iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tablet Takeover Suggests Ereader's Demise

Ereader Tablet

First Posted: 05/05/11 12:36 PM ET Updated: 07/05/11 06:12 AM ET

The ereader's days are numbered.

Though 6 million ereaders were sold in 2010, experts predict it is all downhill from here for these devices, which will be edged out by the growing number of increasingly affordable tablets on the market.

By 2015, twice as many people will own tablets as do ereaders. By the end of 2012, the number of people owning tablets will overtake the number of those owning ereaders, according to research by Forrester, a tech research company.

As the demise of the Flip camera suggests, consumers are increasingly trading single-purpose devices for multifunction gadgets. Especially as the price of tablet computers continues to fall, experts predict users will drop ereaders for tablet PCs that offer web-browsing and video capabilities alongside ebooks. Even Amazon, which helped make ereaders and ebooks mainstream, appears to recognize the ereader's impending demise and is rumored to be developing its own tablet device. The Barnes and Noble Nook Color has already been modified to run Android's Froyo software, taking it into tablet territory.

"We think there'll continue to be a niche for purpose-built ereaders but that niche is getting smaller and smaller as it gets less and less expensive to buy a multifunctional device," said Susan Kevorkian, a research director at IDC, a tech research firm.

While ereaders offer such advantages as long battery life, light weight, and a wallet-friendly price-tag, their utility is limited: They are built primarily to let you read. By comparison, tablets are far more powerful machines that not only offer the Kindle and Nook experience through apps, but include a wide range of other features within a similarly portable device.

Already, the iPad is cutting into the ereader market at a rapid pace. While 47 percent of ereader owners in a November 2010 ChangeWave survey were Kindle owners, the number represents a rapid plunge from August, when 62 percent were. In the meantime, the iPad saw its share increase from 16 percent to 32 percent in the same period.

"It's between [ereaders] and tablet PCs, led by the advancing charge of the iPad. It's a fight that ereaders will not win," said a report from Forrester. "The reason is simple: Tablet PCs like the iPad are a new computing form factor -- a portable, comfortable, personal media and information device with the power to run whatever app developers can and will throw at it."

Though the iPad is on the expensive end of the tablet market, tablets on the whole are getting cheaper. For some consumers, the Nook Color and the rumored Amazon tablet will represent the mid-range of the tablet market -- not quite the tricked-out tech bonanza of the iPad, but enough to get the job done. The Nook Color is priced at $249, drastically cheaper than a high-end tablet. The cheapest iPad 2 available sells for $499.

"Clearly an Amazon [tablet] and the Nook are an example of moving towards a mid-range tablet," said Shannon Denton, an analyst with Razorfish, a digital consulting firm. "iPad is the Mercedes of tablets and there'll certainly be consumers that want the high-end, but there's space for the mid-range."

Of course, for Amazon and Barnes and Noble, it's not just about the device. Both companies are heavily invested in ensuring that they sell ebooks, not just ereaders. And Amazon has a direct channel to consumers looking to buy books that even Apple can't match.

"Amazon is fundamentally a content provider," said Kevorkian. "They're approaching their app and device strategy accordingly to make their content as widely available as they can."

Fifty percent of people who purchased an ebook in the past month bought it at Amazon's Kindle store. Ebook sales, under $1 billion in 2010, are projected to more than double by 2015 to $2.8 billion, according to Forrester. As a destination to purchase books, Amazon's brand is made.

Literary content, however, is no longer just a matter of words on a (digital) page. Though Kindle devotees will tell you they love the paperlike display of the screen, which, unlike a backlit LCD screen, doesn't have glare issues in direct sunlight, all the Kindle provides is text, font size control, and a way to turn the page. Basically, it replicates the experience of the paper-bound book. But it's not just about the book versus the screen anymore: It's about reconsidering what it means to read.

"More and more, reading is taking on a bigger definition," said Allen Weiner, a VP of research at Gartner, a technology research firm. "It's expanding in terms of content-- not just books, but newspapers and magazines. It implies the need for color, graphics, other forms of media."

A new breed of digital book, designed to make reading on a computer take advantage of the computer's capabilities, has changed the way we will think about reading. Push Pop Press, a startup creating interactive digital books, incorporates video and audio into the text, as well as a wide array of playful infographics. One feature on its debut app for Al Gore's Our Choice even lets the reader blow into the iPad's accelerometer to demonstrate windpower on an animated wind turbine, whose blades turn with each breath.

