iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Federal Court May Strike Down Bill Defunding Planned Parenthood

Mitchdaniels

First Posted: 05/09/11 06:56 PM ET Updated: 07/09/11 06:12 AM ET

Gov. Mitch Daniels (R-Ind.) is on the verge of signing a bill that would bar Medicaid patients from receiving any kind of health care at Planned Parenthood clinics, and the family-planning giant is ready to retaliate in federal court.

Republican state lawmakers pushed the defunding bill in order to block taxpayer money to an organization that performs abortions (although the Hyde Amendment has blocked federally funded abortions for 30 years). But Planned Parenthood's lead attorney says the law violates federal Medicaid rules as well as the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

“We're going to file a lawsuit in federal court as soon after the governor signs this bill as we can get into court,” said Roger Evans, director of litigation for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. “The funding ban is scheduled to take effect immediately, and we see Medicaid patients every day, so we will be seeking instantaneous relief against the law taking effect while we pursue the litigation.”

House Bill 1210, introduced by state Rep. Eric Turner (R-Cicero) in January, would prohibit the state of Indiana from contracting with "any entity that performs abortions or … operates a facility where abortions are performed." But federal Medicaid rules state that Medicaid beneficiaries can obtain health services from whichever qualified institution or agency -- including Planned Parenthood -- the person chooses.

Further, Evans said, since abortion is legal on a federal level, the bill violates the 14th Amendment by punishing those institutions that offer it.

“A very essence of something being a constitutional right is that the states cannot punish you for doing it,” he said. “The problem here is that Indiana is penalizing Planned Parenthood for providing women with access to abortion services -- an obviously constitutional realm of conduct. They’re trying to cut off more than a million dollars worth of funds. It's punishment in disguise.”

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) said they never comment on pending legislation, but Indiana state officials have expressed concern in recent weeks that violating the federal Medicaid rule by discriminating against Planned Parenthood could cause the agency to cut off all $4 million in federal funds it gives to Indiana for family planning each year.

But Evans said Planned Parenthood is planning to stop the bill in its tracks before CMS has a chance to rule on it.

“If these contracts are canceled and Medicaid reimbursement is cut off, the consequences will be instantaneous to women in Indiana,” he said. “By the time the federal government goes through the process of levying a penalty, in a way, the damage would be done and irreparable.”

If Planned Parenthood is successful in court, the federal court will issue an injunction against the statute, and life will go on as normal at Planned Parenthood clinics. If the lawsuit is unsuccessful, the new law will take effect the minute Daniels signs it, ensuring that many Medicaid patients with appointments at Planned Parenthood over the next few weeks will have no way to pay for their services.

Daniels’ office did not respond to calls for comment on whether the state legislature has a plan to alert patients of the immediate policy change or whether the state legislature is concerned about the new law violating federal rules. Evans said it's clear from his perspective that Indiana lawmakers proceeded on this bill without any consideration of the practical or legal consequences.

"The legal precedent is already there, but I don't think that penetrates the reasoning of right wing legislators who have an agenda and a vendetta," he said. "They just plunge forward."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Gov. Mitch Daniels (R-Ind.) is on the verge of signing a bill that would bar Medicaid patients from receiving any kind of health care at Planned Parenthood clinics, and the family-planning giant is re...
Gov. Mitch Daniels (R-Ind.) is on the verge of signing a bill that would bar Medicaid patients from receiving any kind of health care at Planned Parenthood clinics, and the family-planning giant is re...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,627
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rdrover
Don't let that horse eat that violin...
10:02 AM on 07/02/2011
"The legal precedent is already there, but I don't think that penetrates the reasoning of right wing legislators who have an agenda and a vendetta," he [Daniels] said. "They just plunge forward."

And the guv wouldn't dare veto it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
02:43 AM on 05/12/2011
I do not know whether to categorize this as guilt by association or throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Perhaps "and your little dog too" sums it up.
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
09:21 PM on 05/11/2011
We seriously need to replace Planned Parenthood with PREPARED Parenthood.

This whole idea that a child is a burden and therefore, disposable, is pretty sick.

I wonder how many women got an abortion in their lives and then never ended up having a kid. I bet that must suck pretty badly. And I almost feel bad about that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shawondasse
10:51 AM on 05/13/2011
Sign me
Blissfully Child-free.
Just because I have the equipment doesn't mean I want to use it. Or have to.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rdrover
Don't let that horse eat that violin...
10:08 AM on 07/02/2011
Tim--it has something to do with a woman's personal decision and its consequences -- not your opinion or feelings!
03:43 PM on 05/11/2011
To help pregnant women, Indiana wants to make affordable medical services less available.
Reminds me of burning the village to save the village.
Some equate terminating a pregnancy with killing a baby. Why then do you revere a god who kills so many babies?
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
03:37 PM on 05/11/2011
"Liberals" act as if these women are having a heart attack or seizure, rather than wanting to get free stuff so they can engage in carefree sex with anonymous men in bars.
03:50 PM on 05/11/2011
97% of Planned Parenthood funds are utilized on non-abortion procedures. What Indiana is doing is akin to amputating the head to cure a tumor. Can a state outlaw federal funds supporting a legal activity?
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
04:24 PM on 05/11/2011
Why shouldn't they be able to choose? Are you anti-choice?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
brt929
10:46 PM on 05/11/2011
Participation in Medicaid is voluntary.  So yes they can. 
 
