iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mayors To Washington: Stop Fooling Around, Help Us Create Jobs


First Posted: 04/30/11 05:19 PM ET Updated: 06/30/11 06:12 AM ET

CHICAGO -- Near the end of a two-day summit here that brought together mayors and federal officials to talk about city design, the mood turned confrontational.

It started when Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, in the middle of a Friday discussion on the federal government's role in city development, turned toward the Washington officials who were sitting with him on stage and expressed his disappointment.

"Mayors could never get away with the kind of nonsense that goes on in Washington," he said. "In our world, you either picked up the trash or you didn’t. You either moved an abandoned car or you didn’t. You either filled a pothole or you didn’t. That’s what we do every day. And we know how to get this stuff done.”

That evidently hit a nerve, as cheers erupted through the Grand Ballroom of the Hilton hotel, where many in the audience were mayors. Manny Diaz, former mayor of Miami, who sat on stage with Nutter, gave an impromptu speech criticizing Washington lawmakers. Other mayors stood up and took the microphone during the question and answer session -- not to ask questions, but to get things off their chests.

The event, co-sponsored by the National Endowment for the Arts, the American Architectural Foundation and the U.S. Conference of Mayors, became, for a few minutes, a forum for mayors to express a difficult truth: Two-and-a-half years after the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, the nation's cities still struggle with chronic budget gaps that can't easily be filled. Tax revenue has plunged as property values have fallen and payrolls have shrunk. Local governments, many of which are legally required to balance their budgets, have made cuts that a few years ago would have been unthinkable.

Municipal budget woes stem partially from crises on the state level, which in turn aren't helped by a lack of federal assistance. Federal dollars from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act covered less than half of states' combined budget shortfall during this fiscal year, according to a recent report from the nonpartisan Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. Come next fiscal year, which for many states begins this July, states' combined shortfall will exceed $110 billion, with only $6 billion in federal aid available, according to the report.

That leaves cities out in the cold, as states focus on solving their own problems. In Newark, aid from the state of New Jersey fell by 40 percent between 2008 and 2010, contributing to a budget crisis that eventually prompted the city, one of the country's most dangerous according to FBI data, to lay off 13 percent of its police force late last year. In Milwaukee County, a community that has contended with a decade-long erosion of bus service, a transit cut in the coming state budget could deal a critical blow to the region's public transportation.

"We get the brunt of what the recession really entails. We're also the last to come out of that," Ed Pawlowski, the mayor of Allentown, Pennsylvania, said in an interview after the panel discussion. "While the economy is getting slowly better, cities are still struggling in a significant way."

Mayors want federal money. They say they can put it to quick and efficient use, creating jobs and helping improve the economy from the bottom up. Nutter gave an example: He closed Philadelphia's crumbling South Street Bridge in 2008, initiating a two-year repair project that was completed on budget and a month early last fall, he said. But federal funds are running dry, as Washington lawmakers have become seemingly obsessed with a desire to cut the federal deficit.

In April, lawmakers almost shut down the federal government as they argued over a few billion dollars in spending cuts. Now, some are saying they will not vote to increase the debt ceiling, and risk leading the nation into default, just to enforce budget austerity.

The four federal officials who sat on stage during the discussion -- Derek Douglas, special assistant to the president on the White House Domestic Policy Council; Roy Kienitz, under secretary for policy at the Department of Transportation; Salin Geevarghese, senior advisor at the Department of Housing and Urban Development; and Rocco Landesman, chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts -- became punching bags.

"You guys need to keep your day jobs. You'd make lousy mayors," said Jennifer Hosterman, mayor of Pleasanton, California, addressing the federal officials as she stood on the ballroom floor. "To hear from the four of you all of your gyrations and concerns and discussion about how we communicate with local government -- we at local government just have to make it happen."

The moderator, Carol Coletta, the former executive director of the NEA initiative the Mayors' Institute on City Design, tried to ease the tension. "What are you asking them to do?" she said. "I mean, what is it that they're keeping you from doing?"

Hosterman talked about her efforts to come into compliance with California's Global Warming Solutions Act. She described months of intense, focused efforts to make her city more efficient. She has specific goals in mind, she said, but she needs more resources.

"Love the dialogue -- thank you very much for that," she said. "But we need money."

The audience laughed in assent, clapping loudly.

