iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Newt Gingrich Was More Supportive Of Individual Mandates Than Mitt Romney

Gingrich

First Posted: 05/12/2011 11:16 am Updated: 07/12/2011 5:12 am

WASHINGTON -- Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) is set to defend his state's health care law from conservative critics in a high-profile speech on Thursday. But Romney is far from being the potential 2012 Republican presidential contender with the most politically problematic record on health care.

That title likely belongs to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), who announced his White House aspirations a day prior to Romney's address.

In his post-congressional life, Gingrich has been a vocal champion for mandated insurance coverage -- the very provision of President Obama's health care legislation that the Republican Party now decries as fundamentally unconstitutional.

This mandate was hardly some little-discussed aspect of Gingrich's plan for health care reform. In the mid-2000s, he partnered with then-Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) to promote a centrist solution to fixing the nation's health care system. A July 22, 2005, Hotline article on one of the duo's events described the former speaker as endorsing not just state-based mandates (the linchpin of Romney's Massachusetts law) but "some federal mandates" as well. A New York Sun writeup of what appears to be the same event noted that "both politicians appeared to endorse proposals to require all individuals to have some form of health coverage."

Neera Tanden, an aide to Clinton at the time who went on to help craft President Obama's law, said she couldn't recall exact speeches, but "strongly" believed that the both Clinton and Gingrich backed the individual mandate. Either way, she added, "Gingrich has been known as a supporter" of the idea for some time.

A simple newspaper archive search bears this out. At an Alegent Health event in Omaha in 2008, Gingrich said it was "fundamentally immoral" for a person to go without coverage, show up at an emergency room and demand free care.

During the keynote address to the Greater Detroit Area Health Council's annual Health Trends Conference in April 2006, Gingrich said he would require Americans earning above a certain income level to buy health insurance or post a bond, the Detroit Free Press reported.

In a June 2007 op-ed in the Des Moines Register, Gingrich wrote, "Personal responsibility extends to the purchase of health insurance. Citizens should not be able to cheat their neighbors by not buying insurance, particularly when they can afford it, and expect others to pay for their care when they need it." An "individual mandate," he added, should be applied "when the larger health-care system has been fundamentally changed."

And in several of his many policy and politics-focused books, Gingrich offered much the same.

In 2008's "Real Change," he wrote, "Finally, we should insist that everyone above a certain level buy coverage (or, if they are opposed to insurance, post a bond). Meanwhile, we should provide tax credits or subsidize private insurance for the poor."

In 2005's "Winning the Future," he expanded on the idea in more detail: "You have the right to be part of the lowest-cost insurance pool and you have a responsibility to buy insurance. ... We need some significant changes to ensure that every American is insured, but we should make it clear that a 21st Century Intelligent System requires everyone to participate in the insurance system."

"People whose income is too low should receive Medicaid vouchers and tax credits to buy insurance," he continued. "Large risk pools (association health plans are one model) should be established so low-income people can buy insurance as inexpensively as large corporations. Furthermore, it should be possible to buy your health insurance on-line to lower the cost as much as possible."

It wasn't just insurance coverage mandates that Gingirch supported. According to a July, 21 2005 Gannett News Service article, the Georgia Republican also said that he would have Congress mandate physical education five days a week for all elementary and high school pupils as a way of combating obesity and diabetes. Such a vision of health care reform seems drawn from the same philosophical threads as the plan that President Obama signed last spring -- as well as from the first lady's campaign to improve children's health.

But Gingrich has joined his Republican colleagues in harshly criticizing the work of the current president, calling the Affordable Care Act "madness" and "indefensible," pressing for it be repealed and defunded and praising the efforts of several state attorneys general who are challenging the constitutionality of the individual mandate.

Spokesmen for Gingrich did not return an email request for comment on his support for federally-applied, individual mandates.

Ed Haislmaier, a health care policy expert at the Heritage Foundation (the conservative think tank that first championed the mandate), said he did not have enough information to comment on Gingrich's past approach to health care reform. Haislmaier did, however, note that there is a distinction between taxing individuals for not buying insurance and requiring them to post a bond, as Gingrich proposed. While the former is a penalty for not getting coverage, "what [the latter] is saying is you have to pay your bills if you get care," he said.

A bond, as Haislmaier noted, is exactly what Romney initially proposed while he was governor of Massachusetts. Romney ended up signing off on a more traditional mandate only after it was passed by the state legislature.

For that signature, Romney now faces a major trust deficit among conservatives. In advance of his Thursday speech, the Wall Street Journal ran an editorial calling him Obama's "running mate," a candidate who was at once "compromised and not credible."

The speech is, if nothing else, a testament to how far the conversation over health care has moved in such a short period of time. When Romney signed his bill into law, the Associated Press published a story titled " Mass. Health Care Plan Riles Some Liberals." In it, John Sweeney, the then-president of the AFL-CIO -- the labor federation which has become a defender of the individual mandate -- decried the idea that "workers were being forced to purchase health care coverage or face higher taxes."