The fate of the ereader comes down to whether consumers deciding on their next device will prefer to opt for the simplicity of a gadget dedicated just to reading -- a boon to those who want to eliminate distractions -- or if they'll opt to buy a multifunctional tablet that can not only supply the computerlike abilities of its compatriots, but maybe even allow new reading experiences.

"I have an 8-track recorder. It still works, if i can get blank 8-tracks it will still record" said Weiner. "It doesn't serve any meaningful purpose, but it still works."

Quick Poll

What do you use to read?

Kindle, or other single-function eReader

NOOK Color, or an enhanced eReader/tablet

Tablet

Books

Some combination of the above


FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

The ereader's days are numbered. Though 6 million ereaders were sold in 2010, experts predict it is all downhill from here for these devices, which will be edged out by the growing number of increa...
The ereader's days are numbered. Though 6 million ereaders were sold in 2010, experts predict it is all downhill from here for these devices, which will be edged out by the growing number of increa...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,026
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (31 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hairydodger
04:57 AM on 05/11/2011
When I first heard about the coming release of an iPad I set out to publish an enhanced children's ebook. It took months but I finally did it. Actually 'we' did it. It took over thirty of us to make this ebook. This is not a commercial post as our ebook is free and contains no advertising. it was the very first enhanced children's ebook and is the very first step in what I believe to be one path to a new form of entertainment. If you would like to see a future example of what can be done on an iPad that can't be done on treeware go to the iTunes ebook store from your iPad and download "Box Head Man". It takes a few minutes as it has over thirteen minutes of videos in it. I'd offer a money back guarantee that you will like it but it's free. It's great to read with your children.
10:57 AM on 05/10/2011
The eReader will continue, but it's market will change from individual users to the classroom. A low-priced Kindle is not much more than the price of a textbook and provides the interactivity and easy updating that a "dead tree" version cannot hope for. As for me--their teacher--I'll continue to use the laptop, netbook, and iPad that I already use in my classroom.
01:54 PM on 05/09/2011
I agree with those of you who said the author of this article must not have spent a lot of time reading, or using an eReader. I can comment b/c I have both a Kindle and an iPad. I use both all the time but for different things. I just got back from a vacation where I was on the beach/by a pool and in the sun constantly for a few days. The iPad wouldn't have made it. The iPad has a horrible glare in the sun (has anyone seen the Kindle commercial depicting this?) The Kindle battery also lasts much longer. They aren't going anywhere..
05:04 PM on 05/31/2011
However, I spent the week on the beach with my Nook Color and it performed perfectly!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ogg-the-bear
Stunning millions with bolts of lightning...
10:33 AM on 05/09/2011
We have both a Kindle & an iPad. The iPad is the workhorse. The Kindle is the curl up in a chair & read. Plus my 11 year old can't break it like he can the iPad. The Kindle goes to the beach. The iPad doesn't. It's physics, bitches!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lev Raphael
Author of "Writer's Block is Bunk"
10:12 AM on 05/09/2011
People keep talking about eyestrain and ADD in re/iPads. I am prone to migraines and have never had eye strain no matter how many hours, day or night, I've read a book on my iPad. I also have no problem with the fact that I can check my email, surf, watch movies etc. on my iPad because I'm a dedicated reader (pun intended), and don't get any more distracted on my iPad than I do with a paper book. If a book holds my attention, it holds it no matter what. I compared Kindle to iPad in terms of reading and didn't like the look or feel of Kindle at all, and loved the backlighting for iPad which means I can read on dark planes and in bed without disturbing my spouse.
09:24 AM on 05/09/2011
I plan to buy a Kindle. I have a desktop pc and a laptop; why would I need a tablet?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fgbouman
Curmudgeon & Designer
06:06 PM on 05/09/2011
Why would you want a tablet? Only because it would improve your life. Readers have their place: in the sun, but tablets are for most everywhere else around the home and office. And let's not forget your smartphone or iPod Touch for when you're on the move. Read a book, watch Fareed, play Angry Birds, work on a project, all with your iPad and iPhone. Try it, you won't go back to living without one.
01:08 AM on 05/09/2011
This article is so ignorant I don't know where to begin. The Flip camera died because a) Cisco bought it and b) it had as much bulk of an iphone and gave you the same quality picture. So yeah, it's going to die. On the other hand, compact cameras are suffering but high end DSLRs are booming. Don't let the cheaper price tags fool you, the Kindle is a superior, high-end reading experience much like DSLRs are to cameras.

