More

Missouri Levee Blast Likely: Supreme Court Rejects Attempts To Block Levee Breach

Missouri Levee

JIM SUHR and JIM SALTER   05/ 2/11 11:32 PM ET   AP

WYATT, Mo. — The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers exploded a large section of a Mississippi River levee Monday in a desperate attempt to protect an Illinois town from rising floodwaters.

The corps said the break in the Birds Point levee would help tiny Cairo, Ill., by diverting up to 4 feet of water off the river. Just before Monday night's explosions, river levels at Cairo were at historic highs and creating pressure on the floodwall protecting the town.

For the Missouri side, the blasts were likely unleashing a muddy torrent into empty farm fields and around evacuated homes in Mississippi County.

Brief but bright orange flashes could be seen above the river as the explosions went off just after 10 p.m. The blasts lasted only about two seconds. Darkness kept reporters, who were more than a half mile off the river, from seeing how fast the water was moving into the farmland.

Engineers carried out the blast after spending hours pumping liquid explosives into the levee. More explosions were planned for overnight and midday Tuesday, though most of the damage was expected to be done by the first blast.

But questions remain about whether breaking open the levee would provide the relief needed, and how much water the blast would divert from the Mississippi River as more rain was forecast to fall on the region Tuesday. The seemingly endless rain has overwhelmed rivers and strained levees, including the one protecting Cairo, at the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers.

Flooding concerns also were widespread Monday in western Tennessee, where tributaries were backed up due to heavy rains and the bulging Mississippi River. Streets in suburban Memphis were blocked, and some 175 people filled a church gymnasium to brace for potential record flooding.

The break at Birds Point was expected to do little to ease the flood dangers there, Tennessee officials said.

The Ohio River at Cairo had climbed to more than 61 feet as of Monday, a day after eclipsing the 1937 record of 59.5 feet.

The river was expected to crest late Wednesday or early Thursday at 63 feet – just a foot below the level that Cairo's floodwall is built to hold back – before starting a slow decline by Friday.

The high water has raised concerns about the strain on the floodwalls in Cairo and other cities. The agency has been weighing for days whether to blow open the Birds Point levee, which would inundate 130,000 acres of Missouri farmland.

Engineers believe sacrificing the levee could reduce the water levels at Cairo by about 4 feet in less than two days. Meteorologist Beverly Poole of the National Weather Service put the figure closer to five feet.

"These are uncharted territories, but it would be very fast," she said.

Carlin Bennett, the presiding Mississippi County commissioner, said he was told a 10- to 15-foot wall of water would come pouring through the breach. The demolition was expected to cover about 11,000 feet of the levee.

"Tell me what that's going to do to this area?" he said. "It's a mini-tsunami."

Maj. Gen. Michael Walsh – the man ultimately responsible for the decision to go through with the plan_ has indicated that he may not stop there if blasting open the levee doesn't do the trick. In recent days, Walsh has said he might also make use of other downstream "floodways" – basins surrounded by levees that can intentionally be blown open to divert floodwaters.

Among those that could be tapped are the 58-year-old Morganza floodway near Morgan City, La., and the Bonnet Carre floodway about 30 miles north of New Orleans. The Morganza has been pressed into service just once, in 1973. The Bonnet Carre, which was christened in 1932 has been opened up nine times since 1937, the most recent in 2008.

"Making this decision is not easy or hard," Walsh said. "It's simply grave – because the decision leads to loss of property and livelihood, either in a floodway or in an area that was not designed to flood."

Officials in Louisiana and Mississippi are warning that the river could bring a surge of water unseen since the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927.

The corps has said about 241 miles of levees along the Mississippi River between Cape Girardeau, Mo., and the Gulf of Mexico need to be made taller or strengthened.

George Sills, a former Army Corps engineer and levee expert in Vicksburg, Miss., said the volume of water moving down the river would test the levee system south of Memphis into Louisiana.

"It's been a long time since we've seen a major flood down the Mississippi River," Sills said. "This is the highest river in Vicksburg, Miss., since 1927. There will be water coming by here that most people have never seen in their lifetime."

