More

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran President, Faces Tough Final Years

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

BRIAN MURPHY   05/10/11 04:33 PM ET   AP

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Weeks of political storms in Iran came down to this moment. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad could choose to deepen his dispute with the country's top ruler. Or here was a chance to make amends and lift Iran out of an ugly power struggle.

He ended up doing a bit of both.

At a Cabinet meeting Sunday, Ahmadinejad lavishly praised Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. But he added some jabs at those who sided with Khamenei in the showdown – which began over Iran's spy chief but quickly expanded into a test of wills between the political machine of the presidency and the towering authority of the theocracy.

Ahmadinejad's half-step contrition could say much about the tone of his final two years in office: humbled and diminished to some degree, but showing no intention of drifting quietly into a lame duck exit.

The main message, experts say, is that Ahmadinejad has lost his favored-son status among the ruling clerics, and now Khamenei and the hard-line theocrats are reasserting their grip with parliament elections next year and the vote for Ahmadinejad's successor in mid-2013. This all means Ahmadinejad may be increasingly sidelined in shaping important policies – including the nuclear standoff with the West – and grooming a political heir.

Instead, the ruling system will likely try to keep Ahmadinejad and his allies boxed in politically and offer little change in Iran's defiant approach to the West and its Gulf neighbors. At home, meanwhile, the clerics may apply even more pressure on Iran's fractured opposition to keep it in line as the rest of the region is awash in pro-reform struggles, analysts say.

"What we're seeing is the ruling system showing its strength and Ahmadinejad displaying his weaknesses," said Mehrzad Boroujerdi, who follows Iranian affairs at Syracuse University. "That's not to say he won't still score some victories. But his time is already fading."

It was inevitable that attention would shift to the race to succeed Ahmadinejad as he has maxed out his time with two consecutive terms. Ahmadinejad, however, dramatically sped up the look-ahead process with a political gambit that backfired.

It started last month when he apparently forced the resignation of the influential Intelligence Minister Haidar Moslehi.

Some Iranian media speculated it was part of Ahmadinejad's efforts to boost a possible presidential run by his close friend and chief aide, Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei. Control of the Interior Ministry is considered an important tool in Iranian politics because its sensitive files have the potential to discredit rivals.

But Supreme Leader Khamenei tossed it all back, reinstating Moslehi and prompting a 10-day disappearing act by Ahmadinejad, who stayed away from Cabinet meetings and other duties.

The no-shows were interpreted as his most audacious challenge to Khamenei, the pinnacle of the Islamic leadership. Clerics, lawmakers and others warned Ahmadinejad to back down and return to work – which he did last week, but at a clear price.

Now, the once ultra-confident Ahmadinejad appears off balance.

The ruling clerics – which vet all candidates for high office – have effectively killed any chance of Mashaei running for president as Ahmadinejad's protege.

Meanwhile, critics in Iran's parliament sense Ahmadinejad is more vulnerable and have started another petition that could – in the most extreme scenario – lead to impeachment proceedings. The chants at Friday prayers, too, have included obvious slaps at Ahmadinejad.

"Death to opponents of the supreme leader," the crowd roared at Tehran University last week.

Even Ahmadinejad's longtime supporters, the hugely powerful Revolutionary Guard, signaled that he went too far.

Ahmadinejad got the message: stop messing with the very foundations of the Islamic system. He pulled back before he dug himself any deeper.

"There is no doubt that Ahmadinejad's power has been undermined," said Abolghasem Bayyenat, a political analyst on Iranian affairs.

But Bayyenat and others caution that all sides in Iran's leadership are highly unlikely to escalate the disputes.

The supreme leader is likely worried about any hints of disarray in Iran at a time of major upheavals in the Middle East. Ahmadinejad knows he cannot win an open feud with the guardians of the Islamic Revolution and must be content with smaller steps on his main objectives: trying to further expand the independence and powers of the presidency and secure his legacy by having an ally elected in 2013.

"Khamenei is extremely sensitive to giving any public impression of serious divisions among the top political leaders of the country and would thus like to keep a tap on the political situation," said Bayyenat, who runs the website irandiplomacywatch.com. "While showing his respect for Khamenei, Ahmadinejad is also unlikely to buckle down under political pressure to dismiss ... Mashaei."

