iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Income Inequality Has Risen In Vast Majority Of Developed Countries -- Even In Sweden

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 05/03/11 05:28 PM ET Updated: 07/03/11 06:12 AM ET

Income Inequality

Widening income inequality has been a thorn in America's side for some time now. Turns out, other countries in the developed world aren't exempt from it, either. Yes, even Sweden.

In a new report, the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) finds that since the mid-1980s income inequality has increased in 77 percent, or 17 of the 22 surveyed countries.

Across all OECD countries, the report found, the average income of the richest tenth of the population is now nine times that of the poorest tenth.

Globalization, technological innovation and relaxed regulatory environments have all contributed to the growing gap between rich and poor, the OECD found. The report pays special attention, though, to the changing formation of families, pointing to research showing the income inequality has risen in the U.S. as a result of growing numbers of single-headed households.

Globally, household income has increased overall by 1.7 percent annually, the OECD found. But not all income levels have benefited equally. The world's bottom decile of earners saw their income grow annually by only 1.4 percent in the last 30 years or so, while the top decile grew at an annual rate of 2.0 percent.

Countries at both extremes of the inequality spectrum are moving closer to the center. Mexico and Chile, which together have the two highest levels of inequality, have seen the gap between rich and poor narrow in recent years. But surprisingly, it's in the historically egalitarian countries of Denmark, Germany and Sweden that the divide between the rich and poor has widened most in the past decade.

This isn't just an issue of poor versus rich, however. The middle-class has largely been left behind too: "The highest 10% of earners have been leaving the middle earners behind more rapidly than the lowest earners have been drifting away from the middle," the report's authors write.

Capital income, or income derived from wealth not work, has been a particularly notable source of rising inequality, the report notes, widening more than wage inequality in two-thirds of surveyed countries.

Still, capital income remains a relatively low percentage of overall income at 7 percent. On Monday, though, Paul Krugman noted that 400 people alone accounted for 10 percent of all U.S. capital gains income in 2007.

With the exception of France, Japan and Spain, wages of the rich have grown more than those of poor since the mid-1980s, the report finds. That has something to do, according to the OECD, with the declining number of average hours worked by low-wage workers, even in comparison to also declining hours worked by the high-wage workforce. Only in Greece and the United States, the report finds, have the average number of hours worked risen for the bottom quintile while declining for the top. (See below chart):

The below graph shows where inequality has risen, where it has fallen, and by how much since the mid-1980s:


Read the paper:

GROWING INCOME INEQUALITY IN OECD COUNTRIES: WHAT DRIVES IT AND HOW CAN POLICY TACKLE IT?

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Widening income inequality has been a thorn in America's side for some time now. Turns out, other countries in the developed world aren't exempt from it, either. Yes, even Sweden. In a new report, ...
Widening income inequality has been a thorn in America's side for some time now. Turns out, other countries in the developed world aren't exempt from it, either. Yes, even Sweden. In a new report, ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 365
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Schlessinger
06:43 AM on 05/10/2011
The lure of big multinational corporations is the big money. What ends up happening is that the poor and the middle class suffer, globally. Here in this country it is called economic growth when companies like Mcdonald's and Walmart are hiring. It's disgusting. Because all the wealth is being siphoned off to the top, we have to deal with cutting schools, firefighters, and policeman. And this is supposed to help us in the long run. When will Americans wake up and fight back against the corporations who are destroying this country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chrystal Ji Davey
Chem. Dance. Theatre.
03:01 AM on 05/09/2011
Weeping for the future of humanity in 3, 2, ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nenitaB
Not the talk. What good result would it hav
09:51 AM on 05/06/2011
From laymans' point of view, this is self-explanatory. It's expected and understandable that with capital while investing , your aim is growth and expansion, when achieved =wealth. What do you expect from one with no capital , no business, no income thus no money. Isn't this inequality?, No educ. no job= no wage=no money= poor. You have these two , = money . If your goal is make your money grow, then youre richer. No money to invest ,you tend to be pooer .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
go2goal
Business Consultant
05:28 PM on 05/05/2011
Missing from this incomplete analysis and review.....the impact of China, India, Vietnam, Singapore, S. Korea, the Philippines and beyond on the poor. middle, and the rich. With 2 added dimensions of course.....skilled (white collar) and unskilled (mainly blue collar) workers.

It's obvious that CEO's and execs banked the profits derived from their labor arbitrage Vs the Chinese & Indian peasant class workers. The CEO's and Execs didn't get smarter and they didn't work harder....they merely exploited the lowest cost labor source in the world under that wonderful gift of globalization. Eventually, the working class will stand up and revolt in the OECD nations just like they're doing in the middle east.....the oligarchs are greedy and shooting themselves in the proverbial foot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tomteboda
04:53 AM on 05/05/2011
This focus is wrong. The focus should be on what is the standard of living for the vast majority of people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Herren
"Human action is purposeful behavior."
01:42 PM on 05/09/2011
... which has gone up an extreme degree over this same time frame... for all, not just the very wealthy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:55 PM on 05/04/2011
The rich know how to rake you of all the value of your economy.
BCinVA
Hillbilly Philosopher
08:31 PM on 05/04/2011
Inevitable result of globalization. Funny system, this capitalism. If capitalists were completely successful it would destroy itself. Sooner or later an adjustment will be made. I hope it is peaceful.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:41 PM on 05/04/2011
It seems that free market is really more about small to medium business.

Capitalism seems more For Big Business, Wall St.,
the creation and growth of them and their greedy allies.
Those who wheel and deal capital seem to have
all the rules and top officials in their pocket.