He said the Army Corps has warned residents that waters levels in Eagle Lake, an oxbow lake of the Mississippi River, will rise exceptionally high, and that could stress a federal levee with a history of problems.

"They're taking some extreme measures to save it," he said.

But few measures could be as drastic as the one at Birds Point.

Bob Holmes, a hydrologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, said using such levees as relief valves can be vital, likening swollen rivers to traffic bottlenecked to one lane in freeway construction zones. Remove the barricades, he says, and things flow more freely.

"I can tell you that when you can open up the flow path and have additional conveyance, you're going to lower the elevations upstream," he said.

Holmes declined to talk specifically about the Birds Point matter, saying the corps was more versed in the computations used to decide the levee's fate.

"For me to make any kind of a guess would be irresponsible," he said. "All this extra rain threw a monkey wrench into it."

Missouri's legal bid to block the breach was rejected by federal courts including the U.S. Supreme Court, which on Sunday refused to intervene.

Missouri officials said the incoming water would crush the region's economy and environment by possibly covering the land under sand and silt and rendering it useless.

Bob Byrne, 59, farms 550 acres below the Missouri levee and called news about the pending break "devastating."

"It's a sickening feeling," he said. "They're talking about not getting the water off until late July or early August. That knocks out a whole season."

Rep. JoAnn Emerson, who represents the southeast Missouri area in Congress, said Monday she had spoken to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, who told her that farmers with crop insurance would be treated the same as if the flood were a natural disaster.

There were other trouble spots Monday, both on the Mississippi and elsewhere in southern Missouri, where rains last week overran a levee protecting the town of Poplar Bluff.

In Olive Branch, about 17 miles northwest of Cairo, the Mississippi River overtook a levee, further drowning the tiny outpost where locals spent recent days erecting walls of sandbags around homes.

In the southern Illinois communities of Metropolis and Old Shawneetown, voluntary evacuations were under way. State officials went door-to-door by boat in some places telling people to leave.

___

Associated Press writers Cain Burdeau in New Orleans and Maria Sudekum Fisher in Kansas City, Mo., contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

WYATT, Mo. — The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers exploded a large section of a Mississippi River levee Monday in a desperate attempt to protect an Illinois town from rising floodwaters. The corps ...
WYATT, Mo. — The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers exploded a large section of a Mississippi River levee Monday in a desperate attempt to protect an Illinois town from rising floodwaters. The corps ...
Filed by Jen Sabella  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 152
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:13 PM on 05/03/2011
Cairo, IL is 60% Black - the farmers are white. I've been through Cario, its not worth on acre of good farm land.
05:25 PM on 05/03/2011
There are sure lots of farming and flood experts on here...I drove the MO river bottom in 1995 after the great flood of 1993..Two years later they were still trying to clean the mess up on some of the farms while lots were just let go...There sure is a hatred for farmers on here so I guess you all dont like to eat..
01:07 AM on 05/03/2011
I have seen a levee break before and I can tell you that what it does to the land isn't pretty. The river doesn't deposit a nice thick layer of good rich dirt on the land. The deposit that is left is a big pile of sand .Water wipes out everything in it's path and deposits the debris where it comes to rest. The clean up takes months Hopefully with this levee breach the sand won't present a big problem to the farmers. I pray for all those affected by the flood waters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carachama
I'm not apt to follow blindly the lead of others
09:08 PM on 05/02/2011
"The corps has said about 241 miles of levees along the Mississippi River between Cape Girardeau, Mo., and the Gulf of Mexico need to be made taller or strengthened."

No, they need to be removed. Protect the people, not the land and let the river be a river. If you are farming just behind the levee, you are farming in the river. The river is not just its channel, but the land that is supposed to naturally flood around it. Many of our problems from the dead area in the gulf, loss of land in Louisiana, catastrophic flooding when levees fail, etc., are due to the fact that we are trying to hold back a river that is not meant to be held back.
photo
southingtonian
"I'm a Capricorn and you can't make me do sh*t.."
04:07 AM on 05/03/2011
we need to learn to live in/on the rivers.
www.surviv­alring.org­/allshelte­r/index.ph­p?file=Sti­lt...for_F­loodplains­.pdf
http://www­.topsider.­com/galler­y-l.asp”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom22602
What the hell is this?
10:53 AM on 05/03/2011
Having 241 miles of levels just passes the flood waters down stream. We would be better off if the level system was removed.
03:54 PM on 05/02/2011
Are we talking about conventional farms: pesticide soaked, subsidized and covered in GMO crops?

