More

Senate GOP Votes Down Bill To End Big Oil Subsidies

Hatch

First Posted: 05/17/11 08:01 PM ET Updated: 07/17/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- A ceremonial vote over whether to end subsidies to major oil companies failed on Tuesday, with 45 Republicans and three Democrats voting to continue the tax incentives to the five largest oil companies.

Atlhough the 52-48 vote broke down mostly along party lines, Republican Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine split with the rest of the GOP to support the effort to repeal oil subsidies. Democratic Sens. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), Mary Landrieu (D-La.) and Mark Begich (D-Alaska), voted against the bill.

Still, the debate over whether to end the subsidies is unlikely to die with Tuesday's vote. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) vowed to continue pushing for the government to end the series of tax credits to five oil companies, which Democrats say could produce $21 billion over the next decade.

"I am confident that before we finish our budget negotiations here, and in anticipation of raising the debt ceiling, that that will be part of it," Reid said at a midday press conference.

The bill would have cut $12 billion in subsidies for producing oil within the United States for Chevron, Shell Oil, BP America, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobile. Another $6 billion would come from eliminating credits for taxes that the oil companies pay to foreign governments, with the final $2 billion from blocking them from writing off certain drilling and development costs.

Republicans said the bill would unfairly single out oil companies, harming their ability to hire American workers, and drive up the United States' dependence on foreign oil.

"Our oil and gas industry is an industry that creates jobs," Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) said on the Senate floor. "We ought to be giving every possible fair break to companies that hire in America."

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) said the bill was an effort to bring in more government revenue and not reduce the deficit.

"Let's be clear about what's going on here: Democrats want to raise taxes to pay for more government spending," he said.

But Democrats say subsidies are unnecessary given the high price of gas, arguing the oil companies should be paying more taxes because they are making large profits -- a statement that has been echoed by at least one former industry leader. John Hofmeister, former president of Shell Oil, said in February that high gas prices mean that major oil companies do not need more incentives in the form of subsidies to produce in the United States.

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) criticized the CEOs of the five biggest oil companies, who appeared last week before the Senate Finance Committee. At that committee hearing, all five said they were against efforts to end the tax credits, which would cut about $2 billion from their profits each year, he said.

"They are so caught up in their profits that they have lost sight of what is happening...on Main Street and around the kitchen table," Rockefeller said on the Senate floor before the vote. "If they had expressed concern for people and then refused to give up their subsidies...at least that would have been a bend."

Even if the bill had passed, it would likely have run up against problems over its constitutionality, as Talking Points Memo's Brian Beutler pointed out. The bill would have increased revenue, running afoul of a rule that says revenue-increasing measures must originate in the House of Representatives.

But Democrats are eager to put Republicans on the record in support for oil subsidies, particularly when some GOP members have said in the past they would support ending them. House Democrats forced a similar vote earlier this month, which failed to gain Republican support.

Several Senate Republicans who previously expressed support for ending the subsidies voted against the bill Tuesday, arguing it was a political ploy by Democrats rather than an effort to lower gas prices or pay down the deficit. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who has spoken out against the subsidies in the past, said on Tuesday he would vote "with his party" because he believes "oil subsidies should be part of a bigger package."

Republicans will offer a ceremonial vote on their own on Wednesday, when the Senate will vote on a bill to expand offshore drilling. That bill, offered by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is also expected to fail.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- A ceremonial vote over whether to end subsidies to major oil companies failed on Tuesday, with 45 Republicans and three Democrats voting to continue the tax incentives to the five larges...
WASHINGTON -- A ceremonial vote over whether to end subsidies to major oil companies failed on Tuesday, with 45 Republicans and three Democrats voting to continue the tax incentives to the five larges...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,540
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (72 total)
  1 of 5  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
foxbat 10:53 PM on 05/17/2011
It's somewhat ironic that, for the last few years, we've sent memos to employees telling them that, for the good of the company, we need them to pick up more of the cost of the insurance.  And they've done it.  We sent notices stating that, because of the economy, we would have to ask them to go without raises/bonuses for the good of the company.  And they've done it.  We asked them to  Read More...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teachone
Knowledge is Power
12:30 AM on 07/12/2011
These republicans need to be impeached, they are the biggest bunch of crooks I have ever had the unfortunate experience to have look at or hear!! Who do they think they are??? Get out of office if you cannot be honest, ethical or do the will of the people, too bad for all of you that you do not get a paycheck for doing the opposite of what is right!! VOTE THEM OUT!!!!
08:13 AM on 06/05/2011
Oh how surprising! The debt limit is a crisis and the GOP wants to extend subsidies to the richest corporation on the planet. It demonstrates how not serious the Republican Party is about anything. Fake party, fake ideas.