Mashaei is a hot button on both sides. He is despised by hard-liners for his views that elevate the values of pre-Islamic Persia and statements suggesting Iran can oppose Israel's government but can be friendly with the Israeli people. Ahmadinejad, on the other hand, is fully vested in Mashaei as a member of his inner circle. Mashaei's daughter is also married to Ahmadinejad's son.

Suzanne Maloney, an Iranian affairs expert at the Brookings Institution in Washington, said there was no doubt about the outcome of the political stare-down in Iran.

"It didn't tell us anything we didn't know – that Khamenei is the top authority," she said.

But the context is crucial. It's now about the jockeying for who will succeed Ahmadinejad.

Opposition groups claim that the Revolutionary Guard pulled the strings during the 2009 re-election of Ahmadinejad, which protesters allege was rigged. The Guard also led the fierce crackdown on demonstrators after the vote and have gradually expanded their power under Ahmadinejad.

The Guard, however, has now made it clear that it will not back Ahmadinejad's ally Mashaei and may further distance themselves from Ahmadinejad as damaged goods during his last two years in office.

"The Revolutionary Guard is interested in the defense of the system rather than the defense of an individual," said Maloney. "It would never sacrifice itself or its influence to stand by anyone seen as challenging the system. Ahmadinejad has cast himself in that role."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Weeks of political storms in Iran came down to this moment. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad could choose to deepen his dispute with the country's top ruler. Or here was a chanc...
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Weeks of political storms in Iran came down to this moment. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad could choose to deepen his dispute with the country's top ruler. Or here was a chanc...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 308
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nmaddog7
05:33 PM on 05/31/2011
Bond villains form new Iranian gov, winning in a landslide election,design new laser beam trap with loose leg straps that will cut a bit to close to Bond's future progeny - FoxNews.com http://bit.ly/mKZR3j
02:16 AM on 05/12/2011
Security forces prosecuted:

http://www.payvand.com/news/11/may/1094.html
01:35 AM on 05/12/2011
This whole thing shows that all the interpretations made during the 2009 until now were completely wrong. Ahmadinejad was never Khamanei's favorite son, as some of us have repeated said. It is also clear by now that the Guard's favorite son was not Ahmadinejad, they probably never had a horse in the race. The only former IRGC commander who ran for the presidency, Gen. Rezaei, was not supported by the Guards and lost the election. He too filed a complaint with the interior ministry about the elections (something Mr. Mousavi never did until ordered by the Supreme Leader 5 days after the deadline had passed).
One must wonder if all these interpretations, and speculations were wrong, what else was wrongly interpreted and broadcasted about the 2009 election.
7 individuals with the security services received life imprisonment, 2 received death sentences-but none reported in the Western media.
Just last week, 50 security and paramilitary officials were given long prison sentences for attacking students at the Universities in 2009-again no attention in the Western media.

No wonder we went on a 10 year binge killing in the muslim world only to find out that most muslims did not care about Osama's death, and most are on the streets asking for Democracy against the despotic regimes we support. How much more are we going to misinterpret and act on that perception?
photo
karim banned
A fool's mind is at the mercy of his tongue and a
09:25 AM on 05/12/2011
US has a chain on its neck called "Israel".

