More

Nikki Haley, Rand Paul: NLRB's Boeing Complaint An 'Attack,' 'Assault' On Businesses

Nikkihaley

First Posted: 05/10/11 03:56 PM ET Updated: 07/10/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Gov. Nikki Haley (R-S.C.) joined a coalition of business interests and Republican lawmakers Tuesday in bashing the National Labor Relations Board for filing a controversial complaint against the Boeing Company last month. At a press conference in the U.S. Chamber of Commerce offices, Haley called the complaint "an unbelievable attack on not just right-to-work states but every state that’s attempting to put their people to work."

In the complaint that attracted Republicans' ire, the labor board's acting general counsel said Boeing broke the law in 2009, when it made plans to create a new production line for its 787 Dreamliner. The aerospace company chose to locate its line in South Carolina, rather than in Washington state, where it had an existing workforce of unionized employees. The NLRB's acting general counsel said Boeing's move was retaliation against its Washington employees with the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, who had gone on strike in the past.

Unions have hailed the filing as a victory for workers, while business groups have called it a case of federal meddling in corporate decision-making. The complaint has thrown the future of the South Carolina factory into limbo.

Although the NLRB has downplayed the significance of the complaint, Republican senators have nonetheless decried it as an attack on free enterprise and right-to-work states like South Carolina. Right-to-work laws prohibit agreements between unions and companies that make union membership a requirement of employment. Generally favored by Republicans and corporate interests, such laws are currently on the books in 22 states, particularly ones in the South.

Dan Yager, general counsel of the HR Policy Association, argued at the press conference that Boeing is being "penalized" for negotiating with the machinists union. Even though he expects Boeing to win the case, Yager claimed the filing will have a chilling effect on companies trying to move into right-to-work states.

"If you're an employer who wants to stay out of court… sort of what the general counsel says is the law," he said.

With litigation that could last well over a year, the Boeing complaint is quickly becoming a significant campaign issue leading up to the 2012 elections: Republicans are looking to paint Barack Obama administration as anti-business and in the pocket of labor unions.

That was certainly the theme of the Chamber event, where a host of Republican lawmakers took to the podium to knock not only the NLRB, but the White House as well. Last week, several Republicans vowed to block President Obama's nominees to the labor board.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who had tough words for the labor board last week, escalated his rhetoric Tuesday morning. He called the complaint "chilling" and "absurd."

"This is legal slander," Graham added. "There has never been a case like this. ... This is politics run amok."

Last week Graham and Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) said they planned on introducing a bill written expressly to nullify the April 20 Boeing complaint. On Tuesday, the lawmakers said the bill is still being tweaked, but will probably be introduced this week.

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) leveled his criticism directly at NLRB acting general counsel Lafe Solomon, who filed the complaint.

"It is absurd in this country that represents free enterprise that one unaccountable, unelected, unconfirmed acting general counsel can threaten thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in investments. This is something you'd expect in a third world country," he said. "It is thuggery at its best."

"The pandering to unions has gotten so far out of proportion, it's difficult to accept," DeMint added, in reference to the White House.

In a statement yesterday, Solomon defended the move.

"There is nothing remarkable or unprecedented about the complaint issued against the Boeing Company," he wrote. "It was issued only after a thorough investigation in the field."

In a recent interview with the New York Times, Solomon said he filed the complaint against Boeing because of strong evidence it had tried to move the production line out of retaliation. In company documents and news interviews, Boeing executives had explicitly cited the strikes as a reason for expanding into South Carolina.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) wondered aloud whether the Boeing complaint indicated the White House had an "enemies list."

"Mr. President… is this decision based on the fact that South Carolina appears to be Republican state?" Paul asked. "That South Carolina is a right-to-work state? I find this appalling, and I respectfully ask the president to rescind this assault on businesses."