The federal officials on stage were speaking in broad, theoretical terms. But the mayors wouldn't stand for that. They knew what needed to get done, they said. What they wanted from Washington was the dollars to do it.

"We should not be expecting or depending on top-down permission from the White House or Washington to have us advocate for this stuff," said R. T. Rybak, mayor of Minneapolis, who stood up and addressed the other mayors. Earlier, Mayor Nutter had complained about the seeming hypocrisy of federal lawmakers who go to ribbon-cuttings and ground-breakings, even if they never supported the legislation for those projects. Rybak heartily commiserated.

"I've seen those guys at the ribbon cuttings. And it pisses me off," he said. "But I go out and organize at election time and tell people exactly who delivered and who did not."

Douglas, of the White House Domestic Policy Council, said federal officials are doing what they can to help. But political gridlock can muck up the process.

"We do hear you," he said. "If you look at the president's budget proposal for FY12 and you go look at the transportation section that he proposed -- this is what he's asking for -- the stuff you're talking about is in there. That's what he requested. Is he going to get what he requested?"

"We can ask for everything under the sun," Douglas added. "But just because we ask for it doesn't necessarily make it so."

But the mayors were not satisfied. Diaz, the former mayor of Miami, said that the conversation in Washington is the opposite of what it should be. Instead of cutting spending, he said, lawmakers should be finding ways to support job-creation and help the economy grow.

It's the mayors, he said, who create jobs. But the mayors aren't getting the federal support they need.

"We’ve got to figure it out. All of us have very, very difficult budget times right now. But notwithstanding that, we have to figure out how to do it," he said. "As a matter of fact, there’s a greater argument to move the country forward now, because we’re in the dumps, than when things were hopping five, 10 years ago.”

Kienitz, of the Department of Transportation, suggested that Diaz run for U.S. Congress. "You could provide that leadership that we need," Kienitz said.

"Thanks," Diaz replied, "but I don’t want a job in Washington.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
CHICAGO -- Near the end of a two-day summit here that brought together mayors and federal officials to talk about city design, the mood turned confrontational. It started when Philadelphia Mayor Mi...
CHICAGO -- Near the end of a two-day summit here that brought together mayors and federal officials to talk about city design, the mood turned confrontational. It started when Philadelphia Mayor Mi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,454
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (77 total)
photo
Kai-HK
Don't Share My Wealth! Share My Work Ethic!
03:38 AM on 05/03/2011
Public unions are what are hurting mayors, not Washington.
serena1313
Condemnation w/o investigation is hgt of ignorance
04:19 AM on 05/03/2011
And how exactly are they hurting the mayors? Sounds like you are simply repeating GOP talking points or stating your opinion as if it is a fact; it's not.

I'd suggest you do some independent research before making erroneous statements unless you can otherwise explain your statement and back it up with factual evidence. Because simply repeating talking points adds nothing to the discussion.

Certainly you are entitled to your opinion, but not your own facts.
photo
Kai-HK
Don't Share My Wealth! Share My Work Ethic!
photo
Kai-HK
Don't Share My Wealth! Share My Work Ethic!
09:38 PM on 05/12/2011
serena1313:

I am still waiting for you to rebut my 'facts' with more of your talking points. Bring 'em when you have them

Kai
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:02 PM on 05/02/2011
Major metropolitan city's have for too long relied upon State and Federal subsidies. This so-called municipal welfare program needs to stop. Just as businesses are born and die on their own accord, so should towns and cities. Everyone complains the federal and state government has too much influence on local decisions but yet they have their hand out. City and Town citizens need to address their own problems and decide for themselves. And no - I'm not a Tea Bagger. I'm a conservative Democrat.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donald
07:43 PM on 05/02/2011
And as we can doubtless see, conservative Democrats like yourself can be just as bullheaded and stubbornly ignorant as the Republicans.

Ever heard of expensive but unfunded federal mandates like "No Child Left Behind"? Do you even have a clue how much tax money could be saved and redirected toward projects back home, if we only stopped building weapons systems like the F-22 that we don't need, cut the federal subsidies to cash-flush oil companies, and repealed the financial tax incentives that encourage American multi-national corporations to relocate American jobs overseas?