(That ought to wind a few trolly's up!)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nevernot
I like paying taxes, they buy me civilization.
04:13 PM on 05/02/2011
As opposed to the poor housing that the governor of Missouri preferred to flood. He actually valued polluted farmland over people's houses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Haun
the first 359 fans were the hardest
04:49 PM on 05/02/2011
I believe that the governor of MO is just try to protect his people, just like the gov. from IL - neither should be villified
05:26 PM on 05/03/2011
You dont have a clue..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Haun
the first 359 fans were the hardest
03:35 PM on 05/02/2011
Why do alot of people think that the federal govt. will have to pay for damages/relocation of the people and property of Cairo? The govt. has done nothing wrong and the people of Cairo should have flood insurance to cover their losses. Lives are not at risk here - just property. Let the flood happen where it will happen - just get everybody out of its way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:27 PM on 05/02/2011
The rich topsoil was deposited there by flooding
02:43 PM on 05/02/2011
I actually happened to talk to the lawyer who was representing the US Army Corps of Engineers, (so he was taking the stance that the Army should be able to blow the levy and flood the farmland) and he gave really good insights. These plans have been around for almost 30 years. The Federal government bought the levees for this specific purpose, because they new that flooding could threaten towns in higher areas. When the farmers settled in the flood plane they were told of these plans, and were given insurance on their property from the federal government in case the levees needed to be breached. But again; the plans were around before the farmers bought the land.

The fact is, the water has to go somewhere, and it's better if it goes onto farms then into towns. The farmers knew the risks, and were given money by the government. The government should be allowed to carry out it's 30 year old plan in order to save a town.
photo
SOD
As kind as possible and as unkind as necessary.
02:58 PM on 05/02/2011
I'm less concerned about the farmers or the town than I am 130,000 acres of topsoil.

Are you aware it takes ~500 years to create one inch of topsoil?
03:14 PM on 05/02/2011
You would rather protect vitamin enriched dirt instead of a town full of thousands of people? (actually it's threatening an additional town, I'm not sure why this article doesn't reference that fact) It produces mainly hay... and we aren't exactly short on that right now. I'm willing to sacrifice some hay to save a few towns, but that might just be me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carachama
I'm not apt to follow blindly the lead of others
09:12 PM on 05/02/2011
Flooding is how the extremely rich topsoil got there in the first place, and it is the reason that people farm there despite the fact that they know that eventually the government will be called in to break the levee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Wojtkowski
Physengrammer (Physicist/Engineer/Programmer)
02:32 PM on 05/02/2011
*facepalm* Short seighteness will kill us all.

People will instinctively pick the "it makes me feel good" option before even so much as looking into the facts and possible consiquences of each scenario.
photo
SOD
As kind as possible and as unkind as necessary.
03:03 PM on 05/02/2011
Considering it takes about 500 years to create one inch of topsoil, this farmland will be rendered useless for about 1000 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Wojtkowski
Physengrammer (Physicist/Engineer/Programmer)
03:14 PM on 05/02/2011
It's even worse than that. Those fields contain unknown amounts of chemicals and pesticides that will be flushed down stream. Where are your environmental activists?

People need to stop acting like they're going to flood Cairo with people IN it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
broui
No d#%& cat. No d#%& cradle.
02:29 PM on 05/02/2011
In Huckleberry Finn, Cairo represented freedom to Jim.

If they had made it there, Jim would have been a free man (of course the no 2nd half of that great classic). But there was fog and a riverboat and it was not to be.

Cairo represented freedom from slavery in Huckleberry Finn.

In 2011, to most of the 2800 inhabitants, it simply represents a home.
photo
SOD
As kind as possible and as unkind as necessary.
03:06 PM on 05/02/2011
I appreciate your sincerity. However, it takes much much longer for topsoil to be replenished than it takes a town to be rebuilt. Roughly 500 years for one inch of topsoil to be replenished. The town could literally be wiped from the face of the earth and rebuilt in a decade.