When so many of them are involved in
the recent Crash, causing loss's of many
hundred's of billion's, and hardly any of
them are even investigated, let alone
taken to trial or to prison [ for at
least 10-20 years], and yet we
send kids to jail for taking
thousands, something
is terribly wrong.

No politician who claims to be a decent
person or religious should stand for this,
they should aggressively fight it.
photo
Austro-libertarian
Sorry, your micro-bio did not meet our guidelines
07:39 PM on 05/04/2011
When you dogmatically state that men = women then it must follow that every counter-evidence is proof of discrimination.... This is why I h4t3 democracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alicia Westberry
college student & Wordpress blog/ website owner
04:35 PM on 05/04/2011
This doesn't shock me. Sadly, I don't see anything improving. Worse, still, it's probably too much to hope for that this can ever be reversed. Not enough people pay enough attention to notice the inequality or to work to attempt to improve circumstances.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Herren
"Human action is purposeful behavior."
04:19 PM on 05/04/2011
So the rich are getting richer... and the poor are getting richer, just not as quickly.

This is more a result of the unprecedented growth of overall wealth over the last 30 years... the benefits of which have been realized mostly by those who were already better off... but that does not equate to the benefits not being seen by all.
photo
drp103
SYSTEM ON
11:38 AM on 05/04/2011
Capitalism: just another way of the many over the centuries to force 100 people to accept less so that 1 rich elohssa prospers.
11:49 AM on 05/04/2011
it is more than 100 people......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Herren
"Human action is purposeful behavior."
04:20 PM on 05/04/2011
You do get that lower rates of growth do not equate to 'having less' .... simply not growing as quickly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nor Cal Mom
Fun n games till someone puts an eye out
04:35 PM on 05/04/2011
But if rates of growth are highest for the individuals who already have the most, that does equate to having less for those with less income when trended over time.
05:16 PM on 05/04/2011
It does equate to having less because what they have is increasingly becoming a smaller percentage of what others have.
10:59 AM on 05/04/2011
AMERICANS AND INCOME INEQUALITY

Americans think inequality
Of income is a passing phase.
We don’t approach it as a polity
Because we stumble in a daze
Promototed by the corporations,
Evangelized by their foundations:
Avowing we can all be rich.
And so we work at fever pitch
Increasingly creating value
Which let’s them nail us to their cross
Of hoping one day we’ll be boss.
Insidious how they corral you.
We, lifelong, give them all we’re worth,
Then, meekly, we inherit earth.

See more at http://poemsonaffairsofstate.blogspot.com/
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
10:36 AM on 05/04/2011
Isn't that the goal of the illuminati?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laurieanichols
je pense donc, je suis
08:32 AM on 05/04/2011
This all dates back to globalization and the corporate mobility that ensued with the easing of financial restrictions between countries. The global support of free trade by countries worldwide at the expense of their own countries workers to benefit the corporations and their shareholders have vastly undermined the economic rights of the bottom 80% almost everywhere. Until there is a re-definition of what wealth really means to a society at large, this trend will be extremely difficult to reverse. I believe that we on the left are fighting really hard to say that our values lie not with the perceived wealth generated by hedge funds and commodity trading but rather in actual tangible goods and services that provide wealth for our community from the ground upwards. A ground-swell economy is needed, when growth is felt from the ground upwards, I would bet that the growth and positive attributes to the economy as a whole multiple exponentially, much more than the trickle down theory that has not delivered on its promises. Unfortunately the rise of globalization coincided with the decline of unions especially here in our country, re-structuring that imbalance of power between workers and executives shareholders will be a monumental challenge to say the least.
09:35 AM on 05/04/2011
there should be a difference in pay between the average grunt workers and an executive or owner of the company......that is nothing at all wrong with that
photo
drp103
SYSTEM ON
11:40 AM on 05/04/2011
democracy in action-NOT
JB1977
My micro bio is empty
12:47 PM on 05/04/2011
Who said anything to the contrary? There certainly should be a difference. But should they make 500 times more than a lower-tiered worker? That's a different story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Schlessinger
06:46 AM on 05/10/2011
good stuff!
photo
Kai-HK
Don't Share My Wealth! Share My Work Ethic!
05:57 AM on 05/04/2011
Excellent post that illustrates that the GINI coefficient is a useless metric.

Glad to see that economic inequality is associated with economic growth and that decreasing inequality is associated with a failing economy.

With Sweden realizing the errors of big government, they are moving quickly to ctahc up with the United States in both economic development and the right of achievers not to be held back by the unproductive takers of our society.

Capitalism and open markets proves resilient as socialist countries continue to fail.

Kai
JB1977
My micro bio is empty
12:49 PM on 05/04/2011
What's your definition of failure? I think Sweden, Denmark, etc. believe they are successful, regardless of whether GDP is rising strongly. More so than Americans feel about their own economy in this day and age.
photo
Kai-HK
Don't Share My Wealth! Share My Work Ethic!
10:01 PM on 05/04/2011
JB1977

More Swedes immigrate to America than Americans immigrate to Sweden. So just by popularity, it looks like America is a success. In addition, a study on the standard of living for Swedes, and families of Swedish decent, in the US compared to Swedes in Sweden, found them to be more successful in the United States.

But my main point is that Americans are more alike than they are apart. Those that have great equality, like Greece, stand out as a cautionary tale, as do North Korea and Cuba, fine example s of countries with very low GINI’s


Kai
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:14 PM on 05/04/2011
Rand took Social Security! Objectivism is a lie!
photo
Kai-HK
Don't Share My Wealth! Share My Work Ethic!
10:03 PM on 05/04/2011
Stealur:

How so? Last time I looked Social Security was still there and marching toward insolvency as consistently as before. So why are you all worried about that.

Who is talking about Objectivism?

Kai