iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Reclaiming Oil Subsidies: Senate Democrats Prepping Bill That Would Recover Billions From Big Firms

First Posted: 04/28/11 07:30 PM ET Updated: 06/28/11 06:12 AM ET

Sen Max Baucus

Seizing the moment, Senate Democrats are working on legislation that would reclaim billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies to Big Oil and redirect the money toward developing cleaner and cheaper fuel sources instead.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) announced on Thursday that his committee is crafting a measure that would repeal major tax breaks for the five largest oil and gas companies, which reported huge spikes in first-quarter profits this week due to skyrocketing oil prices.

"Now is not the time to stand idly by while large oil and gas companies get billions of dollars in tax breaks -- now is the time to take concrete steps toward cleaner, more affordable, domestically-produced energy," Baucus said in a statement. "Reducing dependence on foreign oil isn't easy, but this plan puts us on a path toward a clean, affordable energy future that works for our planet -- and our pocketbooks."

The bill could be ready as soon as next week.

Democrats seem to have found their own source of renewable energy in some poorly-chosen words by House Speaker John Boehner, who in an interview with ABC News on Monday seemingly abandoned longstanding Republican dogma by conceding that oil companies "ought to be paying their fair share" and that the subsidies are "certainly something we should be looking at."

Boehner's staff and colleagues quickly corrected the speaker. But empowered Democrats were already in motion.

Capitalizing on Boehner's comments -- and anger about high gas prices, and first-quarter profit reports -- President Barack Obama and his press secretary called for immediate action Tuesday.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) followed suit by pledging their support. "I'm going to try to get it done as soon as I can do it procedurally in the Senate here," Reid told reporters on Wednesday.

Democratic and environmental groups revved up their email lists. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee even popped up a new website Thursday morning, dubbing the GOP's relationship with the petroleum industry the "R-Oil Wedding."

Meanwhile, the liberal thinkprogress.org website distributed a video in which House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) told a town hall audience that he favored ending oil subsidies. "[W]e propose to repeal all that," Ryan said of corporate welfare generally. Asked specifically about ending oil subsidies, he said "I agree."

But Ryan's office told Politico that the congressman made his comments in the context of overall corporate tax reform.

The American Petroleum Institute and the rest of the oil and gas lobby have historically had more than enough clout on Capitol Hill to fend off attacks.

In fact, many considered Obama's proposal to repeal the subsidies in his State of the Union speech in January to be dead on arrival. Congress had rejected similar requests in two previous budget proposals, even with Democratic majorities in both houses.

But the API seems to be getting increasingly testy as of late.

The group on Thursday called Baucus' plan "a proposal borne of desperation that would do nothing to reduce gasoline prices." API chief economist John Felmy said in a statement, "If Senator Baucus were serious about gasoline prices, he would focus on further development of our vast resources here at home which would create much needed American jobs, increase revenue to the government, and strengthen our energy security."

Baucus' office said his plan would bar the biggest companies from receiving a credit intended for domestic manufacturers, reduce their foreign tax credits for royalty payments to foreign governments and impose an excise tax on certain Gulf leases.

The billions of dollars recouped through those means would be used to promote demand for clean and domestic fuel, incentivize fuel efficient vehicles and build a clean energy infrastructure.

House Democrats have already introduced a bill that would eliminate $40 billion in tax breaks for big oil and gas companies over five years.


*************************

Dan Froomkin is senior Washington correspondent for The Huffington Post. You can send him an email, bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed, follow him on Twitter, friend him on Facebook, and/or become a fan and get email alerts when he writes.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Seizing the moment, Senate Democrats are working on legislation that would reclaim billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies to Big Oil and redirect the money toward developing cleaner and cheaper fue...
Seizing the moment, Senate Democrats are working on legislation that would reclaim billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies to Big Oil and redirect the money toward developing cleaner and cheaper fue...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,931
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (64 total)
04:12 PM on 05/10/2011
The Dems prepare bills to recoup tax subsidies, knowing full well that they will not pass. They come off looking like they support the little guy, and at the same time don't piss off their benefactors in the oil industry.

