iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

More U.S. Oil Drilling Won't Lower Gas Prices, Experts Say

First Posted: 05/06/11 11:46 AM ET Updated: 07/06/11 06:12 AM ET

Oil Drilling
More U.S. offshore oil drilling won't drive down the price at the pump.

WASHINGTON -- Republicans used the politically potent argument about the cost of gas Thursday to pass a bill expanding offshore oil and gas exploration. But analysts say there's a major flaw in their case: More drilling will barely budge prices.

The Restarting American Offshore Leasing Now Act, which passed 266 to 144 with 33 Democrats buying into the scheme, orders the Department of the Interior to move quickly to offer three leases to drill in the Gulf of Mexico and one off the coast of Virginia. The bill demands that the leases be executed by next year.

But the legislation won't reduce the price at the pump, experts said. Nor would a vastly more ambitious effort have much impact.

"It's not going to change the price of oil overnight, and it's probably not going to have a huge impact on the price of oil ever," said Mike Lynch of Strategic Energy and Economic Research, Inc. referring not just to those four leases, but to expanding all U.S. drilling.

Yet House Republicans -- backed by nearly three dozen Democrats -- held out their push for exploitation of the four tracts as a panacea for the weak economy and high gas prices.

"Republicans are standing with the American people, who want us to increase the supply of American energy that will lower costs, reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and create jobs here in America," House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) proudly declared. "And I’m certain –- with $4 per gallon gas -– the American people will remember who listened to them, and who didn’t."

"I think high gas prices and high energy costs are crushing jobs and are just unnecessary," Rep. Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.) told The Huffington Post. "When we have access to domestic resources, gas prices go down. That’s what happened in 2008 when Bush opened up the outer-continental shelf."

Rep. Doc Hastings (R-Wash.), the bill's lead sponsor, made the same argument Wednesday.

"If we send a signal to the markets that we’re going to go after the resources that we have in this country," he told bloggers on a conference call, "I think that will have a positive impact on driving the price of gasoline down. As a matter of fact, that happened in 2008."

But people who study oil markets for a living say they are wrong.

"I would really doubt that that [2008 price drop] would have been because we committed to more drilling," said Phyllis Martin, an analyst with the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), which just released its detailed, annual outlook on energy supply and prices.

"It was most likely the recession," Martin explained. "When demand cuts back, the production cuts back and the prices fall."

As for opening four new drilling leases, that's not even a drop in the bucket.

Analyst Lynch said that, if the nation took an extremely vigorous stance on oil exploitation -- and relaxed restrictions on the Gulf and drilled in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska and off the coast of California, where America's most easily accessible offshore oil is located -- it still would not have much of an impact.

"With the exception of the deep Gulf, where there are restrictions, people are drilling as fast as they can," said Lynch, who regards himself as a moderate Republican. He is bearish on oil prices and believes the cost of crude will drop soon, regardless of an government policies.

"You might, under really optimistic scenarios, over five or six years, add 2 million barrels a day of production," said Lynch, who favors more drilling, even if he rejects the politicians' arguments. "On a global scale, it's significant. But we would still be big importers -- we would still be dependent on foreign oil."

And prices would not move much because of it, the analysts explained. Oil is traded on a world market, and the United States does not have enough petroleum to increase the global supply, which would reduce demand -- and thus the price -- for fuel.

"In 2009, the U.S. produced about 7 percent of what was produced in the entire world, so increasing the oil production in the U.S. is not going to make much of a difference in world markets and world prices," said the EIA's Martin. "It just gets lost. It's not that much."

And boosting drilling in the outer continental shelf?

"What comes out of the OCS is about 1 percent of the world total, and that's not enough to affect world prices," Martin said, even noting that she believes there are even more untapped reserves than officials can estimate at the moment.

Republicans are right about some things, the experts agreed. More drilling would mean more jobs and more tax revenue, if the industry's subsidies and tax breaks were revoked. It could also reduce oil imports -- even if gas prices wouldn't drop.

More offshore drilling, in fact, would be a huge boon for the oil and gas companies that could do it.

"It would be a lot of money for a lot people, but it's not going to make us energy independent," said Lynch, the analyst.

The oil and gas industry has poured $8.8 million into the campaigns of the drilling bill's lead sponsors.

Lynch wouldn't rule out the idea of the United States becoming energy independent, someday, but rated the odds as slim.

"On a scale of Osama bin Laden going to church with Pat Robertson -- it's close to that," he said.