As long as US follows blindly the inconsequential and illogical directions received from Tel Aviv, we cannot expect rational decisions form US in line with it own interest.
11:12 AM on 05/15/2011
The fact is that the US media is focused on just those that do bad to the US, but do not see how many Muslims are being oppressed by their own people.
05:09 PM on 05/11/2011
This guy needs to step down NOW
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vinny123
04:18 PM on 05/11/2011
Ahmadinejad is merely representative of the out-of touch, provocative, primitive so-called leaders in the ME, which also include Assad from Syria, Ghaddafi in Libya and many others, who are maintaining their respective countries in the dark ages of the twelth to thirteenth centuries! Whether he stays or goes is of no consequence because any of the alternatives will not change the status quo of these primitive functioning governments.
03:21 PM on 05/11/2011
Greeting from Iran and sunny Shiraz: A place for best grapes that makes excellent medium body wines. We are waiting for 2013 when the presidential election will take place. It would be exciting to see what happens then and who are the candidates. Ahmadinejad has done one good thing on his part and that is to open up debates about role of presidency and constitutional limits on powers within the system. Now that it has been challenged by this "horrible" president, we can move forward and expect a more open government debates about policies and problems. Specially in the coming years Iran will reevaluate its foreign policies as changes in the Middle East must be taken in to accounts. Many people here in Iran hope that Iran will have a chance to elect a moderate president, and hopefully US will have one too, so we can at least talk. Hopefully.
Bear Left
so the hunters went home
05:23 PM on 05/11/2011
Greetings, Daryush, from the great American Southwest, a place for great wildfires. I have had your Shiraz wine, which, though illegal, was wonderful. I agree that moderation and civil discourse are the best path to reform in Iran. As in most dictatorships, threats and frontal assaults only cause those in power to dig in more firmly. As in most dictatorships, however, I fear that talk of "constitutional limits" is an illusion. There are no limits in a government of men, rather than a government of laws. The brilliant Iranian people deserve "open government debates," but as long as the country is ruled by a "supreme leader," these can never remain open to the point of questioning such leader's authority. I wish you the best.
12:21 AM on 05/12/2011
Iran is more of a "collective leadership that is committed to maintaining an Islamic facade" than a dictatorship, and they want to look like a model in which Islam and democracy can live together. They will have to reform under pressure, and they are under a lot of pressure. Iranian people are sophisticated, open-minded, and outspoken. Debate will go on. However, as long as Iran is under threats, regime can play the nationalistic card to justify its grip. The best thing that could happen to Iranian people is dialogue between US and Iran, and move towards normalization of relations. Not only this would give give US economic and political leverage with Iran, but also would open up the debate. Also, Guardian council doesn't select candidates, parties put candidates forward. Guardian council is in charge of approvals, and they don't get Carte blanche either. If Khatami or Rafsanjani for example decide to run, they can't just disapprove them. In fact, they can't disapprove anyone who is popular enough to win without a huge backlash.
01:44 AM on 05/12/2011
Bear Left

You points are well made. These changes must take place from within by Iranians themselves.

I am affraid that it won't happen. This year the region is in turmoil. While we seem to think it is going in the right direction, one must wonder why only the independent autocratic governments (Libya, Syria, Iran) in the ME appear to be going into violent confrontations (Libya and Syria). This is the year that US forces are to come out of Iraq, in one way or another. I hear of no preparation by our forces to leave the country in a few months. I wonder that is a sticking point that may change the map of the region entirely.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fein
And this too shall pass.
03:15 PM on 05/11/2011
I wonder if the crash course that the world's just gotten on the results of a breached nuclear reactor vessel will dampen the enthusiasm of the 'bomb bomb Iran' crowd.

Blowing up a reactor core would create a cloud of 'fallout' that could contaminate a large part of the globe.

Such an irresponsible action would probably comprise the largest act of state terrorism to date.
photo
dayzee10
Get busy living or get busy dying! Damn right
11:29 AM on 05/11/2011
Time for Ringo to retire to his yellow submarine!!!
11:03 AM on 05/11/2011
It really says something when a lunatic like Ahmadinejad is not radical enough for his bosses. I'd like to gloat over his problems, but there is nothing good in this for the USA.
photo
CabCurious
green green green
09:43 AM on 05/11/2011
I'm amazed they didn't boot him out the door.
01:49 AM on 05/12/2011
can you name a single leader we don't agree with, and the media (with the White House) did not make him out to be crazy?
09:14 AM on 05/11/2011
these guys seriously need to get over honor v/s humiliation ruling their every action & reation .... there is more to life while we wait for the comet (or insert favorite disaster) that will humble us all
09:09 AM on 05/11/2011
Politics. Influence. Power. Mmmmm, sounds a like any other country. He will fade and something new will emerge. This aritcle sounds like the little dictators pal was not in the Islamic tank. More moderate? Who knows.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nkurland
I'm going to leave this planet alive
09:09 AM on 05/11/2011
The president of Iran has no real authority. As soon as he defies the clerics and say, dismisses a minister, they simply cut him out of any role in policymaking. People familiar with the Iranian system have been saying this for years. But the prowar crowd would prefer to beat the drums and hype up largely meaningless statements.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xthomasx
The truth is out there....
08:53 AM on 05/11/2011
His cheap suits are becoming harder and harder to fit every day.
photo
berkleedude
If you don't know what it is, it's Jazz.
08:54 AM on 05/11/2011
I think he buys them in France.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xthomasx
The truth is out there....
03:30 PM on 05/11/2011
They have a Wal-Mart in France?
08:26 AM on 05/11/2011
Suggested viewing: Charlie Chaplin's Little Dictator. Although a spoof on Hitler, it rings true for that iranian madman also.