Asked whether she agreed with Paul, if she believed the White House may have an enemies list, Gov. Haley said, "Right now no one knows what the White House is doing."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Gov. Nikki Haley (R-S.C.) joined a coalition of business interests and Republican lawmakers Tuesday in bashing the National Labor Relations Board for filing a controversial complaint aga...
WASHINGTON -- Gov. Nikki Haley (R-S.C.) joined a coalition of business interests and Republican lawmakers Tuesday in bashing the National Labor Relations Board for filing a controversial complaint aga...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,080
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (60 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Hillbilly49 08:48 PM on 05/10/2011
The modern day neo-conservative says one thing and does another.  In addition, he appears not to know his nations history or have any reasonable plan for its' future.  Neo-conservatives don’t appear to truly be conservative but simply corporate shills; who care nothing about Americans who need to work for a living.  

The Republican Party, which the neo-conservatives align  Read More...



The democrats do not have all of the answers but right wing republicans couldn’t manage a lemonade stand without screwing up.  The simple fact is right wing republican policies have always hurt working Americans; republicans only exists to serve international corporations.


Only a fool would try to deprive working men and working women of their right to join the union of their choice.

-- Dwight D. Eisenhower



Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work, and then they get elected to prove it.

     - P.J. O'Rourke
06:50 PM on 06/21/2011
Solomon opened up a real can of worms here. The reason? Equal Protection Clause in the Constitution as ammended. Remember Citizen's United? One of the more esoteric points you may have missed, (really, it is *not* esoteric -- but a lot of people have missed this) is that Corporations are like people in many ways and due the same treatment. (to extent of Free Speech, at least) IAM filed this complaint much later than Boeing moving the plant to SC. 500 or so workers were already there, setting the place up. They were IAM Union Members. Card Carrying, Dues Paying, True Blue Union Employees. They did something that they could *never* have done in Washington State. They decertified the IAM, saying that the Union did *not* represent their interests. At that point, IAM went to Solomon at the NLRB. He filed the suit, and *frankly* the actions of the Union look more like retaliation than the actions of Boeing do. Thus, equal protection puts the IAM at risk.

Extend the Concept to the IAM. If it is wrong for the Company to retaliate, it is wrong for the Union to do so, either. If (likely *when*) this goes to the SCOTUS, IAM has their butt hanging out naked in the breeze to be spanked *hard* and, in my opinion, they DESERVE it! Actually, those 500 or so employees could have grounds, even now, to file a Civil Rights Violation Lawsuit against IAM and the NLRB! I hope they do!
10:22 PM on 06/06/2011
Boeing Paid No Corporate Taxes For Three Years, Still Wants A Tax Cut

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/06/02/234490/boeing-wants-tax-cut/
06:12 PM on 06/21/2011
Soo...

Let me get this right...

Having UNION jobs is equivalent to paying taxes? I hope the IRS knows 'bout this, 'cause they are going to get screwed royally if Unions ever make a comeback!
04:15 PM on 05/18/2011
I work for boeing in the midwest . The unions are lazy very lazy people / all of them . UNIONS are what is driving work overseas. there greed and lack of any skills . the seattle unions are worse then any other unions. and someone said about the lack of certain skills in southcarolina . hahahahaha. i have never been to south carolina , but im sure any 8th grader there could keep up with the unions work. or in plain english . the unions are stupid and lazy and if they wewnt any slower they would be going backwards
03:16 PM on 05/13/2011
We don't have to go to foreign countries to fight communists, they are right here in America, and worse they own the key to the white house. If we look at history as an example of how things turn out, then we can be sure this country his heading to another civil war, and like the last there will be a "list' of grievences from both sides.
11:54 AM on 05/12/2011
Boeing CEO in WSJ:

Contrary to the NLRB's claim, our decision to expand in South Carolina resulted from an objective analysis of the same factors we use in every site selection. We considered locations in several states but narrowed the choice to either North Charleston (where sections of the 787 are built already) or Everett, Wash., which won the initial 787 assembly line in 2003.

Our union contracts expressly permit us to locate new work at our discretion. However, we viewed Everett as an attractive option and engaged voluntarily in talks with union officials to see if we could make the business case work. Among the considerations we sought were a long-term "no-strike clause" that would ensure production stability for our customers, and a wage and benefit growth trajectory that would help in our cost battle against Airbus and other state-sponsored competitors.