What would bring down prices? In the short term, much broader market forces, such as those that prompted Thursday's huge oil sell-off.

Since the United States remains the largest consumer of petroleum, greater efficiency at home will help in the longer term. Lynch noted that President Barack Obama's past campaign suggestion for Americans to keep their tires properly inflated actually had merit.

"It sounds stupid, but he was right," said Lynch, noting only half-jokingly that it might have paid during the recession to employ all the out-of-work lawyers as tire pressure readers at gas stations.

The biggest factor that would drive down gas prices, though, would be more drilling around the world.

"If you said, 'let's take the equipment and send it to Iraq, and build pipelines,' that's going to flood the market. The easiest oil is in Iraq," Lynch said. He added that other rich supplies could be tapped "in a number of other places like Colombia or Argentina or Brazil."

And what would happen to world prices if America went all out on drilling?

"It would not make the Saudi king stay up at night worrying about his revenue," said Lynch.

Sam Stein contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- Republicans used the politically potent argument about the cost of gas Thursday to pass a bill expanding offshore oil and gas exploration. But analysts say there's a major flaw in their ...
WASHINGTON -- Republicans used the politically potent argument about the cost of gas Thursday to pass a bill expanding offshore oil and gas exploration. But analysts say there's a major flaw in their ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8,343
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (136 total)
10:27 AM on 05/13/2011
The comments on this board, most boards that deal with this topic, actually, are exactly what the government & big oil companies LOVE - CONQUER & DIVIDE baby! `Republican',Democrat, `tree-hugger'. We'll turn on each other with the name calling and DIVERT our attention while they keep doing what THEY want. Dance, little puppets, call names. What's the point of these boards anyway?
12:28 PM on 05/11/2011
It's typical for Democrats to stand by saying something won't help while others are struggling all over the United States. Then someone posts fake surveys saying most Americans believe this or believe that. I'm pretty sure if you actually asked most Americans, they would say do whatever it takes to lower gas prices!
10:04 AM on 05/13/2011
Chad, if you believe `most Americans, they would say do whatever it takes to lower gas prices!' then call us Americans what the big oil companies call us - OIL SLAVES. Until WE push, demand - whatever, for gas alternatives - THAT IS WHAT WE ARE and oil companies KNOW IT REGARDLESS of where they drill!
05:02 PM on 05/13/2011
Of course we need other alternatives ,which we are pursuing but in the mean time like I said "Most Americans" would say to do what it takes to lower the prices at the pump. I am positive of it. Nobody wants to pay 5 to 6 dollars at the pump. Everybody just keeps saying that we are pursuing alternatives, while in turn prices at the pump are steadily rising. A huge part of our current problem is buying gas from other countries and supporting their economies while ours is in the toilet. We could be doing a lot more here than the sparring back and forth among parties.
11:17 AM on 05/15/2011
Prices at the pump are rising and will continue to rise because, for close to 20 years, there has been FAR less new oil found each year - worldwide - than the entire world has been using each year. As a result, demand exceeds supply. Oh, there's enough still in the ground - worldwide - to last for about 25 years...possibly as much as 35 years if the price goes high enough (the more we pay, the more likely we'll get the oil which is expensive to access/produce).

You'll hear that the oil will last until 2047, but that's a false assumption based upon no increase in demand between now and then. Demand in China is increasing exponentially, and India's demand for oil is rapidly rising too. Look, there's no more oil. The OPEC countries know it, the oil companies know it, and the American people simply refuse to believe reality because they don't like what it means.

And drilling in the U.S. is a joke...at least in terms of producing inexpensive oil in any rapid manner. There just isn't any place to do that in the U.S. There's oil in the Gulf...but it takes a billion dollars to get a small amount of it. The same is true to an even greater extent in the Arctic Sea. There is a relatively small amount of oil offshore in the Pacific and Atlantic, but even that isn't cheap to produce.
12:20 AM on 05/11/2011
Here is a pretty interesting read on the evil big oil’s profits.

http://everydayecon.wordpress.com/2006/04/26/oil-profit-margins-vs-other-industries/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Schlessinger
09:12 PM on 05/10/2011
Maybe the best thing Presdident Bush ever said was that Americans are addicted to oil. Of course he did nothing about it, and was himself an oil man, but he has to get credit for something, right? The point is we cannot drill our way out of this mess. We need clean energy. Electric powered and hydrogen powered vehicles are the future. No more greenhouse gases, massive oil spills, and corrupt oil cartels wrecking havec globally.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:20 PM on 05/10/2011
Wasting money and resources on the last few drops of oil, is crazy. Spend that money on rooftop solar, offshore wind and waste bio char bio fuels.
05:11 PM on 05/10/2011
First I am all for any "alternatives" but until there is a true economical alternative to gas, fossil fuels will remain our number one source of fuel. So why not at least tap our resources, create jobs, reduce our dependency on foreign oil, and utilize our on domestic oil instead of complaining every few years and in turn do nothing about it since it would take years to reap any benefit from domestic oil.

