iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Newt Gingrich For President: Twitter Reacts To Non-Announcement Announcement

The Huffington Post     First Posted: 05/09/11 06:11 PM ET   Updated: 07/09/11 06:12 AM ET

If a presidential aspirant alerts his or her supporters that an official campaign announcement is imminent, does it count as an announcement? This is one question that emerged Monday after former House Speaker Newt Gingrich's spokesman, Rick Tyler, told the Associated Press that that the Republican hopeful would formally announce a presidential bid on Twitter and Facebook on Wednesday.

Gingrich signaled himself on Twitter shortly after the news broke that he would discuss his plans for 2012 on Fox News on Wednesday night.

The non-announcement announcement quickly spread on social media, prompting many Twitter users to wonder if Gingrich spoiled his own social media campaign debut. We'll have to wait until Wednesday to see how the actual announcement is treated on those social media channels.

For now, here's a look at those jabbing today's pre-announcement. If you spotted a tweet that should be included here, please link it in the comments section below.

Newt Gingrich, Presidential Candidate?
1 of 14
Total comments: 141 | Post a Comment
1 of 14
Rate This Slide
Interesting Response
Spot-On Reaction

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Top Tweets
loading...
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
If a presidential aspirant alerts his or her supporters that an official campaign announcement is imminent, does it count as an announcement? This is one question that emerged Monday after former Hous...
If a presidential aspirant alerts his or her supporters that an official campaign announcement is imminent, does it count as an announcement? This is one question that emerged Monday after former Hous...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 141
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DarkTruths
Jesus was a liberal. Why do you hate Jesus?
07:23 PM on 05/12/2011
I'm alerting all here that I plan to announce soon that Newt-loops is a doofus. You heard it here first.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Peters
visit me at LOHAD.com
09:48 AM on 05/12/2011
I heard on local news radio that the link in his tweet didn't work -- anyone see a story about that anywhere?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TomZart
09:07 AM on 05/11/2011
" NEWT GINGRICH &THE PRESIDENCY "


Those who wish to be President
Must practice what they teach.
For their people need inspiring
To believe what they preach.

Take heed therefore, unto yourselves
You overseers of the flock
Or the voters shall cast you out
For your futures are not of rock.

Life may place you in deep waters
Though it doesn't wish you to drown.
It's your past record that lets us know
Who you are as you smile or frown.

If you wish to be remembered
From the truth you must never part.
Power corrupts the best of us
When we stop listening to our heart.


By Tom Zart Most Published Poet On The Web!
07:48 AM on 05/11/2011
It,s great newt,s going to run, now we can have family values back.if he were pres, we could hurry up the end of days and wish for better on the next round of evolution.
04:28 AM on 05/11/2011
So doesn't everyone miss the days of the surplus we had during the Clinton presidency? Thats what I always hear. Now would it not make sense that the man who made these surpluses possible just might be the right man to take us out of the financial mess we are in. We can argue all day about who cheated or who had sex in the white house but we all know that is irrelevent. The fact of the matter is that Newt Gingrich is the man who made the surplus possible. He even shut down the government to push this radical agenda to balance the budget and reduce the defict. Now thanks to this radical agenda Pres. Clinton and his followers can boast to having a balanced budget during his term, even though the budgets he sent to Congress were rejected by Gingrich and not passed. Maybe if everyone got past party politics, including all the people in the country, and focus instead on solutions to the problems we could be a strong country again. It took Pres. Clinton Newt Gingrich and all the congressmen to come together to pass legislation that balanced the budget and brought a surplus to our nation and this is the same thing that needs to happen now.
steveinohio
A small businessman in Ohio doing the best he can
09:02 AM on 05/11/2011
I think your comment gives Gingrich far too much credit, but I definitely agree with the sentiment that we ought to be able to have a common American purpose that we work towards without everything becoming a political game. Some stuff is just in our national interest, and while we might fight about methods, I wish we wouldn't lose sight of the end goal. Especially with fiscal matters, being willing to give a little to get a little usually ends up getting the job done.

For all of the budget posturing, it all comes down to arithmetic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drillsgtmark
I don't know but I've been told...
02:11 AM on 05/11/2011
Snooze time...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gamigliuri
Don't Shoot The Messenger!
12:48 AM on 05/11/2011
WOW - I can't believe that old dinosaur knows how to tweet ... and who wants another old fat white corporate-pandering teabagger in office? I think we have learned our lesson here; Pres Clinton; healthiest economy in our lifetimes AND a blanced budget...
Bush; took us into a war based on a lie, never did get the real culprit of 9/11 all while driving our country into financial ruin ...
Obama; took our country from the brink of Depression #2 and got bin Laden and this is only year 2!
I'm voting Democrat from now on - repubs, especially this extremist, right wingnut fringe are misguided, foolhardy and reckless at best.
We are all finally getting it now!
04:14 AM on 05/11/2011
The reason the budget was balanced during the Clinton years and the surplus was possible was because Newt Gingrich was the Speaker of the House. He stood his ground includeing shutting down the government in order to get legislation passed that did not allow overspending and resulted in a lower deficit. Pres Clintons budget proposal was much higher than what Gingrich pushed for and got passed. So Gingrich not Clilnton is mainly responsible for this balanced budget.
photo
iCode v2
Your friendly neighbourhood socialist.
06:04 AM on 05/11/2011
What's it like in that lovely fairytale land you're residing it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lowpdogs
Ratings doesn't equal quality - Jon Stewart
09:02 AM on 05/11/2011
There they go again stealing credit for something they didn't do alone!
12:17 AM on 05/11/2011
Who follows Newt Gingrich on Twitter?!?!?!?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
12:04 AM on 05/11/2011
History is calling. 

Go Newt!
11:03 PM on 05/10/2011
I want Fig Newton and Palin to run. Saturday Night Live will have enough material for the next 10 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anym
Obama is GoldmanSachs
10:14 PM on 05/10/2011
Kitten 2012 has my vote.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:08 AM on 05/11/2011
Bible Spice?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DickRay Schliep
09:26 PM on 05/10/2011
Gingrich is a GREAT candidate for us Dems... GO FOR IT you pathological self serving wanna bee
photo
Hey Lady
Being rich is NOT God's way of saying thanks
10:03 PM on 05/10/2011
#4
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drillsgtmark
I don't know but I've been told...
02:12 AM on 05/11/2011
#5
09:15 PM on 05/10/2011
I wouldn't believe or should I say take with a grain of salt anything I hear on Fox.One for Newt in the snoot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MammaLu
Good food makes good people
08:25 PM on 05/10/2011
Newt is so 1994.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cailleach Echo
10:04 PM on 05/10/2011
Did you mean ... 1894? or 1984?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThePelton
Never underestimate the power of Human stupidity.
08:23 PM on 05/10/2011
Ah yes, Happy is joining Grumpy, Dopey, Doc, Bashful, Sleepy, Sneezy and Snow White as they try to unhorse BHO. I suspect they would prefer unemployment and underemployment to stay high so they can ride it into the White House next year, then make more tax cuts for their wealthiest contributors, and claim that creates jobs. What's to keep some billionaire like Trump from using his big tax breaks from buying a fourth casino to run into bankruptcy in less than a year?