It's all a big game, a game that the little guy never wins!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronnie Avatar Dixon
Legislation is the art of compromise.
01:52 PM on 05/01/2011
Congress should cut tax breaks for big oil companies, but they should also do two other things. Number 1: increase oil spill liabilities for bigger companies, so companies such as Exxon and BP actually pay their fair share in liability when spills occur, and number 2: to regulate how much they can increase prices in this nation, for without that, then they can blame the government's policies when they decide to "speculate" (aka, increase prices).
12:21 PM on 04/30/2011
Enough is Enough. It is time that the American people send a clear message to President, those who plan to run for President as well as members of the Congress and Senate that if they don't start taking care of business- the people they elect, and stop Party politics they will all be removed from office regardless of how much of a treasure chest they have for re-election or not.
The American people have fought hard and long both physically, emotionally, and sacraficially to have it all wiped away by greedy, selfserving, leaders and legislators who allow this to happen. The article about the oil profits is just such an example. While I am at it, perhaps term limits for Congressmen wouldn't be a bad idea as well.
10:30 AM on 04/30/2011
In the words of Admiral Ackbar.."ITS A TRAP"!

We have huge deficits, high gas prices and the dems are pushing to prove that repbulicans take big money from Big Oil. We all know they are in bed with big oil just like you guys are in bed with Unions and Central Banks. You are all corrupt...we get it. Now fix things or get out of the way so others can.
If they were serious about just cutting the "subsidiaries" to help the country they would not be cutting it to dump more money into an area that is continuing to bleed our budget with very little return. We would also stop sending 1.5bil for wind power to China, and 2 bill for exploration to Brazil. Again is say this is just politics not anything to actually help any of us or address any of the real issues. There is 3.5bil you could have used for "clean energy right there" didn't even have to take any money out of corporate america to do it.

This is just politics people pretty tricks to make us not realize the true problems here. The Fed inflation and government constantly in the way of progress.

Prime example: This is most likely the reason we are paying more but because there is no political gain by bringing this to light we will not see much about it.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/29/bernie-sanders-demands-ac_n_855495.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marshallwyattearp
exposing the lies and deceit from all sides
07:58 AM on 04/30/2011
Are my words not of the English language??? You're not paying attention... This president has done nothing. Now as we start heading for an election... he and his party are going to start screaming foul, foul.... WE are paying out to much to big oil, WE are this ... WE are that... The ones that are talking the nonsense about the rich getting advantages... ARE the ones that gave it to them... IT is the same thing just before every election... Pull your heads out of the sand... They get the people all worked up... and never do anything. AND for you people that think we don't have oil... you need to do your research... They started this crap back in the 70's.... Just last year, the earth was spewing oil out at a rate of millions of barrels a day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
supratroll
one indignation under a groove
11:33 AM on 04/30/2011
coherence is not a requisite for the interwebs. bravo!
photo
tugboat9
Watch out for that tongue.
01:00 AM on 05/12/2011
Yammer away,you proud mooncalf.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
foxynoise
12:52 AM on 04/30/2011
Eliminate the Foreign tax credit and you eliminate the debt and deficit virtually overnight. When oil companies wrote tax laws for foreign countries they changed their expenses - royalties - to taxes so they could write off - dollar for dollar - their new foreign taxes from their U.S. taxes. It has cost the U.S. trillions of dollars in revenue and you -the American tax payer is expected to make up the difference. Demand that Congress eliminate the Foreign Tax Credit!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Cabo600
Mongo only pawn in game of life.
10:59 PM on 04/29/2011
I bet the GOP would like to make Boehner literally eat his words about slashing tax breaks for the oil companies, but the cat's out of the bag on that one. This is smart of the dems to jump on it, let's hold Boehner's feet to the fire and give him something to turn white about.
08:35 PM on 04/29/2011
THESE YAHOO'S DON'T HAVE ANY POWER.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
taquinas
10:53 PM on 04/29/2011
What's wrong with you? Don't you want to see some lower gas prices.
photo
tugboat9
Watch out for that tongue.
01:01 AM on 05/12/2011
Explain how that would happen,you know-nothing fool.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:17 PM on 04/29/2011
Cut the oil subsidies now! These corporations could offer to freeze profits and give their customers a break on higher fuel prices during hard times. When does a reaonable profit become an unreasonable profit? If I can't afford to buy their gas then I certainly don't want to continue to subsidize their operations. Why pay greedy ultra rich corporations to take more of our money?
03:38 PM on 04/29/2011
It is about time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
03:24 PM on 04/29/2011
After listening to NPR and the tax credits, the speaker said that calling BIG OIL big oil is a misnomer when you compare the international oil companies like Shell to the national oil companies of countries like Russia and Saudi Arabia. It got me to checking and thinking.

I was checking the subsidies and it seems most are giving for drilling oil wells in the U.S. I was surprised to see that the majors Chevron, Exxon, Conoco Philips, etc... drill only about 10% of those wells! That most of those wells are drilled by small companies and it is still a hit and miss kind of success rate!