The Democrats are not much better. The nation is steeped in corruption and bribery as revealed by this vote. I did not hear Obama make this a big issue, he just will not stand up for the American public forcefully. Saying a few words here and there is not enough!

This is a fight with pirates.Oh yes and the pirates have servants in the Senate and House of Representatives, it is a fight with them also.

The public has an election shaping up with a cast of morons from the Republicans and Obama who is no longer "change and hope" but now the status quo.

I do not know what the hell we are supposed to do. We have no real politics in this nation, just a charade. Maybe it is a re-enactment like a Civil War battle staged for history buffs. No real bullets and the results planned in advance to meet expectations. That was the Senate vote a fore drawn conclusion. No real debate no real deliberation, fake government dressed up to look accurate! You know, like as if it were real.

We should have a picnic and take some photos.
photo
stettin
lux et veritas
11:39 PM on 05/31/2011
on the vote to continue or discontinue subsidies to the oil companies, senators olympia snowe
and susan collins voted in favor of their employers:THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. senators
ben nelson (neb) mary landrieu (louisiana) and mark begish (alaska) voted in favor of their true
employers: MAJOR OIL COMPANIES. all voters should take notice and act.
10:38 AM on 05/28/2011
Big oil, big business and billionaires...... contributors to the Republican party and benefactors of their policy choices. Give to the rich and take from the poor.

When will Americans wake up from their FAUX NOISE induced coma and see what Republican policies have done to the middle class? Your children will have no social security or medicare if they have their way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BLGould
Webcams are a perfect excuse for guerilla theatre!
08:22 PM on 05/19/2011
"The bill would have cut $12 billion in subsidies for producing oil within the United States for Chevron, Shell Oil, BP America, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobile. Another $6 billion would come from eliminating credits for taxes that the oil companies pay to foreign governments, with the final $2 billion from blocking them from writing off certain drilling and development costs.

Republicans said the bill would unfairly single out oil companies, harming their ability to hire American workers, and drive up the United States’ dependence on foreign oil."

I feel like the shop owner in "Little Italy" being told by the local Capo that I MUST pay the protection money so my shop doesn't experience some unfortunate accidental fire and how is my sweet daughter who attends Sacred Heart High School doing? Their fracking MOBSTERS!

Where's our 21st Century Eliot Ness? Where's our 21st Century Teddy Roosevelt?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
baileywick
05:25 PM on 05/19/2011
Orrin Hatch....who's your daddy?
BIG OIL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
02:01 PM on 05/19/2011
It seems unfair to keep giveing them breaks but on the other hand they are the ones who provide a lot of jobs. The real problem is that they know it and take full advantage of it. And when we think that the rich should pay more in taxes aren't we in fact trying to punish them for being successful? These people also provide a lot ot jobs. If we keep targeting them to cure our problems it is no wonder that they close or move their companies. The objective of having a business in America is to make as much profit as possible NOT to make sure everyone lives fat in the lap of luxury. And then there are the Unions - inflating and exaggerating the actual cost of doing business and unless every single worker in America has access to Union benefits aren't they kind of discriminatory? They should not have any rights that everyone else isn't entitled to.
photo
oliviaah
we need more cowbell
11:08 PM on 05/19/2011
If you honestly believe "these oil companies will close or move their companies", try using some common sense. They are heavily invested in this country, and want to be more so; they aren't going anywhere.
Until you can explain why they are being subsidized with taxpayer money, your concern is misplaced. I'll give you a hint.....We can't afford it!
02:02 PM on 05/20/2011
As I stated - they hold it over us and the politicians and take full advantage of it. If they whine that they are hurting and might have to cut jobs - they get bailed out and get the breaks- if they they don't get the breaks they grease a few palms and then they get the breaks. The problem is tht they do have control over jobs and can impact the economy any way and any time they choose. We dan't afford a lot of things but we stil do them don't we? Entitlements to anyone who asks for them, Contributions to SSI that are used for everything but SSI, foreign aid at the same time we are expected to "tighten our belts" etc, etc, etc. We are all "pigs" for oil but want it for free.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TEHelms
Still learning....
10:30 AM on 05/19/2011
Further proof that Republicans are of the corporations, by the corporations and for the corporations! As for we the people, well, we have made our choices, haven't we? As Pogo said: "We have met the enemy and he is us!"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
balthus
09:19 AM on 05/19/2011
The only reason Democrats are half-heartedly pushing this issue is because it will give them an "out" when they cravenly buckle to Repug demands that there be no tax increases in the debt ceiling package. When the debt ceiling is raised, Reid (once again the whipped puppy) will claim victory by saying that no, he couldn't get tax hikes on the wealthy, but he did get "major concessions" from the Repugs, the foremost of all will be this cutting some, but not all, of the oil company slush fund. He's already said as much, when he says it will be part of the debt ceiling deal, while neither he nor other Dem leadership has had b alls enough to say anything recently about the need to raise taxes. In short, this is a diversionary sop to Dems to distract them from another Democrat capitulation. And I get emails from the party asking me for money!
TheBluesGuy
Annoy a Conservative: Think!
07:26 AM on 05/19/2011
What was the exact name of this bill? And where can I get a list of which Senators voted for, and against its passage?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JudeOnPolitics
07:18 AM on 05/19/2011
Since our Congress can't be trusted to be the Parents in the Room, we the people will have to do it.
Since greed for money seems to be the "culprit," we need to invest our money wisely.