American history is chock-full of examples where we've already tried it your way, countless times. We left it up to local municipalities to fend for themselves throughout the Midwest during the Great Depression, when drought hit the entire center of the country. As a result, we had famine in this country in the 1930s, which resulted in over one million people being compelled to desperately relocate to California from Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, West Texas and Arkansas, just so they wouldn't starve.

Laissez-faire government is a concept that only functions well in Ayn Rand books. It simply doesn't work in the real world, and amounts to inflicting cruel and unusual punishment upon our own people. We can either all hang together, or we will most assuredly all hang seperately.
08:57 AM on 05/03/2011
Not necessarily, urban areas contribute far more to federal government than they receive, than suburban and rural areas. Rural areas thrive on massive farm subsidies. While suburban towns thrive on massive highway spending and home mortgage interest deduction. In fact, the middle class receives more help from the federal government in their housing needs than do the urban poor.
photo
GorgyPorgy
Execute Brilliantly
02:42 PM on 05/02/2011
Citizen to the mayors, be responsible for you own budgets. Don't count on the feds.
01:40 PM on 05/02/2011
Time after time cities and states get themselves into these messes, and then blame the feds for not bailing them out.

Maybe it is time for America to grow up and start taking some responsibility.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spoonbill1963
02:40 PM on 05/02/2011
Dems don't take responsibility for anything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spoonbill1963
11:20 AM on 05/02/2011
Funny how most of those mayors are Dems.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:42 AM on 05/02/2011
I'm a Democrat. But on this issue people will call me Republican.

The Mayors have all of the money they need.

Have you ever walked around City Hall if you go pay your taxes in person instead of by mail?

You should go there for the experience.

If they based salaries on productivity instead of senority they have all the money they need.

There's a whole lot more coffee sipping, water cooler rumor mongering, bagel munching, newspaper reading, internet surfing, hall strolling, long lunch breaks, and restroom stall napping going on than actual work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spoonbill1963
11:21 AM on 05/02/2011
That's why they call them gold bricks.
We can't afford to operate this way in the future.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:55 AM on 05/02/2011
Should be plenty of money to go around now that Afg/Iraq wars are over. WooHoo!!
photo
GorgyPorgy
Execute Brilliantly
02:45 PM on 05/02/2011
It's just begun.
04:08 AM on 05/02/2011
Every Mayor we had in our town was corrupt ..Both Democrats and Republicans ..I don't think we need mayors and other political figures , we the people to vote on every bill & law.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spoonbill1963
11:22 AM on 05/02/2011
Good point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brokerallen
The Middle Class Needs To Take Back America
01:32 AM on 05/02/2011
Take the foreign aid away from Pakistan and Israel and use it to help our cities. It is really unfair
to our taxpayers not to do exactly that.
photo
GorgyPorgy
Execute Brilliantly
02:47 PM on 05/02/2011
Take foreign aid away from do nothing African countries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RickMoss
12:47 AM on 05/02/2011
Welcome to the real world. American is broken. Only the people can fix it.

"JOIN THE REVOLUTION"

Read “Common Sense 3.1” at ( www.revolution2.osixs.org )
We don’t have to live like this anymore. "Spread the News"
---
FIGHT THE CAUSE - NOT THE SYMPTOM
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donald
08:01 PM on 05/02/2011
Okay, I read it. I don't disagree with any of it as a general concept. But seriously, whoever did that site really needs to lose the terribly cheesy movie music soundtrack that first overwhelms you when the homepage first opens, and then doesn't stop. Otherwise, I'd imagine that you'll lose most people right from the outset.

And as I noted, I agree with REvolution 2.0 as a general concept. Unfortunately, the site doesn't get beyond the stage of conceptualization and generality. It's not enough to merely point out problems, particularly when the times in which we live require specific solutions. Promising that you're going to burn down the mission isn't a solution unto itself. People are also concerned with what you're proposing as its replacement.
11:06 PM on 05/01/2011
Ugh, the government doesn't create jobs ... those whose income is derived from Taxes just don't seem to realize where this money comes from.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danglines
11:39 PM on 05/01/2011
It should come the greedy rich. Study the great depression. Maybe you'll learn something.
photo
GorgyPorgy
Execute Brilliantly
02:50 PM on 05/02/2011
I like your thinking, the harder you work, the more you pay. That is sensible thinking for liberals.
02:59 PM on 05/02/2011
Clearly you haven't studied at all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trepasky
Sanity is neither free nor easy
07:25 AM on 05/02/2011
The FEDs do indeed create jobs WAP for example, funding for bridges, dams, highways to name a few others.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spoonbill1963
11:23 AM on 05/02/2011
The last successful project by the federal government was World War II.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
go2goal
Business Consultant
09:46 PM on 05/01/2011
Of the 34 OECD nations, the US has one of the bottom lowest per capita tax revenue levels....only Turkey and Mexico have lower tax revenue per person than the US.