As I said before, I would think they will lose all federal matching funds, so children and seniors will end up suffering as well.
 
By the time the people of Indiana start to realize what has been done, Daniels term as Governor will be coming to an end.  I don't see him getting another term, especially not women are voting. 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeRubin2
Norteno favoring Sureno secession
07:33 PM on 05/11/2011
You've outed the conservative governmental agenda behind opposition to abortion: (1) Don't make sex education available, but make lots of church support and lectures about "abstinence" available. (2) Don't make contraception available. (3) Don't make abortions available. (4) Make sure that unwanted children or their parents have absolutely no support from anyone, especially government. (5) Don't provide welfare to the mothers of the children who would have aborted them. (6) Don't educate people or actually try to create a job so that parents can support those kids. (7) Sit there and feel real smug about how you've punished people for having sex.

I know your type. You think that the right to life ends when the head crowns. When your mother's raped by someone whose lineage isn't attractive to you or when your dad knocks up your sister, maybe you'll see that this issue isn't merely about the right to go out and have sex with anonymous men.
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
09:59 AM on 05/13/2011
You don't know my type at all. Especially since I'm an atheist who would never register to a Republican.
03:30 PM on 05/11/2011
I wonder what other legal practices the state of Indiana wants to deny to its citizens?
Ever since the mostly republican appointed supreme court, six republican appointees only three democrats, decided Roe v Wade by a 7-2 margin(5 republican appointees in the majority); the republicans have used it as an issue. I stopped being republican because they lack fiscal responsibility(see debt of Reagan & Bushes), want to pry into private life(restrict medical procedures,wiretap etc) and stink at defense and whine too much. Their only interest is creating oligarchy in US-want us to be more third world than first world country. It's sad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TBull
Come And Take It is a dare, not a request
01:10 PM on 05/11/2011
Racism, bigotry, self serving drivel combined with a total misunderstanding of the constitution. Eugenics anyone? The right to life is the first right guaranteed in the constitution. If you aren't alive, none of the other rights matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeRubin2
Norteno favoring Sureno secession
07:37 PM on 05/11/2011
But I guess that the GOP's interest in "life" ends when the head crowns.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TBull
Come And Take It is a dare, not a request
08:12 PM on 05/11/2011
First things first. Not much can be done for a dead child.
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
08:34 PM on 05/11/2011
We believe in your right to raise your child as you like, as long as you don't actually, um, you know, KILL them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alicia Westberry
college student & Wordpress blog/ website owner
11:54 AM on 05/11/2011
Planned Parenthood should not be defunded. Too many worthy services are provided to justify defunding it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrea J Petro
08:45 AM on 05/12/2011
THANK YOU! Well said with few words. I truly dont think that some people posting or in general know what Planned Parenthood really does, they think it is just abortions and its not. PP provides many services that ALL women need when it comes to not only the reproductive system. They educate, provide needed medical care for many things, emotional and mental support for many issues. They also help people with no or little insurance on a sliding scale to be able to afford birth control and proper medical care. People are upset the funding goes to abortions. There are many "regular" doctors providing abortions and people are using their "private" insurance cover those abortions and other medical services Planned Parenthood provides. It costs the taxpayers much less to provide monthly birth control to a woman then if she has a child and goes on welfare for years raising that child or getting an abortion not to mention if they get sick, have a disease or a treatable infection, that untreated leads to hospitalization and even death costing thousands more. A simple pap smear can save a life, but if you dont have insurance a regular Dr wont take you and PP will. Abortions are like 3% of what they do and some want people to believe they are a revolving door of this service and no others. Defund PP and you will see many, many womens lives in danger and those of their children also.
11:19 AM on 05/11/2011
Do away with PP. Since we are having Obama-care forced onto all American Citizens, then there will be no need of this service, since everyone will have health insurance and can go to a doctor and a specialist if needed.

Explain why we would need this program, with the new healthcare law that is starting to take place?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shawondasse
02:40 PM on 05/11/2011
You are saying we can do without PP because people can now go to doctors?
Dude, PP is a medical practice. They have doctors there. People do go there to see a doctor. It is a medical practice where you can take your insurance to if you have it.
You are under the misapprehension that PP is free to patients. It's not. The difference is 1. availability and 2. this is a non-profit organization and can offer services on a sliding scale. Most conventional practices don't do that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrea J Petro
08:47 AM on 05/12/2011
well said
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Suzanne525
FourMore, WooHoo!!
02:24 PM on 05/10/2011
We had one crazy legislative session in Indiana this year. Besides the defunding of PP, now tax dollars will go to providing vouchers for kids to attend religious schools (waiting for that to go to court) and there is an effort to legalize "coyote pens", where coyotes are penned up and used as bait for "training" dogs. The coyotes will be torn to pieces without any chance to escape. Real humane.