Despite months of effort, no agreement was reached. Union leaders couldn't meet expectations on our key issues, and we couldn't accept their demands that we remain neutral in all union-organizing campaigns and essentially guarantee to build every future Boeing airplane in the Puget Sound area. In October 2009, we made the Charleston selection.
11:54 AM on 05/12/2011
Con't:

Important to our case is the basic fact that no existing work is being transferred to South Carolina, and not a single union member in Washington has been adversely affected by this decision. In fact, we've since added more than 2,000 union jobs there, and the hiring continues. The 787 production line in Everett has a planned capacity of seven airplanes per month. The line in Charleston will build three additional airplanes to reach our 10-per-month capacity plan. Production of the new U.S. Air Force aerial refueling tanker will sustain and grow union jobs in Everett, too.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703730804576315141682547796.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nypapajoe
11:06 PM on 05/11/2011
Rabid Dogs of the conservative Corporate empire that has consumed our nations politics and has purchased these lobbyist to defend them!
04:00 PM on 05/13/2011
Unions don't lobby?

$1billion in campaign contributions from Obama's campaign to date puts Unions in the same mode as corporations.
08:04 PM on 05/11/2011
It's about open markets and free competition. Unions keep up the greed and they'll all go the way of Detroit.

When a high school drop out factory worker is earning more then a RN or Teacher, Houston you got a problem.
08:35 PM on 05/11/2011
Spot on.
09:22 PM on 05/11/2011
BTW, I'm pretty liberal, voted for Obama and will again. But I'm an independent liberal not a lock step one, I pick and choice the issues I support, I can afford to, I'm a voter, not a politician.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
obamavet
Green and Left
03:29 PM on 05/12/2011
Seems to me the Republicans have done their best to eliminate collective barganing for teachers and nurses.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeeSC
07:39 PM on 05/16/2011
Faved for common sense.  I guess that makes 2 of us... Democrats who do not follow like sheeple every word from the party's mouth. 
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danglines
06:14 PM on 05/11/2011
They should be attacking these lying republicans!
08:35 PM on 05/11/2011
Who and specifically HOW should they be attacking those republicans?
05:55 PM on 06/21/2011
By using even *better* lies, you silly!

LOL!!!

"Among the considerat­ions we sought were a long-term "no-strike clause" that would ensure production stability for our customers, and a wage and benefit growth trajectory that would help in our cost battle against Airbus and other state-spon­sored competitor­s." Those are the words that according to IAM are the "smoking gun" needed to prove "retaliation" which is key.

The current lie from the left is that *this* is grounds. Look no farther than the SCOTUS rulings on the matter. Hint: Look up "production stability" being mentioned in their rulings. The left certainly does not like it, but this is almost an open and shut case (against the NLRB) if they can't come up with any language or actions that prove there was retaliation.

'The case hinges on proving Boeing’s intent. It is illegal to retaliate against workers for striking — there have been four strikes at the Washington facility since 1989 — or threaten workers in order to discourage strikes. But the company can decide to locate production in South Carolina because it makes business sense and may include “production stability†as a factor in its decision.'

That is a quote from the NYT in an April 25, 2011 Editorial. They are speaking exactly true.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mburgh
Come Back Samuel Gompers
05:46 PM on 05/11/2011
Knucklehead logic: Government stay out of corporation decisions except when gigantic oil supports are at stake or royalties from public land go unpaid for decades. But support working people? Get rid of insidious right to work laws whose sole benefit is corporate wealth (generally transported out of the state). Fight the power! Indict Nikki Haley for something.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hsspringman
We can cure fundamentalist.
03:40 PM on 05/11/2011
I do not think that I will be flying in a Boeing 787, have you ever been to S.C.? The education levels are pathetic which would lead me to believe that 787s would not be very safe at all as the production workers would barely understand basic English.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeeSC
05:33 PM on 05/11/2011
The most incredibly stu.pid comparison ever.  And if you don't think you'll be flying a Boeing, you obviously won't do much flying period. 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mburgh
Come Back Samuel Gompers
05:47 PM on 05/11/2011
What hsspringman says is true. Corporations come to SC to build factories often have to run basic training programs to get workers up to literacy. I know this for true, since I have done work within SC factories.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spriddler
05:42 PM on 05/11/2011
"The education levels are pathetic which would lead me to believe that 787s would not be very safe at all as the production workers would barely understand basic English."