Please anyone pushing a “green alternatives”, can you tell me a source (especially for vehicles) that can gives the mileage of gas, power output of gas, as cheap to own and use as gas (since most people already have a gasoline power vehicle, thus would not have to buy a new car or special parts to convert our existing cars)?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lw1
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
07:30 PM on 05/10/2011
One advantage of electrification is the lack of pollution from the locomotives themselves. Electrification also results in higher performance, lower maintenance costs and lower energy costs for electric locomotives.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_locomotive
11:59 PM on 05/10/2011
After looking at your link we have two types of electric locomotives. One is powered via overheard or underground lines that get its power from outside sources, which is a possibility that it comes from fossil fuels, thus not really making it green and the other is electric with onboard gas or diesel generators and thus are not green either. So until their in a viable energy source for the infrastructure of the country neither are really alternatives or green since both possible rely on fossil fuels to prove the power.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
powder chowder
☮ Peace: the final frontier...
01:15 PM on 05/10/2011
This is not new news. Experts have been saying this all along; during the "drill baby drill" era and even before that. Conservatives just don't listen to facts, instead they listen to FOX, which I'm sure has put a spin on this subject.
As for alternatives, we must drive the renewable energy economy right here in the USA. If we don't, Europe/Japan/China will and they will reap the profits and jobs and we lose.
06:14 PM on 05/09/2011
Drilling is better than nothing and even better than complaining and waiting for a miracle alternative to come along while doing nothing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lw1
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
11:04 AM on 05/10/2011
Drilling is ignoring real fixes - as T. Boone Pickens has said "We can not drill our way out of this emergency"

Economizing on our consumption, which we could start doing instantly, would do more than the long slow process of tapping our paltry harder to get and refine reserves. Cutting back consumption is part of what lowered prices the last time gas got this high.
05:24 PM on 05/10/2011
It is better to attempt to do something than do nothing at all. If we are able to increase our supply and also remove the U.S domestic market from the commodities market we could and would reduce the price of oil (though it might take some time).

You talk about conserving oil, I agree that is a great way of reducing the cost, but are we headed back to the Carter Era, when we must ration gas or are we going to let the government mandate how much we buy, what we drive or how far we drive? We must do realistic things that can lead to our energy independence like tapping our oil resources, converting oil locked materials, nuclear, solar, and wind, but we must do all of it together and not just think about a “greener” way because right now there is no green way that can compete with oil.
04:50 PM on 05/09/2011
Why would we not want to drill in the U.S? Why not covert coal into oil, why not use the oil sands or oil shale? There are well over 200 years of oil locked up in the coal, oil shale, oil sands and the already known oil reserves that we could use to help lower domestic prices, boost U.S. jobs, promote U.S. products, and become energy independent. So once again why not?
05:40 PM on 05/09/2011
http://www.gasbuddy.com/gb_retail_price_chart.aspx?city1=USA%20Average&city2=Canada%20Average&city3=&crude=y&tme=48&units=us

Review the enclosed website--the Canadian example (rich nation, massive oil/energy reserves, net exporter of oil) demonstrates that you proposed strategy will FAIL to lower prices of oil/retail gas in the domestic US market...Canadian's are also suffering with increasing gas prices at home AND they possess way more conventional/unconventional oil than they could ever use.
06:05 PM on 05/09/2011
Nationalize the domestic oil supplies and remove them from the commodities market (and I honestly hate to say and agree with doing this) but in the end we could do it and also remove our dependency on other countries while increasing of number of jobs, providing a independent source of fuel and oil, and also boosting the overall economy of the U.S. It is not that it will not help; it is the politicians that are stopping this because of their agendas. This about American energy independency, national security, more jobs, more U.S. money staying in the U.S, boosting the economy, and helping easy our pains at the pump.

Hey to everyone on the left, is energy independence not something that you support? Is this not a good change? Why would you not stand behind it?
?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lw1
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
11:08 AM on 05/10/2011
Why would you not want to use cleaner alternatives? If you don't like clean air you could burn coal in your living room.