Say we take away those tax breaks for the small companies leaving only the majors who can afford the drilling of wells here in the U.S. Are we better off? Does this increase the chance of having our markets manipulated?

http://money.cnn.com/2011/04/25/news/economy/oil_drilling_gas_prices/index.htm?iid=EL

I don't think drilling here helps the price of gasoline! I see from this report it does reduce our dependence on foreign oil and create jobs here! These are good goals in and of themselves!

I think the tax breaks should stay at this point. If BIG was getting 90% of this money, I would be the first to say they need to go away!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
taquinas
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
01:35 PM on 04/30/2011
didn't I say that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
outlandish
Republican motto since Reagan, in greed we trust.
03:18 PM on 04/29/2011
.
photo
mmsuki
Fine; I evolved, you didn't.
03:09 PM on 04/29/2011
Wow, Max Baucus was my enemy during the HCR debates, but now he's turned me around.
Way to go, Max!
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
02:44 PM on 04/29/2011
I think we can all agree on one thing. Gas prices are very high and it is hurting the country.

The price of gas includes:

Raw material - Crude oil (controlled by opec mostly)
The cost of getting that product (Transportation, and procurement cost (including speculation))
Processing cost- Refiners
Operating cost - Employee and executive compensation
Discretionary spending (Political lobbying, Marketing, Research and development)
Distribution cost (Getting gasoline to the gas station)
Profit (As much you can possibly sell the product for less the costs above)

If we are going to bring down the cost of energy.. Doesn't it make sense for all of these things to be rationalized?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
too young but old enough
I already know how this is going to turn out...
03:48 PM on 04/29/2011
You forgot to include speculation...Since people can invest in oil, it drives up the prices without actually increasing physical demand.
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
03:56 PM on 04/29/2011
I got it under "cost of getting that product" (including speculation).

I really hope the gov is serious about investigating how much speculation influences oil prices. I am sure it is more than even i want to believe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chromehippie2
Pluralistic Eclectic
09:39 PM on 04/29/2011
Unfortunately, the basic premise is wrong. Gas prices are not high enough, as they do not cover the costs of unseen externalites - environmental costs, pollution and cleanup and further research etc.

We need to pay even a fraction of what other modern countries pay, so that the proceeds can go towards weening ourselves off oil. Oil is the heroine of the environment, and its time we clean up. Slap a 25 cent tax per gallon, and use the proceeds to build modern monorails and electric powered car fleets and filling stations. Few will notice it, as we are willing to keep paying for higher and higher gas anyway, which will just go to filling the fat bellies of BP coffers.
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
03:02 PM on 04/30/2011
There is no way our economy could handle additional taxes on oil. Even though i agree with your argument entirely.

How about an approach like this. "A price floor". If the price of oil drops below $80 a barrel, the government gets 100% of the revenue between current price and $80.

So if Oil goes to $70 a barrel then the price of the barrel is $70 plus a $10 a barrel tax. So long as the price of a barrel is above $80. No additional taxes.

I know its not perfect, but its a start. With this plan Alternate energy companies would know a price certain where their product would need to be competitive. So if Saudi Arabia tanks the price of Oil (AGAIN). then Alternate energy investments don't get thrown away.
stillable2think
Do what works.
02:16 PM on 04/29/2011
I spent about $350 a month for energy costs (heating, cooling, lights, appliances) for 2,400 sq ft.

Then I used the Obama energy tax credits and weatherized my home (insulation, new windows/doors, appliances and these $60 LED bulbs that give really good light).

I put solar panels on the roof (the cheaper water heating ones) b/c hot water is one of the higher energy users.
My electric bill has dropped by 27%, my heating and cooling has dropped by 42%, and my home is a lot more comfortable.

I am going to install the solar voltaic panels this fall and a personal wind turbine (Jay Leno has one). Then I will only need the "grid" for 10% of my energy needs.

The $$$ I save every month on energy costs, I put into a retirement account.

Assuming inflation is only 5% for energy (it is more like 10% now), in 10 years I would be paying over $542 a month for energy. That is $52,827 for 10 years of energy.
If you do the math, alternative energy, weatherization and conservation is suddenly really cheap.
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
02:26 PM on 04/29/2011
Fanned- I like people who thing in real terms as opposed to ideological positions.
JLFL
Being progressive liberal rocks. We DO stuff.
03:04 PM on 04/29/2011
That's freakin' awesome. I actually received a credit on my account from the electric company last month for $12 - I was shocked. I didn't use enough electricity for my solar system to have to switch over to the grid for supply, so I actually wound up selling energy to the grid.