Do you realize how bigoted and absent of fact that statement is?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeeSC
05:59 PM on 05/11/2011
I'm quite sure he does.  Sad, isn't it. 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hsspringman
We can cure fundamentalist.
09:53 PM on 05/11/2011
Actually it is not. Too many people in that area are very superstitious, Too many in the south which includes S.C. are poorly educated. I find neither one to be day in and day out competent for such detailed work as assembling an air craft.
01:26 PM on 05/11/2011
And the left wonders why jobs go off shore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mburgh
Come Back Samuel Gompers
05:49 PM on 05/11/2011
Because Reagan and his pirate crew let them.
02:19 PM on 05/23/2011
WOW, that is living in the past. Lets think more recently, like Obama's GE friends.
01:08 PM on 05/11/2011
So...the average SC resident makes $39,000 yearly. The average SC Boeing employee makes $56,000 yearly. So all of this "third world" talk is, in fact, garbage.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:QYCib40gdWMJ:www.payscale.com/research/US/Employer%3DBoeing_Company,_The/Salary/by_State+boeing+pay+scale+in+south+carolina&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com
http://www.sciway.net/facts/
01:20 PM on 05/11/2011
Spot on.
02:25 PM on 05/11/2011
It's the only "argument" that these left-wing hypocrites have left. It is slowly dawning on them that their party is less "pro-worker" and more "pro-union" - which explains why the Democrats are trying to punish workers in South Carolina in order to benefit union bosses in Washington with increased dues.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeeSC
05:34 PM on 05/11/2011
Good grief.  I wish people would stop with the political party bashing.  I'm a liberal Democrat and I support Boeing and oppose the complaint.  It's not a left-wing "anything". 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lee Andrew
173rd ARMY RECON (DAV)
01:08 PM on 05/11/2011
Ninety-five percent of Republicans ought be on that enemies list. Thank goodness after twenty-five years I saw the light and walked into the light.

Memo to DEMS: The enemy is home grown you know who they are and I hope and pray that you have the fortitude to do battle against them.
02:33 PM on 05/23/2011
WOW, in the spirit of Obama, let’s get along, all of this enemy talk is so divisive. Seems a good healthy debate, as Obama asks for, is better than just declaring someone with a different label (like Republican or Conservative ) an enemy. Let’s debate not hate!

An enemies list by Obama is just as wrong as an ememies list by Nixon was. Are we willing to say Nixon was right to have one, just so it would be right for Obama ... I say no.
01:02 PM on 05/11/2011
Just look at the locations of these right to work (for lowere wages) states. These laws flourish in the states with the worst education systems and are famous for their ignorance. Arizona anyone? The only job Nikki (the quickie) Haley should be worried about is the bl**-job she gave when she was cheating on her husband.
01:27 PM on 05/11/2011
NJ is very enlightened right? Texas is where the jobs are.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spriddler
02:22 PM on 05/11/2011
What an absurdly bigoted comment.
12:59 PM on 05/11/2011
So...let me get this right...

Boeing wants to build an ADDDITIONAL assembly line for their 787s in SC. No one in WA is losing their job. So how is this not any example of union bullying?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nevernot
I like paying taxes, they buy me civilization.
02:17 PM on 05/11/2011
Because they do not want to continue operations in WA. If there's nothing to build there's no reason to keep the WA employees working.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spriddler
02:26 PM on 05/11/2011
I think you are misinformed. They have hired an additional 2,000 people for the WA line since they made this decision in 2009. They will be building 7/10 787's/month in WA. The other 3 will be built in SC. WA is also getting additonal work for the tanker contract Boeing won from the military.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeeSC
05:40 PM on 05/11/2011
Sorry.  Washington has not lost one single job and the idea that they want to discontinue operations is ludicrous at best.