The line, "their utility is limited: They are built primarily to let you read. " is priceless. That's exactly why I bought a Kindle instead of an iPad, so that I would read. Not check email, weather, play Angry Birds or watch a movie. There are still many of us who long to read like the days before the ADD hell we live in. E-readers take us back to those days while giving us the fruits of technology. Maybe the writer should try an e-reader herself to see what uninterrupted reading is like again.
09:29 AM on 05/09/2011
"There are still many of us who long to read like the days before the ADD hell we live in. E-readers take us back to those days while giving us the fruits of technology­."

Agreed! Although I would suggest the 'ADD' you talk of is brought on by the sheer amount of choice and variety technology is offering us. I'm no anarcho-primitivist, but I find technocrats are overlooking some serious concerns.

Mark at www.idgconnect.com/blog
02:18 PM on 05/09/2011
I love your 2nd par. I can't imagine reading a paper book that allowed me to click on my email from any page. Terrible, terrible thought. Add-hell indeed.

Twitter is my current hobbyhorse-enemy. My daughter left paperbooks all over our house in varying stages of being read. After we finally broke down and let her have a cell ph. (one of the last in her high school class, if we believe her), she now carries IT around and responds to every idiotic tweet. I hate it!

Add-hell, indeed.
05:42 PM on 05/08/2011
This is a very poor article. I am absolutely convinced that the author doesn't usually read entire books. Talking about "tablet vs ereaders" seems to me something like "the war between speakers vs earphones". I have both, because both are totally different things.
02:24 PM on 05/08/2011
Today is Mother's Day: I wonder how many Moms are getting a Kindle or Nook, vs. how many are getting iPads or other tablet computers? I suspect that Kindle will win this game, Nook will have a good day as well, and that Mom's who get iPads will also be happy, but they won't be getting them for the primary purpose of having an ereader/ using ebooks.

I have (& love & frequently use) an Amazon Kindle. Don't miss conventional books at all. I also recently ordered an iPad, for faster access to the internet, and for some work-related reading (journal articles, pdf). My Kindle replaced conventional books. I hope my iPad will mostly replace my habit of printing-out medical joural articles (pdfs), and be useful on hospital rounds as a quick link to our EMR. I will likely install the Amazon ebook app on my iPad, and down load my books, just for back-up, but I can't imagine switching to a heavier back-lit object for book reading. I think these products have different strengths, and that they don't compete with each other directly, at least not the way this author thinks they do.
02:18 PM on 05/08/2011
Anyone who has actually used an eReader with eInk will never, ever consider using a backlit LCD. End of story. Multifunction devices do a little bit of everything well. Dedicated devices do that one thing exceptionally well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:02 PM on 05/08/2011
I'm so glad books still make up about 1/4.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geoffrey s
Another Progressive from Texas ...
09:37 AM on 05/08/2011
I don't' think readers and tablets have to be mutually exclusive. I've had a kindle for 3 years and I use it for the vast majority of my casual reading. When I get a tablet, I'm sure I'll use it, like I currently use my phone, as a secondary reading source. I like kindle's eInk for my casual reading - as I read 10-12 books a month, doing all that on a backlit screen would be a strain on my eyes.

But, the tech news narrative anymore is 'will x be the y killer?' Kindle v tablets. Android v iPhone. Xoom v iPad. killer killer killer. Its as if there is only room in the US markets for one of any type of product. Why can't we have both?
11:17 AM on 05/08/2011
They are all VON NEUMANN MACHINES!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dg96tefnEU

It will just be a matter of producing the software for the tablet to do whatever the e-readers do. But the tech companies are playing various competitive games with the technology. It is manipulated for the money. So we never get truly excellent technology..
06:49 AM on 05/08/2011
Never heard of or used ereader in my life. Good bye
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hairydodger
02:29 AM on 05/08/2011
Ask any twenty something for the time and they'll look at their phone. They don't wear a watch. Why would they? It's a single function device.
09:14 PM on 05/07/2011
Well, duh, of course I use "some combination of the above," namely, treeware and my Kindle.

The problem with tablets is that the backlighting and the poor battery life. If you want to read electronically, use an eReader. My love is Kindle, but if Kindle didn't exist then Nook would be quite alright.