But, that's what our republickans like around here.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shawondasse
03:11 PM on 05/10/2011
What are you talking about with these coyote pens? Is there some kind of thing people are trying to do to stop this? How can I sign up? Can you post a link?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Suzanne525
FourMore, WooHoo!!
03:36 PM on 05/11/2011
www.in.gov/nrc/2377.htm

I just read the language about how many coyotes and foxes can be in the 300 acre pens and how many dogs... made me sick. They can release 7 month old foxes into the pens.

And they say that the dogs don't kill them. The pens are for "keeping the dogs in shape".

You can leave comments at that site.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sandy10percent
03:22 PM on 05/10/2011
Did they do anything about unemployment, and bringing jobs to Indiana.
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
12:51 PM on 05/10/2011
"The legal precedent is already there, but I don't think that penetrates the reasoning of right wing legislators who have an agenda and a vendetta," he said. "They just plunge forward."

You know, if it weren't for all the penetrating and plunging done by people who can't handle kids, we wouldn't even need Planned Parenthood at all.
12:53 PM on 05/10/2011
You do know that they have a wider range of services than birth control and abortions, right?
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
01:06 PM on 05/10/2011
Name one service that is in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution.
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
07:51 PM on 05/10/2011
What else do you want to call ending a human life?

Aside from this, this is about breaking the Constitution. You are the one that steers us back towards your affinity for killing babies. You're right, you can't have a reasonable discussion with someone who promotes killing babies. But that's the point, right? You can't have a reasonable discussion about the Constitution, so you run the truck off the cliff and blame everyone else.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Suzanne525
FourMore, WooHoo!!
02:27 PM on 05/10/2011
The planning process to become parents should be praised and supported. People who planned and are ready to become parents are much more likely to be better parents than those who feel unready, overwhelmed and trapped.

Why do you hate good parenting?
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
04:50 PM on 05/10/2011
I love good parenting. And, gee, I didn't need, EVER a government agency to tell me how to be a good father or take care of my kids. I even paid for the birth in cash. $5K, instead of over $25K.

If you need the government to plan a pregnancy, you probably shouldn't be parents at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EJavaM07
Doing what no one else will.
12:49 PM on 05/10/2011
This is just one more distraction from the GOPher's failure to create the new jobs they promised.

Where are all the new jobs you promised, John Bohner?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George Melby
A renegade minister you don't want to mess with!
02:39 PM on 05/10/2011
As I've said before elsewhere, Democrats AND Republicans are about as useful in creating jobs as are screen doors in submaines... not a good idea!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EJavaM07
Doing what no one else will.
10:29 AM on 05/11/2011
So true, but Dems have one thing that is very useful in getting new jobs created that Pubs will never have: the threat of new taxes if they don't.

Were Dems to threaten the business community w/ new taxes should they not begin to use their record cash horde to create them, we would have more jobs than we know what to do with.

And by the way, there would be no new taxes from the threat: the business community would always prefer to hire new workers than pay new taxes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjtaylor22
12:49 PM on 05/10/2011
good ole republicans...only speak about honoring the constitution..but dont care whats in it...........
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:30 PM on 05/10/2011
They are happy to trample the constitution if it denies citizenship to brown-skinned babies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tenilla
02:48 PM on 05/10/2011
Maybe they were all home-schooled. They have heard of something called the "Constitution" -- but apparently they have no knowledge of the Amendments to the Constitution or the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting the Constitution.
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
03:33 PM on 05/11/2011
Where's the part about paying for birth control? I missed that.

James Madison got worked up at the idea that the Feds should get involved in public schools or police work.
12:41 PM on 05/10/2011
Barring health care for needy women. Dear God, if that doesn't tell you what kind of immoral human being he is, I don't know what will.
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
03:36 PM on 05/11/2011
No one barred anything.
03:41 AM on 05/12/2011
Tim, you are correct. No one barred anything. They're just saying we arent paying for it anymore, take responsibility. If you have a right to do whatever you want with your body, then pay for it yourself...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thinkable
12:29 PM on 05/10/2011
Ahhh hard line republican legislation. Never fully thought through. Always driven entirely by ideology and a product of inflexible thought. Lets consider what you are saying here republicans 1) underpriveledged women do not deserve basic primary health care, including reproductive health care (i.e., OB-GYN care, birth control, cancer screenings, etc.), 2) Birth control services should not be permitted for underpriveledged women, even though there is an obvious problem with this given that it increases the likelihood of unwanted pregnancies which leads to....3) abortions are impermissible. Soooo... in sum, if you are an underpriveledged woman you can't access birth control so you are more likely to get pregant, but don't try to get an abortion as this is not permissible, we would like you to have the baby...HOWEVER, assistance should not be provided for you to support this baby you were apparenty mandated to have on multiple levels. So well thought out, thanks republicans
03:47 AM on 05/12/2011
You play, you pay. Take responsibility for your actions. No one is taking away basic primary health care and birth control is not health care. There are many folks who support cancer research and raise money to support it. Let those who support birth control and abortion do the same and not demand those that do not support it be REQUIRED to pay for it.