iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Illegal Students Entitled To K-12 Education, Dept. of Education Reminds Schools

CHRISTINE ARMARIO   05/06/11 07:38 PM ET  AP

MIAMI — The U.S. Department of Education sent a letter to districts around the country Friday, reminding them that all students – legal or not – are entitled to a public education.

The letter comes amid reports that schools may be checking the immigration status of students trying to enroll, and reminds districts they are federally prohibited from barring elementary or secondary students on the basis of citizenship status.

"Moreover, districts may not request information with the purpose or result of denying access to public schools on the basis of race, color or national origin," said the letter, which was signed by officials from the department's Office of Civil Rights and the Department of Justice.

"We put this letter out now because we know school districts are in the process of planning for the next school year, and wanted to make sure they had this in hand," said Department of Education spokesman Justin Hamilton. "We were concerned about the number of reports that we've received and heard about, and felt it was necessary to make it clear that this has been the law of the land since Ronald Reagan was president."

A 1982 Supreme Court case, Plyer v. Doe, held that states cannot deny students access to public education, whether they are in the U.S. legally or not. The court ruled that denying public education could impose a lifetime of hardship "on a discrete class of children not accountable for their disabling status."

The letter comes as the Office of Civil Rights investigates three complaints, and less than a week before the president is expected to deliver a speech on immigration during a visit to Texas.

The Office of Civil Rights is also currently evaluating a complaint filed last month by the Southern Poverty Law Center against schools in Durham County, N.C.

The organization claims discrimination against Latino students. In one instance, a girl attempting to enroll in a district high school was asked for her passport and visa and was told that if she didn't have one, she must be an illegal alien, said attorney Gerri Katzerman.

Ken Soo, a lawyer representing Durham Public Schools, said the district was looking into the complaint and would correct any problems found.

Katzerman said the issue has become increasingly common in the Deep South as demographics change and more Latino families move in.

"We hear from them a very similar experience, where they attempt to enroll and are asked about their immigration status, are asked for documents they don't have, and they basically disappear back into the population without having the opportunity to participate in public education," she said.

Civil rights officials are also investigating a complaint in Hazleton, Penn., where school officials considered requiring four proofs of residency for new students. The proposal has been changed, though some believe the requirements are still too onerous.

Legislation has been introduced in a number of states this year that would authorize districts to inquire about immigration status when students enroll in the district.

Republican Rep. Becky Nordgren, of Alabama, for example, sponsored a bill that would have required students and their parents to provide proof of citizenship to enroll. She said her district has seen a rise in the number of undocumented immigrants and that this has placed an undue cost on the local government.

"Quite frankly, I believe that these issues need to be addressed," she said.

Nordgren said that her bill stalled after she learned about the 1982 Supreme Court case.

The letter Friday said districts can require students to provide proof of residency within a district, such as phone or water bills, but that immigration status would not be relevant. Districts can also require a birth certificate to confirm a student's age, but cannot bar enrollment if the certificate is from another country. Nor can they deny enrollment if a student does not provide a social security number.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

Filed by Erica Liepmann  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
08:44 PM on 05/16/2011
The case was never submnitted to a full test and the conclusion from the appeal was -

"If the State is to deny a discrete group of innocent children the free public education that it offers to other children residing within its borders, that denial must be justified by a showing that it furthers some substantial state interest. No such showing was made here. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals in each of these cases is Affirmed"

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0457_0202_ZO.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DaMojo
Death eatin' a hoodoo biskit
01:30 PM on 05/10/2011
Well, public schools are paid for by taxes. Illegal immigrants do not pay their share in that so in reality, their kids should not go to school here. BUT.....since our own kids are barely bothering to learn anything or their parents aren't bothering to make them....I say let the illegal kids in to get an education. SOMEONE needs to learn to read and keep things going.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
10:56 PM on 05/09/2011
Some contend ~ Plyler v. Doe does not mandate primary education for illegals

"In fact, Plyler does not prohibit a state from denying primary education to illegal immigrants. Plyler holds only that, if a state wants to do that, it needs a better reason than Texas had in 1982."

http://www.denverpost.com/ci_17595084

Read more: Guest Commentary: Public education and illegal immigrants - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/ci_17595084#ixzz1LukBJTzs
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raging Cajun
09:03 PM on 05/09/2011
I would love to contribute to the state or agency that goes after the patently absurd 1982 Supreme Court decision stating that illegal children have a "right" to a free education. No one has a "right" to a free education. It is something we give our citizens as a benefit to them and to the larger society by having a better educated populace. The very idea that someone can enter the country illegally and demand the benefits that we give to OUR citizens and legal residents is ridiculous. No wonder we cannot close stop the illegal flow when our courts and legislators, at the behest of liberal and ethnic lobbies, grant illegals benefits, including free education for their illegal children, health benefits, and we do everything to NOT enforce sanctions against employers for hiring them. The public is going to have to take this situation into our own hands while we still have a nation left and I do mean while we still have a nation--we won't be for very much longer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:59 PM on 05/09/2011
And yet we are sending American mothers to jail for sending their American kids to "better" school districts?
07:45 PM on 05/09/2011
Yes, they're required to teach them.

They can also, however, turn them in to INS/DHS. And push for them to be taken into protective custody by the State pending their deportation.

Different solution to the problem. Same outcome.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rsheeran
Beware them both, and all of their degree
07:23 PM on 05/09/2011
I agree with the 1982 Supreme Court case ruling but I also wonder about the hardship being faced by underfunded school districts in taking on this additional burden. I believe that while no child should be denied an education, perhaps an accounting of this could help steer some funding towards this burden?
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
08:47 PM on 05/16/2011
The ruling was based on the argument that until deprotation hearings were decided it was not certain that the child would be deported so they had to continue to provide equal education to what eveyone else received till it was known that hey were to be deported or not or else it might cause illiteracy for this who managed to stay.