Based on FACTS....the US are one of the lowest taxed people in the world....and the upper income brackets are by far the lowest taxed in the world. The Republicans are nuts.....that is unless you don't want any roads, water supply, clean water, education, or etc....

For the Libertarians......what country with 308 million people doesn't have a government? Libertarian principles don't work....unless you are a country of 15 people.
11:09 PM on 05/01/2011
I don't believe you, you telling me that people in Mexico pay less tax per person?? What biased study did you find?

I'm middle class and between Federal and State Taxes down to the local Sales Tax I am left with about 60% of my income .. after the Government Mafia Thugs take their cut.

Is 40% not enough?? To hell with you and the rest who want to steal even MORE of my money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danglines
11:42 PM on 05/01/2011
the problem with Mexico is that so much of the economy is under ground because the leadership of the country has institutionalized racism and economic greed. People over 35 years old can't get a job.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spoonbill1963
11:24 AM on 05/02/2011
The people who haven't paid income taxes in years want the rest of us who do to pay even more in taxes.
Amazing.
barbra1971
Sherry Hunt my hero
12:22 PM on 05/02/2011
If they earn more then minimum which covers only survival they would pay taxes too. For the same reason we don't tax beggars.
Cheap, cheap, cheap... we want everything cheap so we end up with cheaply paid people too. Prices should cover decent pay that people earning them could afford what they need: shelter, food, health care, education, raising children, retirement .... and we don't have to pay for it from taxes. Taxes on their way back are chipped here, chipped there and only part is used for good cause, rest vanishes in huge hole.
Without reasonable pay we will run in circles over and over again until it all collapses (we are almost there).
Please correct me if I am wrong in my assertion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
go2goal
Business Consultant
09:39 PM on 05/01/2011
The Republicans and Tea Party Pirates and the greedy rich (me, me, me) population segment have the answer......just cut your budgets so they can give more tax cuts to the rich. The rich will spend more money and that will fix the pot holes and the schools.....

Vote for Tea Party Pirates and Republicans....and you think things are bad now, they're the reason we're in this situation. 30 Years of Reagonomics is killing out country....and especially our cities.
10:05 PM on 05/01/2011
Greedy? Ha.

The only greedy people are the marxist progressives who wage class warfare always that someone else give up their money. Your greed for other people money is mind boggling.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ruolivert
11:10 AM on 05/02/2011
"we did not start this war, it was brought to our shores." Bank and big business bailouts are why people think the rich a greedy and should share the wealth
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spoonbill1963
11:25 AM on 05/02/2011
Yes, and don't forget to mention the progressives aversion to working.
11:10 PM on 05/01/2011
Greed is stealing more and more of other people's money then retiring in Florida at age 60 with a full Pension and Cadillac Health Plan.

Government = GREED.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
apathyman
Let them hate, so long as they fear
09:20 PM on 05/01/2011
Every elected official should be subject to recall with in six months of their election, But with specific criteria in mind. That way if we ever have another Crop like the current governors and and house members doing their best to screw the middle class, while attempting to please their corporate masters it can be fixed before to much damage is done. Think about how well government would run if senators weren't free to mock things up for their entire term with no fear of losing their jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
No brag, just fact.
08:25 PM on 05/01/2011
Vote-out the ones who insist that the government should not be paid the money it is rightfully and legally due. Then re-submit your requests.
10:07 PM on 05/01/2011
And at the same vote out the marxist progressives who want to spend other people money on programs that are not part of the federal government mandate and we can start with socials security...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
No brag, just fact.
01:36 AM on 05/02/2011
Social Security is only a problem for those who want to spend the money in ridiculous ways. Bigger yachts, summer homes - little things such as that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spoonbill1963
02:43 PM on 05/02/2011
Socialism never works.