said of Obama’s letter to congressional leaders. “We need to take away the subsidies of these five major oil companies. We have to do that as quickly as we can. I'm going to try to get it done as soon as I can do it procedurally in the Senate here."

"There's no necessity for these subsidies. The companies have broken all records for profits,” Reid said in a conference call with reporters. "They do quite well without the subsidies.”

So far, at least, the battle is all about optics. The oil industry’s prodigious lobbying and campaign spending give it such a firm grip on Republicans -- and some Democrats -- that their subsidies were perfectly safe even when Democrats controlled both houses. Indeed, the president proposed cutting oil subsidies in his previous two budgets as well, but the Senate never brought his provisions to a vote.

But House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) gave Democrats an opening too delightful to pass up on Monday night when, under interrogation by ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl, he conceded that the subsidies were "certainly something we should be looking at" and that oil companies "ought to be paying their fair share.”

The White House pounced on Boehner's comments, which his staff immediately sought to correct.

Even as Republicans made clear that their party line remains the same -- and that they consider repealing subsidies a tax increase by another name -- Democrats and environmental groups joined the chorus calling to end the fossil fuel industry handouts.

Now there’s even some talk that the imaginable might actually happen.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) on Wednesday called on Boehner to hold an up-or-down vote on a Democratic bill that would repeal even more subsidies than Obama is calling for. It would recoup some $8 billion a year in tax breaks from oil and gas companies.

"I’m a little encouraged,” Blumenauer told The Huffington Post. "The spotlight on this issue, with the speaker and the president, helps a lot. And juxtaposed with skyrocketing gas prices and these amazing profit reports that are coming out from the oil companies, we may actually be producing a perfect storm, where there is actually a chance."

"I still wouldn’t bet the farm on it,” he said. "But I do think this alignment is such that it makes it more likely.”


*************************

Dan Froomkin is senior Washington correspondent for The Huffington Post. You can send him an email, bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed, follow him on Twitter, friend him on Facebook, and/or become a fan and get email alerts when he writes.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Democrats are gleefully charging ahead with a proposal to end multi-billion-dollar oil and gas subsidies, seeing an opportunity to redirect the public’s ire over gas prices from the Wh...
WASHINGTON -- Democrats are gleefully charging ahead with a proposal to end multi-billion-dollar oil and gas subsidies, seeing an opportunity to redirect the public’s ire over gas prices from the Wh...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 828
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
Beatriz09 08:49 PM on 04/27/2011
"So far, at least, the battle is all about optics. The oil industry’s prodigious lobbying and campaign spending give it such a firm grip on Republicans -- and some Democrats -- that their subsidies were perfectly safe even when Democrats controlled both houses. Indeed, the president proposed  Read More...
06:57 PM on 04/30/2011
well all i can say to all voters is give our govt elected officials a choice either bring the ridiculous fuel prices down or we all have got to VOTE every last one of them OUT of office from the bottom to the top and the top to bottom ,, the american people need to come together and take our country back and our govt back as fast as possible and you watch how fast them on the hill and white house move to getting the oil companys to lower fuel prices !!! because IF we dont do somthing with them officals they wont do a thing to help bring down the prices and we the tax payers will keep getting shafted more and more ,, there is NO reason for gas to be so high , we have more oil then we know what to do with and thats FACTS !! they raise the price only on assumptions of problems overseas not on actual or real time events ok and thats a real friggin shame on THEM and US for letting them do this to us !!! think about it people !!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jdl51
03:48 PM on 04/30/2011
"In recent weeks, gas prices around the country have surged to levels unseen since the 2008 oil spike. However, market fundamentals are not driving the nearly $4.00/gallon gas prices. In fact, under the Obama administration, oil production is at record highs and there is adequate global supply of crude. As Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) commissioner Bart Chilton has explained, rampant oil speculation, which is at its highest level on record right now, is to blame for current prices."

If oil companies are making absurd profits from market manipulation, take away the subsidies. They'll still be making more money than they were a few months ago, so why would it hurt them now? Any complaining about losing a few million in subsidies while they're cleaning up on the profit side is just spoiled rich guys wanting more and more no matter who ends up paying for it. In this case it's the American taxpayers who are paying for it.
photo
TexasTreader
My other dog is a gator
04:24 PM on 04/28/2011
How are WE on the defensive? It's libs trying to raise the price of gas in a recession with high unemployment numbers. We've got the high ground here.