Any company using offshore banking, paying no income tax through loopholes, getting subsidies while raking in billions a quarter in profits, and not creating jobs in the USA is on our list of companies to withhold money from.

We the wise need to Sell our stock holdings in those companies and reinvest in True American companies who: bank in the 50 states, pay taxes without loopholes, refuse subsidies they don't need, and are creating jobs inside the 50.

We need to put our money where it will benefit our nation, our children's and grandchildren's futures.

Any company fitting the true American description, reply to this post with your stock symbol and we can research and decide where to reinvest our funds.
Olethea
Life may be sweeter for this- I don't know.
07:03 AM on 05/19/2011
Looks like the big PR firms have sent out some paid 'consultants' to comment on blogs.
dhodge
Atheist Libertarian, No god, No gov't.
06:29 AM on 05/19/2011
Tax breaks aren't going to increase oil production. If production isn't increased, there's no reason to hire more employees (who's going to hire extra people to do the same work when that just takes out of profits); ergo tax breaks don't necessarily lead to hiring. If they want to increase production, and profits thereby, then let them do it just like everyone else does; invest their OWN money into more employees (whom they will ultimately exploit for profit as that is the basis of capitalism: paying someone less than the actual monetary value they bring to the company). It's not fair that we subsidize them hiring more employees, which increases their oil production and profits thereby; they don't then share the profits with us that they made off the employee we subsidized for them to hire!.....
Olethea
Life may be sweeter for this- I don't know.
06:59 AM on 05/19/2011
These companies are making obscene profits and will continue to do so without taxpayer funded subsidies.

They do not need incentives to drill anymore.

Time to end corporate welfare.
02:04 PM on 05/19/2011
the Government decides on the amount of oil production!
photo
stettin
lux et veritas
12:06 AM on 06/01/2011
vicbar88: your statement must be flagged as totally false! if the Obama administration
were deciding on the amount of oil production, can you honestly say or believe that
the prices we are paying at the pump would be where they are today!!!!!!!
06:19 AM on 05/19/2011
I'm surprised that this wasn't the top story on_HP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deepfreezevideo
Now with even MORE microbial micro-bio!
11:54 PM on 05/18/2011
“We ought to be giving every possible fair break to companies that hire in America.â€

What's fair about double taxing everyone who buys gasoline, Ms. Hutchinson?
TheBluesGuy
Annoy a Conservative: Think!
07:28 AM on 05/19/2011
What's fair about the Socialistic taxing of all Americans for the benefit of those who drive, Mr. deepfreezevideo?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deepfreezevideo
Now with even MORE microbial micro-bio!
09:51 PM on 05/19/2011
You're barking up the wrong tree. Maybe you need to re-read my statement because your reply makes no sense. Hutchinson is defending tax BREAKS when the oil companies should be paying their fair share. They've managed to grow quite wealthy and they should be good community citizens.
If you think paying taxes is socialism then we have nothing to talk about.