What you suggest is slow, difficult and expensive and bad for our health.

We can make US jobs by taking the bloated military budget primarily spent on protecting multi-national oil drilling and shipments and employ those folks right here installing US made solar, wind, and tide power.
06:08 PM on 05/10/2011
Solar panels, wind turbines, and tidal generators are all nice but they are not advanced enough, cheap enough and powerful enough to provide power to the whole country. We have been subsidizing this green industry and can you show me a viable alternative to oil in vehicles based on mileage, power output and overall cost?

Yes drilling and converting oil holders into oil is not super quick, possibly difficult (depending on which one we start with first) and can be harmful, but are we still not harming the world by allowing others to pollute it to and that is what is happening when we use foreign oil, we just move the pollution to another country, but we do not remove it.

Why not push the U.S. into domestic energy independence? We could use the domestic oil taxes to fund alternatives to oil. We could create jobs of a lot of people that need them. We could reduce or remove speculators by nationalizing the oil supplies and removing them from the international commodities markets, we could stop funding countries that either fund terrorist or are complacent to the terrorist and we could start producing domestic items that use oil instead of importing them, all of which would boost our economy and get it back on track.
photo
yukonsam
This space reserved for self-referential irony.
01:12 PM on 05/09/2011
We produce only about 7% of the world's oil supply. We consume about 25%.

Want to cut prices? We have a LOT more leverage on the demand side of the equation than the supply side, and demand is much more elastic than most people think. Cut our consumption just a few percentage points and watch the bottom drop out of the crude oil market.

But Republicans and Democrats from Oil states don't really want the price to drop. High prices mean happy Big Oil campaign donors. Joe Sixpack doesn't drop millions on "issue ads" on the candidate's behalf, so skeeerew him!
05:26 PM on 05/09/2011
If we tap into all of our known oil reserves like already drilled wells, new construction of wells, convert coal into oil, use the oil shale and oil sands that are in our country and nationalize it (as much I as do not want to say this), and keep it off the commodities markets while reducing the EPA regulations that would hinder these companies, we could have energy independence within 10 years. The problem is that the people in Washington say it might take to long and thus they do nothing, and this extends the time frame for us to do something about it. So start drilling now and promoting other sources of oil and other types of fuel like nuclear and let’s start our way to energy independence. This new drilling would open up more jobs, promote U.S. oil products, server ties with terrorist supporting nations, and help the alternative fuel industry through subsidizes funded by taxes collected on domestic oil. At the end of the day the only people stopping our energy independence are the American people, either those elected or their constitutes. .
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
04:38 AM on 05/10/2011
Start drilling now?
Read a history book. America has been drilling continuously for over a century and a half. More than anywhere else. And for the last 40 years it has produced less oil every year.
Some idea!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
doriath22
Born-again Jacobin. Robespierre had the right idea
09:15 AM on 05/10/2011
Except for the minor problem that the required resources just aren't there
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
10:35 AM on 05/09/2011
Just another example of how ideology and political considerations trump facts for the GOP. reminds me of a comment that H.L. Mencken made about William Jennings Bryan: You could drive a prairie schooner through any one of his arguments and never bump up against.a fact.
10:34 AM on 05/09/2011
Simple supply and demand. If the supply increases faster than the demand, then prices will fall. Therefore, if US drilling proceeds apace and the black stuff really starts flowing, prices should go down. Another good reason why the oil sands and shale oil should be tapped in to a.s.a.p., in tandem with increased offshore drilling.

The other salient point is tax - I'm not sure how much fuel duty/tax you guys pay in the US, but we pay the equivalent of about $11 per gallon at the pump in the UK for our gas (petrol and diesel), and about $7.70 of that is all tax.

We had a risible 1 pence per litre reduction in our fuel tax in March, and so they've slapped an extra 12% tax on the North Sea oil and gas operations 'to pay for it', thereby forcing up our household energy bills and forestalling much-needed investment in the area in order to tap into new reserves.

We should be very wary of voting in politicians who then promptly bring in ruinous eco-policies - Julia Gillard in Australia being a prime example, Chris Huhne in the UK is another. The sooner they get kicked out, along with their crack-pot climate crank notions, the better.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Real Patriot
Individuals have human rights, not religions.
12:08 PM on 05/09/2011
No. It is not simple supply and demand. Free market forces cannot work in the face of global price fixing cartels / oligopolies like OPEC, nor can the law of supply and demand work to decrease the price of a product for which there is INELASTIC demand as there is in the US, period.