DRILL HERE, DRILL NOW!!!
The Notorious PDF
Keen Observer
05:52 PM on 04/28/2011
Oh. Please. First of all, you right-wingers are completely phony, because you've been telling us all year about how government spending is "destroyingAmerica", and how we can't even afford education and infrastructure, and how collecting enough revenue to pay for it is "soshulizm", and now you're sitting here arguing against reducing government spending, which you all just said is "soshulizm". It's only "soshulizm" when it goes to help old people, poor people and minorities. You all love "soshulizm" as long as it goes into the pockets of multinational billionaires.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MontanaBanana
I've had it trying to reason with the GOP
05:56 PM on 04/28/2011
Fanned!
12:43 PM on 04/29/2011
Thanks for trying too enlighten that poor soul.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Gregor53
Remembering your past gives power to the present.
09:09 PM on 04/28/2011
Please explain to me Exxons announcement of first quarter earnings of $11 Billion, up about 60% from this time last year.  While you are on the high ground, bend over and enjoy.
photo
camelias and sweet tea
Small drinking village with a shrimping problem
02:00 PM on 04/28/2011
These subsidies were originally for manufacturing, not oil, somehow they wormed their way into it.
01:53 PM on 04/28/2011
Repealing oil subsidies is a tax increase, but reducing financial aid to help poor people heat their homes isnt? Nice.
photo
iconoclast6
This is my BOOM stick!
01:38 PM on 04/28/2011
The Kochs will be looking for a new BOehNER............
01:24 PM on 04/28/2011
OK, bad math in my last post. The US consumed about 7 billion barrels of oil in 2010. So removing subsidies could be seen as adding about $1 to the price of a barrel of oil. Assuming a market price of gasoline at $3.85 / gallon, when crude oil is $112 / barrel, gasoline is 3.4% the price of a barrel of oil (the average over the last decade is ~4.7%). So, removing these subsidies could conceivably add between $0.035 to $0.045 to a gallon of retail gas, if passed directly to the consumer.

The federal tax on retail gasoline is $0.18 per gallon and state/local tax is about $0.22 per gallon (these are fixed, not percentages). However, if we get rid of these, you will be driving on dirt or paying a toll.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Angie Tyne 1
I want my disagree button!!
02:48 PM on 04/29/2011
pssst I don't know if you saw it but once your comment posts there is an edit button next to the permalink. I just discovered it today. YAYS!!
lowlycitizen
Kindness is free, spread liberally
01:12 PM on 04/28/2011
The GOPuppets didn't realize that holding the House majority would shine a spotlight on their long-standing affair with big business. Your reap what you sow.
photo
TexasTreader
My other dog is a gator
04:26 PM on 04/28/2011
Versus your animosity toward employers. If you had it your way, the USA would be one great big tourist trap and Americans would be selling home made friendship bracelets on the roadside.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MontanaBanana
I've had it trying to reason with the GOP
05:59 PM on 04/28/2011
No, we libs like employers. Afterall, many of us are employers. You seem to think that only GOPers hire people. That is your fist mistake. We don't like bit oil companies getting subsidies for doing something they would do without the subsidies and that is hunt for oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigmadd
Retired Teamster & Vet USN
11:59 PM on 04/28/2011
because of the GOP (Greed Over People)we are about there now they keep outsourcing our jobs,weaking unions and dumbing down the country it won't take long
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dax49
12:39 PM on 04/28/2011
The news programs should herald the names of ANY POLITICIAN who vbotes against rescinding these tax breaks-the American people have a right to know exactly who is voting against this and WHY!
photo
camelias and sweet tea
Small drinking village with a shrimping problem
02:01 PM on 04/28/2011
fanned. and I agree Name names
photo
TexasTreader
My other dog is a gator
04:29 PM on 04/28/2011
Hey, genius, if you want to know how any politician votes on a given bill (even all of Obama's "present" votes) the info is available online.
iam99
To know what you prefer...
12:31 PM on 04/28/2011
Does it help The People, or does it benefit your money master corporations?

If it helps your human constituents then go for it, if the corporations who have bought, er, uh contributed to your funds then forget about it.
libertyanne
Red-haired Freedom lover
12:23 PM on 04/28/2011
Thank you Harry Reid! It's about time the Dems started fighting these cons. They don't care about this country they just want to give money to corporations so in turn the campaign money will come to them. The campaign ads from this vote will prove this point.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
11:59 AM on 04/28/2011
I thought Republicans were free market capitalists and subsidies were Democratic socialist programs. What happened? While you're at it give us back the farm subsidies you "redistributed" to your corporate masters.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
12:39 PM on 04/28/2011
Right on!!!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MontanaBanana
I've had it trying to reason with the GOP
06:00 PM on 04/28/2011
Fanned again, if i could.
11:57 AM on 04/28/2011
Why has the GOP not claimed that removing the subsidies will increase the price of oil? Because it only amounts to about $0.001/barrel given the amount of oil we consume each year. But do not worry, the Repubs are likely to give it back by reducing royalty payments.

Why can't Dems explain that oil (and other global commodities, such as corn and wheat) are subject to free market fluctuation. Do Repubs want the government to have more control, so they can affect the free market at any moment?

With Repubs, when it comes to oil, we just need to find more, not use less (Drill Baby Drill. But, when it comes to helping citizens, we need to use less. Even oil companies will agree, it is not realistic to assume the US can produce enough oil to our satisfy current demand.
11:40 AM on 04/28/2011
It's time for Reid and the Senate Democrats to break every bit of legislation down to a single issue, bring them to vote, pass them and send them to the House. There is an election coming up and people need to know exactly who supports building or destroying the middle class and the nation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mary Blickhahn
Mary Quite Contrary
11:02 AM on 04/28/2011
Hmmm Big oil gets big money no matter what they do, and we just get ripped off and yelled at for not having enough money to magically cover all these expenses and we take it. Man we're a screwed up nation!
Reading the paper today a thought ran through my head...Maybe the wealthiest of this country is taking all our all our money so we can't buy off our own politicians???