Romney, Sweeney added, was taking "a page out of the Newt Gingrich playbook."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) is set to defend his state's health care law from conservative critics in a high-profile speech on Thursday. But Romney is far from being the po...
WASHINGTON -- Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) is set to defend his state's health care law from conservative critics in a high-profile speech on Thursday. But Romney is far from being the po...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,609
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (124 total)
03:25 PM on 05/17/2011
He would never get my vote or the vote of homosexuals.What is it with these Republicans? They're the worst lairs and cheaters.
10:39 PM on 05/15/2011
Ron Paul 2010 or we all loose
01:57 PM on 05/15/2011
Hey girls, it's been at least 10 minutes since I posted to this site and you still can't get up the nerve to let it through? C'mon wimps, you can take a punch every now and again. It doesn't hurt that much and it is the democratic way (small "d"). We all know it's not the Democrat way because DEMOCRATS prove every day they are afraid of the free and open exchange of opinion and information. You girls are a sad case.
01:30 PM on 05/15/2011
Newt would make the perfect Democrat running mate for Obama in his re-election bid. Newt is a fat philanderer like the revered Ted Kennedy, is a proponent of the individual mandate like tyrant-in-chief Obama, and is a former collaborator of perhaps the biggest Democrat wretch, Hillary (I can't say for sure that she is the absolute biggest since the Democrat Party has such a wide offering in the likes of Pelosi, Boxer, Napolitano, Wasserman-Schultz, etc.). Keep up the Gingrich attacks, boys and girls. Sounds like you big-government tax-and-spend socialists have concluded that Gingrich will put your no-nothing teleprompter-reading master in his place in any serious debate. Can't wait!!!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosieee
10:32 AM on 05/15/2011
Who want to spend four years looking and listening to that piece of fat blubber? Is the exwife still alive that was in the hospital with cancer when he ask for a divorce to marry the secretary he was having an affair with? Do we ever have time without elections?
09:20 PM on 05/16/2011
A man definitely shows tendency toward pieceofshitness doing that kind of thing. I dunno -- should we give him a chance as president?
photo
Exfl
A centrist until the center moved.
10:22 AM on 05/15/2011
Newt has said a lot of things that he didn't actually mean. Just ask his ex-wives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wustner
there are now cowards among us
10:15 AM on 05/15/2011
Newt Gingrich Was More Supportive Of Individual Mandates Than Mitt Romney

that's this week

next week he'll be
funny things that sex on the brain has
09:21 PM on 05/16/2011
But look, he just converted, didn't he? (To what?) You never know what his next calling will be.
07:47 AM on 05/15/2011
Gingrich believed in many things, but then he was SAVED! Again! And now, the blind man sees!

Newt believes that most people have forgotten the things that he did and what he stood for. He may be right! He is betting that America has a short memory. Or better yet, that they forgive him so now will believe his lies.

Plus, now that he is Catholic, he can lie, go to confession, tell the priest he is so sorry and be forgiven, every single time. Sweet little arrangement!
09:23 PM on 05/16/2011
That's what Christianity -- and perhaps most especially Catholicism with the confessional (ok, all) is about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:12 AM on 05/15/2011
Isn't this like being required to buy auto insurance ?
So we are not stuck with the bill if hit by someone
who might not typically buy it ?

So does the GOP want to tell the auto insurance
people they want to destroy that law too ?

Clearly we need serious reform, too bad
Obama and Dem's didn't quite get it done.
They insured millions of kids, etc. and that's
very good. But the greedy insurance and
drug firms bought themselves a good deal.
With the GOP and conservative Dem's like
Blanche Lincoln in their pocket.
10:39 PM on 05/15/2011
auto insurance should not be mandated either.
DIdaho
Born in the Air Force (Texas), moved to Idaho in 1
12:29 AM on 05/15/2011
Universal Coverage. Individual Insurance Mandate. No question. No argument. That's New't's position. Romney's, too. You think I'm arguing this? Why,in god's good name, would you argue that this is what has to happen and a year later say it cannot under any case be?

Look, I'm not trying to make an argument. I'm just saying. What can any case be?
DIdaho
Born in the Air Force (Texas), moved to Idaho in 1
12:19 AM on 05/15/2011
Oh, come on. Gingrich is the most idiotic, among the most ignorant, who is the most self-serving of the most illogical of all of positions that could possibly be invented among the most illogical conspiracies that the crudest of the idiotic could possibly embrace.

Granted, that gives him a majority of the Republican base. But it doesn't give him 10'% of the electorate. But it does make him the most sensible of the political gurus on the right. What kind of crown do you get for being the smartest idiot in the parking lot?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
librldem
Snarking for Merika n jebus! Glory!
10:16 AM on 05/15/2011
Well Bachmann got a spiffy gold plastic tiara to compliment her plastic magic wand.
09:24 PM on 05/16/2011
Ummm, ask George?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Fit2betied
Give Peace a Chance ☮
10:56 PM on 05/14/2011
The moderators in this thread have been really heavy handed.

Even timid posts have been sent to the great gig in the sky without anyone else having the opportunity to see them.
07:53 PM on 05/14/2011
This is exciting, hiccup...!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChristianEcon.com
"The Lord abhors dishonest scales."--Proverbs 11.1
06:59 PM on 05/14/2011
Thanks Newt Gingrich for your career championing the ideology that is destroying the American middle class, the American economy, and allows all productive people and their families to sacrifice more and more for less and less. Great job! --Signed, Rich Republican Beneficiary
01:50 PM on 05/14/2011
Fig-newt-ton
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChristianEcon.com
"The Lord abhors dishonest scales."--Proverbs 11.1
07:00 PM on 05/14/2011
Well put.