To prove this point, currently in the US there are huge tax breaks and subsidies for oil companies, they are allowed to drill on public, demand is down and supply is up so much the US is exporting. All of these things would work to reduce the price IF the price responded to free market forces like th elaw of supply and demand, but prices are not down. Thus the current pricing subatantiates the corrupting of the market by colluding to fix prices and by crushing non-petroleum alternatives which make demand inelastic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lw1
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
11:18 AM on 05/10/2011
Your lovely fantasy "if US drilling proceeds apace and the black stuff really starts flowing," is just that. Too many ifs, not enough facts.

On the other hand "crack-pot climate crank notions"
are supported by 97% of scientists.
09:56 PM on 05/10/2011
We have the ifs, the only problem is the left being scared of making other countries mad at us for not having to depend on them and thus hurting the whole global economy thing. That is the truth. If you doubt it, then why are we not pursuing the energy independence that Mr. Obama wanted (you do remember that right, well we are 3 years in to his 10 year plan and we are facing higher energy cost than when he took office).

What would happen if the U.S. did not require any outside energy supplies and we used ethanol blended gasoline? It would hurt the world due to higher food cost (if we based our ethanol off of corn, sugar beets, or any other food based crop), it would hurt nations that depend on our oil to be exported, it would hurt importing countries, and it would force the rest of the countries to redo their import export strategies thus effecting their economies. The same would happen with going to a total alternative to oil because with the U.S doing it if would effect the rest of the world.
10:08 PM on 05/10/2011
Ok my take on the "crack-pot" ideas of global warming.

Fist it is happening, but it happening many times before man too.

If it was so dire, why does Gore always fly private jets across the world and why is his big house have such a big carbon foot print compared to the rest of the houses in the nation?

Remember the leaked info from the global climate conference, just a few years ago.

What about the other scientist that do not agree with the rest, are they just crazy or are they just not wanting to jump on the money making "green train" which has been shown to result in billions and billions of dollars if the climate people got their way.

In the end the “Green Movement” is nothing more than a scam to remove money from certain industries and redistribute it other area while basing their movement on something that might be nothing more than the nature of the earth and Sun. This is nothing more than a way to boost someone's wallet, while preying on people's love of their world.
10:20 AM on 05/09/2011
Your article was written with extreme bias, I have lost a lot of respect for the news that is reported on AOL. Since that vote last Thursday oil has dropped over 10% and gas will start to go down in price, you seem to care more about being inline with what Obama wants you to say instead of doing some actual journalism. The more we drill here the more it helps our country plain and simple, we also need to stop using corn for fuel but Obama will not support that because it would hurt some of his Illinois supporter where the corn is processed to ethanol. We should be using algae to convert into methanol and mix that with our gas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
10:36 AM on 05/09/2011
Did you learn this at a Glen Beck cupcake lecture?
01:01 PM on 05/09/2011
What is super user; someone who gets paid to watch Beck and post ignorant comments all day?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Real Patriot
Individuals have human rights, not religions.
12:10 PM on 05/09/2011
Completely incorrect. What is obtained in the US does not stay in the US, therefore it serves absolutely NO domestic benefit.
12:59 PM on 05/09/2011
If demand stays the same and supply is increased, prices will go down, basic economics and common sense. I think lower prices would be a benefit to everyone. Algae is much better than corn for fuel. Why would Obama incourage Brazil to drill offshore and give them billions to do so when he has done everything he can here to prevent more drilling?
03:20 AM on 05/09/2011
There is a well documented article about high gas prices at aliberlpatriot.com.
10:03 PM on 05/08/2011
http://www.gasbuddy.com/gb_retail_price_chart.aspx?city1=USA%20Average&city2=Canada%20Average&city3=&crude=y&tme=48&units=us

OIL EXPORTER Canada retail gas prices track OIL IMPORTER USA's price increases. So, rich developed nation with MASSIVE oil reserves and NET EXPORTER STATUS cannot secure cheap retail gas for its own population==>this "case study" PROVES DRILL-BABY-DRILL cannot lower gas rices in USA.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Real Patriot
Individuals have human rights, not religions.
12:49 PM on 05/09/2011
B/c Canada privatized, their supply is subject global price fixing just like in the US.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
07:45 PM on 05/09/2011
It's also largely some of the same multinationals.