This is little more than feel good tyranny.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
broui
No d#%& cat. No d#%& cradle.
03:51 PM on 05/02/2011
If we were going to rebuild these peoples' homes at taxpayers expense then I'd be all for relocating them.

But we won't. We don't do that. We assume they've got insurance. We assume they'll be just fine. But poor folks like these don't land on their feet so easily.

As to the topsoil, if you were so concerned about that, you'd be railing against industrial farming which as seen 2 of 4 feet of topsoil blown away in our farm belt in the past 60 years due to poor farming methods.

This isn't tyranny. Tyranny is arbitrary or unrestrained exercise of power; despotic abuse of authority. This isn't arbitrary in the slightest. This is about the needs of people first - poor and minority at that. Tyranny is undue severity or harshness. What is severe or harsh about looking after people?

The fields will NOT be unusable for 500 years. You're using unsupportable hyperbole. These fields have flooded before numerous times and they are still nutrient rich.

So, unless you're willing to pony up for these good folks' relocation, you're going to have to accept that the government erred on the side of people, doing the people's business.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:18 PM on 05/02/2011
They'll just apply for welfare...er, I mean subsidies from the federal government.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markscoular
Living Life In The Real World
02:19 PM on 05/02/2011
the megafarmers like these guys live off subsidies. farming is just an excuse for government funded welfare
01:12 AM on 05/03/2011
shame on you
05:18 PM on 05/03/2011
And pray tell what do you know about farming...You dont even have a clue..
photo
SmotPoker
Medical Marijuana saved my life.
02:18 PM on 05/02/2011
People over land that's an easy one.
02:24 PM on 05/02/2011
If you were talking about lives, sure, but this is property. Who is to say that someone's home is more important than another man's farm?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
03:07 PM on 05/02/2011
yes
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nevernot
I like paying taxes, they buy me civilization.
04:22 PM on 05/02/2011
Who is to say that 2100 peoples homes are less important than a few mens farms? Especially when the farm land was purchased with notice from the Army Corps of Engineers that their land could be flooded at any time to protect the cities along the river and were provided insurance policies to remove the risk from the farmers.
photo
SOD
As kind as possible and as unkind as necessary.
03:08 PM on 05/02/2011
It most certainly is not.

Where do you think food supplies originate? Hint, not in your grocery store.

It takes ~500 years to replenish one inch of topsoil.

No civilization has EVER outlived its topsoil.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:12 PM on 05/02/2011
Let the farmers sell tickets to people to watch the "Amazing Levy Explosion - explosion - explosion".

Probably make more money on that than on the crops.

...just make sure all the people who buy tickets to see that sign a release to relieve you of all legal ramifications for what happens when the mighty Mississippi makes it's way towards the stands
photo
SOD
As kind as possible and as unkind as necessary.
03:10 PM on 05/02/2011
You're confused.

This isn't about money, but rather saving the only natural resource that is of long term fundamental importance to a civilization, topsoil. It takes ~500 years for one inch of topsoil to be replenished and in this case it will take minutes to destroy it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onwisconsin
Trust women; protect choice.
01:51 PM on 05/02/2011
It's crops vs. people. I'd side with the people every single time.
photo
SOD
As kind as possible and as unkind as necessary.
03:11 PM on 05/02/2011
And what do you think people eat?

It takes roughly 500 years to replenish one inch of topsoil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nevernot
I like paying taxes, they buy me civilization.
04:24 PM on 05/02/2011
Too bad they don't grow people food there. The cows and horses might be angry that their hay will have to travel a bit further but since we are in no shortage of hay it will be fine. Flooding and depositing of silt is one of natures methods of restoring topsoil anyways.
01:46 PM on 05/02/2011
"The corps said Monday on its Facebook page it had made no decision on whether to intentionally breach the levee in Missouri's Mississippi County..."

This is the saddest thing I've read today. Our social media sites are being used for information dissemination, instead of our news outlets.
02:39 PM on 05/02/2011
At least it didn't go through the spin cycle first.